Townhome-Style Apartment Communities in Fort Worth, TX

Page 2 of 2: businesses ranked 101-182 of 182. Start from the top.

Venue at 8651 Apartments

#101

65

Venue at 8651 Apartments

3.8(524)✓ Google-verified

Venue at 8651 earns strong marks for maintenance staff who fix issues quickly and explain problems clearly, plus clean grounds and package lockers that reviewers value. However, serious concerns emerge around unresponsive management, delays in processing transfers and refunds, pest-infested move-in units, and surprise visitor parking charges and towing policies that left tenants frustrated.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Atlantic Station

#102

65

The Atlantic Station

3.8(329)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents and those greeted by the office team praise responsive staff and a well-maintained community with solid amenities and family events. However, recent concerns center on unprofessional phone support, undisclosed pest problems at move-in, slow appliance repairs, and amenities that don't work reliably, creating a gap between what's promised and what residents experience day-to-day.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Bottle House on Main

#103

65

Bottle House on Main

3.8(256)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews hinge on specific staff: Edgar handles maintenance repairs quickly, Tristun and Gigi excel at tours, and Kaleigh runs operations smoothly. One-star reviews expose the flip side: front desk communication fails, hallways and elevators look neglected, pool and gym upkeep slip, and residents report vehicle vandalism and disputes over towing. Staff inconsistency appears to be the fault line. Where a skilled leasing agent or maintenance member steps in, people feel heard and cared for. Without that personal touch, the same complex feels unresponsive and dirty. Location near downtown and amenities impress; follow-through on cleanliness and security does not.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Southern Oaks Apartments

#104

65

Southern Oaks Apartments

3.9(130)✓ Google-verified

Brenda and Norma in the office set Southern Oaks apart with genuine care and patience through the leasing process. Glenn Jones and the maintenance team handle repairs quickly and professionally. But the complex struggles with serious gaps: recent residents report mice in walls, mold odor, pest control marked complete when untreated, and frustration over pet policy disclosure and post-move billing disputes. Location near shopping is a draw, and many find it quiet for a city complex. Long-term residents praise the family feel and how staff know tenants by name. New arrivals, though, sometimes encounter uninhabitable conditions on move-in and hit walls when asking for lease releases. The split between five-star praise for staff and one-star warnings about hidden problems suggests experience varies sharply by unit and timing.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Flats on Mill

#105

63

Flats on Mill

3.7(229)✓ Google-verified

Flats on Mill splits sharply between residents who praise responsive staff (especially leasing agent Janneth) and fast maintenance, and those who report cockroaches, safety issues, and surprise fees that spike after ownership changes. Repairs arrive within hours or a day when things work, but communication breakdowns and unexplained lock-outs mar the experience for frustrated tenants. The bark park stays stocked, and some residents enjoy quiet sections with good neighbors. Yet pest control monthly charges do not guarantee service visits, and amenities like the pool have sat unused for years. New management appears to be turning the ship, but older complaints about fees and bugs linger.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Hulen Park Place Townhomes

#106

63

Hulen Park Place Townhomes

3.8(103)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the residents report exceptional care from management (especially Nicole) and quick maintenance, citing clean spaces and a welcoming vibe. The other half describe chronic leaks, locked office doors during business hours, slow or ignored repair requests, and interactions with the same manager that feel dismissive or hostile, ranging from hang-ups during emergencies to perceived unfair treatment. Management credibility splits sharply on this point: several five-star reviews credit Nicole with professionalism and hard work; multiple one-star reviews call her unorganized, unwelcoming, and unavailable. Flooding recurs as a maintenance failure. Parking policy changes (free to reserved) drew frustration. Review recency and edit history suggest ongoing tension rather than resolution.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Historic Electric Building Apartments

#107

62

Historic Electric Building Apartments

3.9(113)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Front-facing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and some residents describe year-long stays as positive. The building's location in historic Sundance Square remains an asset for those who value downtown living. Infrastructure problems dominate resident complaints: two of three elevators frequently offline for weeks, creating hazardous conditions for upper-floor tenants carrying belongings downstairs. Water outages, smoking despite no-smoking policies, thin sound insulation between units, trash overflow, and repeated utility billing errors point to systemic maintenance and management gaps that offset good staff interactions.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Paloma Village

#108

60

Paloma Village

3.8(56)✓ Google-verified

Half the reviews praise the modern finishes, welcoming staff (especially Madison and Leslie), and quick maintenance. The other half report severe soundproofing gaps and dispute aggressive move-out charges for normal wear and tear, including fridge door discoloration and carpet cleaning costs. Management enforces tenant fees tightly but overlooks violations: unregistered dog breeds, pet waste throughout grounds, smoking indoors, and non-resident amenity use. Several residents cite safety lapses, including a protruding nail that required medical attention and mushrooms in the dog park.

Senior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

The Stella

#109

63

The Stella

3.7(211)✓ Google-verified

Staff turnover in recent months improved the experience, with newer management (Ashley, Brenda, Tresh) earning consistent praise for responsiveness and care. However, long-standing operational problems persist: multiple residents report systematic billing errors, overcharges they had to catch themselves, and move-out fees charged despite miscommunication from the office. Safety is a critical concern repeated across recent reviews, with residents documenting frequent police activity for overdoses, open drug use on common grounds, and homeless people at night. Move-in conditions were poor enough several residents photographed damage and filth; pest problems and cigarette odor have made units uncomfortable for families. Maintenance crew responds quickly and professionally. The office staff under new management are friendly and helpful with lease questions. Yet billing remains chaotic, move-out procedures unclear, and the neighborhood environment at portions of the complex is unsafe enough that residents felt they could not walk alone or recommend the property despite appreciating the staff. The gap between what residents were charged and what they received is the core frustration.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Carmel Creekside Apartments

#110

63

Carmel Creekside Apartments

3.7(347)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the location, cleanliness, and handful of exceptional staff members like Paige, who genuinely help tenants navigate issues. However, a persistent pattern emerges: AC units fail monthly and go weeks unrepaired, management ignores escalations, roof leaks are left unchecked, noise complaints bring no resolution, and residents report safety incidents including shootings. Multiple tenants cite hidden fees that push actual rent far above advertised rates. The leasing office makes strong first impressions with friendly application help, but maintenance responses become minimal once you move in. Repairs either drag on indefinitely or contractors do poor work. Several long-term residents who loved the community at first eventually left due to compounded maintenance failures and management's refusal to treat concerns seriously.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Rise Spring Pointe

#111

63

Rise Spring Pointe

3.7(221)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Dee, Natasha, Christina, Allen, and Harold earn consistent praise for speed and kindness during leasing and maintenance. Units arrive clean with washers and dryers included. Move-in approvals happen fast. Long-term residents report years of neglect: heat outages during winter with young children, broken kitchen fixtures, ceiling leaks, hot-water failures, pests, stolen car wheels, towing disputes, and parking sign delays. Management denies responsibility and refuses refunds. Security gate failures permitted crime, including an elderly resident's murder. The gap between welcoming initial service and absent follow-through defines the experience.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Mylo Apartment Homes

#112

61

Mylo Apartment Homes

3.6(439)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Nancy, Susan, Kyle, and Jason earn consistent praise for friendliness and quick service, especially during move-in and maintenance calls. However, residents report severe pest problems, unresolved AC and water damage, ignored maintenance requests, and poor trash pickup, with some families leaving after short stays due to heat and bug infestations. The welcome experience masks a pattern once you move in: work orders sit, pest control visits don't happen despite scheduled spraying, and management responses range from dismissive to accusatory. For families needing reliable upkeep and pest control, the gaps between promised service and delivery are significant.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Sansom Ridge Apartments

#113

62

Sansom Ridge Apartments

4.1(47)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Rosetta, Bren'Sha, Sabrina, and Lisa earn consistent praise for friendliness and genuine helpfulness. The property offers spacious units, a food pantry, community events, and quiet grounds at an affordable price. However, residents report serious maintenance gaps: roach infestations staff cannot control, trash accumulation, package theft from unlocked office storage, and parking lot safety concerns (unsupervised children, car break-ins, towing company damage). Office management has been unresponsive to payment questions and resident concerns.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Maxwell Apartments

#114

60

Maxwell Apartments

3.6(342)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing and management staff, especially Alice and Veronica, earn consistent praise for patience and professionalism. However, maintenance response times have declined significantly under new leadership. Residents report week-long waits for repairs, repeated AC failures, and unresolved issues like malfunctioning gates and pest problems. Move-in experience is typically smooth, but post-move conflicts over deposits and fees (especially involving the AI chatbot) have escalated disputes. The complex's physical appearance draws approval when maintained, yet critical systems like cooling and emergency contact lines frequently fail. Those relocating for work value the location near Stockyards and Sundance Square; families should weigh maintenance reliability against the competitive leasing team.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Tides at Eastchase

#115

59

Tides at Eastchase

3.0(292)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise staff warmth and the property's spacious layouts, but recent reviews reveal a breakdown in essential services. AC failures have left dozens without cooling for weeks, repair requests go unanswered, the maintenance team is drastically understaffed, and management responses range from unavailable to evasive. Common area cleanliness is noted, yet pet waste management and pest control remain persistent frustrations despite repeated complaints. The complex has cycled through multiple management companies and staffing changes. When dedicated property managers like Aide Aguilar, Andrea Smith, or Diamond Torres are present, residents report genuine responsiveness and quick email replies. However, these bright spots sit against a pattern of deferred maintenance, broken communication, and a gap between what management claims it can do (like providing portable AC) and what it actually delivers.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Residences at Eastland

#116

62 low data

Residences at Eastland

3.7(115)✓ Google-verified

Management quality varies sharply. When engaged, property managers like Andria earn strong praise for attentiveness. However, staffing gaps, slow maintenance response, and selective rule enforcement undermine trust. Location and cleanliness are noted positives.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Monticello Crossroads

#117

59

Monticello Crossroads

3.6(146)✓ Google-verified

New management has won over some residents with responsive service and visible improvements, but chronic maintenance failures and poor communication undermine trust. Air conditioning repairs drag for months while residents pay full rent for amenities that sit unused; office hours go unstaffed and emails go unanswered. Recent leasing managers Johan and Roger earn consistent praise, yet the gap between their helpfulness and the maintenance team's slowness has left multiple residents filing complaints with Texas authorities.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Burnett Lofts

#118

60

Burnett Lofts

3.6(117)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Burnett Lofts holds a 3.6 rating across 117 Google reviews. A detailed sentiment read was not produced on this pass, so the placement rests on rating consistency and volume.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

McCart Apartments

#119

61

McCart Apartments

3.9(71)✓ Google-verified

Audrey's attentiveness and quick lease processing earn consistent praise, but persistent water damage, plumbing issues, and slow maintenance repairs dominate complaints. Many residents report outdated fixtures, visible mold, and pest problems. The gap between website photos and actual unit condition frustrates long-term renters, and management allegedly charges move-out fees for pre-existing damage.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Axis Waterfront

#120

59

Axis Waterfront

3.0(306)✓ Google-verified

The leasing office staff, especially Henry and Trenna, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and fast approvals, making the rental process smooth for relocating families. Behind that friendly front sits a complex with persistent maintenance failures: roaches and gnats in units, weekly water outages, aging electrical systems, and management that ignores concerns or resists early lease termination despite serious safety issues. Maintenance problems appear intermittent rather than universal, but when they occur, complaints about unresponsive management and billing disputes dominate. Residents report staying years when satisfied, and pet owners appreciate the dog amenities. Long-term renewals suggest the community works for some, while others describe their experience as unsafe and unmanageable.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Evergreen at Hulen Bend

#121

61

Evergreen at Hulen Bend

3.9(63)✓ Google-verified

Evergreen has a committed core of long-term residents who praise the grounds, location, and when management is stable, the friendliness of staff like Ms. Clemons and earlier maintenance teams. However, recent management changes have triggered departures, with multiple seniors reporting slow work order completion, hallway sanitation issues (pet waste, mold from leaks), harsh enforcement of parking violations, and deposit disputes that left residents feeling disrespected rather than cared for. The property struggles with consistency. Good maintenance staff and responsive management earn five-star ratings; poor communication, staff turnover, and health concerns in common areas drive one- and two-star reviews. Senior residents especially cite feeling dismissed when their requests go unanswered or when management lacks empathy during medical crises.

Senior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Cobble Hill

#122

59

Cobble Hill

3.5(126)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the reviews are enthusiastic; the other half report serious problems. Recent arrivals and visitors praise the new manager Devin and staff member Kellie, clean spaces, and fair pricing around $875 monthly. But long-term residents describe years of roach infestations, slow pest control responses, and office staff (particularly Lori) who ignore maintenance requests and don't answer calls. A few moved to different buildings and still faced infestations. Communication breakdowns extend to canceling tours without notice and denying refundable application fees. For affordability and pets, this complex works. The grounds have improved under new management. But verify pest control thoroughly before signing a lease, especially for units toward the back of the property. Ask for a pre-move inspection and get promises about pest treatment in writing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Landry at Cross Creek

#123

61

Landry at Cross Creek

3.7(110)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise the spacious units and staff warmth (Abby, Kayla, and Kaedee named repeatedly as patient and helpful), with some noting fair deposit refunds and reliable maintenance. The property loses points sharply on noise: multiple reviewers report constant sound from above and ineffective complaint resolution, with management's standard fix being a move to a higher floor rather than addressing the noise source. Thin walls and cheap construction appear structural, not fixable after move-in. Lease-end frustrations center on vague damage charges and the trash fee policy. One reviewer paid for carpet work after providing photos showing only normal wear; another resents a $25-per-bag surcharge despite overflowing bins. Staff communication on non-basic issues reads as dismissive in several accounts. The 3.7 rating reflects a genuine split: families and professionals who value staff attentiveness rate it highly; noise-sensitive residents or those with move-out disputes leave one stars.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Everly Plaza

#124

61 low data

Everly Plaza

4.5(16)✓ Google-verified

Most recent reviews (2-4 years old) praise the quiet, clean setting and manager Tammy's welcoming approach. A one-star review from two months ago reports serious issues: bedbug infestation, trespassing, drug activity, theft of medication packages, and disruptive neighbors. The reviewer notes staff did little to address these problems.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

HomeTowne At Matador Ranch

#125

61 low data

HomeTowne At Matador Ranch

4.0(69)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report good office service and a calm, safe setting. However, maintenance delays and unwanted children in a seniors-focused community undercut the experience for some. Security and emergency access issues also surface in complaints.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments

#126

59

Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments

4.1(20)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the prime downtown location near parks and restaurants, clean units, and responsive named staff like Camryn and maintenance crew Willie and Ramon. The biggest tensions emerge around the no-elevator design (blocking accessibility for mobility-limited renters), inadequate parking, train noise, and serious billing disputes at move-out. The property works best for young professionals and dog owners who prioritize walkability over amenities and frills.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Dylan

#127

61

The Dylan

3.6(107)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Dylan delivers a modern, well-maintained community with responsive staff and a convenient location near shops and restaurants. Hidden costs pile up quickly: residents report base rents of $1,200-$1,600 plus $25-$125 monthly add-ons for parking, trash, and pets, and towing fees exceed $300 if you park without a reserved spot after 9 pm.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Sansom Bluff Apartments

#128

60

Sansom Bluff Apartments

3.5(198)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sansom Bluff offers spacious apartments with good amenities and standout maintenance and activities staff. However, the leasing office consistently fails to answer phones or provide welcoming service, and management shows dismissive attitudes once residents move in. The property itself appeals to pet owners and families, but office staff turnover has left frustrated residents who feel unwelcome when they need help.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Decker Apartment Homes

#129

58

Decker Apartment Homes

3.7(274)✓ Google-verified

Eight years in and fresh arrivals alike report the same core failures: calls and emails go unanswered, water shuts down without notice, and pest control stalls while damage spreads. The move-in team impresses, and maintenance responds quickly when they can, but systemic issues around communication, infrastructure (flooded parking lot, broken gates), and neighborhood safety consistently override that initial goodwill. Residents describe being nickeled and dimed for utilities they cannot reliably access, then abandoned by management once the lease term winds down.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

#130

59

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(114)✓ Google-verified

Slate has split sharply along a management change: since March 2026, tenants praise responsive staff (especially Meshun Davis), active renovations, and the reopened pool. Before that shift, residents faced pest problems, mold, poor communication, and unresolved maintenance issues. The location near Fort Worth groceries and highways and cleaning standards are strengths when managed well. New tenants report smooth leasing tours; long-term residents from the pre-2026 era warn against the property entirely.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Sansom Pointe Senior

#131

60

Sansom Pointe Senior

3.7(99)✓ Google-verified

Sansom Pointe Senior draws residents with low rent and daily activities, but living here means battling roaches, broken elevators, and smoke drifting from neighboring units despite the advertised non-smoking policy. Management largely ignores complaints; while event coordinator Sabrina earns consistent praise, the office itself stays behind closed doors and fails to address the core maintenance and pest control issues that have pushed many residents out within months.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Ridgmar Oaks

#132

60

Ridgmar Oaks

3.9(38)✓ Google-verified

Ridgmar Oaks draws strong praise for spacious layouts and responsive leasing staff like Lisa and Viviana, yet reviews highlight a troubling gap between front-office service and property maintenance. Multiple residents report months-long AC outages, roach problems, rodent issues, and deteriorating conditions that management addresses slowly or patches rather than fixes. Tenant experiences improve markedly when dedicated staff handle cases, but the underlying maintenance shortfalls remain a significant concern for long-term residents.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Haven at Chisholm Trail

#133

59

The Haven at Chisholm Trail

3.4(461)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Haven offers helpful staff and amenities near shopping and medical services, but residents consistently report frustration with office communication: calls go unanswered, promises repeat without follow-through, and work orders languish. Maintenance teams deliver when reached, yet safety concerns and neighbor complaints have required management escalation and, in at least one case, tenant departure.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Sovereign

#134

59

The Sovereign

3.4(318)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff like Nataly and Faith receive consistent praise for speed and transparency, and some residents describe quiet apartments in a convenient location. However, grounds maintenance has deteriorated sharply. Reviewers document grass uncut for months, trash sitting for weeks, roach infestations that survive repeated treatments, bird and dog waste piling up, and shattered glass on walking paths. Maintenance requests vanish into silence; one resident waited two weeks for a kitchen sink repair and months for promised pressure washing. Move-in walkthroughs are skipped, opening residents to disputed damage charges at move-out. Staff turnover is severe (15 managers and 30+ maintenance workers cited in one review), and corporate reportedly blocks repairs. Some residents report unfair fees for trash violations on top of existing fees, and one applicant paid $375 in application fees before being told mid-process that only a social security number-not a Mexican passport-was acceptable, with no refund issued.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Dylan Apartments

#135

59

Dylan Apartments

3.3(215)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong five-star reviews praise responsive maintenance (Andres, staff noticed dishwasher leak), welcoming leasing agents (Celia, Maria, Claudia), and a calm, quiet setting. However, repeated one-star complaints document widespread roach problems in units, spoiled food, and wires damaged by pests. Management reportedly becomes hostile when questioned; promised amenities like the pool stay closed. The rating split (52% five-star, 39% one/two-star) reflects two very different tenant experiences.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Reserve at Quebec

#136

59

Reserve at Quebec

3.0(209)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star reviews highlight a maintenance team that shows up fast and treats residents well, especially Tony and Luis who earn repeated praise. Residents who stay long-term describe a quiet, family-friendly place with attentive staff. However, a parallel stream of one-star complaints focuses on months-long repair delays, failed emergency calls (sewage backups left unresolved), unresponsive management after promises are made, and a recent billing scare where a resident faced collection action after her lease ended. The split is stark: those praising the community and maintenance crew versus those trapped in repair limbo with indifferent office staff. Property remains affordable and pet-friendly, but the gap between maintenance responsiveness and office follow-through creates a lottery feel. Families and seniors considering this location should ask specifically about AC and emergency repair timelines before signing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Horizons at Sunridge

#137

59

Horizons at Sunridge

3.0(203)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the reviews are five-star, often highlighting maintenance staff like Juan Hernandez and office team members who handle requests quickly. The other half describe delayed repairs (10 days for door fixes), constant roach infestations despite weekly spraying, thin doors that don't close, mold on window sealant, and management resistance to resident complaints or unit transfers. Long-time residents report paying multiple rent increases before finally getting breaks. The office and management seem disconnected from property upkeep complaints. Amenities like the pool, dog park, screened patios, and fitness center draw praise when accessible. Several residents note the community feels quiet and family-friendly when maintenance keeps pace. But the stark divide suggests experience depends heavily on how quickly the maintenance team responds and whether management follows through on building repairs versus cosmetic fixes.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Stallion Pointe Apartments

#138

59

Stallion Pointe Apartments

3.5(148)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Casey Williams and Sabrena Butler earn strong praise for genuine care, running food pantries, organizing community events, and helping residents navigate life challenges. Yet serious complaints about broken A/C units in summer heat, mold exposure, and slow maintenance response suggest the care stops at the office door. The gap between five-star experiences and damaging one-star accounts reveals two Stallion Pointe realities. Families with young children find real community support here. Renters facing unit problems find themselves fighting the building alone, sometimes considering legal action. The business's claims of energy-efficient appliances ring hollow when A/C fails at 83 degrees indoors.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Highland Park Apartments

#139

59

Highland Park Apartments

3.6(91)✓ Google-verified

Highland Park's leasing team, especially Daisy and Kenda, earns consistent praise for patience and knowledge. Maintenance and property management divide opinion sharply: some residents report timely fixes and friendly responses; others faced months of ignored requests, pest problems, and water damage. The quiet location near Clearfork appeals to renters, but the aging buildings and wear require realistic expectations.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Handley Oaks Apartments

#140

59

Handley Oaks Apartments

4.0(59)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers split sharply on Handley Oaks. Many praise the office staff (particularly Norma and Lupita) for helpfulness, the quiet grounds, and the clean remodeled units on move-in. However, a persistent minority report serious roach infestations that management fails to remedy, alongside complaints of rent overcharging, inadequate pest control, and staff becoming unresponsive once leases are signed. The property appears well-maintained when working, but pest issues are a deal-breaker for some.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

#141

57

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

3.4(149)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sandshell divides sharply. Those staying long-term praise the quiet grounds, pool events, and genuinely helpful staff members like Hailey and Garrett. But newer residents hit a wall fast: cockroaches carpet the laundromat, mice run across floors, ants infest bathrooms, and mold hangs in the air. Water cuts off for hours without warning, parking enforcement tows cars at 1 a.m. with no advance notice, and move-out inspections generate five-figure damage charges that reviewers say don't match photos they took. The complex bills itself as luxury on its website, but reviews describe it as poorly maintained, aging apartments sold at premium prices. One long-term resident's later review warns that management uses move-out inspections to retain deposits aggressively. Multiple reviewers mention switching to nearby alternatives like The Hadley because pest and infrastructure problems go unresolved for weeks or months.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Life at Westland Estates

#142

59

The Life at Westland Estates

3.4(191)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members Natisha and Amanda earn consistent praise for going beyond typical leasing help, moving tenants in smoothly, and arranging fast maintenance. The maintenance team responds quickly to reported issues. However, a smaller group of residents report roach infestations in units, unleashed dogs creating safety problems, and grounds left unclean. Pest entry through drains and chimneys went unresolved in some cases. Gym access limited to office hours leaves working residents unable to use the advertised on-site facility. Parking lot speeding and package theft were also mentioned. The complex appears split: those with responsive staff have stayed happy; those facing pest and safety issues found management unresponsive to complaints.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Carmen Apartments

#143

59

The Carmen Apartments

2.7(190)✓ Google-verified

Tenants split sharply on The Carmen. Loyal residents praise named staff like Menshayla and maintenance crews who respond quickly and treat people well; some have lived here over a decade. But newer or shorter-stay residents report months-long waits on critical repairs, unresolved pest and mold issues despite paying for services, and a front office that often doesn't answer. One tenant left while pregnant due to unaddressed apartment problems; another notes water shut-offs without refunds and accessibility barriers for wheelchairs.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Nolan

#144

56

The Nolan

2.9(73)✓ Google-verified

New management has turned the property around with visible improvements to lighting, landscaping, and maintenance, earning praise for their responsiveness and willingness to work with tenants. However, the complex still struggles with inconsistent office staffing, pest control, plumbing leaks during rain, and poor grounds upkeep that reviewers describe as longstanding and unresolved.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Aden Crest Apartments

#145

58

Aden Crest Apartments

3.4(145)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents experience a quiet community but struggle with inconsistent enforcement of policies and maintenance gaps. Staff friendliness varies widely-some praise specific managers and maintenance workers, while others report unresolved issues like ceiling leaks, water outages, and mold that persisted for months or years despite work orders.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Sunset Pointe Apartments

#146

58

Sunset Pointe Apartments

3.3(208)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews praise staff by name (Becky, Beverly) and report pleasant stays; longer residents recall good years before 2023. One-star reviews detail years of ignored maintenance requests, unresolved plumbing failures, pest infestations they were charged to treat, mystery cable billing, and management that avoids accountability. Some five-star reviewers acknowledge the mixed picture but credit staff effort for improvements. The gap mirrors the rating spread itself: enthusiastic five-stars versus deeply frustrated long-term tenants who report management declining since late 2023, inconsistent maintenance response, and charges for repairs typically the landlord's duty. Responsiveness varies dramatically by staff member.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Morningside Apartments

#147

58

Morningside Apartments

3.6(65)✓ Google-verified

Management and leasing staff, especially Maria and Juan, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and problem-solving. Recent administrative changes have notably improved resident satisfaction and maintenance responsiveness. However, recurring complaints center on aging infrastructure: pest problems, mold, leaks, and slow fixes on critical systems like heating. Some residents report year-long repair waits. The gap between enthusiastic recent reviews and older complaints suggests either real improvements underway or inconsistent execution across different maintenance issues and timeframes.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Estrella at Seminary Apartments

#148

58

Estrella at Seminary Apartments

3.6(91)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents report a stark divide in experience. Tenants praise office staff members Patricia and Ana as attentive and kind, and maintenance worker Pedro as efficient and respectful. However, the majority of recent complaints center on deferred maintenance, pest infestations, water damage, and mold that persist despite repeated work orders. Some tenants feel management responds inconsistently, with better service for certain residents while others report dismissal, poor communication, and substandard unit conditions for the price. The complex offers bilingual support and a quiet atmosphere, but structural and sanitation issues dominate negative reviews. One recent tenant with a young child reported roach infestation, bird and insect entry, a hole left unrepaired after plumbing work, and inadequate heating. Multiple residents describe fighting for months to resolve basic problems, and one mentioned hiring an attorney over mold and health concerns.

Student HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Chalk Gardens

#149

58 low data

Chalk Gardens

4.8(6)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents praise the leasing and maintenance teams by name, noting smooth application processes and quick repairs. Suilma and Lili earn specific credit for accessibility and problem-solving; the AC technician impressed with speed and efficiency.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Celine

#150

58

The Celine

2.7(224)✓ Google-verified

Staff warmth and apartment size draw people in; five-star reviewers praise named team members like Selena, Crystal, and Lauren for attentiveness and quick responses. The darker side emerges quickly: residents report unbearable summer heat with blocked AC requests, move-in units crawling with roaches and stripped of water, maintenance tickets logged but never completed, and a pattern of hidden fees stacking advertised rent to nearly 20% higher. Security failures (car break-ins, improper towing) and withheld deposits pile onto the frustration. Recent management changes hint at systemic turnover. Some residents who stick it out a year report positive experiences; others flee before their lease ends or pursue legal action. The split between five-star and one/two-star reviews (40% vs 55%) reflects this divide: you either hit responsive management and avoid major repairs, or you land in a unit needing work that never materializes and a lease office that ghosts you.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Tides on Avril

#151

57

Tides on Avril

3.5(247)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the reviews are five-star praise for office staff like Taliza, Bibiana, and Felicia, and fast maintenance responses. The other half report serious problems: cockroach infestations across units despite multiple fumigations, black mold in bathrooms and vents, clogged sewage lines, holes in the dog park fence, a non-functional pool, and a laundry room too expensive to use. Management ignores repair requests and disputed charges. Move-in is especially problematic. Residents are not allowed to inspect units beforehand, then arrive to find conditions far worse than advertised models. Deposits take months to return after repeated calls to multiple staff members. Charges rise without clear explanation. One reviewer paid $789 for a one-bedroom and saw it climb to $1,200, while another's bill jumped from $1,276 to $1,475.50. Staff deny residents pay for amenities even as rent statements show "service and facilities charges."

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Silversage Point at Western Center

#152

57

Silversage Point at Western Center

3.3(108)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Recent tenants and prospective renters praise staff warmth and quick repairs under strong management, but many long-term residents report chronic failures: leaks go unfixed for months, roaches persist despite complaints, and management changes so often that follow-up work stops. The property appears livable under stable leadership but unstable when the office turnover returns.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Patriot Pointe Apartments

#153

57

Patriot Pointe Apartments

3.1(121)✓ Google-verified

The property draws strong praise for apartment size, layout, and amenities, with select staff members earning deep loyalty for professionalism and genuine care. Management responsiveness and maintenance speed fail repeatedly: mold sits untreated for weeks, pest control remains ineffective, and calls often go unanswered. High turnover in office staff mirrors tenant departure rates. While some residents thrive in the community, others face deteriorating grounds, noisy neighbors, and unresolved maintenance claims despite full rent charges. Standout employees like Daishuntane and Clemente drive positive experiences, but their impact cannot offset systemic gaps. The property's mixed-income model, proximity to Fort Worth Veterans Affairs and Tarrant County College, and amenities (pool, fitness center, game room) appeal on paper, yet execution wavers sharply between periods of good stewardship and visible decline.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Babers Manor

#154

56 low data

Babers Manor

5.0(2)✓ Google-verified

One applicant expressed enthusiasm about the application process and anticipation of moving in, though evidence is limited from a single recent review.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Tides on Hulen

#155

53

Tides on Hulen

3.0(195)✓ Google-verified

The leasing team at Tides on Hulen draws genuine praise for accessibility and helpfulness, but the property itself is plagued by unresolved maintenance failures that persist for months. Residents report no hot water for extended periods, broken toilets and doors, and management that either avoids the phone or becomes dismissive when contacted. Security deposits vanish after move-out, and the gap between what the marketing promises (furnished, well-maintained) and what residents live through is stark enough that even loyal long-term tenants leave frustrated and uncompensated.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Columbia Renaissance Square

#156

56 low data

Columbia Renaissance Square

3.4(45)✓ Google-verified

Residents report standout staff members who respond quickly and organize weekly events, but persistent pest problems, thin walls that carry neighbor noise, and inconsistent maintenance undercut the experience. Some praise the move-in condition and fitness amenities; others cite unprepared temp workers and a six-year decline in upkeep.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Vega Place Apartments

#157

56 low data

Vega Place Apartments

3.8(12)✓ Google-verified

Older reviews highlight a welcoming community with a duck pond and attentive former management, but recent posts describe neglected grounds since a manager departed. Serious historical complaints include safety gaps, unannounced apartment entries, and selective pet policy enforcement; grounds upkeep remains the most current concern.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Gardens At Cobb Park

#158

55 low data

Gardens At Cobb Park

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Gardens at Cobb Park draws praise from residents who value its peaceful setting and friendly staff, particularly assistant manager Huseni. However, significant complaints span unresponsive office communication, serious security issues, and documented pest infestations that management has not resolved. Limited recent activity makes current conditions unclear.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Westmount at River Park Apartments

#159

53

Westmount at River Park Apartments

3.4(218)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Westmount at River Park is split sharply between strong praise for leasing staff and deep frustration with management, maintenance, and condition. Long-term residents cite repeated turnover in management, inconsistent policies, unresponsive offices, hidden fees that weren't refunded, and deteriorating units. The pool has stayed closed for months despite being a resident priority, the workout room smells bad, and in-unit amenities like washers and hot water fail or were never installed as promised. Staff at the leasing desk earn consistent five-star reviews for helpfulness. Those staying report feeling safe but exhausted by the complex's rigid policies and slow repairs. The business advertises one- and two-bedroom options with pet services, a fitness center, and coffee bar. Their website lists special move-in offers. In practice, reviewers say move-in deals go unpaid, parking is heavily restricted, and maintenance requests languish. One tenant with strong payment history faced eviction proceedings after requesting a single payment delay. Newer residents sometimes report good initial experiences; longer-term occupants describe escalating frustration with unresponsive management and inability to reach named staff like Brittany.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

#160

54

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

3.1(423)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Amanda and Arthur shine during leasing, but the property itself struggles badly. Reviewers report months-long AC outages, non-functioning laundry, roach infestations, water damage, broken amenities, and pavement with large holes. Management does not respond to complaints or code violations, and tenants describe unit conditions so poor they postponed move-ins. One five-star reviewer praised Eric in maintenance for fixing multiple issues in a single visit, yet others say maintenance walks around smoking instead of addressing requests. The gap between leasing experience and living experience is stark. Tenants across multiple reviews mention feeling trapped: unprepared units, delayed move-ins, eviction notices despite rent credits for unlivable conditions, and corporate silence. This complex carries serious red flags for anyone without a strong alternative.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Sorrento

#161

54

Sorrento

3.4(421)✓ Google-verified

Sorrento divides sharply between residents who connect with front-office staff and those battling months-long maintenance failures. Since BH Living took over management, most reviewers report AC breakdowns lasting weeks in Texas summer heat, gates that stay broken, and maintenance requests answered only after tenants visit the office in person or contact the city. Staff turnover means floaters handle problems rather than permanent workers. One bright spot: individual leasing agents like Giia, Kaitlyn, Lily, and Lindsey earned praise for warmth and professionalism. But the complex as a whole fails tenants on its core responsibility-keeping the property safe and livable. Specific failures recur across reviews: a flooded kitchen sink that drains on its own, portable AC units that break immediately, gates non-functional for months, wheel theft with no usable security footage, and electric bills topping $600 monthly due to running backup cooling. Residents also report being charged for trash collection and threatened with $400 towing fees for unregistered guest vehicles. The shift from previous management (Knightvest and Greystar) triggered the decline. Multiple residents have contacted lawyers or the city. Those who have stayed praise the townhomes and amenities, but the cost is paid in stress and out-of-pocket fixes.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Lancaster Apartments

#162

54

Lancaster Apartments

2.9(70)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise maintenance technician Jaime for swift, thorough repairs and the office staff (including Abril) for friendliness. One complaint alleges discriminatory treatment in payment processing and language barriers. The wide rating split (40% five-star, 50% one/two-star) reflects a sharp divide: recent visitors describe efficient maintenance and a calm environment, while at least one reviewer felt excluded.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Leuda May Apartments

#163

54

Leuda May Apartments

3.9(20)✓ Google-verified

Recent management changes have improved day-to-day responsiveness, with tenants praising staff like Donya and Holly for quick action on repairs and accessible communication. However, billing disputes persist, roach infestations in some units went unaddressed for months, and the property's history of frequent management turnover has left some residents uncertain about long-term reliability.

Furnished & Corporate HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Hulen Heights Apartments

#164

53 low data

Hulen Heights Apartments

3.7(30)

Strong long-term residents and manager Diane's attention earn consistent five-star praise, but office availability complaints and a serious discrimination allegation split opinion sharply. Older units with wear show; location near Central Market is a draw for most.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Residences of Diamond Hill

#165

53

The Residences of Diamond Hill

2.5(145)✓ Google-verified

Severe maintenance and pest issues dominate resident feedback, with tenants reporting cockroaches, ants, and spiders in newly-painted units alongside unprompted move-in claims. Staff responsiveness is a consistent friction point: applications get lost, maintenance tickets close without work completed, AC failures go unresolved, and communication from the office is sparse or nonexistent. A handful of five-star reviews praise the community's safety for families and mention helpful staff members, but these stand against a sea of complaints spanning years.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Hayes Apartments

#166

53

The Hayes Apartments

3.1(117)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report chronic maintenance failures that persist for months without resolution: air conditioning that doesn't cool, ceilings that leak when it rains, dishwashers that break repeatedly, and pest infestations including roaches and rats. Leasing staff like Timira Jackson receive praise for patience and helpfulness during sign-up, but once tenants move in, repeated maintenance requests go unfilled, calls go unanswered, and management responds defensively when problems are raised. Multiple residents describe being told repair timeframes are uncertain, having completed requests marked as resolved without actual fixes, and facing threats of eviction rather than assistance. A few positive reviews note recent staff improvements, but the overwhelming pattern is that The Hayes does not address serious habitability issues. The gap between the leasing experience and the reality after move-in appears stark. Reviewers cite pest problems worsening, water damage going untreated, and utilities being overcharged, yet report that management either deflects blame or avoids contact. One resident documented an eight-month sequence of repeated AC failures, flooding from HVAC units, laundry machines breaking at each use, and repeated service calls that failed to fix the issue. Staff conduct is also cited as unprofessional: aggressive door knocking, throwing away residents' belongings without notice, reckless driving through the complex, and one report of a maintenance worker cussing at a guest.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Crestwood Place Apartments

#167

53

Crestwood Place Apartments

3.5(84)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents describe steady decline under current management, with broken amenities (laundry, gym access), delayed repairs (AC took a month; washers out for months), and inconsistent enforcement. While some staff members earn praise for kindness, the complex feels neglected overall, with office hours severely limited and tenant complaints routinely ignored. Management changes frequently, and residents report paying for amenities they cannot access.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Premier Gardens Apartments

#168

53 low data

Premier Gardens Apartments

3.8(6)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise affordable rents for the Cultural District location and recent maintenance improvements, but communication remains a sore spot and some units suffer from heat inefficiency and water infiltration during heavy rain. The property offers spacious townhome-style flats with patios, though older finishes and infrastructure limits appeal.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Springs

#169

51

The Springs

2.8(121)✓ Google-verified

The Springs has deteriorated significantly. Residents report mold in walls and vents, roaches, rats, and possums throughout units. Maintenance is slow or nonexistent; water damage goes unfixed for months. Office staff are described as rude and unresponsive. A few past staff members earned praise, but recent management changes have worsened communication and responsiveness. The complex faces structural failures, squatters in vacant units, and potential closure.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

The Moderne

#170

51

The Moderne

3.2(24)✓ Google-verified

The Moderne shows a sharp divide between newer and older tenant experiences. Recent five-star reviews praise the updated management team (especially Sydnee), responsive service requests, and the West 7th location near dining and shops. However, older reviews paint a troubling picture of move-in disasters (mold, filthy units), neglected grounds, security breaches, and management indifference. The property allegedly operates Airbnbs alongside permanent housing, creating noise and property damage. Tenants report illegal insurance charges and unfair lease-blocking after maintenance issues.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

#171

49

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

2.6(72)✓ Google-verified

Most tenants describe a complex in serious disrepair where basic requests go unaddressed for months, management ignores legal notices, and residents resort to court action to force compliance. Staff turnover is constant, billing is unreliable, and pests (roaches, beetles) persist despite cleaned units. A handful reported helpful staff, but systemic issues dominate the experience.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Madeleine

#172

50

The Madeleine

2.9(99)✓ Google-verified

The Madeleine shows a sharp divide: residents praise individual staff members like maintenance workers Dwayne and James for their attentiveness, yet describe the property overall as declining rapidly with trash, parking chaos, and water cuts. Management ignores neighbor complaints and allows conditions to deteriorate, leaving long-term residents frustrated. Several residents report untreated pest problems, broken AC systems, and unfinished repairs stretching months. A parent documents moisture and likely mold in HVAC vents affecting a baby's health. Hidden fees appear regularly on bills. Leasing office staff can be dismissive when responding to serious issues, though early-leasing staff like Tashyra and Cynthia earned praise for patience.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Buttercup Place Apartments

#173

50 low data

Buttercup Place Apartments

3.4(20)✓ Google-verified

Buttercup Place draws deeply committed residents, including those rebuilding from homelessness, who praise the community and staff support. Recent reviews flag ongoing pest issues, unresponsive phone lines, and safety concerns in shared spaces that undercut the positive foundation.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Times Square On the Hill

#174

50

Times Square On the Hill

2.9(45)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff-especially Jordan and Benitta-earn consistent praise for kindness and clear communication during move-in. Long-term residents report feeling safe and well-managed. However, newer complaints flag vehicle theft, parking headaches, and delayed fixes on water and maintenance issues, suggesting inconsistent upkeep.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Victoria Place Apartments

#175

50 low data

Victoria Place Apartments

3.0(38)✓ Google-verified

Victoria Place has recovered noticeably since new ownership took over several years ago. Residents praise the cleanliness, responsive management, and improved grounds. However, AC outages during hot months and lingering security concerns dampen satisfaction, and some find pricing steep.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Travis Gardens Apartments

#176

47 low data

Travis Gardens Apartments

3.1(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Travis Gardens divides sharply: recent five-star reviews credit strong management (Ms. Shonda, Christy), safety, and community feel. Older one-star reviews cite hostile management, pest problems, slow maintenance, parking chaos, and severe failures during family hardship and winter emergencies. Current state unclear; property appears to have cycled through different management eras with mixed results.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Wedgewood Apartment Homes

#177

43 low data

Wedgewood Apartment Homes

3.2(90)✓ Google-verified

Wedgewood has declined significantly over the past five years. Residents report chronic A/C breakdowns left unaddressed for months, widespread pest problems despite pest control fees, and plumbing failures. Recent reviews cite unresponsive management and rude staff; older positive reviews mention a technician named Juana and friendlier office practices that no longer appear to apply.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Fort 1901 Lofts & Apartments

#178

40 low data

Fort 1901 Lofts & Apartments

3.7(3)

Limited review data shows sharp contrast: one renter praised the peaceful, modern feel and value, but another reported months-long mold issues, roof leaks, and slow repairs despite management change. Health impact noted.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Aspen Apartments

#179

39 low data

The Aspen Apartments

2.7(74)✓ Google-verified

Aspen sits well below the townhome-style average (2.7 vs. 3.93 stars). Maintenance response splits sharply: some praise quick action, but others report two-day delays on water floods and ignored roach infestations. Management turnover leaves residents divided. Office staff earn consistent praise from some tenants and complaints of rudeness and billing disputes from others. Safety issues (gunfire, physical threats, resident shooting) and unexplained utility charges dominate negative reviews. Most flagrant complaints cite pet control failures despite payment, unpredictable fee stacking, and refund delays up to four months.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Autumn Chase Apartments

#180

35 low data

Autumn Chase Apartments

3.2(56)

A mixed record: some tenants report attentive staff and timely fixes; many describe months-long repair delays, persistent roach problems, and sewage backups. Visitor parking fees ($3.25-$3.30 daily, $315 tow penalty) and frequent management changes underscore operational instability. Crime and noise complaints recur throughout. Newer reviews (past 2 years) are sparse and positive; the weight of detailed complaints is older but substantial.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Creekside Apartment Homes

#181

33 low data

Creekside Apartment Homes

No rating yet✓ Google-verified

Creekside offers studio through two-bedroom units across Fort Worth with pet-friendly policies and shared amenities including a fitness center, pool, and on-site laundry. Review data is limited, so prospective tenants should contact the property directly to verify current conditions and pricing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Park Terrace Apartment

#182

32 low data

Park Terrace Apartment

2.7(13)

Park Terrace shows significant dissatisfaction: 54% of reviews are one or two stars, with tenants citing poor communication, outdated apartments, and trash on grounds. Maintenance staff Steve is praised for responsiveness, but management and front-desk interactions are frequently described as disrespectful or dismissive.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Last updated 2026-08-23