Compare 8 apartment complexes in Arlington, TX scored on recent Google reviews. How we score ›
8 businesses in Arlington, TX. See all 8 on the map ›
Residents consistently praise the staff as warm and responsive, with common areas that stay spotless and well-kept. The community thrives on a packed calendar of activities, walking distance to shops and doctors, and resort-style facilities including a pool and fitness center. One security concern about non-functional cameras and theft stands out against the overwhelmingly positive feedback.
Huntington Meadows wins consistent praise for leasing staff (Stephanie and Kelsi appear repeatedly) who make tours quick and tours thorough. Grounds look well-maintained and check-in runs smoothly. When maintenance works, it works fast. The sharp problems: AC breakdowns get ignored for weeks despite multiple requests, roaches appear routinely, and pest control doesn't treat whole buildings when neighboring units are sprayed, causing infestations to spread. Residents also report confusing billing with water and trash charged twice, then again through a third party, pushing monthly costs up by $300. Recent experience splits clearly. Newcomers and tourists say leasing is great. Longer residents hit maintenance walls and pest issues, then discover fees don't match the unit cost promised.
Residents consistently praise the friendly office staff, particularly manager Andrea Cross, and note strong community engagement. Recent improvements in property maintenance and management have shifted sentiment upward, though earlier reviews flagged air conditioning failures, broken fitness equipment, and elevator reliability issues that reportedly persisted during a management transition period.
Residents report a safe, quiet community where management and maintenance go above and beyond. Named staff like Stephanie Straw, Rhonda, and KeKe earn consistent praise for professionalism and attentiveness. The main friction points are delayed repairs and malfunctioning security gates, plus occasional office understaffing that frustrated some visitors seeking information.
Some staff members earn genuine praise for effort and responsiveness, particularly Selma, Alyssa, Jade, and the maintenance team. However, this experience is drowned out by repeated failures: management reshuffles every six months with no consistency, German cockroaches infest buildings for months on end, the front gate stays broken for years, cars get towed or stolen regularly, and move-in inspections are laughable. Billing disputes lead to collections without warning, disputes over autopay charges felt extractive, and communication from the office is simply absent. Residents describe the property as unsafe, neglected, and unwelcoming beyond individual staff kindness. Water heaters go unfixed for weeks, dirty units sit waiting for promised cleaning, and the company appears indifferent to these systemic failures. New prospects also report being turned away from tours without legitimate reason, creating a first impression that confirms the deeper complaints.
Most residents report serious maintenance failures, pest infestations, and repeated water or internet outages that make daily life difficult. While a few staff members earn praise for personal helpfulness, management is viewed as unresponsive to systemic problems and more focused on rent collection than resident care. Maintenance requests often take weeks; when work is done, it frequently recurs within days. Lease terms hide costs (11-month contracts, deposit disputes), and regular rent increases have doubled unit prices without corresponding improvements. The property itself is aging-original fixtures, low ceilings, no AC backup, and worn-out common amenities.
Campus Edge draws strong praise for leasing staff, especially tour guide Leo, but residents report serious operational failures. Frequent false alarms, roach problems, missing packages, and unclear charges dominate recent complaints. Management communication is weak, cleanliness is inconsistent, and maintenance rules are unevenly applied. The property works well during tours but deteriorates once you move in.
High five-star ratings reflect strong approval of the community's appearance and appeal. Review evidence is limited (only 2 reviews), but mentions include well-maintained grounds and amenity offerings.
When you submit a quote or contact form, your inquiry may go to partner providers who can do the work. We may receive a referral fee for this, but our rankings and scores come from our published method alone and are never affected by fees.
Last updated 2026-07-24
