Fort Worth Apartment Reviews Guide
Menu

The Aspen Apartments

Updated 2026-07-24 · 2,182 reviewed · 417 listed · Scored from 74 Google reviews · How we rank ›

2.7(74) 39 low data composite score See reviews on Google ✓ Google-verified
Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Aspen Apartments
Services
Luxury Apartments, Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Reviews
74

The real story

Aspen sits well below the townhome-style average (2.7 vs. 3.93 stars). Maintenance response splits sharply: some praise quick action, but others report two-day delays on water floods and ignored roach infestations. Management turnover leaves residents divided. Office staff earn consistent praise from some tenants and complaints of rudeness and billing disputes from others. Safety issues (gunfire, physical threats, resident shooting) and unexplained utility charges dominate negative reviews. Most flagrant complaints cite pet control failures despite payment, unpredictable fee stacking, and refund delays up to four months.

Based on limited recent reviews, so treat this as low-confidence.

Praised for
  • responsive maintenance staff
  • helpful office staff (inconsistent)
  • spacious units
  • decent pricing
Watch-outs
  • pest control neglect
  • unresponsive maintenance for major issues
  • safety concerns and crime
  • unpredictable fees and billing
  • poor management attitude
  • slow deposit refunds
slow-maintenancepest-problemsoverpriced-feespoor-communicationfriendly-staffnoisy-neighborssafe-neighborhood
Think twice if: Those sensitive to crime, requiring pest control, or unwilling to tolerate billing surprises should look elsewhere.

Where it delivers

  • staff named Amparo and Liddy praised for going above expectations
  • Damian (maintenance) available outside normal hours for emergencies
  • spacious floor plans

What to ask before signing

  • Damian (maintenance) has responded to after-hours lockouts
  • Office staff Amparo and Liddy named for excellence
  • Water bills reported at $80 single-occupant vs. $35 for others
  • Pest control reportedly not conducted despite tenant payment
  • Deposit refunds delayed up to 4 months
  • Prior management issues (named Jalycia Golden, Tonda Grant) cited for unprofessional conduct; newer management reported as improvement by some

How residents rate the community

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Spacious units at moderate cost attract some tenants but maintenance responsiveness and pest control gaps frustrate others.
Luxury Apartments
Not evidenced as luxury by reviewers; complaints about peeling paint, roach infestation, and water damage undercut any premium positioning.

Measured against the market

  • Rated 2.7 against a 3.93 average across the 265 townhome-style apartment communities businesses listed here.
  • Has more Google reviews than 34% of the businesses in this directory.

How we got this number

How We Rank
Star rating 0
Review volume 81
Review recency 0
Review sentiment 41
Profile completeness 75
Verification 0

Ratings pulled apart

5
22
4
5
3
9
2
5
1
33

Get in touch

Address
7412 Ederville Rd, Fort Worth, TX 76112

Last verified 2026-07-24

Office hours

Monday
09:00-17:30
Tuesday
09:00-17:30
Wednesday
09:00-17:30
Thursday
09:00-17:30
Friday
09:00-17:30
Saturday
Closed
Sunday
Closed

As listed on Google.

Enquire about The Aspen Apartments

Your enquiry goes to the Fort Worth Apartment Reviews Guide team, who will pass it to The Aspen Apartments. We only share your details with providers relevant to your request.

Common questions

How fast does maintenance respond?
Mixed reports. Some praise quick action, especially under current management. Others cite two-day waits on water damage. Damian (maintenance) has responded after hours to emergencies.
Are utilities included or predictable?
Water charges appear to vary dramatically. Residents report $35 to $80 per month; one tenant claims being charged twice the unit average despite living alone.

Similar apartment complexes nearby

The Madeleine
51

The Madeleine

3.0(99)✓ Google-verified

The Madeleine's low average rating masks a sharp divide: a minority report genuine satisfaction with staff helpfulness, while most residents cite persistent pest issues, delayed repairs, water failures, and management unresponsiveness. Maintenance technicians Dwayne and James earned praise for follow-through, yet others wait weeks for basic service requests to start. Residents report roach infestations, ants, water shutdowns blamed on the city (contradicted by neighbors' working service), and mounting unexplained fees. Trash accumulation, dog waste in common areas, and unchecked neighbor complaints add to the decline reviewers describe. The leasing office, when staffed, includes standouts like Cynthia and Tashyra, but office manager Crystal is frequently absent and staff are accused of dismissive attitudes. Conditions appear uneven across the property, with some residents experiencing minor issues while others report health hazards including possible mold in HVAC systems and respiratory problems in young children. One tenant filed a maintenance photo log spanning months with no resolution. Parking is severely limited, enforced neighbor conduct is minimal, and gate security is non-functional. The core tension: reviewers cannot determine whether poor maintenance is widespread neglect or whether discrimination shapes service quality by section or resident type.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Steeplechase Apartments
59

Steeplechase Apartments

3.6(134)✓ Google-verified

Many residents praise staff warmth and unit renovations, particularly highlighting manager Deborah's responsiveness and the property's grounds. A significant minority report serious problems: monthly car break-ins, uncontrolled roaches, broken mailboxes, and a non-functional security gate, alongside complaints that prices don't match the living conditions and that management dismisses or retaliates against complaints. The split is stark and recent. Five-star reviews consistently mention fast maintenance response, spacious renovated units, and a quiet community feel. One-star reviewers who have stayed longer (a year to 25 years) describe deteriorating security, pest issues, and feeling trapped by lease terms, suggesting quality varies sharply by unit or timing.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Campbell Apartments & Townhomes
66

The Campbell Apartments & Townhomes

3.7(296)✓ Google-verified

Staff and maintenance crews stand out for speed and care. Alex handles tours with patience and detail; Tori manages follow-ups relentlessly; Kenneth and Patrick tackle repairs with respect and efficiency. Units themselves are fresh and clean, with thoughtful layouts. The major caveat: at least one resident reported rats in walls and vents, with the office unresponsive. The split in scores (60% five-star but 29% one/two-star) suggests most residents thrive here, but pest issues-if widespread-matter deeply. Long-term residents report no problems, which hints the concern may be isolated or episodic rather than systemic. Leasing is the strongest draw; maintenance response is the consistent reassurance.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Own this business? Get featured

Own or market a business here? Ask about featured placement and advertising on this directory. Your message goes straight to the directory team.

Last updated 2026-07-24