Find an apartment in luxury apartments in Arlington, TX
Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.
43 businesses, scored on recent reviews. The order weighs each business's overall score by how much of its reviewed work is luxury apartments, so a lower-scored specialist can rank above a higher-scored generalist.
Most residents report spacious units, quick maintenance response, and welcoming staff in a well-kept community where some stay for years. However, recent reports of roach infestations in multiple units and move-in discrepancies raise serious concerns about property conditions and management transparency during what appears to be a transition period.
Melanie Ward and the leasing team leave a strong impression, greeting prospects warmly, walking them through options patiently, and making the application process smooth. Staff like Katarina and Saherra carry that care into resident life, maintenance fixes issues quickly, and the property feels clean and spacious for the price. Community events like Juneteenth draw families back year after year. Parking is generous and the neighborhood quiet. Long-term residents describe feeling genuinely heard by management, which handles both tours and move-in logistics with visible personal investment.
Most residents praise Autumnwood's clean grounds, efficient maintenance, and staff friendliness, particularly leasing staff member Maria. However, a few report inconsistent front desk service, move-in date confusion, and occasional administrative mix-ups that dampen the experience.
Lenox Cooper divides sharply along a timeline. Five-star reviewers, mostly those early in their lease or visiting during tours, praise leasing staff (especially Paige Durden and Stephanie) for friendliness and clarity. They see modern design, responsive maintenance under head technician Marco, and community events as positives. However, longer-term residents report a sharp decline after office staff changes. They describe hidden monthly fees beyond advertised rent, persistent roach and rodent problems despite weekly pest control requests, hallways left dirty, aggressive towing on move-in, paid guest parking that conflicts with original policies, thin walls, and high move-out charges. Some residents paid $1,600-$1,700 in towing fees or move-out costs. Management is characterized as defensive when questioned, dismissive of complaints, and inconsistent in enforcement. The leasing experience and resident reality appear to be two different communities.
Most residents praise the building's luxury finishes, cleanliness, and staff warmth, particularly General Manager Karina and front desk team members Scott, Sincere, Kashes, Nick, and Gladys. However, multiple recent reviews describe Karina as unprofessional, petty, and selectively hostile toward certain residents, issuing questionable lease violations and failing to respond to complaints. Move-out billing has also frustrated residents who were not clearly informed of month-to-month fees and charges.
Find an apartment in luxury apartments in Arlington, TX
Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.
Arbor Oaks is a popular student housing option near UT Arlington offering furnished or unfurnished units at prices lower than comparable apartments in the area. Most reviewers praise cleanliness and proximity to campus, though one resident raised serious concerns about RA access to units and lack of privacy.
Staff, especially leasing agent Austin, earn consistent praise for warmth and problem-solving; residents report spacious apartments in a quiet, welcoming community where they feel safe. Recent complaints center on internet outages disrupting work-from-home residents, lapses in trash and pet-station upkeep, slow repair responses (water damage, mold), and parking shortages, with management perceived as dismissive during those issues.
Long-term residents and recent applicants consistently highlight the personal service from Jennifer and Valerie in the leasing office, plus quick maintenance response. The all-bills-paid model and amenities like the pool, dog park, and playground appeal to families. Some applicants report delayed updates on their applications and unclear payment deadline policies that left them frustrated.
Most residents praise the leasing team (Tina, Joselin, Joycelyn) and maintenance staff (Julio, Cesar) for attentiveness and friendliness. Units are spacious and clean when working properly. One lengthy complaint, however, details severe parking scarcity at night, apartments not ready on move-in with rusty dishwashers and roach issues, and maintenance battles that felt unnecessary for the rent paid. Staff responsiveness stands out as genuine. Amenities include a pool, fitness center, dog park, and outdoor kitchen. Location near major roads and shopping draws praise. The gap between five-star and one-star experiences suggests inconsistent quality control at turnover and ongoing parking design problems.
Lesley, Burgundy, and Hailey deliver genuinely warm leasing tours and front-desk support that stand out, and the property itself offers attractive finishes, a fitness center, pool, and Viridian trail access. But behind the marketing, tenants report a management breakdown: persistent roach infestations residents were not allowed to transfer out of, filthy common areas and hallways reeking of rotting trash due to overflowing chutes, units that arrive dirty with hair painted into walls, and a systematic failure to defend residents at move-out, applying "creative" wear-and-tear charges while never offering walkthroughs. Security doors and gates fail constantly. Staff responsiveness stops at leasing. For renters willing to pay luxury pricing, the gamble is steep: tour experience does not predict operational reality, and management prioritizes deposit collection over habitability or accountability.
Staff here stand out as genuine and invested, particularly during tours and move-ins. Reviewers consistently mention Alex, Alyssa, and Roxanne by name, noting how much care they take answering questions and explaining fees. The property itself earns steady praise for cleanliness, manicured grounds with mature trees, and rapid maintenance responses within 24 hours. Residents feel the community is secure and walkable to shops and services. The townhome layout and pool amenities receive specific mention. One reviewer called maintenance turnaround exceptional; another said the office staff solves problems promptly enough to wish for more issues to chat about. The move-in process runs smoothly with transparent communication. Residents describe the neighborhood atmosphere as peaceful, their units as personal spaces, and the community events as valuable touchstones. No substantive complaints emerge across recent reviews.
Most residents praise Luis and Angelica for transforming management into a caring, professional operation where staff treat tenants like family. However, their recent departure has triggered anxiety: some older reviews clash starkly, alleging the same pair ignored calls, cursed at residents, and let the complex degrade into trash and dog waste. Meanwhile, a few flag cracked walls and one questions why a child's birth certificate is required for an application. The experience hinges on who manages on any given day. When engaged, staff excel at lease signings and community events. When absent or problematic, the building shows neglect. This is a place with real bones but uneven execution.
Tenants who stayed report strong connections to the property and consistently praise location, cleanliness, and staff like Christie, Adriana, and Cristy for quick responses. However, multiple reviewers describe severe pest problems, unanswered maintenance requests spanning months, aggressive staff behavior, and discriminatory conduct during leasing. The roach complaints are specific and detailed, with tenants noting they hired outside pest control and found visible infestation upon move-in. Some reviewers felt disrespected or belittled; one reported racial bias. The divide suggests vastly different experiences depending on when tenants moved in or which staff member they dealt with. Recent positive reviewers focus on location, design, and responsive management. Older one-star reviews detail systemic failures: an eight-month broken dishwasher, managers blaming tenants for pest issues, and a blonde manager described as rude and dismissive. Financial complaints center on unreasonable move-out charges (a $1,500 fee plus retained deposit for carpet damage) and alleged application fees. The pattern hints at either resolved problems or inconsistent standards between units and management shifts.
Half the residents praise friendly staff like Anthony and Jeremy, vibrant community events by Josiah and Kathryn, and quick maintenance turnarounds. The other half struggle with unresolved AC and EV charger outages lasting months, hallways that smell and lack cleaning, parking so tight that finding a spot after 6 PM is nearly impossible, and a front office that often ignores calls and takes 15 months to return deposits.
A well-run property with polished leasing and grounds, but maintenance responsiveness lags. Staff like Chris, Alejandra, and Stephany earn frequent praise for attentiveness during tours and move-in. Renovated units are spacious and quiet, and management will work with tenants on lease terms. However, one recent resident has struggled for two months with an AC unit stuck above 78 degrees, with follow-up repair visits never materializing, suggesting that urgent problems may fall through the cracks. Tour experience and first impressions consistently impress. The dog park, pool, and fitness center draw interest. Some find rent steep, though move-in specials appear common. Best suited to people confident the office will advocate for them during lease negotiation, less ideal for anyone needing rapid maintenance response under stress.
Bardin Greene divides sharply: long-term residents and quick movers praise the leasing team (Andrea, Robyn, KaSundra by name) for personal attention and swift turnover, and report maintenance responds promptly when contacted. But a smaller cohort experienced nightmare scenarios: AC down over a month with zero proactive updates, mold and roach infestations, locked-out tenants, and water outages. The office only acted after corporate email. Deposit and utility clawbacks have landed residents in legal disputes. The complex itself earns consistent praise for being quiet, clean, and well-positioned with a usable gym and pool. Staff professionalism is genuine in leasing. The tension is maintenance follow-through on major issues and transparent upfront billing. Five-year residents love it; newcomers with urgent repairs face abandonment.
Office staff like Carlie, Lindsay, and Angela earn consistent praise for leasing support and flexibility during the application process. Once residents move in, experiences diverge sharply: some report quick maintenance responses and good communication, while others face months of unresolved plumbing, A/C, and mold problems paired with staff who avoid accountability. Move-in apartments have arrived filthy and non-functional. Noise complaints go unaddressed despite repeated calls and police involvement.
Wimbledon Oaks draws mixed reviews: some residents praise the maintenance team's kindness when they show up, but chronic complaints center on unresolved issues. Hot water failures recur monthly, AC repairs stall for weeks in summer heat, and pest problems persist despite claims of cleanliness. Management responsiveness has declined under recent leadership, leaving residents frustrated when basic services fail.
Strong staff loyalty dominates positive reviews: Sam, Tami, and Jayme consistently earn praise for attentive service during move-in and problem-solving. Yet persistent complaints center on A/C malfunctions, cockroach infestations, and slow or incomplete repairs despite management goodwill. One tenant reported unit damage requiring a move with added fees; another waited weeks for fixes on a faulty air conditioning system. The gap between staff praise and maintenance failures suggests strong management intent but operational strain. Website claims off-campus proximity to UT Arlington, furnished units, in-unit laundry, and resort amenities. Complaints suggest advertised renovations do not always match unit condition, and pest issues recur despite staff effort.
Leasing staff earn consistent praise for patience and professionalism during the move-in process, and some residents report enjoying quiet living once settled. However, widespread complaints about roaches, rats, and mice dominate recent reviews, with residents citing six months of unresolved pest issues despite monthly extermination charges. Maintenance backlog is severe with only two workers for the entire complex and work orders allegedly marked complete without actual repairs. Hidden fees stack monthly on top of advertised rent, pushing real costs well above quoted prices. Initial unit condition often falls short, with moldy appliances, structural damage, and pest evidence appearing at move-in or shortly after. Reviewers describe thin walls, outdated finishes, and band-aid repairs that fail quickly. Some residents report a recent surge of five-star reviews from first-time reviewers posted on the same dates, raising credibility concerns alongside documented lease-breaking and legal action by frustrated tenants.
The leasing experience here stands out for warmth and professionalism, particularly from staff members Sabrina and Melanie, who consistently go the extra mile during tours and applications. However, post-move troubles undercut this promise: multiple residents report deposits withheld without clear explanation, unanswered emails, collection agency involvement even after staff acknowledged errors, and broken laundry facilities left unrepaired for extended periods. Maintenance responds promptly to requests, and the complex itself feels charming and well-placed in Arlington. But the gap between how moving in feels and how moving out goes reveals serious accountability problems in accounting and communication that can linger for months after departure.
Find an apartment in luxury apartments in Arlington, TX
Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.
Most residents report a clean, secure complex with responsive maintenance and welcoming staff, particularly highlighting managers Stephanie and Keke. Some prospective tenants have experienced understaffed office visits and long waitlists; inoperable security gates and occasional repair delays also surface as concerns.
The property has seen sharp improvement since new management arrived, with residents praising staff responsiveness and maintenance speed. Trisha and the front office team handle leasing smoothly, rent is affordable for the area, and location near AT&T Stadium works well. However, older complaints about deposit delays, unresolved appliance repairs, and closed amenities despite rent collection suggest gaps remain. Recent five-star reviews (last week) outpace older one-star grievances, but the mixed rating reflects both genuine transformation and unresolved resident pain points. Late-stage maintenance issues hit harder because the building promises essentials: the refrigerator delay cost a resident $437 out of pocket, and pool closures in summer contradict the advertised amenities. Deposit disputes lingered over 60+ days contrary to stated policy. New management appears to have fixed leasing friction and office culture, yet systemic delays on serious repairs and financial accountability still surface in resident accounts.
Residents consistently praise the modern townhome design, maintained grounds, and attentive staff when present; Joaquin Brown and manager Heather earn particular recognition. However, the office has serious responsiveness gaps: some renters cannot reach anyone post-move-out for deposit refunds, scheduled tours are missed, and complaints range from locked doors to security gate failures and vehicle theft. Rent runs toward the high end for the market. Residents with positive experiences report quick maintenance and staff that remember details like holiday treats. The quiet atmosphere and pet-friendly yards attract families and pet owners, though drainage issues and the compact floor plans (600 sq ft for one-bedrooms) are recurring frustrations.
New management has won over residents with attentive office staff (Dahlia, Vanessa, Dalila named repeatedly), quick approvals and move-ins, and visible property fixes over recent months. But serious problems persist: widespread roach infestations, the pool closed for months with no real work, garbage cans overflowing across the complex, and calls and emails going unanswered. Residents praise individual staff while simultaneously warning others away due to facility neglect and fees that don't match services. The split between five-star endorsements of the office team and one-star warnings about conditions suggests management is actively improving communication and paperwork, yet the physical plant and pest control remain unresolved. Long-term residents report a three-year cycle of management changes, with this latest team earning goodwill faster than prior ownership but not fast enough to fix deep maintenance backlog.
Pavilion draws sharply divided views: some tenants praise fast maintenance crews and quiet nights, while others report persistent roach and mold problems left unresolved for months. Water leaks into children's spaces, unprofessional staff conduct, and uneven enforcement of building rules frustrate residents. Move-in ready experience depends heavily on which unit and maintenance team you get.
The sales team shines: leasing staff like Victoria, Maria, and Kathy are patient and welcoming during tours. Early experiences feel comfortable and quiet. Once residents settle in, the picture darkens. Maintenance requests disappear from the system or close without being done. Pest control is inadequate. Air conditioning outages drag for weeks despite promises. Long-term residents report a cycle of broken commitments and slow repairs, creating a gulf between the friendly leasing office and the reality of living here. For tenants, this is a complex trade. Staff professionalism persists, but the core services fall short. The gap between what leasing staff promise and what maintenance delivers is the core complaint. Rent is due on time, yet repairs lag for months. If you are risk-averse or sensitive to delays, proceed cautiously; enthusiastic early reviews fade as maintenance frustrations mount.
Strong leasing staff (Stephanie, Kelsi, and others) draw five-star reviews for their tours and flexibility, and some residents report fast maintenance responses. However, persistent complaints dominate recent months: emergency calls go unanswered, maintenance staff skip work orders for weeks, roaches and ants infest units despite repeated fumigation, and broken floors and dishwashers get glued rather than replaced. Late arrivals for AC failures, towed cars, and maggot-infested hallways suggest management presence has gaps that front-office staff cannot close. Multiple residents report billing surprises and fee stacking (water, trash, condo service totaling over $300 monthly). The contrast suggests Huntington Meadows excels at first impression but falters once residents move in and need sustained property upkeep or emergency response.
Lucy and Brittany, two leasing staff, stand out for their personal attention during move-in and early interactions, but resident experience deteriorates sharply once tenants occupy units. Maintenance requests routinely sit for weeks unresolved; reviewers report unaddressed leaks, pest infestations, broken doors and outlets, and appliance failures. The property's management has grown dismissive post-lease, with some residents describing rude or even contemptuous responses to serious complaints. Security cameras on the grounds are non-functional, and catalytic converter theft has struck repeatedly. The online resident portal and lease application process receive consistent praise for clarity and ease. However, the gap between professional leasing operations and poor post-move maintenance and responsiveness is stark. Multiple long-term tenants express regret and plan to leave; newer residents often rate the stay favorably, suggesting problems surface weeks to months into occupancy.
Cheyenne and a few team members earn consistent praise for friendliness and follow-through, but the property itself struggles with deep, unaddressed problems. Residents report roach infestations, botched maintenance work marked complete without inspection, and multiple fires tied to electrical failures. Safety is a recurring worry: high crime, police with rifles on premises, and a broken front gate. The office rarely answers phones, and renovated unit listings do not match what tenants receive. Honesty matters here. Rent is low because the building cuts corners on pest control, electrical safety, and upkeep. Walls are thin and noisy. Guest parking fees kick in quickly. For families, young professionals, or anyone who values a secure, well-maintained space, this is not the fit.
Tours are consistently praised for friendly staff like Musab, Daniela, and Genesis, and proximity to UTA is a genuine draw. Residents report a marked decline in property upkeep, management responsiveness, and problem-solving over recent years, with pervasive roach issues, grimy common areas, and surprise fees dominating complaints even from those who initially found the place liveable.
Staff consistency is the standout: Sam (maintenance supervisor) and leasing team members like Adrianne, Amanda, Natoya, and Tonya earn repeated praise for quick responses and patient assistance. Residents describe a quiet, secure place suited to seniors, though a few note cramped floorplans and aging finishes.
Five-star reviewers prize the quiet atmosphere, spacious layouts, and staff responsiveness from Pam, Jenny, Joe, and others who accommodate lease flexibility and fix problems quickly. One and two-star complaints center on roach and mold infestations in isolated units, renewal rent hikes that price out long-term residents, aging A/C systems, and aggressive move-out fees residents claim lack transparency.
Center Chase Apartments offers loft-style units steps from UTA with in-unit washers/dryers and a strong property manager. Tenants praise the quiet location and responsive emergency maintenance, but recent reviews flag high electricity bills, summer heat from window AC units, and slow routine maintenance turnaround.
Most residents report a punishing experience with serious maintenance and pest control failures. Roach infestations are the dominant complaint, alongside regular internet and water outages, poor repairs (especially bathtub work done repeatedly), and rent hikes that outpace improvements. Staff communication is chaotic; move-in charges surprise residents, deposit refunds are disputed, and management is hard to reach. A handful of graduate students and early residents praise proximity to campus and cite individual staff members (Ansib) as genuinely helpful. Maintenance teams handle emergency electrical and plumbing work quickly when they come. Yet these pockets of goodwill are drowned out by overwhelming accounts of negligence, water damage, mold risk, and the sense that problems are managed reactively rather than fixed.
Rosemont at Mayfield Villas draws nearly 60% of its reviews at one or two stars. Complaints centre on punitive parking enforcement and confusing vehicle registration rules that have trapped residents, slow leasing communication, and staff who give conflicting answers. The one five-star review praised proximity to Highway 20 and responsive maintenance, but this is vastly outweighed by accounts of unresolved repairs, withheld deposits, and management that ignores repeated requests.
Riverbend draws sharply divided reviews: about half rate it five stars, half give one or two. Residents who praise cite responsive maintenance, community events, and friendly staff; those with complaints report roaches and rats, recurring flooding, maintenance entering unlocked doors without notice, excessive towing despite paying for parking, and dismissive management. Several reviews name managers Esther and Susan, with vastly different experiences. Rent ranges cited near $1,800-2,000 monthly.
Strong personal touches from management, particularly office manager Lisa, make some residents feel at home; units are described as clean and maintenance issues handled promptly. However, recurring roach infestations and outdated infrastructure undercut the promise, with several reviews citing pest problems across apartments and cosmetic-only fixes.
Front desk staff, particularly Carolina, earn consistent praise for friendliness and communication. However, this is overwhelmed by widespread complaints about pest infestations residents handle themselves, maintenance that marks work complete without visiting, and billing surprises. Multiple families with children report rats and roaches throughout units despite paying pest control fees; some waited months for basic repairs like air conditioning. The contrast between leasing experience and actual living conditions is stark.
Five-star reviewers praise the quiet setting and attentive maintenance staff (particularly Elizabeth and Adriana), with spacious units at reasonable cost. One-star reviews paint a stark opposite picture: persistent roach infestations, crumbling drywall, non-functional HVAC, and aggressive move-out fees of $500 to $3,500, often charged despite units being clean at departure.
Long-term residents praise the grounds, responsive maintenance, and welcoming staff like Gudelia and Gladys, describing a quiet, family-friendly space. However, recent and mid-tenure reviews flag aggressive towing, parking chaos, slow HVAC repairs, outdated cabinets and refrigerators, and management unprofessionalism, with deposits allegedly withheld and vehicles repeatedly towed even when properly registered.
Centennial has a 3.3-star rating split sharply between five-star and one/two-star reviews, with limited detail available. Complaints focus on slow or absent maintenance response, water damage, mold, and front desk staff negligence. One reviewer noted prices feel prohibitive.
Evidence is limited to one negative review from two years ago. That reviewer praised maintenance speed but criticized the apartment layout, noting the small living room, disproportionately large bedroom, and kitchen cabinets mounted too high to reach easily.
Head over to our enquiry page and tell us what you need.
Get in touchLast updated 2026-08-23
