Greater Fort Worth Apartment Complex Guide
Menu

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities in Greater Fort Worth

Page 3 of 3: businesses ranked 201-278 of 278. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.

Oxford at Iron Horse
#201
60

Oxford at Iron Horse

3.5(105)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents consistently praise the responsive office team and efficient maintenance, with several tenants returning or staying for years. Staff members like Amanda, Amber, and Johnny earn repeated recognition for promptness and care. However, a subset of reviews flags serious noise complaints centered on one unit, and one tenant reported billing confusion during a lease break that escalated to collection. The property itself attracts repeat residents drawn to spacious layouts, community events, and genuine staff attentiveness. Management follows up after repairs to confirm satisfaction and organizes regular activities like food truck Fridays. The grounds are maintained to a standard long-term residents appreciate, though neighbor behavior and occupancy-related parking remain variable."

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Slate at Fort Worth Apartments
#202
59

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(114)✓ Google-verified

Slate has split sharply along a management change: since March 2026, tenants praise responsive staff (especially Meshun Davis), active renovations, and the reopened pool. Before that shift, residents faced pest problems, mold, poor communication, and unresolved maintenance issues. The location near Fort Worth groceries and highways and cleaning standards are strengths when managed well. New tenants report smooth leasing tours; long-term residents from the pre-2026 era warn against the property entirely.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Forest Park Apartments
#203
60

Forest Park Apartments

4.4(39)✓ Google-verified

Strong maintenance and responsive staff earn consistent praise from long-term residents, with move-in processes and security deposit returns cited as fair and transparent. Management conduct divides opinion sharply: several reviewers credit specific staff (Ignacio, Tammy) for professionalism, while others report policy disputes, unclear fees, and confrontational interactions that drove tenants out.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Sansom Pointe Senior
#204
60

Sansom Pointe Senior

3.7(99)✓ Google-verified

Sansom Pointe Senior draws residents with low rent and daily activities, but living here means battling roaches, broken elevators, and smoke drifting from neighboring units despite the advertised non-smoking policy. Management largely ignores complaints; while event coordinator Sabrina earns consistent praise, the office itself stays behind closed doors and fails to address the core maintenance and pest control issues that have pushed many residents out within months.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Ridgmar Oaks
#205
60

Ridgmar Oaks

3.9(38)✓ Google-verified

Ridgmar Oaks draws strong praise for spacious layouts and responsive leasing staff like Lisa and Viviana, yet reviews highlight a troubling gap between front-office service and property maintenance. Multiple residents report months-long AC outages, roach problems, rodent issues, and deteriorating conditions that management addresses slowly or patches rather than fixes. Tenant experiences improve markedly when dedicated staff handle cases, but the underlying maintenance shortfalls remain a significant concern for long-term residents.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Haven at Chisholm Trail
#206
59

The Haven at Chisholm Trail

3.4(461)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Haven offers helpful staff and amenities near shopping and medical services, but residents consistently report frustration with office communication: calls go unanswered, promises repeat without follow-through, and work orders languish. Maintenance teams deliver when reached, yet safety concerns and neighbor complaints have required management escalation and, in at least one case, tenant departure.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
The Sovereign
#207
59

The Sovereign

3.4(318)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff like Nataly and Faith receive consistent praise for speed and transparency, and some residents describe quiet apartments in a convenient location. However, grounds maintenance has deteriorated sharply. Reviewers document grass uncut for months, trash sitting for weeks, roach infestations that survive repeated treatments, bird and dog waste piling up, and shattered glass on walking paths. Maintenance requests vanish into silence; one resident waited two weeks for a kitchen sink repair and months for promised pressure washing. Move-in walkthroughs are skipped, opening residents to disputed damage charges at move-out. Staff turnover is severe (15 managers and 30+ maintenance workers cited in one review), and corporate reportedly blocks repairs. Some residents report unfair fees for trash violations on top of existing fees, and one applicant paid $375 in application fees before being told mid-process that only a social security number-not a Mexican passport-was acceptable, with no refund issued.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Dylan Apartments
#208
59

Dylan Apartments

3.3(215)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong five-star reviews praise responsive maintenance (Andres, staff noticed dishwasher leak), welcoming leasing agents (Celia, Maria, Claudia), and a calm, quiet setting. However, repeated one-star complaints document widespread roach problems in units, spoiled food, and wires damaged by pests. Management reportedly becomes hostile when questioned; promised amenities like the pool stay closed. The rating split (52% five-star, 39% one/two-star) reflects two very different tenant experiences.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Reserve at Quebec
#209
59

Reserve at Quebec

3.0(209)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star reviews highlight a maintenance team that shows up fast and treats residents well, especially Tony and Luis who earn repeated praise. Residents who stay long-term describe a quiet, family-friendly place with attentive staff. However, a parallel stream of one-star complaints focuses on months-long repair delays, failed emergency calls (sewage backups left unresolved), unresponsive management after promises are made, and a recent billing scare where a resident faced collection action after her lease ended. The split is stark: those praising the community and maintenance crew versus those trapped in repair limbo with indifferent office staff. Property remains affordable and pet-friendly, but the gap between maintenance responsiveness and office follow-through creates a lottery feel. Families and seniors considering this location should ask specifically about AC and emergency repair timelines before signing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments
Horizons at Sunridge
#210
59

Horizons at Sunridge

3.0(203)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the reviews are five-star, often highlighting maintenance staff like Juan Hernandez and office team members who handle requests quickly. The other half describe delayed repairs (10 days for door fixes), constant roach infestations despite weekly spraying, thin doors that don't close, mold on window sealant, and management resistance to resident complaints or unit transfers. Long-time residents report paying multiple rent increases before finally getting breaks. The office and management seem disconnected from property upkeep complaints. Amenities like the pool, dog park, screened patios, and fitness center draw praise when accessible. Several residents note the community feels quiet and family-friendly when maintenance keeps pace. But the stark divide suggests experience depends heavily on how quickly the maintenance team responds and whether management follows through on building repairs versus cosmetic fixes.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Stallion Pointe Apartments
#211
59

Stallion Pointe Apartments

3.5(148)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Casey Williams and Sabrena Butler earn strong praise for genuine care, running food pantries, organizing community events, and helping residents navigate life challenges. Yet serious complaints about broken A/C units in summer heat, mold exposure, and slow maintenance response suggest the care stops at the office door. The gap between five-star experiences and damaging one-star accounts reveals two Stallion Pointe realities. Families with young children find real community support here. Renters facing unit problems find themselves fighting the building alone, sometimes considering legal action. The business's claims of energy-efficient appliances ring hollow when A/C fails at 83 degrees indoors.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Highland Park Apartments
#212
59

Highland Park Apartments

3.6(91)✓ Google-verified

Highland Park's leasing team, especially Daisy and Kenda, earns consistent praise for patience and knowledge. Maintenance and property management divide opinion sharply: some residents report timely fixes and friendly responses; others faced months of ignored requests, pest problems, and water damage. The quiet location near Clearfork appeals to renters, but the aging buildings and wear require realistic expectations.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Handley Oaks Apartments
#213
59

Handley Oaks Apartments

4.0(59)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers split sharply on Handley Oaks. Many praise the office staff (particularly Norma and Lupita) for helpfulness, the quiet grounds, and the clean remodeled units on move-in. However, a persistent minority report serious roach infestations that management fails to remedy, alongside complaints of rent overcharging, inadequate pest control, and staff becoming unresponsive once leases are signed. The property appears well-maintained when working, but pest issues are a deal-breaker for some.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Waters Park
#214
59

Waters Park

3.5(94)✓ Google-verified

Strong maintenance response times and courteous staff draw many residents, but a significant minority report unresolved pest infestations, secondhand smoke leaking between units, and poor office communication. The gap between five-star and one-star reviews reflects real operational inconsistencies that may depend on timing, unit location, or management attention.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments
#215
57

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

3.4(149)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sandshell divides sharply. Those staying long-term praise the quiet grounds, pool events, and genuinely helpful staff members like Hailey and Garrett. But newer residents hit a wall fast: cockroaches carpet the laundromat, mice run across floors, ants infest bathrooms, and mold hangs in the air. Water cuts off for hours without warning, parking enforcement tows cars at 1 a.m. with no advance notice, and move-out inspections generate five-figure damage charges that reviewers say don't match photos they took. The complex bills itself as luxury on its website, but reviews describe it as poorly maintained, aging apartments sold at premium prices. One long-term resident's later review warns that management uses move-out inspections to retain deposits aggressively. Multiple reviewers mention switching to nearby alternatives like The Hadley because pest and infrastructure problems go unresolved for weeks or months.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Life at Westland Estates
#216
59

The Life at Westland Estates

3.4(191)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members Natisha and Amanda earn consistent praise for going beyond typical leasing help, moving tenants in smoothly, and arranging fast maintenance. The maintenance team responds quickly to reported issues. However, a smaller group of residents report roach infestations in units, unleashed dogs creating safety problems, and grounds left unclean. Pest entry through drains and chimneys went unresolved in some cases. Gym access limited to office hours leaves working residents unable to use the advertised on-site facility. Parking lot speeding and package theft were also mentioned. The complex appears split: those with responsive staff have stayed happy; those facing pest and safety issues found management unresponsive to complaints.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Carmen Apartments
#217
59

The Carmen Apartments

2.7(190)✓ Google-verified

Tenants split sharply on The Carmen. Loyal residents praise named staff like Menshayla and maintenance crews who respond quickly and treat people well; some have lived here over a decade. But newer or shorter-stay residents report months-long waits on critical repairs, unresolved pest and mold issues despite paying for services, and a front office that often doesn't answer. One tenant left while pregnant due to unaddressed apartment problems; another notes water shut-offs without refunds and accessibility barriers for wheelchairs.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Nolan
#218
56

The Nolan

2.9(73)✓ Google-verified

New management has turned the property around with visible improvements to lighting, landscaping, and maintenance, earning praise for their responsiveness and willingness to work with tenants. However, the complex still struggles with inconsistent office staffing, pest control, plumbing leaks during rain, and poor grounds upkeep that reviewers describe as longstanding and unresolved.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments
Park City Townhomes Apartments
#219
58

Park City Townhomes Apartments

3.4(155)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong personal touches from management, particularly office manager Lisa, make some residents feel at home; units are described as clean and maintenance issues handled promptly. However, recurring roach infestations and outdated infrastructure undercut the promise, with several reviews citing pest problems across apartments and cosmetic-only fixes.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Buffalo at Arlington
#220
58

Buffalo at Arlington

3.2(344)✓ Google-verified

Buffalo at Arlington offers apartments blocks from UT Arlington with modern amenities that appeal to many students. Yet the experience is drastically split: those who navigate move-in smoothly praise clean units, responsive staff by name, and facilities like the rooftop pool and fitness center. The overwhelming complaint is catastrophic move-in chaos, with hundreds moved simultaneously, hours-long key delays, and units arriving uninhabitable (roaches, broken windows, dirty floors). Staff turnover and communication breakdowns compound these issues, with residents reporting unresolved maintenance and unclear billing practices. Management struggles appear structural rather than occasional. Reviewers note understaffing during move-in season, non-functional fingerprint scanners forcing unsafe door-propping, and a disconnect between front-line staff goodwill and backend systems (Cardinal Management handling billing disputes). Charges for damage not caused by residents and lack of proration for mid-month arrivals frustrate cost-conscious students. The 49% five-star / 44% one-two-star split reflects two sharply different realities: smooth arrivals versus logistical collapse.

Student HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Aden Crest Apartments
#221
58

Aden Crest Apartments

3.4(145)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents experience a quiet community but struggle with inconsistent enforcement of policies and maintenance gaps. Staff friendliness varies widely-some praise specific managers and maintenance workers, while others report unresolved issues like ceiling leaks, water outages, and mold that persisted for months or years despite work orders.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Dove Park Apartments
#222
58

Dove Park Apartments

3.1(98)✓ Google-verified

Strong resident satisfaction drives many 5-star reviews, with families and couples praising Veronica and the leasing team, quick maintenance turnarounds, and the park-like setting near Highway 114. However, a recent tour revealed significant facility concerns: foul smells and a roach sighting cast doubt on cleanliness standards that would alarm prospective renters or long-term residents. Community events like the Back-to-School bash build loyalty, and the proximity to Grapevine parks and Southlake appeals to those seeking value. Yet unresolved pest and odor complaints suggest maintenance gaps despite the pace of repair responses. Current residents often overlook age because space and affordability outweigh newer finishes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Sunset Pointe Apartments
#223
58

Sunset Pointe Apartments

3.3(208)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews praise staff by name (Becky, Beverly) and report pleasant stays; longer residents recall good years before 2023. One-star reviews detail years of ignored maintenance requests, unresolved plumbing failures, pest infestations they were charged to treat, mystery cable billing, and management that avoids accountability. Some five-star reviewers acknowledge the mixed picture but credit staff effort for improvements. The gap mirrors the rating spread itself: enthusiastic five-stars versus deeply frustrated long-term tenants who report management declining since late 2023, inconsistent maintenance response, and charges for repairs typically the landlord's duty. Responsiveness varies dramatically by staff member.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Morningside Apartments
#224
58

Morningside Apartments

3.6(65)✓ Google-verified

Management and leasing staff, especially Maria and Juan, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and problem-solving. Recent administrative changes have notably improved resident satisfaction and maintenance responsiveness. However, recurring complaints center on aging infrastructure: pest problems, mold, leaks, and slow fixes on critical systems like heating. Some residents report year-long repair waits. The gap between enthusiastic recent reviews and older complaints suggests either real improvements underway or inconsistent execution across different maintenance issues and timeframes.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Estrella at Seminary Apartments
#225
58

Estrella at Seminary Apartments

3.6(91)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents report a stark divide in experience. Tenants praise office staff members Patricia and Ana as attentive and kind, and maintenance worker Pedro as efficient and respectful. However, the majority of recent complaints center on deferred maintenance, pest infestations, water damage, and mold that persist despite repeated work orders. Some tenants feel management responds inconsistently, with better service for certain residents while others report dismissal, poor communication, and substandard unit conditions for the price. The complex offers bilingual support and a quiet atmosphere, but structural and sanitation issues dominate negative reviews. One recent tenant with a young child reported roach infestation, bird and insect entry, a hole left unrepaired after plumbing work, and inadequate heating. Multiple residents describe fighting for months to resolve basic problems, and one mentioned hiring an attorney over mold and health concerns.

Student HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Chalk Gardens
#226
58 low data

Chalk Gardens

4.8(6)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents praise the leasing and maintenance teams by name, noting smooth application processes and quick repairs. Suilma and Lili earn specific credit for accessibility and problem-solving; the AC technician impressed with speed and efficiency.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Celine
#227
58

The Celine

2.7(224)✓ Google-verified

Staff warmth and apartment size draw people in; five-star reviewers praise named team members like Selena, Crystal, and Lauren for attentiveness and quick responses. The darker side emerges quickly: residents report unbearable summer heat with blocked AC requests, move-in units crawling with roaches and stripped of water, maintenance tickets logged but never completed, and a pattern of hidden fees stacking advertised rent to nearly 20% higher. Security failures (car break-ins, improper towing) and withheld deposits pile onto the frustration. Recent management changes hint at systemic turnover. Some residents who stick it out a year report positive experiences; others flee before their lease ends or pursue legal action. The split between five-star and one/two-star reviews (40% vs 55%) reflects this divide: you either hit responsive management and avoid major repairs, or you land in a unit needing work that never materializes and a lease office that ghosts you.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
The Hudson
#228
57

The Hudson

3.5(138)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews consistently praise Lechele, the leasing agent, and the maintenance team for responsiveness and professionalism. Long-term residents report a steep decline since new management arrived, citing pest infestations that persist despite multiple visits, roof leaks that go unrepaired, and harsh policies like charging fees for declined payments with no grace period. The complex's biggest draw is its location and affordable pricing for the area, but structural issues (mold, roaches in walls, gaps in roofing) undermine that appeal. The shift feels real: earlier reviews highlight quick AC fixes and friendly communication; recent ones document months-long pest problems and punitive billing practices.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Tides on Avril
#229
57

Tides on Avril

3.5(247)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the reviews are five-star praise for office staff like Taliza, Bibiana, and Felicia, and fast maintenance responses. The other half report serious problems: cockroach infestations across units despite multiple fumigations, black mold in bathrooms and vents, clogged sewage lines, holes in the dog park fence, a non-functional pool, and a laundry room too expensive to use. Management ignores repair requests and disputed charges. Move-in is especially problematic. Residents are not allowed to inspect units beforehand, then arrive to find conditions far worse than advertised models. Deposits take months to return after repeated calls to multiple staff members. Charges rise without clear explanation. One reviewer paid $789 for a one-bedroom and saw it climb to $1,200, while another's bill jumped from $1,276 to $1,475.50. Staff deny residents pay for amenities even as rent statements show "service and facilities charges."

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Silversage Point at Western Center
#230
57

Silversage Point at Western Center

3.3(108)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Recent tenants and prospective renters praise staff warmth and quick repairs under strong management, but many long-term residents report chronic failures: leaks go unfixed for months, roaches persist despite complaints, and management changes so often that follow-up work stops. The property appears livable under stable leadership but unstable when the office turnover returns.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Campus Edge on UTA Boulevard
#231
57

Campus Edge on UTA Boulevard

3.1(228)✓ Google-verified

Tour staff, particularly Leo, earn consistent praise for patience and professionalism during the leasing process. Once residents move in, experience fractures sharply: maintenance responds within two days, but management communication fails, packages disappear, roaches infest units despite cleaning efforts, fire alarms trigger repeatedly at night, and rules apply unevenly across the complex. Residents report unexplained repair charges stacked monthly, A/C withheld when temperatures reach 87 degrees, and little accountability when units suffer water damage or residents have roommate conflicts. The property itself shows visible trash, vandalism in the garage, and stairwell filth. Management does not engage after the lease is signed.

Student HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Patriot Pointe Apartments
#232
57

Patriot Pointe Apartments

3.1(121)✓ Google-verified

The property draws strong praise for apartment size, layout, and amenities, with select staff members earning deep loyalty for professionalism and genuine care. Management responsiveness and maintenance speed fail repeatedly: mold sits untreated for weeks, pest control remains ineffective, and calls often go unanswered. High turnover in office staff mirrors tenant departure rates. While some residents thrive in the community, others face deteriorating grounds, noisy neighbors, and unresolved maintenance claims despite full rent charges. Standout employees like Daishuntane and Clemente drive positive experiences, but their impact cannot offset systemic gaps. The property's mixed-income model, proximity to Fort Worth Veterans Affairs and Tarrant County College, and amenities (pool, fitness center, game room) appeal on paper, yet execution wavers sharply between periods of good stewardship and visible decline.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Hills at Ironhorse
#233
57

The Hills at Ironhorse

3.4(100)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise the quiet neighborhood, friendly staff, and quick repairs on minor issues, but newer reviews document significant problems under recent management: mold in air vents, pest infestations, months-long delays on critical repairs (AC in summer, washing machines), vehicle and package theft, and abrupt lease terminations. The complex remains affordable and well-located near shopping and transit, but maintenance quality and security appear inconsistent.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Marina Del Rey Apartments
#234
57

Marina Del Rey Apartments

3.4(97)✓ Google-verified

Tenants praise the management team, particularly Diana Munoz and Daphne, for professionalism and responsiveness; many residents stay multiple years and highlight recent upgrades like new washers and dryers. However, some report pest issues at move-in, delayed maintenance, and tight parking. Rent charges ($2000 for three-bedroom) draw mixed reactions; one reviewer noted the complex works with people rebuilding credit.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Babers Manor
#235
56 low data

Babers Manor

5.0(2)✓ Google-verified

One applicant expressed enthusiasm about the application process and anticipation of moving in, though evidence is limited from a single recent review.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
101 Center
#236
56

101 Center

3.6(586)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Despite a convenient location near UTA and Downtown Arlington, 101 Center struggles with tenant satisfaction across maintenance, billing, and management responsiveness. Reviewers report persistent pest problems left unfixed, maintenance requests marked resolved without action, and difficulty reaching staff through phone or email. Staff performance varies sharply: some maintenance technicians earn praise for quick, respectful work, but overall management frustrates residents with billing discrepancies, lease-signing tactics that leave tenants worse off, and a perception that concerns are dismissed. Multiple residents document pest issues lasting months, parking garage security failures, and lost packages. Those seeking quick, hands-on support before move-in should look elsewhere.

Student HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Ash Lane Apartment Homes
#237
56

Ash Lane Apartment Homes

3.0(83)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Nina and Amber earn consistent praise for helpfulness and professionalism, and newer residents report a clean, affordable complex with quick move-ins. However, long-term tenants describe a pattern of delayed maintenance (weeks for repairs), persistent roaches despite personal spending, and noisy neighbors who remain unaddressed despite documented complaints and police calls. The gap between experiences suggests staffing or management structure problems. One maintenance manager (Julio) was credited but left; outsourcing to private contractors appears to have worsened response times. Multiple residents report AC outages lasting weeks in Texas summer heat, water damage, and appliances that fail without prompt attention. Rent increases are ongoing despite these issues.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Infinity on the Landing
#238
56

Infinity on the Landing

3.5(85)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Infinity on the Landing wins genuine praise for hands-on maintenance staff and a solid property manager team who go the extra mile with quick repairs and warm service. Residents cite staff like Irving, Angel, and Erika by name for professionalism and follow-through. The complex offers well-kept amenities that long-term residents clearly value. However, a steep divide exists between those experiences and serious complaints about bait-and-switch fees, severe pest infestment, misleading advertising, and an overwhelmed or indifferent upper management. New tenants report broken promises on lease terms, surprise charges for washers/dryers, and towing tactics that feel intentional. The gate security is reportedly always open, and communication across the office is inconsistent-some staff are warm, others dismissive.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Southwest Apartments
#239
56

Southwest Apartments

3.5(84)✓ Google-verified

Recent management changes have dramatically improved resident experience. Tenants now praise staff responsiveness, with maintenance arriving within 20 minutes and managers like Norma earning high marks for friendliness and accessibility. However, a vocal minority reports serious historical issues: roaches, broken HVAC, chronic maintenance delays under previous management, and disputed billing practices that led to wrongful evictions and destroyed credit. Current residents feel welcomed and safe; past residents describe chaos, fraud allegations, and inadequate support through crisis.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Tides on Hulen
#240
53

Tides on Hulen

3.0(195)✓ Google-verified

The leasing team at Tides on Hulen draws genuine praise for accessibility and helpfulness, but the property itself is plagued by unresolved maintenance failures that persist for months. Residents report no hot water for extended periods, broken toilets and doors, and management that either avoids the phone or becomes dismissive when contacted. Security deposits vanish after move-out, and the gap between what the marketing promises (furnished, well-maintained) and what residents live through is stark enough that even loyal long-term tenants leave frustrated and uncompensated.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments
Arthouse
#241
56

Arthouse

3.7(81)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise Arthouse's location in Keller Town Center, proximity to trails, and several standout staff members like Jay and Sandy. Maintenance requests from positive reviewers get same-day attention, and the community feel appeals to many. However, negative reviews reveal systemic problems: roach infestations, dirty or broken amenities, delayed repairs, and unresponsive front office staff. Management turnover, failed HVAC systems, and move-in conditions (dirty units, previous damage not repaired) anger tenants paying premium prices. The gap between promised upkeep and actual delivery creates stark contrasts between satisfied and frustrated residents.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Columbia Renaissance Square
#242
56 low data

Columbia Renaissance Square

3.4(45)✓ Google-verified

Residents report standout staff members who respond quickly and organize weekly events, but persistent pest problems, thin walls that carry neighbor noise, and inconsistent maintenance undercut the experience. Some praise the move-in condition and fitness amenities; others cite unprepared temp workers and a six-year decline in upkeep.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments
Vega Place Apartments
#243
56 low data

Vega Place Apartments

3.8(12)✓ Google-verified

Older reviews highlight a welcoming community with a duck pond and attentive former management, but recent posts describe neglected grounds since a manager departed. Serious historical complaints include safety gaps, unannounced apartment entries, and selective pet policy enforcement; grounds upkeep remains the most current concern.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments
The District on Collins
#244
55

The District on Collins

2.9(241)✓ Google-verified

Front desk staff, particularly Carolina, earn consistent praise for friendliness and communication. However, this is overwhelmed by widespread complaints about pest infestations residents handle themselves, maintenance that marks work complete without visiting, and billing surprises. Multiple families with children report rats and roaches throughout units despite paying pest control fees; some waited months for basic repairs like air conditioning. The contrast between leasing experience and actual living conditions is stark.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Gardens At Cobb Park
#245
55 low data

Gardens At Cobb Park

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Gardens at Cobb Park draws praise from residents who value its peaceful setting and friendly staff, particularly assistant manager Huseni. However, significant complaints span unresponsive office communication, serious security issues, and documented pest infestations that management has not resolved. Limited recent activity makes current conditions unclear.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
The Morgan
#246
55

The Morgan

3.4(424)✓ Google-verified

Several residents credit Laura, Cheyanne, and Ty for smooth leasing and move-in support, though this goodwill evaporates once maintenance issues emerge. Recurring complaints involve broken air conditioning units stuck above 74 degrees for two months, unaddressed mold and pest problems, repair requests ignored or repeated after quick failures, and management refusing accountability when residents raise grievances. The property has seen staff turnover (Berta, Maria, and Wade departed), and complaints intensify after management transitions. One long-term resident reported 30+ maintenance tickets over 13 months ignored entirely. Communication failures compound problems: broken email portals, unanswered phone calls routed to AI, and no follow-up on serious issues like water outages or electrical hazards. Cheap rent attracts tenants initially, but operational breakdowns and deposit disputes at exit sour the experience.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Westmount at River Park Apartments
#247
53

Westmount at River Park Apartments

3.4(218)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Westmount at River Park is split sharply between strong praise for leasing staff and deep frustration with management, maintenance, and condition. Long-term residents cite repeated turnover in management, inconsistent policies, unresponsive offices, hidden fees that weren't refunded, and deteriorating units. The pool has stayed closed for months despite being a resident priority, the workout room smells bad, and in-unit amenities like washers and hot water fail or were never installed as promised. Staff at the leasing desk earn consistent five-star reviews for helpfulness. Those staying report feeling safe but exhausted by the complex's rigid policies and slow repairs. The business advertises one- and two-bedroom options with pet services, a fitness center, and coffee bar. Their website lists special move-in offers. In practice, reviewers say move-in deals go unpaid, parking is heavily restricted, and maintenance requests languish. One tenant with strong payment history faced eviction proceedings after requesting a single payment delay. Newer residents sometimes report good initial experiences; longer-term occupants describe escalating frustration with unresponsive management and inability to reach named staff like Brittany.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Holt on Chisholm Trail
#248
54

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

3.1(423)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Amanda and Arthur shine during leasing, but the property itself struggles badly. Reviewers report months-long AC outages, non-functioning laundry, roach infestations, water damage, broken amenities, and pavement with large holes. Management does not respond to complaints or code violations, and tenants describe unit conditions so poor they postponed move-ins. One five-star reviewer praised Eric in maintenance for fixing multiple issues in a single visit, yet others say maintenance walks around smoking instead of addressing requests. The gap between leasing experience and living experience is stark. Tenants across multiple reviews mention feeling trapped: unprepared units, delayed move-ins, eviction notices despite rent credits for unlivable conditions, and corporate silence. This complex carries serious red flags for anyone without a strong alternative.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Centennial Court Apartments
#249
54

Centennial Court Apartments

2.3(440)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents report a punishing experience with serious maintenance and pest control failures. Roach infestations are the dominant complaint, alongside regular internet and water outages, poor repairs (especially bathtub work done repeatedly), and rent hikes that outpace improvements. Staff communication is chaotic; move-in charges surprise residents, deposit refunds are disputed, and management is hard to reach. A handful of graduate students and early residents praise proximity to campus and cite individual staff members (Ansib) as genuinely helpful. Maintenance teams handle emergency electrical and plumbing work quickly when they come. Yet these pockets of goodwill are drowned out by overwhelming accounts of negligence, water damage, mold risk, and the sense that problems are managed reactively rather than fixed.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Sorrento
#250
54

Sorrento

3.4(421)✓ Google-verified

Sorrento divides sharply between residents who connect with front-office staff and those battling months-long maintenance failures. Since BH Living took over management, most reviewers report AC breakdowns lasting weeks in Texas summer heat, gates that stay broken, and maintenance requests answered only after tenants visit the office in person or contact the city. Staff turnover means floaters handle problems rather than permanent workers. One bright spot: individual leasing agents like Giia, Kaitlyn, Lily, and Lindsey earned praise for warmth and professionalism. But the complex as a whole fails tenants on its core responsibility-keeping the property safe and livable. Specific failures recur across reviews: a flooded kitchen sink that drains on its own, portable AC units that break immediately, gates non-functional for months, wheel theft with no usable security footage, and electric bills topping $600 monthly due to running backup cooling. Residents also report being charged for trash collection and threatened with $400 towing fees for unregistered guest vehicles. The shift from previous management (Knightvest and Greystar) triggered the decline. Multiple residents have contacted lawyers or the city. Those who have stayed praise the townhomes and amenities, but the cost is paid in stress and out-of-pocket fixes.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Lancaster Apartments
#251
54

Lancaster Apartments

2.9(70)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise maintenance technician Jaime for swift, thorough repairs and the office staff (including Abril) for friendliness. One complaint alleges discriminatory treatment in payment processing and language barriers. The wide rating split (40% five-star, 50% one/two-star) reflects a sharp divide: recent visitors describe efficient maintenance and a calm environment, while at least one reviewer felt excluded.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Leuda May Apartments
#252
54

Leuda May Apartments

3.9(20)✓ Google-verified

Recent management changes have improved day-to-day responsiveness, with tenants praising staff like Donya and Holly for quick action on repairs and accessible communication. However, billing disputes persist, roach infestations in some units went unaddressed for months, and the property's history of frequent management turnover has left some residents uncertain about long-term reliability.

Furnished & Corporate HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Hulen Heights Apartments
#253
53 low data

Hulen Heights Apartments

3.7(30)

Strong long-term residents and manager Diane's attention earn consistent five-star praise, but office availability complaints and a serious discrimination allegation split opinion sharply. Older units with wear show; location near Central Market is a draw for most.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Residences of Diamond Hill
#254
53

The Residences of Diamond Hill

2.5(145)✓ Google-verified

Severe maintenance and pest issues dominate resident feedback, with tenants reporting cockroaches, ants, and spiders in newly-painted units alongside unprompted move-in claims. Staff responsiveness is a consistent friction point: applications get lost, maintenance tickets close without work completed, AC failures go unresolved, and communication from the office is sparse or nonexistent. A handful of five-star reviews praise the community's safety for families and mention helpful staff members, but these stand against a sea of complaints spanning years.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
848 Mitchell
#255
53

848 Mitchell

2.4(442)✓ Google-verified

Widespread complaints about pest infestations, mold, filthy conditions, and slow maintenance plague this property. While rooms are spacious and affordable, residents consistently report roaches on move-in day, unresponsive work orders that take months to address, unusable pools and gyms despite amenity fees, and staff that feels dismissive and rude.

Student HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Hayes Apartments
#256
53

The Hayes Apartments

3.1(117)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report chronic maintenance failures that persist for months without resolution: air conditioning that doesn't cool, ceilings that leak when it rains, dishwashers that break repeatedly, and pest infestations including roaches and rats. Leasing staff like Timira Jackson receive praise for patience and helpfulness during sign-up, but once tenants move in, repeated maintenance requests go unfilled, calls go unanswered, and management responds defensively when problems are raised. Multiple residents describe being told repair timeframes are uncertain, having completed requests marked as resolved without actual fixes, and facing threats of eviction rather than assistance. A few positive reviews note recent staff improvements, but the overwhelming pattern is that The Hayes does not address serious habitability issues. The gap between the leasing experience and the reality after move-in appears stark. Reviewers cite pest problems worsening, water damage going untreated, and utilities being overcharged, yet report that management either deflects blame or avoids contact. One resident documented an eight-month sequence of repeated AC failures, flooding from HVAC units, laundry machines breaking at each use, and repeated service calls that failed to fix the issue. Staff conduct is also cited as unprofessional: aggressive door knocking, throwing away residents' belongings without notice, reckless driving through the complex, and one report of a maintenance worker cussing at a guest.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Crestwood Place Apartments
#257
53

Crestwood Place Apartments

3.5(84)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents describe steady decline under current management, with broken amenities (laundry, gym access), delayed repairs (AC took a month; washers out for months), and inconsistent enforcement. While some staff members earn praise for kindness, the complex feels neglected overall, with office hours severely limited and tenant complaints routinely ignored. Management changes frequently, and residents report paying for amenities they cannot access.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments
Holly Park Apartments
#258
53

Holly Park Apartments

3.1(38)

Long-term residents praise the grounds, responsive maintenance, and welcoming staff like Gudelia and Gladys, describing a quiet, family-friendly space. However, recent and mid-tenure reviews flag aggressive towing, parking chaos, slow HVAC repairs, outdated cabinets and refrigerators, and management unprofessionalism, with deposits allegedly withheld and vehicles repeatedly towed even when properly registered.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Premier Gardens Apartments
#259
53 low data

Premier Gardens Apartments

3.8(6)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise affordable rents for the Cultural District location and recent maintenance improvements, but communication remains a sore spot and some units suffer from heat inefficiency and water infiltration during heavy rain. The property offers spacious townhome-style flats with patios, though older finishes and infrastructure limits appeal.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Summerstone Apartments
#260
52

Summerstone Apartments

3.3(115)✓ Google-verified

Summerstone offers spacious townhomes at budget-friendly rates, but 1980s construction means thin walls, poor insulation, and high summer electricity bills. Residents praise Irene and maintenance staff for responsiveness, yet consistently report pest problems, litter throughout grounds, and a property office that screens calls, disputes deposit deductions aggressively, and has left residents with damaged credit. Management and facilities have deteriorated noticeably over recent years. The fitness center sits vandalized, the pool has frequent closures, and staff demeanor toward problem reports feels dismissive compared to prior management. Move-out processes are contentious: residents report deposit holds for normal wear and tear, excessive painting charges, and rapid collection threats. Long-tenancy residents cite communication breakdowns and a shift toward a more adversarial posture.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Springs
#261
51

The Springs

2.8(121)✓ Google-verified

The Springs has deteriorated significantly. Residents report mold in walls and vents, roaches, rats, and possums throughout units. Maintenance is slow or nonexistent; water damage goes unfixed for months. Office staff are described as rude and unresponsive. A few past staff members earned praise, but recent management changes have worsened communication and responsiveness. The complex faces structural failures, squatters in vacant units, and potential closure.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments
The Moderne
#262
51

The Moderne

3.2(24)✓ Google-verified

The Moderne shows a sharp divide between newer and older tenant experiences. Recent five-star reviews praise the updated management team (especially Sydnee), responsive service requests, and the West 7th location near dining and shops. However, older reviews paint a troubling picture of move-in disasters (mold, filthy units), neglected grounds, security breaches, and management indifference. The property allegedly operates Airbnbs alongside permanent housing, creating noise and property damage. Tenants report illegal insurance charges and unfair lease-blocking after maintenance issues.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Ridge Crest Apartments
#263
50 low data

Ridge Crest Apartments

3.8(27)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Wendy, the long-tenured property manager, draws consistent praise for quick responses and care. A small, quiet community with reasonable rents and well-kept grounds appeals to residents seeking a low-key environment. Management quality has fluctuated over years; thin walls, aging fixtures, and occasional parking disputes frustrate some, while others report deposit delays and unexplained fees.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Mission Pointe Club Apartments
#264
50 low data

Mission Pointe Club Apartments

3.2(114)✓ Google-verified

Mission Pointe Club delivers mixed experiences, though recent reviews lean heavily negative. While some tenants praise the pet-friendly setup and proximity to the airport, widespread complaints center on pest problems, aggressive move-out charges, and management unresponsiveness to maintenance requests and emergencies.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)
#265
49

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

2.6(72)✓ Google-verified

Most tenants describe a complex in serious disrepair where basic requests go unaddressed for months, management ignores legal notices, and residents resort to court action to force compliance. Staff turnover is constant, billing is unreliable, and pests (roaches, beetles) persist despite cleaned units. A handful reported helpful staff, but systemic issues dominate the experience.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Madeleine
#266
50

The Madeleine

2.9(99)✓ Google-verified

The Madeleine shows a sharp divide: residents praise individual staff members like maintenance workers Dwayne and James for their attentiveness, yet describe the property overall as declining rapidly with trash, parking chaos, and water cuts. Management ignores neighbor complaints and allows conditions to deteriorate, leaving long-term residents frustrated. Several residents report untreated pest problems, broken AC systems, and unfinished repairs stretching months. A parent documents moisture and likely mold in HVAC vents affecting a baby's health. Hidden fees appear regularly on bills. Leasing office staff can be dismissive when responding to serious issues, though early-leasing staff like Tashyra and Cynthia earned praise for patience.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Buttercup Place Apartments
#267
50 low data

Buttercup Place Apartments

3.4(20)✓ Google-verified

Buttercup Place draws deeply committed residents, including those rebuilding from homelessness, who praise the community and staff support. Recent reviews flag ongoing pest issues, unresponsive phone lines, and safety concerns in shared spaces that undercut the positive foundation.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Times Square On the Hill
#268
50

Times Square On the Hill

2.9(45)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff-especially Jordan and Benitta-earn consistent praise for kindness and clear communication during move-in. Long-term residents report feeling safe and well-managed. However, newer complaints flag vehicle theft, parking headaches, and delayed fixes on water and maintenance issues, suggesting inconsistent upkeep.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Victoria Place Apartments
#269
50 low data

Victoria Place Apartments

3.0(38)✓ Google-verified

Victoria Place has recovered noticeably since new ownership took over several years ago. Residents praise the cleanliness, responsive management, and improved grounds. However, AC outages during hot months and lingering security concerns dampen satisfaction, and some find pricing steep.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Ticknor Terrace
#270
49 low data

Ticknor Terrace

2.8(39)✓ Google-verified

Ticknor Terrace has deteriorated significantly. Recent reviews describe a roach and rat-infested property with aggressive move-out charging, rude staff, and poor ground maintenance. Older reviews mention helpful staff and quiet neighbors, but current conditions and management practices dominate complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Travis Gardens Apartments
#271
47 low data

Travis Gardens Apartments

3.1(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Travis Gardens divides sharply: recent five-star reviews credit strong management (Ms. Shonda, Christy), safety, and community feel. Older one-star reviews cite hostile management, pest problems, slow maintenance, parking chaos, and severe failures during family hardship and winter emergencies. Current state unclear; property appears to have cycled through different management eras with mixed results.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Wedgewood Apartment Homes
#272
43 low data

Wedgewood Apartment Homes

3.2(90)✓ Google-verified

Wedgewood has declined significantly over the past five years. Residents report chronic A/C breakdowns left unaddressed for months, widespread pest problems despite pest control fees, and plumbing failures. Recent reviews cite unresponsive management and rude staff; older positive reviews mention a technician named Juana and friendlier office practices that no longer appear to apply.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Fort 1901 Lofts & Apartments
#273
40 low data

Fort 1901 Lofts & Apartments

3.7(3)

Limited review data shows sharp contrast: one renter praised the peaceful, modern feel and value, but another reported months-long mold issues, roof leaks, and slow repairs despite management change. Health impact noted.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
The Aspen Apartments
#274
39 low data

The Aspen Apartments

2.7(74)✓ Google-verified

Aspen sits well below the townhome-style average (2.7 vs. 3.93 stars). Maintenance response splits sharply: some praise quick action, but others report two-day delays on water floods and ignored roach infestations. Management turnover leaves residents divided. Office staff earn consistent praise from some tenants and complaints of rudeness and billing disputes from others. Safety issues (gunfire, physical threats, resident shooting) and unexplained utility charges dominate negative reviews. Most flagrant complaints cite pet control failures despite payment, unpredictable fee stacking, and refund delays up to four months.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Autumn Chase Apartments
#275
35 low data

Autumn Chase Apartments

3.2(56)

A mixed record: some tenants report attentive staff and timely fixes; many describe months-long repair delays, persistent roach problems, and sewage backups. Visitor parking fees ($3.25-$3.30 daily, $315 tow penalty) and frequent management changes underscore operational instability. Crime and noise complaints recur throughout. Newer reviews (past 2 years) are sparse and positive; the weight of detailed complaints is older but substantial.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Creekside Apartment Homes
#276
33 low data

Creekside Apartment Homes

No rating yet✓ Google-verified

Creekside offers studio through two-bedroom units across Fort Worth with pet-friendly policies and shared amenities including a fitness center, pool, and on-site laundry. Review data is limited, so prospective tenants should contact the property directly to verify current conditions and pricing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Park Terrace Apartment
#277
32 low data

Park Terrace Apartment

2.7(13)

Park Terrace shows significant dissatisfaction: 54% of reviews are one or two stars, with tenants citing poor communication, outdated apartments, and trash on grounds. Maintenance staff Steve is praised for responsiveness, but management and front-desk interactions are frequently described as disrespectful or dismissive.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Lakes of Williamsberg
#278
31 low data

Lakes of Williamsberg

3.4(5)✓ Google-verified

Reviews from nearly a decade ago describe litter left across the grounds with inconsistent staff cleanup. Safety history and housing assistance policies were concerns to past residents.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments

Last updated 2026-08-23