Affordable & Low-Income Housing in Greater Fort Worth

Page 3 of 3: businesses ranked 201-223 of 223. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.

The Residences of Diamond Hill

#201

53

The Residences of Diamond Hill

2.5(145)✓ Google-verified

Severe maintenance and pest issues dominate resident feedback, with tenants reporting cockroaches, ants, and spiders in newly-painted units alongside unprompted move-in claims. Staff responsiveness is a consistent friction point: applications get lost, maintenance tickets close without work completed, AC failures go unresolved, and communication from the office is sparse or nonexistent. A handful of five-star reviews praise the community's safety for families and mention helpful staff members, but these stand against a sea of complaints spanning years.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Crestwood Place Apartments

#202

53

Crestwood Place Apartments

3.5(84)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents describe steady decline under current management, with broken amenities (laundry, gym access), delayed repairs (AC took a month; washers out for months), and inconsistent enforcement. While some staff members earn praise for kindness, the complex feels neglected overall, with office hours severely limited and tenant complaints routinely ignored. Management changes frequently, and residents report paying for amenities they cannot access.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Westmount at River Park Apartments

#203

53

Westmount at River Park Apartments

3.4(218)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Westmount at River Park is split sharply between strong praise for leasing staff and deep frustration with management, maintenance, and condition. Long-term residents cite repeated turnover in management, inconsistent policies, unresponsive offices, hidden fees that weren't refunded, and deteriorating units. The pool has stayed closed for months despite being a resident priority, the workout room smells bad, and in-unit amenities like washers and hot water fail or were never installed as promised. Staff at the leasing desk earn consistent five-star reviews for helpfulness. Those staying report feeling safe but exhausted by the complex's rigid policies and slow repairs. The business advertises one- and two-bedroom options with pet services, a fitness center, and coffee bar. Their website lists special move-in offers. In practice, reviewers say move-in deals go unpaid, parking is heavily restricted, and maintenance requests languish. One tenant with strong payment history faced eviction proceedings after requesting a single payment delay. Newer residents sometimes report good initial experiences; longer-term occupants describe escalating frustration with unresponsive management and inability to reach named staff like Brittany.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Spring Glen Apartments

#204

46 low data

Spring Glen Apartments

3.5(62)

Spring Glen draws long-term residents who value the peaceful setting and responsive management, though the pool's chronic closure frustrates prospects counting on that amenity. Evidence is limited to brief reviews spanning several years, with mixed satisfaction tilting toward stability for those already settled in.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

#205

57

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

3.4(149)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sandshell divides sharply. Those staying long-term praise the quiet grounds, pool events, and genuinely helpful staff members like Hailey and Garrett. But newer residents hit a wall fast: cockroaches carpet the laundromat, mice run across floors, ants infest bathrooms, and mold hangs in the air. Water cuts off for hours without warning, parking enforcement tows cars at 1 a.m. with no advance notice, and move-out inspections generate five-figure damage charges that reviewers say don't match photos they took. The complex bills itself as luxury on its website, but reviews describe it as poorly maintained, aging apartments sold at premium prices. One long-term resident's later review warns that management uses move-out inspections to retain deposits aggressively. Multiple reviewers mention switching to nearby alternatives like The Hadley because pest and infrastructure problems go unresolved for weeks or months.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Normandale Place Apartments

#206

49 low data

Normandale Place Apartments

3.8(14)✓ Google-verified

Normandale Place draws strong praise for safety and staff warmth, but recent reviews flag serious concerns: renters report being shown clean sample units then moved to deteriorated ones at higher rent once leases are signed. The property's grey cinderblock design leaves some residents feeling the space does not match its marketing promise of dignity.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Columbia Renaissance Square

#207

56 low data

Columbia Renaissance Square

3.4(45)✓ Google-verified

Residents report standout staff members who respond quickly and organize weekly events, but persistent pest problems, thin walls that carry neighbor noise, and inconsistent maintenance undercut the experience. Some praise the move-in condition and fitness amenities; others cite unprepared temp workers and a six-year decline in upkeep.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

#208

49

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

2.6(72)✓ Google-verified

Most tenants describe a complex in serious disrepair where basic requests go unaddressed for months, management ignores legal notices, and residents resort to court action to force compliance. Staff turnover is constant, billing is unreliable, and pests (roaches, beetles) persist despite cleaned units. A handful reported helpful staff, but systemic issues dominate the experience.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Vega Place Apartments

#209

56 low data

Vega Place Apartments

3.8(12)✓ Google-verified

Older reviews highlight a welcoming community with a duck pond and attentive former management, but recent posts describe neglected grounds since a manager departed. Serious historical complaints include safety gaps, unannounced apartment entries, and selective pet policy enforcement; grounds upkeep remains the most current concern.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Gardens At Cobb Park

#210

55 low data

Gardens At Cobb Park

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Gardens at Cobb Park draws praise from residents who value its peaceful setting and friendly staff, particularly assistant manager Huseni. However, significant complaints span unresponsive office communication, serious security issues, and documented pest infestations that management has not resolved. Limited recent activity makes current conditions unclear.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Times Square On the Hill

#211

50

Times Square On the Hill

2.9(45)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff-especially Jordan and Benitta-earn consistent praise for kindness and clear communication during move-in. Long-term residents report feeling safe and well-managed. However, newer complaints flag vehicle theft, parking headaches, and delayed fixes on water and maintenance issues, suggesting inconsistent upkeep.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Ridge Crest Apartments

#212

50 low data

Ridge Crest Apartments

3.8(27)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Wendy, the long-tenured property manager, draws consistent praise for quick responses and care. A small, quiet community with reasonable rents and well-kept grounds appeals to residents seeking a low-key environment. Management quality has fluctuated over years; thin walls, aging fixtures, and occasional parking disputes frustrate some, while others report deposit delays and unexplained fees.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Calloway Place Apartments

#213

54

Calloway Place Apartments

3.6(28)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Calloway Place draws strong loyalty from residents who praise quick maintenance response and staff like Penny and Amanda. However, a significant minority report unresolved structural issues (cracked roofs left with temporary fixes, faulty AC units), hidden billing charges, and harsh towing enforcement that catches residents off guard.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Northill Manor

#214

43 low data

Northill Manor

2.3(3)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Limited review evidence: two one-star accounts detail severe complaints about management conduct, rent hikes, and payment disputes. No positive experiences documented.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Fort West Apartments

#215

46

Fort West Apartments

2.7(21)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Fort West Apartments struggles with fundamental maintenance and management failures that create unsafe living conditions. Tenants report raw sewage backups lasting months, unchecked roach infestations, mold, and flooded units with no follow-up. The property management is consistently unreachable; complaints go unanswered and maintenance requests stall indefinitely. A controversial towing policy charges $350 per vehicle despite unclear registration procedures, and the office is often vacant. A handful of long-term residents praise quiet periods and responsive staff, but they appear to be exceptions in a complex marked by code violations, inadequate staffing, and systemic neglect.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Moderne

#216

51

The Moderne

3.2(24)✓ Google-verified

The Moderne shows a sharp divide between newer and older tenant experiences. Recent five-star reviews praise the updated management team (especially Sydnee), responsive service requests, and the West 7th location near dining and shops. However, older reviews paint a troubling picture of move-in disasters (mold, filthy units), neglected grounds, security breaches, and management indifference. The property allegedly operates Airbnbs alongside permanent housing, creating noise and property damage. Tenants report illegal insurance charges and unfair lease-blocking after maintenance issues.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Travis Gardens Apartments

#217

47 low data

Travis Gardens Apartments

3.1(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Travis Gardens divides sharply: recent five-star reviews credit strong management (Ms. Shonda, Christy), safety, and community feel. Older one-star reviews cite hostile management, pest problems, slow maintenance, parking chaos, and severe failures during family hardship and winter emergencies. Current state unclear; property appears to have cycled through different management eras with mixed results.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

#218

47 low data

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

4.4(16)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the quiet setting and past staff quality under managers Carmen and Marina, with maintenance technician Miller White specifically noted for professionalism. Recent reviews show sharp decline: new management rarely in the office, phones go unanswered, and one resident reported severe pest issues. Experience appears heavily dependent on current staff presence.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Autumn Chase Apartments

#219

35 low data

Autumn Chase Apartments

3.2(56)

A mixed record: some tenants report attentive staff and timely fixes; many describe months-long repair delays, persistent roach problems, and sewage backups. Visitor parking fees ($3.25-$3.30 daily, $315 tow penalty) and frequent management changes underscore operational instability. Crime and noise complaints recur throughout. Newer reviews (past 2 years) are sparse and positive; the weight of detailed complaints is older but substantial.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Park Terrace Apartment

#220

32 low data

Park Terrace Apartment

2.7(13)

Park Terrace shows significant dissatisfaction: 54% of reviews are one or two stars, with tenants citing poor communication, outdated apartments, and trash on grounds. Maintenance staff Steve is praised for responsiveness, but management and front-desk interactions are frequently described as disrespectful or dismissive.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Lakes of Williamsberg

#221

31 low data

Lakes of Williamsberg

3.4(5)✓ Google-verified

Reviews from nearly a decade ago describe litter left across the grounds with inconsistent staff cleanup. Safety history and housing assistance policies were concerns to past residents.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Creekside Apartment Homes

#222

33 low data

Creekside Apartment Homes

No rating yet✓ Google-verified

Creekside offers studio through two-bedroom units across Fort Worth with pet-friendly policies and shared amenities including a fitness center, pool, and on-site laundry. Review data is limited, so prospective tenants should contact the property directly to verify current conditions and pricing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Village Creek Apartments

#223

17 low data

Village Creek Apartments

No rating yet

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Affordable & Low-Income Housing

Last updated 2026-08-23