Fort Worth Apartment Reviews Guide
Menu

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities in Fort Worth, TX

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities in Greater Fort Worth

Townhome-style apartments split the difference between a house and a standard apartment building. Units are typically arranged in two or three story rows with private entrances, attached garages or reserved covered parking, and little to no shared hallway space. Many include a small patio or fenced yard, and some communities offer washer/dryer hookups or full-size units in-unit rather than a shared laundry room. Fort Worth has 231 communities in this style spread across areas like Alliance, Chisholm Trail, Near Southside, and the suburbs ringing Loop 820, so the mix of price, age, and finish level varies a lot block to block.

When comparing communities, walk the grounds if you can and look past the leasing office model unit. Check how sound travels between units (shared walls are usually fewer than a standard apartment, but not zero), how parking actually works at night, drainage around patios after rain, and whether the garage or carport is included in rent or billed separately. Ask about pet policies, maintenance response times, and whether the HOA or management company handles landscaping and exterior repairs.

Our ranked guide to Fort Worth's best townhome-style communities scores each property on factors like unit privacy, parking and storage, maintenance responsiveness, and value for the square footage. See the full methodology for how we weigh and verify these factors.

Find an apartment in townhome-style apartment communities in Fort Worth, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info

All townhome-style apartment communities in Fort Worth, TX, ranked by score and relevance

We found 231 businesses offering townhome-style apartment communities in Fort Worth, TX; 175 met the criteria for the scored directory. The order weighs each business's overall score by how much of its reviewed work is townhome-style apartment communities, so a lower-scored specialist can rank above a higher-scored generalist.

Mansions at Timberland Apartments
#1
87

Mansions at Timberland Apartments

4.6(387)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the office staff for friendliness and efficiency, with multiple mentions of Nadia's excellent tours and Rachael's helpfulness. Maintenance stands out: one reviewer reported after-hours AC repair completed in under two hours by technician Julio, while others highlight quick turnaround on repairs and immaculate grounds that are regularly maintained.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Union at Stockyards
#2
86

The Union at Stockyards

4.9(81)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Simon, Cortland, Laurie, and Taylor handle move-ins with genuine care, often going beyond standard help to make relocations smooth and stress-free. Beyond leasing, the property delivers on its promise: residents praise thick walls, spotless common areas, a well-equipped maintenance team, and a calendar of community events from cycling outings to pickle ball tournaments that foster real friendships among neighbors. The Stockyards location brings live music and dining right outside, while the interiors feel modern and resort-like with a resort-style pool, Sky Lounge, and EV charging. What keeps people invested is less the checklist of amenities and more the people running it-staff know resident names, follow up on requests, and treat living here as a relationship, not a transaction.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Marq on West 7th
#3
86

The Marq on West 7th

4.8(164)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents consistently praise The Marq for staff responsiveness and a tight-knit community feel. Maintenance requests close within 24 hours, with named staff like Kyle and Johnny earning frequent mention for quick, quality work. The Cultural District location near restaurants, museums, and shops appeals across age groups. One resident cited 13 years of loyalty. A security concern about bike theft and absent cameras surfaces in a small minority of reviews, though most residents report no issues.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The George
#4
87

The George

4.9(525)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents praise the maintenance team's quick response and the friendly leasing staff, with many highlighting Jason's exceptional service and the property's clean, safe feel. The location near Clearfork shops and diverse community appeal to multiple age groups, though some report sharp move-out fees, occasional noise from neighbors, and frustration with periodic amenity failures like elevators and pool upkeep. Repeat visitors note the leasing experience is personable and well-organized, and maintenance issues often resolve within hours. Pet owners appreciate the straightforward fee structure. However, pricing concerns and inconsistent staff attention during tenancy suggest the property's service depends heavily on which team members engage with you.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
VLux Trails
#5
77

VLux Trails

4.1(126)✓ Google-verified

Jeremy and the leasing team earn consistent praise for making the move-in process smooth and stress-free, with reviewers noting rapid responses to applications and questions. The community itself appeals strongly: residents emphasize the quiet atmosphere, well-kept grounds, and spacious townhomes with backyards, plus maintenance staff who fix work orders within hours. Pet owners appreciate the dog park and friendly vibe. The gated layout, smart home features, and nearby amenities (pool, hot tub, dog park, fire pits, grilling area) align with what residents expected. Long-term residents stay put, and those relocating from other states report no regrets despite signing sight-unseen.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities

Find an apartment in townhome-style apartment communities in Fort Worth, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info
The Monarch Medical District Apartments
#6
83

The Monarch Medical District Apartments

4.6(320)✓ Google-verified

Sean and the leasing team-Jasmine, Sky, and Shawn-consistently earn praise for professionalism, quick turnarounds, and genuine care. Residents highlight Sean's diagnostic skill and willingness to explain repairs; leasing staff welcome new tenants warmly and handle move-ins smoothly. One long-term tenant noted a sharp decline: maintenance responsiveness dropped in the past year, with major issues ignored and communication breaking down. The first two years were strong, but recent deterioration has eroded confidence. This signals a potential shift worth monitoring.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Marquis at Bellaire Ranch
#7
82

Marquis at Bellaire Ranch

4.8(96)✓ Google-verified

Marquis at Bellaire Ranch wins consistent praise for its riverfront location, mature trees, and the warmth of its community. Residents highlight fast maintenance response, thoughtful management, proximity to Trinity Trails and Clearfork shops, and a rare blend of younger and older tenants creating a respectful, inclusive atmosphere. One resident reported repeated security failures and property damage disputes totaling $5,000 out of pocket, with minimal follow-up from management. Vehicle break-ins and an open security gate are documented concerns. Most other residents felt safe, though this account merits serious consideration before signing a lease.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Olympus 7th Street Station
#8
84

Olympus 7th Street Station

4.7(183)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the maintenance team for same-day or next-day service, with Joe Brantley and Larry repeatedly named for their speed and professionalism. Staff like Vivian and Autumn earn high marks for making leasing and move-in smooth and personal. The location draws most renters: walkable to 7th Street, Montgomery Plaza, restaurants, and the Trinity Trail, yet surprisingly quiet for an urban core address. Two serious disputes stand out. One tenant was charged $6,000 for two months after moving out on a month-to-month lease, then an additional $1,500 when disputing the damages, and the account went to collections. Another reported two car break-ins with management refusing to cooperate with police or return calls. These conflicts suggest billing practices and security warrant close scrutiny.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Hunter Park Apartments
#9
84

Hunter Park Apartments

4.7(128)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents consistently praise Hunter Park for attentive maintenance that fixes problems within 24 hours, engaged staff by name, and a genuinely quiet atmosphere. Grounds stay clean, amenities work, and staff remember residents; one isolated complaint about a rude office interaction stands against overwhelming positive experience. The property draws multi-year tenants partly because on-site maintenance (Chuck and Moe) respond fast and think ahead. Management texts before entering apartments to avoid waking night-shift workers. Pool, dog park, good lighting, and proximity to shopping keep people rooted here; the fireplace and spacious layouts matter to those who stay.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
The Davis
#10
84

The Davis

4.5(452)✓ Google-verified

Living at The Davis feels like joining a community rather than renting an apartment. Staff members, particularly Marina, consistently make residents feel welcomed and cared for. Maintenance responds quickly to work orders and keeps the property clean. Amenities like the fitness center and pool are well-maintained. Long-term residents cite zero issues over years of tenancy. The quiet, relaxed vibe appeals across age groups and lifestyles. Parking can be tight in some buildings, which matters if you have multiple vehicles. Overall, the combination of responsive staff and genuine community connection sets this complex apart.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Marquis at Stonegate
#11
83

Marquis at Stonegate

4.6(197)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently report a safe, quiet community where maintenance responds within hours to overnight requests and staff build real relationships with tenants. The Trinity Trail access, proximity to shopping and dining, and well-kept pool and fitness center draw families and young professionals who renew leases; parking waitlists and lack of a playground are the main drawbacks. Dale, Kaylee, and Kate are named for their professionalism during move-ins and lease questions. Residents mention staying two years or longer, with multiple people upgrading to bigger units within the same complex rather than moving out.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Summers Landing Apartments
#12
82

Summers Landing Apartments

4.3(273)✓ Google-verified

Summers Landing's leasing process stands out for Ivette Fonseca's patience and genuine care, with reviewers repeatedly praising her guidance through tours and apartment selection. The community itself earns consistent marks for clean grounds, functional amenities like the pool and laundry, and staff who make settling in feel effortless and welcoming. Office Manager Veronica and the maintenance team round out a property where move-in goes smoothly and residents report feeling valued from day one. Reviewers moving from out of state or starting fresh highlight the personal attention that shaped their decision to choose this complex.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Crystal Springs
#13
81

Crystal Springs

4.8(115)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents praise the staff's warmth and professionalism, beautiful finishes, and lively community atmosphere. Many highlight quiet units and responsive maintenance. However, a meaningful minority report paper-thin soundproofing, inconsistent rules enforcement, and parking frustrations-complaints that stand in sharp tension with the majority's experience of peaceful, sound-resistant homes. Staff members including Stevie, Hannah, Kayci, Emily, and Jeff earn frequent mention for patient, attentive service during tours and move-ins. The property's resort-style amenities and River District location draw consistent praise. Negative reviews surface building-specific complaints: loose marijuana and noise enforcement in certain zones, trash room upkeep, and unpredictable move-out fee disputes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Creekside at North Beach Apartments
#14
83

Creekside at North Beach Apartments

4.7(368)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff earn consistent praise for knowing residents by name, fixing problems same-day, and creating a welcoming tone. Michelle, Veronica, and Stephanie stand out for responsiveness. The grounds feel safe with gated entry and foot patrols, pools run smoothly, and units arrive move-in ready. However, management sometimes announces critical work hours before or after the fact, leaving residents locked out of advertised amenities during office hours. Reserved parking costs $30 monthly but lacks enforcement, so some pay for spots they cannot use. Noise from neighbors and thin walls frustrate ground-floor residents. One long-term tenant noted the community went from excellent to inconsistent as leadership changed.

Luxury ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Montage Southside
#15
81

Montage Southside

4.6(93)✓ Google-verified

Tracy and Valerie in leasing earn repeated praise for patience, knowledge, and follow-through; residents consistently report clean, spacious homes and a well-kept community in a walkable downtown location. Maintenance responds quickly to requests, and the staff accommodates move-in timing flexibly. One sharp complaint marks the departure of a previous manager residents valued highly. The property appeals to people relocating, pet owners (nearby bars and restaurants, walkable area), and renters who toured multiple communities before choosing here. Competitive pricing relative to amenities is noted. Staff turnover has created a small sting in an otherwise stable experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Bexley Clearfork
#16
82

Bexley Clearfork

4.7(372)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Isaiah, Alton, Emily, and Salvador earn consistent praise for warmth and quick responses. Residents note clean grounds, modern apartments, and strong property upkeep. However, pet waste accumulation, overflowing trash bins, open gates allowing tailgating, and delayed maintenance undermine the experience. A major mold and humidity failure went unresolved for months. For the price, many feel the complex lacks basic security and enforcement. Location near shopping, dining, and highways appeals to residents. EV charging stations exist but often sit occupied by non-EV owners due to unenforced parking rules. The gap between staff quality and management systems remains stark.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Cortland Ridglea
#17
80

Cortland Ridglea

4.4(356)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Living here feels like stepping into a well-run operation. The leasing staff (Brooklyn, Kalli, Crystal named specifically) stay proactive and attentive, maintenance teams like Erik respond fast even on holidays, and residents consistently praise the thick walls and landscaping. The grounds are clean and safe, parking is straightforward, and the location near Tom Thumb and Sprouts works well for most. One resident moved from Phase 1 to Phase 2 and found the newer units plagued by roaches and AC issues despite similar pricing, plus pool debris and patio wildlife; management fixed what they could, but the gap between phases surprised them. Overall, the community shines because staff genuinely care and residents feel heard. Quality depends on which phase you choose. Phase 1 residents report fewer maintenance surprises and affordable pricing; Phase 2 units are newer but arrived less inspected for pests and AC. The pet amenities (bark park) and resident events matter to the culture here. Samsung appliances and energy efficiency are standard. Security is tight (police presence after incidents, regular safety emails). For families and post-grads seeking a friendly, responsive place, this works; renters sensitive to pest history or wanting guaranteed build quality should ask detailed move-in inspection questions.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Spring at Silverton
#18
82

The Spring at Silverton

4.5(111)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the staff's warmth and genuine attention, particularly Latasha Phillips, who greets people with a smile and solves problems immediately. Leasing is straightforward and personalised. The facility itself is beautiful, with clean grounds, a pool, workout center, and regular activities that feel resort-like. Most reviewers say they have found their forever home here. The community excels at making seniors feel welcomed during a major life transition. Maintenance responds quickly, events and food are well-regarded, and the atmosphere balances professionalism with personal care. Multiple residents with 4+ years here credit staff like Latasha, Tanisha, and Jessy for making the lifestyle change feel like the right decision.

Senior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Village on West Seminary
#19
82

The Village on West Seminary

5.0(42)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members like Claudia, Maria, and Taylor create a welcoming experience during tours and the application process, with residents and prospects consistently noting their attentiveness and warmth. The community appeals to families seeking safety and affordability, with new ownership backing recent improvements and a reputation for accessibility that extends from initial inquiry through move-in.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Hadley Riverside
#20
73

The Hadley Riverside

4.4(458)✓ Google-verified

The leasing team-especially Mariah and Krystle-earns consistent praise for warmth and responsiveness, and amenities like the pool and gym stay well-kept. But the community splits sharply over operations: residents praise prompt maintenance on minor requests, while others report months-long delays on critical issues like structural floor damage. Gates malfunction constantly, security presence is absent despite promises, roaches and thin walls plague multiple units, and deposit deductions feel excessive. Parking is tight and towing is aggressive. For families and those working from home, the location near schools and shopping appeals, but security concerns, pest problems, and noise issues give pause. The leasing experience feels deliberately friendly; the living experience varies widely depending on maintenance luck and noise tolerance.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Cortland Fossil Creek
#21
73

Cortland Fossil Creek

4.3(502)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents report a quiet place to live with standout maintenance and leasing staff, particularly Jessie and Rahni, who respond quickly and care about resident needs. The grounds and amenities draw consistent praise, though a vocal minority describes neglected landscaping, poor security documentation, steep unexplained move-out bills, and early unit deterioration like loose fixtures and water damage. Details matter here: long-term residents renew leases and feel welcomed; move-outs raise red flags about transparency. Maintenance excels at repairs; management's transparency and security controls divide residents sharply. Existing damage like rust on appliances and water stains suggest older renovation standards.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Mercantile River District
#22
79

Mercantile River District

4.5(265)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff, especially Noelle and Melissa, earn consistent five-star praise for professionalism and above-and-beyond service during tours and move-ins. Residents highlight resort-style amenities (lazy river, state-of-the-art fitness center, game room) and speedy maintenance response times. The River District location appeals to young professionals and families seeking modern finishes. However, pest control failures, unpredictable fees, and management communication gaps undercut the luxury positioning. A two-month resident reported recurring roaches, unresolved roof noise, and non-responsive staff; a three-year resident cited neglected grounds and astronomical add-ons. Dog park sanitation and parking security are secondary concerns. The experience depends heavily on leasing staff and which building you occupy.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Cassidy at Western Hills
#23
81

The Cassidy at Western Hills

4.4(799)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff, particularly Jannet, consistently go out of their way to make prospects feel heard and welcome. Applicants note the team's genuine care and willingness to work with individual circumstances, which stands out against pressure tactics at other complexes. Once residents move in, maintenance responsiveness can lag, though management has proven willing to act when complaints are escalated. The complex itself is well-maintained, safe at night, and pet-friendly with convenient highway access. Updated finishes and wood-like flooring appeal to many residents. The property feels genuinely community-oriented from the leasing side. However, expect delays if you need maintenance support without pushing for answers.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Azora Ranch Apartments
#24
78

Azora Ranch Apartments

4.5(87)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the property's upkeep, strong management team, and attentive maintenance. Staff members like Brandy, Noah, and Brighton earn particular recognition for welcoming service and efficient problem-solving. The main drawback is mandatory WiFi that residents report as unreliable and costly at $150 monthly, with inconsistent office phone responsiveness.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Luna Vista Apartments
#25
77

Luna Vista Apartments

4.0(215)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff at Luna Vista, particularly Karla and Kelly in the leasing office, consistently go above and beyond to support tenants through move-ins and ongoing needs. The community feels calm and welcoming, with maintenance that respects resident space and office staff who handle problems quickly and professionally. Prices range from $750 for a 500-square-foot 1-bedroom to $1,550 for a 2-bedroom townhome. The complex offers pet amenities, a playground, splash pad, and on-site maintenance, positioning it as both accessible for budget-conscious renters and attractive to families.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Three77 Park
#26
80

Three77 Park

4.4(208)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents consistently praise the staff, maintenance responsiveness, and upkeep. Named team members like Alexa and Abbe are repeatedly cited for going beyond standard service, while maintenance typically responds within a day to repair requests. Move-in experiences are smooth and welcoming. Three exceptions stand out: two residents experienced quick evictions after late payments, and one visitor witnessed unprofessional conduct (staff filming TikToks during their phone meeting). The first complaint targets payment policy severity; the others reflect isolated incidents. Six-year and five-year residents speak warmly of community events, pest control follow-up, and consistent improvements under multiple management generations.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Broadway Chapter
#27
80

Broadway Chapter

4.7(89)✓ Google-verified

Residents and prospective tenants consistently praise the staff, especially managers Halie, Izabella, Katie, and Megan, for patience and going beyond their role to help with applications and move-in. Units are modern and well-maintained, and the Bricktown location near restaurants and bars appeals to those wanting walkability. Two one-star reviews flag rude leasing interactions and unclear self-tour instructions, though these are outliers in an 89-review sample skewed heavily toward five-star ratings.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Aviator West 7th
#28
78

Aviator West 7th

4.3(290)✓ Google-verified

Most visitors praise the clean, well-organized property and its proximity to Montgomery Plaza shops. Staff members Leslie, Santos, Christal, and Junior consistently make tours smooth and welcoming, answering questions thoroughly and helping applicants feel confident in their decision. However, some prospective tenants report days of missed calls and no follow-up from the leasing office, with the Molly chatbot creating frustration. One applicant raised serious concerns about application handling and alleged bias. These communication gaps stand out against the generally positive leasing team experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Alleia at Presidio
#29
76

Alleia at Presidio

4.5(245)✓ Google-verified

Since a corporate buyout, Alleia at Presidio shows a split personality. Long-term residents and newer arrivals praise individual staff members-especially Cassandra, Nora, and Monica-and note that maintenance responds quickly. The pool stays clean, and move-in experiences feel smooth when the right person handles it. But others report roaches during and after move-in, parking that has become harder to find after paid carports were added, dog waste stations not emptied regularly, and a jump in transaction fees from around $10 to $50. Several reviews use the word "luxury" to describe what the place no longer feels like, particularly after the ownership change. Management turnover appears real; nostalgia for the previous regime is a thread through negative reviews. The price, now near $1,400 for a 640 sq ft unit, sits above complaints about declining condition. Reviewers note that the office itself became less accessible after the buyout and that longtime residents-who championed the place when Cassandra was the face of it-now feel let down. Maintenance quality is not in question; consistency and follow-through on shared amenities are.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Rocklyn at Samuels
#30
78

Rocklyn at Samuels

4.4(225)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise a tight-knit staff and rapid maintenance response, with particular shout-outs to Richard (groundskeeping) and Nicole/Rose/Dominic (leasing). Management feels genuinely invested in resident comfort. Some frustration over pet deposit pricing, parking issues from adjacent winery patrons, and occasional cleanliness oversights, but these do not dampen the overall sense of a well-run property with strong morale. High staff turnover has occurred over the years, though core team members have remained. The property sits in a desirable downtown-adjacent location with appealing amenities. Most residents overlook isolated lapses in favor of the responsive, personable environment.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Westpoint at Scenic Vista Apartments
#31
75

Westpoint at Scenic Vista Apartments

4.4(454)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise Westpoint for its staff responsiveness, especially leasing agents Tania, Marina, and Elizabeth, and highlight spacious units that feel more like homes. The community offers well-maintained grounds, a resort-style pool, gym, and dog park. However, one long-term resident's detailed 2-star review documents serious issues: a non-functional gate despite the community's gated promise, resulting in homeless individuals entering the pool and altercations requiring police; water damage in units that wasn't fully repaired; and rents rising to $1,450 without corresponding repairs. That reviewer called these facts grounds to leave.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Overton Park Townhome Apartments
#32
74

Overton Park Townhome Apartments

4.1(179)✓ Google-verified

Well-maintained townhomes in Southwest Fort Worth draw consistent praise for clean grounds, attentive staff, and peaceful surroundings. Rose, Leslie, Angie, and maintenance worker Max stand out for going beyond standard service, though some recent reviews flag communication lapses during leasing and occasional rudeness from maintenance personnel. The property itself earns high marks: residents note spotless parking lots, neat yards, and fresh interiors. Townhome layouts include private patios, wood-like flooring, and built-in shelving. A small set of one-star reviews raise concerns about reliability during critical transitions and attitude shifts in the maintenance team.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Hunter Plaza
#33
78

Hunter Plaza

4.3(188)✓ Google-verified

Staff excellence drives positive experiences here, especially leasing agent Nadia who handles applications with transparency and speed, and maintenance crew Erin and Francisco who respond quickly to requests. One resident reported serious safety, cleanliness, and harassment concerns that management appears not to have addressed; another flagged record-keeping issues and lease documentation problems. The building shows investment in updates-new washers, working elevators, clean hallways-though older infrastructure remains. Most tenants describe a warm welcome and smooth move-in, with staff treating them as individuals rather than numbers. Common praise focuses on Nadia's personal attention during the leasing process, maintenance responsiveness, and the property's central downtown location. The facility amenities (fitness center, theatre, library, business center, garage parking) are listed but not detailed in reviews.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Aveline at Centreport
#34
77

Aveline at Centreport

4.3(358)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents report a well-maintained property with staff who respond quickly to maintenance requests, though satisfaction hinges on which manager handles their lease. Recent management changes have improved cleanliness and responsiveness, but pet policies are unevenly enforced, and some residents feel unfairly treated over ESA or dog complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Xander at James
#35
70

Xander at James

4.3(106)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report friendly staff and quick maintenance fixes, especially technician Miguel and manager Myrna. However, recurring complaints about broken AC, missing hot water, and pest infestations undercut satisfaction. One reviewer mentioned pricing concerns despite staff quality.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Windsong Apartments
#36
77

Windsong Apartments

4.3(147)✓ Google-verified

Michael and Deanna in the leasing office greet residents by name and handle tours and applications with genuine warmth. Francisco and Logan on maintenance move fast and handle repairs thoroughly. The grounds are peaceful and clean, and long-term residents praise the diverse, respectful community. Two reviewers reported severe cockroach infestations that went unresolved despite multiple calls, turning a small problem into a building-wide issue. Most feedback centers on staff professionalism and responsiveness during move-in and ongoing tenancy. Those who encountered pest problems say management ignored repeated requests for help, which is the core complaint here. The 4.3 rating and 77% five-star distribution reflect strong day-to-day experience for most, but the pest failures leave a sharp edge.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Harden at Public Market
#37
77

The Harden at Public Market

5.0(22)✓ Google-verified

Move-in feels personal rather than transactional here. Staff members like Taylor, Ashley, and Michele walk prospects through floor plans with genuine patience, follow up quickly, and remember residents' names. Maintenance staff Chris, Greg, and others arrive promptly for service calls and fix issues properly; reviewers single them out by name across months. The building itself is new, sits in restored historic Public Market with restaurants planned, and offers courts for pickleball and a resort pool. One reviewer compared this unfavorably to other Fort Worth complexes and found the difference striking. Residents report feeling cared for rather than like account numbers. The location near TCU, Downtown, and the Medical District draws people for proximity to work and family. Early-stage teething with a new build hasn't dented sentiment; instead, reviewers credit management for working through kinks. The vibe is notably informal-staff offer coffee and refreshments, greet people by name in the hallway, and a leasing professional who placed a client there called their team's commitment to follow-through rare in the market.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
Chateau on the River Apartments
#38
76

Chateau on the River Apartments

4.6(301)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents report conflicting experiences. Some praise the Trinity Trail location, staff friendliness, and quick maintenance responses. However, multiple reviews detail years of unresolved water intrusion, mold concerns, pest problems, and repeated AC failures. One tenant required emergency room care due to a broken air conditioner left unfixed for a month. Management transitions (four in five years) appear to correlate with service decline. Newer residents often rate highly based on move-in experience, while longer-term tenants document persistent building issues, inadequate repairs, and delayed accountability. Recent one-star reviews name specific staff (Carissa, Rachel) as dismissive toward disability accommodation requests and unresponsive to urgent health and safety concerns. Positive reviews consistently highlight named leasing agents (Carissa Scott, Courtney Wells, Rachel Tribble) for move-in assistance, but these same names appear in complaints about office responsiveness to maintenance emergencies and accessibility needs.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Horizon at Ridgeview
#39
68

Horizon at Ridgeview

4.0(56)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently report a quiet, well-run community with responsive staff and quick maintenance. Jarred (or Jared) as property manager earns repeated praise for professionalism and care; Jason handles maintenance speedily. Townhomes feel modern and spacious, with included appliances, private yards, and resort amenities (pool, hot tub, gym, dog park). Parking remains contentious: uncovered spots fill with expired registrations, the security gate hangs open, and garages are narrow. Walls mark easily. Some past visitors faced office no-shows for tours. Overall, families and pet owners seeking a tight-knit feel in Fort Worth find value here despite these friction points.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Monticello Apartments
#40
73

Monticello Apartments

4.1(138)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Linda and the office team earn consistent praise for welcoming newcomers and answering questions without rushing. Mario, the maintenance person, gets named multiple times for handling repair calls promptly at any hour. The complex draws long-term residents who cite quiet surroundings, safe streets, and reasonable rents. One serious complaint describes a keyed car and management's refusal to hold the resident accountable due to no camera proof, which raises a concern about how the community handles disputes between residents. The spacious one and two-bedroom layouts and patios appeal to families staying years. Pet fees run $20 monthly. Staff remain the strongest draw: reviewers repeatedly mention feeling welcomed from the leasing office tour onward. Service calls get addressed without delay.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Skyview West
#41
73

Skyview West

4.3(221)✓ Google-verified

Skyview West wins strong loyalty from residents who stay multiple years, drawn by spacious layouts, friendly staff named Will and Cari, and maintenance that usually shows up same-day. The dark side emerges in broken AC units left unrepaired for months, fruit flies and roaches found in new units, and management that marks work orders complete when no one showed up. Long-term residents praise the community; recent move-ins hit serious climate and pest problems with little accountability. Staff responses vary widely: some residents report immediate fixes and genuine care, others document zero-visit work orders and dismissive office conversations. A truck theft, pest allergies affecting a child, and repeated false promises about "end of day" repairs appear in multiple complaints. The complex's affordability and space appeal fade fast when AC fails in Texas heat and pest control doesn't materialize.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Sedona Place
#42
75

Sedona Place

4.5(158)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents consistently report Sedona Place as a warm, activity-rich community where management knows residents by name and hosts regular events like game nights and holiday parties. Recent management changes have introduced friction: several residents cite broken security gates, rent hikes paired with reduced staffing, and communication lapses, though the current team appears to be addressing these issues.

Senior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Solay Fort Worth
#43
73

Solay Fort Worth

4.4(173)✓ Google-verified

Staff members Desteny, Nora, and Monica stand out for patient, helpful service during tours and transfers. Before May, residents report quiet surroundings and fast maintenance. A shift in management has triggered a stark reversal: trash accumulates indoors and outdoors, the gym and pool lack basic cleaning, the gate fails, and residents report car thefts and safety hazards. Complaints note office unavailability and unanswered emails. The 4.4-star rating masks a deep divide. Early reviews praise location, friendliness, and amenities at reasonable cost. Recent reviews describe a property that feels neglected despite luxury pricing, with garbage odors, overflowing chutes, broken systems, and an unsafe perimeter. Residents explicitly tie the decline to management change.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Berkeley Apartments
#44
75

The Berkeley Apartments

4.2(481)✓ Google-verified

Strong staff and quick maintenance draw residents to renew leases, especially those drawn to community events. However, some face gaps in move-in guidance, pest delays, and surprise maintenance charges that undermine the otherwise positive experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Providence at Marine Creek Apartment Homes
#45
75

Providence at Marine Creek Apartment Homes

4.2(262)✓ Google-verified

Office staff-especially Yolanda, Melinda, and Linda-earn consistent praise for responsiveness and professionalism. Maintenance resolves issues the same day, with technician Pablo noted for comfort and speed during major repairs. The grounds stay clean and quiet, with low package theft and neighbour conflicts. However, security enforces a 10pm-style curfew strictly, charges $50 for minor lease violations, and places trash cans far from units. Some residents report past ceiling leaks and mold issues. Buyers seeking affordable townhome-style living with reliable maintenance should find the team dependable. Those with accessibility needs or flexibility concerns should reconsider: the security rules feel oppressive to shift workers or families wanting outdoor time in vehicles, and accessibility for disabled residents appears limited.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Greens of Fossil Lake Apartments
#46
73

The Greens of Fossil Lake Apartments

4.3(268)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the grounds, landscaping, and maintenance response times, with staff members named repeatedly for their courtesy. However, a significant minority report severe roach problems in multiple buildings despite paying a $5 monthly pest fee, alongside complaints that the gym is too hot, equipment breaks down regularly, and promised upgrades never materialize.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Regatta 55 Apartments
#47
75

Regatta 55 Apartments

4.6(74)✓ Google-verified

Staff earn consistent praise for responding quickly to maintenance calls and handling resident questions with genuine care. Cecelia, Kaylee, Luke, and Colton are named as standouts. The location near Fort Worth hospitals and shopping appeals to residents new to the area. However, deferred cosmetic maintenance is a friction point: residents report stairwell odors, scuffed walls, grimy floors, and a building that looks far older than its three-year age. Move-in costs (lack of elevator access, valet service value) and communication gaps during emergencies (winter water line break, snow removal) have frustrated some. The 55+ focus means fewer social programs and younger peers than residents might prefer.

Senior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Overlook Ranch
#48
73

Overlook Ranch

4.3(233)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

New management last year has restored maintenance response and staff courtesy, with several residents praising quick fixes and welcoming leasing staff. Persistent problems shadow the experience: vehicle break-ins and lack of security cameras, billing disputes and unexplained charges, aggressive rent hikes, and a troubled gate system create friction that offsets the well-designed clubhouse.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Monticello Oaks Townhomes Apartments
#49
73

Monticello Oaks Townhomes Apartments

4.3(60)✓ Google-verified

Monticello Oaks stands out for attentive maintenance staff (Jeff named repeatedly for quick turnarounds) and a leasing team that walks prospects through options without pressure. Common areas and grounds are consistently spotless. One applicant reported being charged a $50 fee but receiving no response within the promised 24 hours; most recent reviews, however, praise Nelida and the wider team for smooth, professional interactions. The property draws praise for both its physical condition and staff demeanor. Visitors consistently mention arriving at tour appointments to find the place clean and staff ready to help. Maintenance issues get resolved quickly. The single negative review stands as an outlier among 60, suggesting either a processing error or a customer service breakdown on a particular occasion.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Casa Rana
#50
75

Casa Rana

4.5(77)✓ Google-verified

Most tenants praise Casa Rana's responsive leasing staff and fast maintenance, with named crew members like Seth and Daniel earning repeated recognition for going the extra mile. Laura and Lori handle complex situations with genuine care, and the company tracks down missing student packages with real urgency. However, some residents hit friction at move-in and move-out: flooring needing repair, promised yard work never materializing, and disputed paint charges for minor wear. Reaching the office can be slow during summer months, and one tenant felt the local team went silent after complaints reached corporate.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Monterra Village
#51
72

Monterra Village

4.3(428)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the maintenance team's speed and the office staff's warmth-Megan, Madison, and others handle moves and requests efficiently, and the community feels welcoming. A vocal minority reports serious problems: repeated AC breakdowns, pest infestations left unaddressed, front office unavailability during crises, and aggressive move-out billing practices tied to corporate ownership changes. Leasing interactions are inconsistent; some feel unwelcome and describe pricing manipulation. Long-term residents split sharply: those planning to stay cite three pools, townhomes, and genuine staff care; those departing cite the property's age and Weidner management's nickel-and-diming approach. One recent tour involved a leasing agent who did not greet visitors, rushed a family with a one-year-old during the golf cart ride, and showed apparent discomfort when pricing was questioned.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Cityscape Apartment Fort Worth
#52
73

Cityscape Apartment Fort Worth

4.6(38)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise the location, modern design, and staff warmth at this downtown Fort Worth complex. Named leasing and office staff handle move-ins smoothly and remain responsive. The core frustration centers on maintenance credibility: two separate reviewers report a dishwasher broken for 8-10+ months with no fix, a fired maintenance employee, and promises (patio gates, parking) not delivered.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Parkside So7 Urban Apartments
#53
74

Parkside So7 Urban Apartments

4.4(267)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the maintenance crew and location near Trinity Park, dining, and trails, with many calling it the best apartment experience they've had. Recent management changes have shaken confidence: some report grounds neglect, security lapses, false fire alarms multiple times weekly, and unresponsiveness to concerns, though others describe current staff as responsive and thoughtful. The core tension is between well-executed operations (when management is engaged) and periods where the property feels neglected despite premium pricing.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
SageWater Village
#54
72

SageWater Village

3.9(214)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the maintenance team and management for their attentiveness and warmth. The grounds, pool, and walking trails draw appreciation, and staff like Omar, Alfredo, Darah, Erica, and Jake earn repeated mention. One long-term resident reports 18+ months of unresolved secondhand smoke complaints despite repeated calls, suggesting enforcement gaps that management has not addressed.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
Willow Glen
#55
74

Willow Glen

4.1(199)✓ Google-verified

Willow Glen draws consistent praise for its quiet setting, clean grounds, and attentive staff who resolve issues quickly. Residents of multiple years highlight pool gatherings and friendly community events as major draws. Serious concerns emerge around pest control, deposit practices, and transparency. One resident reported a roach-infested unit from move-in day, while another documented their refundable deposit being converted to inflated utility charges and unsubstantiated damage claims.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Cortland Chisholm Trail
#56
74

Cortland Chisholm Trail

4.4(356)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Cortland Chisholm Trail draws strong praise for individual staff members who make the leasing experience warm and personal, and the layout and finishes appeal to renters. But serious problems undermine those strengths: multiple residents report roach and rat infestations, maintenance delays lasting weeks, and units arriving in poor condition. Security and community management also falter when non-residents breach gates and management becomes unreachable.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Villas at Cantamar Apartments
#57
74

Villas at Cantamar Apartments

3.8(205)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members Jessica and Alexia stand out for going beyond the standard tour, answering questions thoroughly, and moving applications quickly without appointments. The property itself draws consistent praise for cleanliness, maintenance, and amenities like the pool and dog park, making it a welcoming option for first-time renters and families on a budget. Pricing starts around $1000 for studios and tops out near $2000 for three-bedroom units, with pet fees running $300-600 upfront and $20-40 monthly. The location in Western Hills North and gated security appeal to those seeking both affordability and a sense of community.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Shelby at Northside
#58
72

Shelby at Northside

4.3(301)✓ Google-verified

Staff go out of their way to help during leasing and maintenance, and families enjoy the amenities and community feel. Security and cleanliness lag behind the friendly front-office experience. The broken gate alarm, unsecured doors, and litter in common areas frustrate longer-term residents, though recent reviews suggest some improvements to the gate system.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Presidio at River East
#59
71

Presidio at River East

4.3(53)✓ Google-verified

Most residents consistently praise the maintenance staff, especially Juan, for quick response times and genuine care. Front office workers including Joy and Brittany earn repeated credit for going above and beyond during move-in and ongoing support. The community feels clean, well-kept, and has genuine amenities like pool and park access, with stunning downtown views. However, structural issues dog the experience: thin walls mean neighbors' noise carries constantly, gates fail regularly or stay open, and parking is tight with repeated car thefts and break-ins reported. Management has been responsive to some complaints but slow to address pool-access problems from outsiders and dismissive about noise concerns. One denied applicant flagged an inflexible screening system.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
Bluestem Village
#60
70

Bluestem Village

4.4(103)✓ Google-verified

Bluestem's physical spaces and maintenance staff earn consistent praise, but management's handling of disputes severely undercuts the experience. Reviewers report pest invasions that took months to resolve, sky-high exit fees for minor wear, and a pattern where complaints to the office trigger retaliation rather than fixes. A few long-term residents credit individual managers like Michael for resolving issues, but many others describe an office culture that blames tenants instead of solving problems. Thin insulation amplifies noise complaints, and newer residents often face move-out invoices $600-$900 higher than expected. Pest control appears reactive rather than preventative. Staff can be warm on good days but dismissive or evasive when tenants push back. The divide between five-star reviews (mostly from early stays or staff-backed solutions) and one/two-star reviews (move-out or unresolved escalations) suggests timing and luck matter more than policy here.

Luxury ApartmentsSenior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Forena Revelstoke
#61
71

Forena Revelstoke

4.3(170)✓ Google-verified

Forena draws strong praise for its facilities, amenities, and original leasing experience: staff like Breonia and Breanna made tours and move-ins smooth, and some residents love the quiet community feel. But a significant cohort reports persistent car thefts, slow office response, recurring elevator failures, and frustration with new management. The shift from Olympus to AIR Communities brought charges residents dispute, poor communication, and enforcement gaps (smoking, pool hours). Many residents who initially loved it now doubt renewal under current management.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Kessler Apartments
#62
69

Kessler Apartments

4.2(107)✓ Google-verified

Staff reliability and cleanliness drive strong praise. Residents consistently highlight maintenance crew members Jersson Andrés, Daniel, and Alexis for responsiveness and professionalism, and leasing agent Keyla for smooth onboarding. The property stays visibly clean and quiet. However, new management in late 2023 has triggered a sharp rating drop. Complaints center on deteriorating landscaping, broken amenities (pools, fire pits, BBQs), package theft, and a $200 monthly surcharge for second-vehicle parking. Residents report cost-cutting that undermines the value proposition, despite some remaining in long-term leases at original rates.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
SageWood Village
#63
70

SageWood Village

4.4(105)✓ Google-verified

Most recent reviewers praise the maintenance team, especially Braden, for fast repairs and clear communication, and note welcoming front-office staff and well-maintained units. However, a significant cluster of complaints from the past year describes catastrophic water damage, dismissive management, poor repair follow-up, and serious structural issues that went unaddressed for months.

Luxury ApartmentsSenior & 55+ LivingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Tallgrass Village
#64
69

Tallgrass Village

4.1(167)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents report a safe, quiet setting with attentive maintenance staff and welcoming management. However, new lease renewals bring undisclosed fees, and several tenants say the office ignored complaints about neighbor harassment and charged excessive move-out fees and carpet replacement costs without clear justification.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
SageStone Village
#65
69

SageStone Village

4.1(165)✓ Google-verified

SageStone earned loyalty from long-term residents who praise the maintenance team, especially Braden, for prompt and professional work. The grounds are clean, location convenient, and community activities foster belonging. Move-out disputes cloud the experience: management charged for normal wear and tear on carpets, forcing residents to fight for security deposit refunds; some report appliance replacement fees that may exceed Texas Property Code protections. Office staff are mostly friendly, though one leasing professional received complaints for rudeness. Safety concerns have emerged when maintenance failed to permanently fix a shower door that later shattered. Hallway odors and trash accumulation suggest inconsistent common-area management. Those staying two to seven years report positive experiences, but prospective residents should thoroughly document unit condition at move-in and challenge questionable deductions before paying.

Luxury ApartmentsSenior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Savoy
#66
65

The Savoy

4.0(87)✓ Google-verified

Staff excellence, especially Kyndra in leasing and maintenance technicians Dee and Jay, drives strong satisfaction. The community feels family-friendly and quiet, with recent gym and pool upgrades. However, serious complaints emerge around security lapses, pest control delays, move-in readiness, and management's handling of resident concerns; some residents felt unheard despite documenting issues.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Trail Lakes Apartments
#67
71

The Trail Lakes Apartments

4.9(13)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the complex for its clean, quiet grounds and responsive management. The property manager Amanda stands out across reviews for her professionalism, availability, and genuine care for tenants; maintenance staff are described as friendly and helpful.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Laurel Heights at Cityview
#68
69

Laurel Heights at Cityview

3.8(361)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the responsive maintenance team and genuinely welcoming staff, citing fast problem-solving and personal attention. Leasing staff like Brittany and Courtney stand out for patience and clarity. Recent fixes to gates and water issues have resolved earlier frustrations. However, parking tow incidents and confusing move-in fees have left some frustrated, and newer office staff sometimes give conflicting information.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Bexley Champions Circle
#69
71

Bexley Champions Circle

4.3(206)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance stars like Lallish earn consistent five-star praise for professionalism and speed, and the grounds are clean with appealing amenities. But residents report paper-thin walls that prevent sleep, slow and incorrect diagnoses on major appliances, and a move-out process marred by inflated charges sent immediately to collections. Management's noise complaint verification system backfired, threatening residents for using it. New management has taken a hard line on lease enforcement, raising concerns about transparency and fairness. The split reflects two different experiences depending on whether you encounter stellar technicians or hit policy friction. Appliance repairs often require multiple visits. Move-out disputes loom large in recent complaints, and residents cite management's reluctance to replace aging equipment.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Trinity Highline
#70
71

Trinity Highline

4.3(67)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise a strong, named staff: leasing agent Nina, maintenance technician Darmarcus who often completes requests same-day, and grounds keeper Alexis. Move-in was smooth, the finishes are modern, and the location near Sundance Square and the Stockyards makes it feel upscale yet affordable for the area. One significant negative: a former resident's year-long saga involving towed cars, unreimbursed charges, persistent smoke/marijuana odor despite the advertised smoke-free policy, and an unresolved deposit dispute that was never refunded months after departure. Beyond that outlier, the main friction is parking availability (one resident paid $75 monthly extra) and occasional maintenance delays outside of Darmarcus's quick responses. Staff responsiveness and genuine care drive the overwhelmingly positive experience for those who stay.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Firestone at West 7th
#71
70

Firestone at West 7th

4.1(539)✓ Google-verified

The leasing team delivers standout service during move-in, and individual maintenance workers respond fast to requests. Downtown location and walkability draw praise, but the property shows its age: windows leak, AC fails repeatedly, and the emergency response disappoints in summer heat. Residents report inconsistent policy enforcement and a shift toward rowdier tenant mixes that management hasn't addressed. Genuine resident feedback diverges sharply from some clustered reviews mentioning specific staff; one tenant suspects fake positive posts from non-residents. The core trade-off is smooth leasing experience against ongoing building maintenance and neighbor quality struggles that seasoned residents find intolerable despite the location appeal.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Presidium Revelstoke
#72
71

Presidium Revelstoke

4.3(313)✓ Google-verified

Presidium Revelstoke draws strong loyalty from long-term residents who praise Stephanie, Carlee, and the maintenance team for responsiveness and care. But a sharp divide emerged recently: a new property manager's combative style, unresolved security concerns (vehicle break-ins, broken gates, missing cameras), package theft, and noise complaints from poor building construction have left newer and frustrated residents questioning whether the premium price justifies the service. The complex excels at cosmetic upkeep and amenities (power washing, dog park, pet washing station) and staff like Stephanie earn genuine affection. However, systemic gaps remain: a faulty AI chatbot, difficulty reaching the office, gate remotes delayed weeks, pet owners ignoring community rules, and move-in units handed over uncleaned. Management changes appear ongoing; the shift in tone since a previous manager departed has triggered lease-renewal anxiety among residents who feel unheard.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Terraces of Marine Creek Apartments
#73
71

Terraces of Marine Creek Apartments

3.9(150)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents consistently praise maintenance staff, particularly JJ, for solving problems quickly and with genuine care. Leasing team, especially Huseni, earns repeated mention for warmth and professionalism. The property feels quiet and clean, with newer updates like the reopened pool adding value. However, a small but serious segment reports persistent roach problems across multiple units since late 2023, plus confusion over smoking policy. While new management has improved conditions, older residents note the community has not fully recovered from past neglect. These issues affect peace of mind despite otherwise strong satisfaction.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Chapel Creek Cottages
#74
64

Chapel Creek Cottages

4.1(57)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents praise individual staff members and the cottages' appearance, but ongoing complaints centre on sluggish maintenance, communication gaps, and management indifference. Some tenants wait weeks for repairs; others report unaddressed complaints over a year and missed move-in inspections. Multiple reviews cite an AI-first response system that makes reaching a person difficult.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Bowery at Southside
#75
69

The Bowery at Southside

4.2(142)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing staff earn consistent praise for personal attention and professionalism, particularly Marcella, Jackie, Raven, and Christina. Move-in transparency and online processes appeal to those with simple needs. However, management falls short once residents are in place: noise complaints go unresolved, maintenance staff misconduct was not addressed adequately, and unit cleanliness at move-in often fails to meet promises. Policy design leaves existing residents vulnerable to being passed over for unit transfers, and billing errors compound frustration. A handful report smooth year-long stays, but accountability gaps leave many feeling abandoned after signing the lease. The property markets itself across multiple categories but struggles with core tenant protection. Leasing works well; living here depends heavily on luck with neighbors, staff conduct, and how quickly management acts on complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
REVL Crockett Row
#76
70

REVL Crockett Row

4.3(139)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Revl Crockett Row attracts praise for its leasing and maintenance teams, who handle urgent requests quickly and treat residents as individuals. Staff members Luis, Gabby, Madison, Junior, and Hernan are named repeatedly for going above and beyond. The complex offers modern units, a distinctive third-floor amenity space, gym and pool, and strong security on West 7th. However, significant operational gaps undermine the experience. Pest issues appear in recent reviews; freezing pipes trigger false fire alarms at least 20 times yearly; unresolved move-out communication led to a resident having a $150 charge sent to collections without notice or itemization, damaging her credit; stolen items from storage units were denied coverage despite lease language promising financial responsibility; and heavy noise from nearby bars affects sleep. Hidden fees add $100 monthly, surprising residents at lease renewal.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
The Landing at Centreport Apartments
#77
70

The Landing at Centreport Apartments

3.9(287)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Ole, the maintenance technician, earns consistent five-star praise for speed, professionalism, and a helpful attitude. The small management team keeps the pace of work orders quick, and residents report a peaceful setting. However, parking remains tight with no shade coverage, and some long-term residents worry that amenity upgrades lag behind comparable complexes in the area. Unit features like large closets and spacious rooms appeal to residents, but management's recent upkeep efforts have drawn mixed reviews. Common complaints cite insufficient hallway cleaning and paint residue from remodeling work.

Furnished & Corporate HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
Monarch Pass Apartments
#78
70

Monarch Pass Apartments

4.1(1071)✓ Google-verified

Monarch Pass draws strong praise for staff warmth, particularly leasing agent Stephanie, and residents report feeling safe in a quiet setting. However, a significant minority struggle with delayed repairs, pest control failures, and laundry equipment that does not work reliably; some cite unresolved maintenance requests weeks after submission and disputes over promised rent relief.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Creekside Apartment Homes
#79
66

Creekside Apartment Homes

3.9(194)✓ Google-verified

Many residents praise Yessenia Sanchez and Arthur for attentive, friendly leasing support and highlight clean units and a nice pool area. However, serious gaps emerge once tenants move in: management fails to answer phones consistently, weekend pool parties with 60+ people shake windows despite complaints, unauthorized gate access leads to after-hours gatherings, and valet trash service goes unpaid yet undone. Applicants report month-long communication blackouts after paying application fees, with no callbacks or emails. Parking issues include wrongful tows despite registration, and some reviewers mention unaddressed concerns about roaches and drug activity. The complex excels at first impressions but struggles with follow-through and resident quality-of-life issues.

Furnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District
#80
68

Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District

4.0(204)✓ Google-verified

Trinity Urban offers affordable apartments with genuine community spirit, though maintenance reliability and building systems are significant pain points. Staff like Juan and Kiana actively organize events that help residents connect, and pricing beats expectations for the location. Recurring complaints about non-working air conditioning, elevator outages, and delayed maintenance responses suggest operational gaps that undercut the otherwise welcoming atmosphere.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Campbell Apartments & Townhomes
#81
66

The Campbell Apartments & Townhomes

3.7(296)✓ Google-verified

Staff and maintenance crews stand out for speed and care. Alex handles tours with patience and detail; Tori manages follow-ups relentlessly; Kenneth and Patrick tackle repairs with respect and efficiency. Units themselves are fresh and clean, with thoughtful layouts. The major caveat: at least one resident reported rats in walls and vents, with the office unresponsive. The split in scores (60% five-star but 29% one/two-star) suggests most residents thrive here, but pest issues-if widespread-matter deeply. Long-term residents report no problems, which hints the concern may be isolated or episodic rather than systemic. Leasing is the strongest draw; maintenance response is the consistent reassurance.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
South 400 Apartments
#82
69

South 400 Apartments

3.9(145)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the maintenance team's speed and professionalism, particularly Joan, who has built a reputation for quick fixes and genuine care. Staff at all levels (leasing, front office, grounds) are consistently described as friendly and responsive, and common areas are well-maintained. The pool and gym are well-regarded. However, package theft is rampant due to an unguarded external mailroom, and some residents report security lapses (broken elevators, open garage gates). Move-in procedures lack coordination. Some describe the community as unsafe and dirty despite the strong staff presence. The contrast between excellent personal service and systemic security failures defines the mixed experience here.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Flats at Brentwood
#83
69

Flats at Brentwood

4.1(319)✓ Google-verified

Residents credit leasing staff, particularly Isai, with smooth application and move-in support; the grounds are clean and well-kept. Yet maintenance backlogs persist: appliances stay broken for months, pest control is missing, and office phones go unanswered. Newer management is seen as focused on revenue over community care, with disputes over parking fees and lack of compensation for damage caused by maintenance itself. The best experience comes early, during leasing. Long-term living reveals gaps: broken dishwashers wait since March, rats reported, and management responsiveness has dropped noticeably since staff turnover.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Club at Stonegate Apartments
#84
67

The Club at Stonegate Apartments

4.0(346)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Rod and a handful of staff members earn consistent praise for fast, attentive maintenance work. The location suits people near TCU, and many residents love the quiet neighborhood feel and pet amenities. However, prospective tenants repeatedly hit a wall: the complex uses AI chatbots that don't transfer calls to humans, making it nearly impossible to reach the leasing office before signing. Once inside, residents report serious structural issues (mold, water damage, broken windows), expensive move-out fees ($1,100+), undisclosed monthly charges, and a management team that dismisses health concerns. The divide is stark: families praising the safe community coexist with tenants fleeing due to hidden contracts and unresolved building defects. The complex's shift to AI support has created its biggest liability. Reviewers note that Preia (a leasing agent) is helpful when you reach her, but she is the exception. Maintenance quality depends heavily on who you get; Rod is exceptional, but others are slow or provide cosmetic fixes to serious problems. Move-in experience varies widely. Lease terms are strict, and the cumulative cost of undefined monthly fees plus break penalties catches many tenants off guard.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Huntley
#85
69

The Huntley

4.1(163)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Shoni and Jai earn consistent praise for attentive, personable service. New tenants find the amenities and finishes impressive. But persistent complaints span thin walls, repeated theft despite cameras, dirty common spaces, and management's failure to address safety issues like trespassing and indecent exposure. Long-term residents report significant decline since a recent management changeover.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Griffin Apartments
#86
66

The Griffin Apartments

3.9(203)✓ Google-verified

Staff stars like Christina and Angel earn repeat praise for going beyond expectations during moves and repairs. Many residents report swift, professional help with maintenance and leasing. However, a substantial block of recent arrivals encountered serious move-in problems: roaches, mold, broken appliances, and dirty units. Several complaints cite unresponsive management, ignored maintenance requests, and deposit disputes where the complex allegedly kept money despite approval policy reversals. One tenant faced documented code violations that were never repaired during tenancy.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Lauren Apartments
#87
65

Lauren Apartments

3.9(142)✓ Google-verified

Most residents feel at home here and praise staff responsiveness and upkeep. Management communicates well and maintenance acts quickly. However, some face real downsides: packages go missing, parking tightens on weekends, smoking violations aren't enforced despite lease terms, and recent security incidents nearby worry tenants.

Luxury ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Find an apartment in townhome-style apartment communities in Fort Worth, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info
Belterra Apartments
#88
67

Belterra Apartments

4.0(252)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star reviewers praise the leasing team, especially Daisy, and highlight the clean grounds, spacious floor plans, and pool upkeep. Long-term residents report serious infrastructure problems: AC units that fail during peak summer, arriving months to fix and running up utility bills to $800; package thefts occurring despite advertised smart lockers with no mail room camera coverage; pest control calls that go unanswered or result in incomplete treatments; and a faulty gate that stays open, leading to vehicle break-ins and security incidents. Management communication lapses and deflection of responsibility appear consistently across negative reviews. While newer residents describe a luxury feel and responsive maintenance visits, those staying longer than a year encounter compounding maintenance failures, billing disputes, and safety concerns. Positive reviews tend to reflect tour experiences rather than sustained occupancy. The business website advertises a "SMART COMMUNITY," but residents report outdated appliances (from 2005), electrical problems, broken amenities, and recurring issues after repeated maintenance visits.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Bexley Arcadia
#89
64

Bexley Arcadia

3.9(133)✓ Google-verified

The leasing team-particularly Zyra, Angel, and Breann-consistently earns praise for making apartment moves and lease changes seamless and stress-free. Maintenance staff also draw high marks for speed and professionalism, often solving problems within hours. However, residents report a stark divide: upper management ignores calls, brushes off urgent requests, and delegates manager-level issues to leasing agents. Common complaints span mold and water damage left unresolved for months, delayed repairs, dirty common areas since a recent management changeover, and inadequate security with multiple car break-ins but no gates or cameras. One long-term resident praised the property itself but called the management "a joke." Parking and noise enforcement also draw complaints. Strong units and amenities undercut by inconsistent management response. The complex offers a three-tier pool, smart-home apartment features, and 24-hour emergency maintenance. Reviews name Jon and Lallish from maintenance as particularly committed. Leasing staff excel at lease switches and deposit clarity. Yet residents describe management as visibly unprofessional-scrolling phones during work hours, yelling at employees in public, and threatening collections over disputed charges. The core tension: people love the physical space and the frontline staff, but fear the management's lack of urgency when serious issues arise.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Park Creek Apartments
#90
63

Park Creek Apartments

4.0(203)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff set Park Creek apart: maintenance techs and leasing agents respond quickly and treat residents as people, not transaction lines. That goodwill faces friction from security gaps-gate breaks down regularly, car thefts cluster on certain blocks, and pet owners ignore cleanup rules-plus recent management changes brought an AC emergency that stretched a week in Texas heat.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Junction Crossing Apartments
#91
63

Junction Crossing Apartments

3.8(244)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Brandon and the leasing team earn consistent praise for their knowledge and responsiveness during tours and early move-in. Amenities, including pools and a clubhouse, draw admiration. However, the complex suffers from a stark divide: residents report that management quality shifted noticeably under new leadership, with recurring failures in maintenance response, pest control, noise enforcement, and parking allocation. Many complaints centre on unresponsive office staff, privacy violations during maintenance, gate malfunctions, and billing disputes over move-out charges and stolen packages. Long-term residents and recent arrivals describe very different experiences, suggesting the property improved under a manager named Itzel but remains inconsistent. Staff like Brandon are praised when present, yet reviews note he lacks independence and relies heavily on others. The complex appears polished on tour but struggles with follow-through on repairs, cleanliness standards, and tenant communication once residents move in.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Bexley at Left Bank
#92
65

Bexley at Left Bank

3.8(226)✓ Google-verified

Bexley at Left Bank draws sharp contrasts in resident experience. Maintenance staff, especially Erin, earn consistent praise for fast, responsive work and genuine care. Yet office communication falters: tenants report ignored calls, billing errors, and slow resolutions that require in-person visits. Sound insulation is a real problem, with neighbors' voices, music, and pets clearly audible. Rent jumps of $600-$800 after year one are steep when the same unit rents lower to new arrivals. The property offers genuinely nice amenities, a prime location, and staff who smile when they show up. But behind the attractive facade sit construction gaps, a broken garage gate in extended repair cycles, and an office that shifts into low gear once you renew. Strong maintenance and weak management make this a mixed bag: arrive with eyes open about noise, expect office friction, but know your unit repairs will get done right.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Loft Vue Living
#93
66

Loft Vue Living

3.9(208)✓ Google-verified

Loft Vue wins renter loyalty through two standouts: leasing staff (particularly Roderick and Alexa) who spend hours on first-time-renter questions and close deals same-day, and furnished units near TCU that undercut local student housing prices. The dark side is sporadic but serious: months-long Wi-Fi outages and ceiling damage without response, units entered without notice, belongings removed, cleaning fees charged on top. Two of 17 recent reviews report management that felt extractive rather than helpful. The business attracts strong initial sentiment from the leasing team and location, but a vocal minority report maintenance neglect and billing practices that undercut trust. For price-conscious TCU students with low maintenance expectations, the convenience and furnished options appeal. For anyone who might need quick repairs or careful lease-term billing, the gaps in follow-through management are a real risk.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
University House TCU
#94
66

University House TCU

4.1(60)✓ Google-verified

Most current residents praise quick maintenance, friendly staff, and spotless apartments within walking distance of campus. Covered parking and study amenities draw repeat praise. Historical concerns about pest control and administrative practices surface in older reviews; current feedback suggests these may have improved, though move-in practices warrant clarification before signing.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Taj Mahal Apartments
#95
66

Taj Mahal Apartments

3.6(101)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents have stayed for years because of genuine care from management, particularly Jackie Sevilla, and reliable maintenance crew David and Emad. The draw is bills-paid affordability near downtown, a quiet atmosphere, and staff that handle requests same-day without bureaucracy. Long-standing tenants prize the second-chance rental policy and resort pool. One resident flagged inconsistent neighbor behavior and wished for gated entry or garage parking, but these are exceptions in an overwhelmingly loyal base.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Bell Presidio
#96
66

Bell Presidio

4.0(292)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Bell Presidio attracts strong praise for individual staff like Anna and Cyrian and amenities like the gym and pool, but residents consistently report a divided experience. The property looks well-designed on arrival, yet ongoing complaints center on roach infestations, delayed maintenance responses, management turnover, and a disconnect between advertised luxury pricing and upkeep. Communication from the leasing office is a widespread frustration: emails go unanswered, promised concessions are delayed, and residents report needing to visit in person to resolve issues. Multiple residents pay over $2,000 monthly and describe pest problems lasting months, trash buildup in parking areas, repeated pool closures, and broken gym equipment. Recent lease processing and ESA accommodation requests have created additional stress. The property changed ownership recently, which reviewers link to declining conditions and staff instability. Maintenance and select staff earn consistent praise for effort within constraints, but management accountability and responsiveness remain the core complaint.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Bottle House on Main
#97
66

Bottle House on Main

3.8(248)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Gigi, Kaleigh, and Daje have earned strong loyalty from residents. Management responds quickly to maintenance issues and makes people feel valued during tours and stays. The complex sits close to downtown with a welcoming coffee area. However, cleanliness varies across common areas. Residents report filthy hallways, elevators, and gym equipment that does not work. Some tenants faced communication breakdowns and lease delays during move-in, leaving a frustrating first impression despite later improvements.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Lofts at West 7th
#98
64

The Lofts at West 7th

3.7(295)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the leasing team-Shelley, Allen, Jacob, and Nicholas stood out for patience and personal attention-and note clean units and a stellar West 7th location near bars, restaurants, and Trinity Park. However, recent construction disruptions sparked frustration: night-shift workers reported demolition-level noise in adjacent units with no advance notice or help from management, who dismissed concerns as normal apartment living. One reviewer also flagged forced WiFi charges and worries about the area's future.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
CoHo Apartments
#99
65 low data

CoHo Apartments

4.4(23)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents love the walkable South Main location, quick maintenance response, and the high-tech Ori furniture that appeals to minimalists. Recent concerns center on management transitions: security deposits held beyond Texas law timelines, AC failures not properly repaired, and broken gate access. Strongest reviews praise named staff like Kim, Tony, and Camryn. Weakest highlight legal and safety oversights under newer management.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
The Stella
#100
65

The Stella

3.8(208)✓ Google-verified

New management (MLDC) has won strong praise for responsiveness and staff professionalism, especially Ashley and Brenda, with residents noting smooth lease changes and helpful support. However, a significant portion report move-in units that were poorly cleaned despite "newly renovated" claims, persistent cigarette and marijuana odors, and ongoing cockroach and rodent issues that management has not resolved.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Venue at 8651 Apartments
#101
65

Venue at 8651 Apartments

3.8(524)✓ Google-verified

Venue at 8651 earns strong marks for maintenance staff who fix issues quickly and explain problems clearly, plus clean grounds and package lockers that reviewers value. However, serious concerns emerge around unresponsive management, delays in processing transfers and refunds, pest-infested move-in units, and surprise visitor parking charges and towing policies that left tenants frustrated.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Southern Oaks Apartments
#102
65

Southern Oaks Apartments

3.9(128)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise Brenda, Norma, and Glenn Jones by name for personal attention and fast repairs, and many call the community quiet and welcoming. Management earns trust through responsiveness and genuine care. However, serious operational gaps undermine this goodwill: pest control failures were knowingly withheld, fees are disputed and sometimes unrefundable, senior tenants report repeated harassment, and one recent resident faced a pre-existing mice infestation management denied knowing about. The divide between individual staff kindness and institutional dysfunction creates polarized experiences.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Bell Lancaster Apartments
#103
63

Bell Lancaster Apartments

3.7(259)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Karen and the maintenance team earn consistent praise for responsiveness and genuine care, making leasing and repairs straightforward. That goodwill runs into a wall of systemic problems: water damage left unrepaired for years, unsanitary common areas, frequent management changes that leave tenants without clear accountability, and billing errors around move-in promotions. One resident paid $800 extra after being rushed into a lease without receiving promised rent concessions. The property has real strengths in its units and staff presence, but struggles to translate day-to-day friendliness into reliable property management. Issues pile up (dumpster overflow, dog waste on grounds, pool maintenance failures) and linger. Lease disputes after move-out add friction. For those who find the right unit and avoid maintenance crises, Bell Lancaster works. For others, poor follow-through on repairs and management inconsistency creates years of frustration.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
District at LeftBank
#104
64

District at LeftBank

3.8(294)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The property shows a sharp divide between longtime dissatisfaction and hope under new ownership. Long-term residents report repeated water damage from faulty sprinkler lines, serious black mold left unaddressed, broken elevators, and broken security gates that made theft common. Pest control requests went unanswered for months despite infestations. Recent reviews praise the new management team (Adrienne, Britain, Sophia, Nicole, Lauryn) for quick responses and genuine care, though structural and systemic issues remain unresolved. The location near West 7th and downtown Fort Worth, spacious floor plans, and pet amenities attract residents, but safety concerns and maintenance neglect have driven many away. Staff responsiveness has improved noticeably, with new management resolving lease transfers and handling calls promptly. However, residents flag ongoing problems: dark hallways with burned-out lights, dog waste throughout common areas, and exterior doors still broken months into the transition. One resident reported being charged thousands in unexpected "reletting fees" after moving out with proper notice.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Drake on Summit Apartments
#105
62

The Drake on Summit Apartments

3.8(208)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents praise individual staff members and the range of amenities, but maintenance and cleanliness have deteriorated sharply. Multiple reviewers report filthy move-in units, mold painted over rather than fixed, repeated AC failures, and overflowing trash in common areas. Security is a concern: break-ins occur, the parking garage lacks patrols, and management seldom responds to calls. The courtesy officer rarely picks up. A few long-term residents who moved in earlier had better experiences; recent arrivals and those facing mold or safety issues describe management as dismissive and unresponsive, with move-out charges applied without photo evidence. The standout staff members Chris, Kelly, and Ty are consistently mentioned for their helpfulness, and amenities like the 24-hour gym and sky deck are valued. However, operational failures-fire alarms going off daily, doors left propped open, elevators reeking-overwhelm these positives. Reviewers advise documenting everything, using a specific payment system to avoid fees, and verifying move-out conditions in writing.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
The Atlantic Station
#106
64

The Atlantic Station

3.8(322)✓ Google-verified

Staff at the front desk-Jackie, Destiny, Jessica Garcia-consistently earn praise for patience and going above and beyond during leasing. Robert and Roberto on maintenance are known for quick emergency fixes and professional work. However, the property shows serious gaps in upkeep. Residents report move-in apartments with holes merely painted over, broken fridges blamed on residents, and roach problems that persist despite pest control calls. Maintenance sometimes patches issues (caulking over holes) rather than solving them. Parking enforcement is rigid, leading to a $330 tow over a one-space error despite a valid pass.

Luxury ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Sansom Ridge Apartments
#107
64

Sansom Ridge Apartments

4.2(46)✓ Google-verified

Sansom Ridge draws strong loyalty for its affordable rents, spacious units, and standout staff members like Rosetta and Sabrina who run a food pantry and host community events. Management has failed residents during payment disputes, pest problems persist despite requests, trash accumulates around the property, and break-ins plus package theft remain unresolved despite on-site cameras. The complex excels at ground-level support but struggles with accountability at the office level. Maintenance staff like Bren'Sha earn high marks for professionalism. Quiet on the surface, the community faces underlying safety and upkeep issues that management has not addressed across multiple resident tenures.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Monticello Crossroads
#108
61

Monticello Crossroads

3.7(141)✓ Google-verified

Monticello Crossroads has split into two distinct periods. Under recent management (Roger, Johan, and maintenance lead Javier), residents report friendly, responsive service and visible improvements. However, deeper issues persist: maintenance backlogs, unresolved pest infestations, chronic trash overflows, and a history of management instability create real daily hardship for longer-term residents. Newer residents praise the turnaround; those with ongoing problems report feeling ignored by corporate ownership and blame-shifted to office staff. Specific problems include unanswered maintenance requests marked resolved without completion, rats in units, no on-site maintenance availability, billing disputes sent to collections, and parking spaces consumed by company waste containers. Language barriers in the leasing office compound communication troubles. The complex appears to have been through corporate management challenges and a past television intervention attempt. Current staff appear engaged, but systemic issues suggest surface improvement may not address underlying operations problems.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Flats on Mill
#109
62

Flats on Mill

3.7(230)✓ Google-verified

Strong personalities on staff, especially Jenneth, earn repeated praise for attentive leasing and fast repairs. Yet the property wrestles with a deep split: long-term residents who found the community quiet and well-maintained under current ownership stand against those who left after pest infestations, management turnover, security problems, and constant fee surprises. One reviewer experienced cockroaches, shootings, 12 police cars, and a locked unit at move-out within 11 months; another praised silence and care from the same address. The pool has sat closed for two years, raising questions about promised amenities. Staff inconsistency mirrors these swings. Jenneth, Caesar (maintenance), and the current team earn genuine affection; an office worker named Michelle drew complaints about rudeness. Residents on quieter grounds report thriving; those in active zones report the opposite. New ownership appears to have stabilized things for some, but fee creep and pest control gaps persist even under the new regime.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Trails at Summer Creek
#110
63

The Trails at Summer Creek

3.8(122)✓ Google-verified

New residents often experience prompt maintenance and welcoming staff, particularly Alicia Jacobs, who handles enrollment with care. The grounds feel peaceful with trails for walking and a dog park on site. However, the complex struggles with systemic parking shortages and towing practices that frustrate tenants; maintenance sometimes sidesteps repairs rather than fixing them properly. Office management responsiveness varies; some residents felt ignored when raising concerns about disputes or resource allocation, and the pool is closed during spring months despite warm weather.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Historic Electric Building Apartments
#111
62

Historic Electric Building Apartments

3.9(113)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Front-facing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and some residents describe year-long stays as positive. The building's location in historic Sundance Square remains an asset for those who value downtown living. Infrastructure problems dominate resident complaints: two of three elevators frequently offline for weeks, creating hazardous conditions for upper-floor tenants carrying belongings downstairs. Water outages, smoking despite no-smoking policies, thin sound insulation between units, trash overflow, and repeated utility billing errors point to systemic maintenance and management gaps that offset good staff interactions.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Hulen Park Place Townhomes
#112
62

Hulen Park Place Townhomes

3.8(101)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Hulen Park Place is deeply divided. Long-term residents praise its quiet layout and occasional responsive maintenance, but recent reviews describe chronic flooding, pest infestations, and a manager perceived as dismissive and difficult. The gap between five-star and one-star accounts suggests either significant recent deterioration or sharply different treatment by staff. Move-in conditions have disappointed renters, with dirty units and broken systems; one tenant reported an unusually fast resolution after initial complaint. Security deposit disputes and office inaccessibility frustrate tenants trying to resolve routine matters. The maintenance staff itself draws consistent praise, but management's willingness to prioritise repairs appears inconsistent.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Trinity Bell Gardens
#113
63

Trinity Bell Gardens

3.9(76)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents and newcomers alike consistently praise the management team's consistency and friendliness, fast maintenance response, and beautiful grounds with active community events. The core frustration centres on thin walls that let neighbor noise bleed through, uneven parking enforcement that leaves renters without spaces despite paid rent, and move-out charges residents dispute, compounded by privacy concerns about application verification practices and complaints about service quality. Maintenance staff like Adam are named for same-day fixes. Amenities include pool, fitness room, walking trail, and monthly food trucks. However, residents with pets report high move-out carpet charges even for pre-existing damage, and those without garages struggle with first-come parking while some residents leave garages unused or park multiple vehicles.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Ridgmar Oaks
#114
61

Ridgmar Oaks

4.0(37)✓ Google-verified

Ridgmar Oaks divides sharply along a management timeline. Under the previous ownership, tenants faced months-long repair waits, widespread pest issues, and deteriorating facilities. The arrival of the current management team (Lisa, Viviana, Felicia, and others) has dramatically shifted operations, with residents praising rapid repairs, responsive communication, and genuine care. However, the property itself remains aging and pest-prone, and recent reviews from the past month suggest underlying problems persist despite staff improvements.

Luxury ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Paloma Village
#115
60

Paloma Village

3.8(55)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews consistently praise Madison, Vanessa, and Leslie for attentive leasing help and the modern, clean apartments. Maintenance responds quickly to work orders. But the other half of the story reveals serious wear: reviewers hear neighbors' drawers and footsteps as if walls were paper, move-out charges appear arbitrary (full carpet replacement for invisible stains, fridge door for discoloration alone), and management tolerates marijuana smoke, restricted dog breeds, and unattended dog waste despite complaints. One tenant needed medical attention after stepping on a protruding nail management had ignored. A tenant researching this place should know that luxury finishes mask construction shortcuts. The staff care, but rule enforcement is inconsistent. Rents climb while complaints about sound, safety, and unfair charges mount. Positive reviews tilt toward recent arrivals and leasing-day excitement; discontent grows with tenure.

Luxury ApartmentsSenior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Carmel Creekside Apartments
#116
63

Carmel Creekside Apartments

3.7(347)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the location, cleanliness, and handful of exceptional staff members like Paige, who genuinely help tenants navigate issues. However, a persistent pattern emerges: AC units fail monthly and go weeks unrepaired, management ignores escalations, roof leaks are left unchecked, noise complaints bring no resolution, and residents report safety incidents including shootings. Multiple tenants cite hidden fees that push actual rent far above advertised rates. The leasing office makes strong first impressions with friendly application help, but maintenance responses become minimal once you move in. Repairs either drag on indefinitely or contractors do poor work. Several long-term residents who loved the community at first eventually left due to compounded maintenance failures and management's refusal to treat concerns seriously.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Residences at Eastland
#117
62 low data

Residences at Eastland

3.7(115)✓ Google-verified

Management quality varies sharply. When engaged, property managers like Andria earn strong praise for attentiveness. However, staffing gaps, slow maintenance response, and selective rule enforcement undermine trust. Location and cleanliness are noted positives.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Nolan
#118
56

The Nolan

2.9(73)✓ Google-verified

New management has turned the property around with visible improvements to lighting, landscaping, and maintenance, earning praise for their responsiveness and willingness to work with tenants. However, the complex still struggles with inconsistent office staffing, pest control, plumbing leaks during rain, and poor grounds upkeep that reviewers describe as longstanding and unresolved.

Townhome-Style Apartment Communities
Axis Waterfront
#119
59

Axis Waterfront

3.0(297)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff earn consistent praise for speed and patience, with Jaelyn Tucker, Henry, and Treena mentioned by name across multiple five-star reviews. Maintenance responds quickly and after-hours. Living conditions tell a different story: residents report recurring water outages, ant and gnat invasions, trash collection failures despite paying premium rent, and concerns about gate security and how maintenance enters units. The split mirrors the rating spread: people love the signing process and immediate staff interaction, but ongoing operational issues create regret among long-term residents. One reviewer in a loft noted plumbing delays and disputed charges; another cited rodent problems tied to missed valet trash service and no Regional Manager follow-up.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Evergreen at Hulen Bend
#120
61

Evergreen at Hulen Bend

3.9(63)✓ Google-verified

Evergreen has a committed core of long-term residents who praise the grounds, location, and when management is stable, the friendliness of staff like Ms. Clemons and earlier maintenance teams. However, recent management changes have triggered departures, with multiple seniors reporting slow work order completion, hallway sanitation issues (pet waste, mold from leaks), harsh enforcement of parking violations, and deposit disputes that left residents feeling disrespected rather than cared for. The property struggles with consistency. Good maintenance staff and responsive management earn five-star ratings; poor communication, staff turnover, and health concerns in common areas drive one- and two-star reviews. Senior residents especially cite feeling dismissed when their requests go unanswered or when management lacks empathy during medical crises.

Senior & 55+ LivingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Burnett Lofts
#121
60

Burnett Lofts

3.6(115)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents credit Burnett Lofts for its walkable downtown position, well-appointed apartments, and a capable maintenance team led by Derrick. The leasing staff (particularly Kayla, Landon, and Sarah) receive consistent praise for professionalism and attentiveness. A management change in spring 2025 is noted as turning around prior service gaps. However, older reviews and recent comments reveal persistent friction: the parking garage gate has repeatedly failed, leaving cars vulnerable to break-ins; callers struggle to reach the leasing office; and move-out security deposit disputes have stretched months without resolution. Noise from neighbors and delayed HVAC fixes appear in multiple accounts. New management has improved maintenance responsiveness, but office accessibility and security remain contentious.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
McCart Apartments
#122
61

McCart Apartments

3.9(71)✓ Google-verified

Audrey's attentiveness and quick lease processing earn consistent praise, but persistent water damage, plumbing issues, and slow maintenance repairs dominate complaints. Many residents report outdated fixtures, visible mold, and pest problems. The gap between website photos and actual unit condition frustrates long-term renters, and management allegedly charges move-out fees for pre-existing damage.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Everly Plaza
#123
61 low data

Everly Plaza

4.5(16)✓ Google-verified

Most recent reviews (2-4 years old) praise the quiet, clean setting and manager Tammy's welcoming approach. A one-star review from two months ago reports serious issues: bedbug infestation, trespassing, drug activity, theft of medication packages, and disruptive neighbors. The reviewer notes staff did little to address these problems.

Luxury ApartmentsSenior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Maxwell Apartments
#124
60

Maxwell Apartments

3.6(337)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff Alice and manager Veronica consistently earn praise for friendliness and thorough help during tours and move-in, making the application process smooth and welcoming for most applicants. However, residents report significant gaps once they move in: emergency maintenance responds slowly even in heat emergencies, repair requests languish unresolved (AC, dishwashers, rotting wood), and some face pest infestations and noise from other units. Disputes over deposit retention and application fee practices appear in multiple complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Highland Park Apartments
#125
61

Highland Park Apartments

3.7(91)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff like Daisy, Kenda, and Savannah earn consistent praise for patience and attention to detail, and the quiet location near The Shops at Clearfork appeals to many residents. However, maintenance responsiveness is deeply inconsistent: some tenants report timely fixes, while others describe months of ignored requests for pest control, water damage, and mold remediation. Staff tone varies sharply, from welcoming to curt. Move-out deposit disputes and safety concerns about narrow stairs add friction.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Estrella at Seminary Apartments
#126
61

Estrella at Seminary Apartments

3.7(89)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Estrella has a sharp divide: some tenants credit Patricia, Ana, and maintenance tech Pedro with going above and beyond, describing a quiet community where repairs happen promptly. Others report months-long unresolved water leaks, mold in children's bathrooms, roach infestations, and maintenance work (like wall repairs) left incomplete. The gap seems to depend partly on which manager you get and whether your requests reach the right person. Pricing starts at $749/month across 1-, 2-, and 3-bedroom units. The business lists pet-friendly policies and bilingual staff. However, multiple tenants describe a pattern of office communication breakdowns, unequal responsiveness, and deteriorating building conditions (peeling paint, broken windows, trash accumulation) that contradict the advertised appeal.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Cobble Hill
#127
58

Cobble Hill

3.5(125)✓ Google-verified

Half the reviews praise staff warmth and cleanliness, while the other half describe years of roaches, ignored maintenance requests, and communication breakdowns. A new manager (Devin) appears to have energized the office, but older complaints about pest control failures, selective staff responsiveness, and management indifference to tenant hardship remain vivid. Long-term residents in back buildings reported infestation since move-in and no rent relief despite forced relocations. For those on tight budgets, affordability and some genuine staff support exist, but the pest history and inconsistent management raise real questions about habitability and fair treatment. Newer arrivals under current leadership report better experiences than older tenants.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Decker Apartment Homes
#128
57

Decker Apartment Homes

3.7(273)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents describe a complex deteriorating under management transitions, plagued by persistent water leaks that trigger unexplained shutoffs, roach infestations, and water damage that management either ignores or charges tenants to absorb. Move-in staff can be personable and maintenance responsive in emergencies, but this goodwill erodes once you are settled: emails go unanswered, phone lines route to an AI system that mishandles requests, invoices balloon, and tenants report staff become hostile when lease renewal approaches or when seeking accountability for repairs.

Furnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Sansom Bluff Apartments
#129
60

Sansom Bluff Apartments

3.5(195)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sansom Bluff splits sharply: residents consistently praise the buildings, pool, and events, especially when dealing with named staff like Kasundra, Rosetta, or Hunter. The complex struggles with management turnover and office professionalism. Multiple tenants report rudeness from current office staff, trouble reaching leasing by phone, and suddenly higher rents with added charges; one resident reported roach infestation and unresolved water quality complaints since move-in. The property attracts families and pet owners drawn to its spacious units and grounds. Quality hinges entirely on which staff member handles your request: beloved individuals like Rosetta and Hunter get five-star praise for responsiveness and care, while recent office transitions have left others frustrated by dismissive, evasive management and communication breakdowns.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
HomeTowne At Matador Ranch
#130
60

HomeTowne At Matador Ranch

4.0(68)✓ Google-verified

Seniors and retirees consistently praise the quiet setting, supportive office staff (Shannon and Gracie named repeatedly), and friendly community. Activities keep residents engaged. However, recent concerns around slow maintenance, a faulty fire alarm system, and unruly upstairs neighbors undermine the safety and comfort the community otherwise promises. Parking and gate security also needs attention.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Landry at Cross Creek
#131
60

Landry at Cross Creek

3.6(109)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise the leasing staff, especially Abby and Kayla, for responsiveness and respect. Units are spacious with clean grounds, and the package locker system works well. The community is undermined by poor sound insulation and management's reluctance to enforce noise rules; residents report ten or more complaints without meaningful action. Lease-break and towing policies feel punitive, and some describe management communication as dismissive on issues beyond basic tasks. The property works best for those tolerant of apartment noise and stable in their lease. Staff effort shines through day-to-day interactions, but structural limits and policy rigidity create friction at move-out or during disputes.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Haven at Chisholm Trail
#132
60

The Haven at Chisholm Trail

3.5(458)✓ Google-verified

Tenants split sharply on The Haven at Chisholm Trail. Office staff and maintenance teams earn consistent praise for patience and responsiveness, and early move-in flexibility stands out. However, serious safety concerns dominate lower ratings: residents report management's failure to evict a tenant accused of assault, wrongful eviction filings after payment issues, and a pattern of ignored maintenance requests. Communication gaps and damage dispute charges add to tenant frustration.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Sansom Pointe Senior
#133
60

Sansom Pointe Senior

3.7(99)✓ Google-verified

Sansom Pointe Senior draws residents with low rent and daily activities, but living here means battling roaches, broken elevators, and smoke drifting from neighboring units despite the advertised non-smoking policy. Management largely ignores complaints; while event coordinator Sabrina earns consistent praise, the office itself stays behind closed doors and fails to address the core maintenance and pest control issues that have pushed many residents out within months.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Sovereign
#134
59

The Sovereign

3.4(318)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff like Nataly and Faith receive consistent praise for speed and transparency, and some residents describe quiet apartments in a convenient location. However, grounds maintenance has deteriorated sharply. Reviewers document grass uncut for months, trash sitting for weeks, roach infestations that survive repeated treatments, bird and dog waste piling up, and shattered glass on walking paths. Maintenance requests vanish into silence; one resident waited two weeks for a kitchen sink repair and months for promised pressure washing. Move-in walkthroughs are skipped, opening residents to disputed damage charges at move-out. Staff turnover is severe (15 managers and 30+ maintenance workers cited in one review), and corporate reportedly blocks repairs. Some residents report unfair fees for trash violations on top of existing fees, and one applicant paid $375 in application fees before being told mid-process that only a social security number-not a Mexican passport-was acceptable, with no refund issued.

Furnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Dylan Apartments
#135
59

Dylan Apartments

3.4(216)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the residents praise the calm setting and responsive maintenance team, especially leasing staff like Celia, Maria, and technician Andres. The other half report persistent roach infestations, management issues, and closed pool access, raising serious questions about pest control and upkeep despite the stated move-in specials. Quality varies sharply by unit and time. Recent reviews confirm ongoing pest problems even after older complaints. Staff friendliness and maintenance speed are genuine, yet cannot offset fundamental concerns about cleanliness and management consistency that would deter many renters.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Westmount at River Park
#136
59

Westmount at River Park

3.3(214)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Individual staff members like Samantha, Claudia, Maria, and Taylor earn consistent praise for friendliness and helpfulness; residents also note safe buildings and quick maintenance responses when things work. The complex's real problem is instability. Management has turned over five times in three years, changing rules constantly; payment portals malfunction regularly, leaving tenants unable to pay online and facing credit hits; maintenance requests go unresolved (AC leaks, hot water, appliance issues); and leadership shows no flexibility with residents in hardship, even those with perfect payment histories. Built-in shelves and a dog park exist on paper, but reviewers describe the dog area as overgrown and unmaintained, units as small with popcorn ceilings and tiny bathrooms, and amenities like the pool as neglected for months at a time.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Reserve at Quebec
#137
59

Reserve at Quebec

3.0(206)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the maintenance crew, particularly Tony and Luis, for going above and beyond on repairs and staying professional under pressure. The community feels peaceful and welcoming to many. However, a significant subset reports major frustration: months-long delays on promised repairs, office staff making commitments they don't keep, and serious water damage and mold being dismissed as "still livable" rather than addressed. The experience varies sharply depending on whether you encounter responsive maintenance or unresolved maintenance requests. Office staff like Melisa and the move-in team win praise for their warmth and efficiency. Yet communication breaks down on complex issues, leaving residents without updates or timelines. Management appears stretched or inconsistent in how it handles problems across the property.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Handley Oaks Apartments
#138
59

Handley Oaks Apartments

4.0(58)✓ Google-verified

Front office staff, particularly Norma and Lupita, earn consistent praise for attentiveness during the leasing process and willingness to work with non-traditional income. However, multiple recent reviews document severe roach infestations management has not resolved despite work orders and pest control visits, with some tenants reporting conditions worsened after treatment.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Life at Westland Estates
#139
59

The Life at Westland Estates

3.4(190)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Positive experiences center on Natisha and Amanda, who earn consistent praise for patience, availability, and going beyond the lease process. Maintenance under Fabian responds quickly and handles repairs correctly. The apartments themselves are spacious and amenities work well when accessible. However, persistent complaints about roach infestations, non-functional gates, and limited gym access overshadow these strengths. Safety issues like package theft and unruly tenant behavior concern some residents. The gap between five-star and one-star reviews reflects a stark divide: those who encounter engaged management praise it highly, while others face pest problems and poor front-desk responsiveness.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments
#140
59

Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments

4.2(17)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the modern apartments, location near downtown and Newby Park, and quick maintenance response from named staff like Camryn and Willie. Several tenants lived happily for years. However, move-out billing practices have triggered serious disputes, including allegations of unclear charges sent to collections without itemized explanations. The property has no gated parking or on-site amenities, and sits next to active train tracks.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Sunset Pointe Apartments
#141
59

Sunset Pointe Apartments

3.3(209)✓ Google-verified

Sunset Pointe draws strong praise for its staff warmth and apartment appearance, yet the community is sharply divided by persistent maintenance failures and management unresponsiveness. Residents report urgent repairs left unaddressed for months, unexpected charges for items management should cover, and poor follow-up on complaints, while a vocal subset describe feeling unheard and mistreated. The business maintains resort-style amenities on paper (pool, play area, cafe) but reviewers say these often remain closed or underused. Staff turnover compounds problems: maintenance disappears mid-job, office personnel change constantly, and urgent calls go unanswered. One long-term resident raised concerns about discrimination and questioned recent rating improvements, citing systemic neglect that worsened after 2023.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Slate at Fort Worth Apartments
#142
59

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(112)✓ Google-verified

New management since February 2026 has revitalized the property with rapid repairs, remodeling, and reopened amenities like the pool. Meshun Davis, the current manager, receives consistent praise for responsiveness and care. However, reviews from 2023 to 2024 reveal a troubled history of roach infestations, security deposit withholding, communication breakdowns, and unclean units under previous ownership.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Morningside Apartments
#143
59

Morningside Apartments

3.6(65)✓ Google-verified

Management and leasing staff, especially Maria and Juan, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and problem-solving. Recent administrative changes have notably improved resident satisfaction and maintenance responsiveness. However, recurring complaints center on aging infrastructure: pest problems, mold, leaks, and slow fixes on critical systems like heating. Some residents report year-long repair waits. The gap between enthusiastic recent reviews and older complaints suggests either real improvements underway or inconsistent execution across different maintenance issues and timeframes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Mylo Apartment Homes
#144
57

Mylo Apartment Homes

3.6(439)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Nancy, Susan, Kyle, and Jason earn consistent praise for friendliness and quick service, especially during move-in and maintenance calls. However, residents report severe pest problems, unresolved AC and water damage, ignored maintenance requests, and poor trash pickup, with some families leaving after short stays due to heat and bug infestations. The welcome experience masks a pattern once you move in: work orders sit, pest control visits don't happen despite scheduled spraying, and management responses range from dismissive to accusatory. For families needing reliable upkeep and pest control, the gaps between promised service and delivery are significant.

Student HousingSenior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Horizons at Sunridge
#145
58

Horizons at Sunridge

3.0(202)✓ Google-verified

Strong maintenance staff and office team loyalty shine through, but systematic building neglect and pest management failures undermine the experience. Reviewers praise Juan and the front desk crew for responsiveness, yet struggle with unresolved mold, doors that won't close, roaches despite constant spraying, and a management that prioritizes cosmetic landscaping over unit repairs. Rent hikes and long wait times (sometimes 10 days) test patience; those most satisfied live without structural problems.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Oxford at Lake Worth
#146
58

Oxford at Lake Worth

3.0(138)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most five-star reviewers praise the office team by name (Kristen, Kaylee, Tori, Aliza, Paula) for genuine warmth and swift maintenance turnarounds under 24 hours. The pet-friendly setup with two bark parks and scenic countryside appeal to dog owners. However, a vocal minority report systemic failures: pest control that sprays but never escalates, water leaks left unresolved until mold develops, and move-out charges of $600+ that don't count against stated deposits. One tenant described months of ignored maintenance requests; another was told management cannot honor scheduling requests for privacy-sensitive work. The rating spread (43% five-star, 49% one-to-two-star) reflects a sharp divide. Positive reviews center on recent improvements under current management and the peaceful rural setting. Negative reviews focus on unresolved structural problems, fee opacity, and the tension between friendly office staff and management's unwillingness or inability to fix underlying maintenance or communication issues. Staff turnover may explain some disparities in leasing agent behavior.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Celine
#147
58

The Celine

2.7(221)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Crystal and Lauren earn consistent praise for patience during leasing, and residents who stay report friendly, responsive teams and clean common areas. The reality diverges sharply for many: move-in units arrive unprepared with broken AC, roaches, water leaks, and damage ignored by maintenance despite tickets marked complete. Advertised rent of $945 becomes $1,136 after mandatory fees and valet trash. Water shutoffs occur monthly, security deposits vanish over disputed charges, and management churns every few months amid resident complaints. Vehicle break-ins and broken parking cameras compound the picture.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Holt on Chisholm Trail
#148
58

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

3.1(420)✓ Google-verified

Staff warmth masks systemic property failures. Leasing agents like Arthur, Amanda, and Crystal earn consistent praise, and Eric excels at repairs when he reaches your unit. But residents endure months without AC or heat, abandoned work orders, poor communication from management, and amenities like the pool that never open despite rent that climbs mid-lease. With only two maintenance workers for a sprawling complex, the operation buckles under its own size.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Stallion Pointe Apartments
#149
57

Stallion Pointe Apartments

3.4(144)✓ Google-verified

Stallion Pointe's Resident Services team earns consistent praise for genuine support, from helping non-residents find resources to running food pantry and community events. Staff like Casey Williams and Sabrena Butler are named repeatedly for going far beyond basic help. Maintenance problems tell a darker story. Multiple residents report A/C failures lasting weeks or months, mold in units, roach infestations, and emergency calls that go unanswered. One resident's apartment sat at 55 degrees during a freeze with no response. Another endured a water-damaged ceiling marked "in progress" for months with no work done. The leasing staff care, but management appears unable or unwilling to enforce repairs.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Silversage Point at Western Center
#150
57

Silversage Point at Western Center

3.3(108)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Recent tenants and prospective renters praise staff warmth and quick repairs under strong management, but many long-term residents report chronic failures: leaks go unfixed for months, roaches persist despite complaints, and management changes so often that follow-up work stops. The property appears livable under stable leadership but unstable when the office turnover returns.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Patriot Pointe Apartments
#151
57

Patriot Pointe Apartments

3.1(121)✓ Google-verified

The property draws strong praise for apartment size, layout, and amenities, with select staff members earning deep loyalty for professionalism and genuine care. Management responsiveness and maintenance speed fail repeatedly: mold sits untreated for weeks, pest control remains ineffective, and calls often go unanswered. High turnover in office staff mirrors tenant departure rates. While some residents thrive in the community, others face deteriorating grounds, noisy neighbors, and unresolved maintenance claims despite full rent charges. Standout employees like Daishuntane and Clemente drive positive experiences, but their impact cannot offset systemic gaps. The property's mixed-income model, proximity to Fort Worth Veterans Affairs and Tarrant County College, and amenities (pool, fitness center, game room) appeal on paper, yet execution wavers sharply between periods of good stewardship and visible decline.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Vega Place Apartments
#152
57 low data

Vega Place Apartments

4.0(10)✓ Google-verified

Recent visitors find the grounds peaceful and staff welcoming, though one long-standing complaint from a decade ago raises serious flags about management professionalism, resident safety, and arbitrary rule changes. Current experience may differ.

Senior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Hayes Apartments
#153
56

The Hayes Apartments

3.2(119)✓ Google-verified

Timira and Bobbie draw consistent praise for patient, attentive service; some residents report maintenance arriving quickly. Many others describe a management crisis: AC units broken for weeks or months, ceilings and windows leaking through rainy seasons, roaches and rats documented across units. Residents report calling multiple times to no answer, work orders marked resolved without fixes, and staff behaviour ranging from dismissive to aggressive. A handful note positive recent changes, but the bulk of complaints span the past year and remain unresolved. The complex appears caught between pockets of good staff effort and systemic property failure. Move-in units often arrive dirty and broken. Elderly and families with children describe staying in cars or seeking legal counsel. One resident was charged $180 for belongings discarded by management without notice. The laundry costs $2 per load with frequent breakdowns. The core issue is maintenance volume: the office claims responsiveness on select tickets while residents document weeks-long waits for critical failures.

Student HousingFurnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Columbia Renaissance Square
#154
56 low data

Columbia Renaissance Square

3.4(45)✓ Google-verified

Residents report standout staff members who respond quickly and organize weekly events, but persistent pest problems, thin walls that carry neighbor noise, and inconsistent maintenance undercut the experience. Some praise the move-in condition and fitness amenities; others cite unprepared temp workers and a six-year decline in upkeep.

Luxury ApartmentsSenior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Gardens At Cobb Park
#155
55 low data

Gardens At Cobb Park

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Gardens at Cobb Park draws praise from residents who value its peaceful setting and friendly staff, particularly assistant manager Huseni. However, significant complaints span unresponsive office communication, serious security issues, and documented pest infestations that management has not resolved. Limited recent activity makes current conditions unclear.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Crest Centreport Apartments
#156
55

Crest Centreport Apartments

1.9(146)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Months of waiting for repair requests, roaches thriving despite monthly pest control charges, and staff entering units without warning or notice define tenant experience here. The affordable rent attracts budget-conscious renters, but most feel trapped by hidden fees, ignored maintenance problems, and a leasing office more focused on charges than solutions.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Hulen Heights Apartments
#157
54 low data

Hulen Heights Apartments

3.7(30)

Strong long-term residents and manager Diane's attention earn consistent five-star praise, but office availability complaints and a serious discrimination allegation split opinion sharply. Older units with wear show; location near Central Market is a draw for most.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Spanish Village Apartments
#158
54

Spanish Village Apartments

2.8(51)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Recent reviews show improvement under new management, particularly manager Maria. Office staff and maintenance teams earn consistent praise for friendliness and speed. However, a deep split remains: cleanings are incomplete, some repairs drag, past management issues linger in older complaints, and pest problems surface in multiple reviews. The complex suits budget-conscious renters in a quiet pocket, but the track record is uneven.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
West Chase Apartments
#159
54

West Chase Apartments

3.7(29)✓ Google-verified

Recent residents report strong personal connections with the management team, especially Manager Flor, and praise the gated community, convenient location near highways and restaurants, and responsive office support. Older complaints describe maintenance delays, poor phone access, and parking reallocations, though these predate current staffing.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Lancaster Apartments
#160
54

Lancaster Apartments

2.9(70)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise maintenance technician Jaime for swift, thorough repairs and the office staff (including Abril) for friendliness. One complaint alleges discriminatory treatment in payment processing and language barriers. The wide rating split (40% five-star, 50% one/two-star) reflects a sharp divide: recent visitors describe efficient maintenance and a calm environment, while at least one reviewer felt excluded.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Leuda May Apartments
#161
54

Leuda May Apartments

3.9(20)✓ Google-verified

Recent management changes have improved day-to-day responsiveness, with tenants praising staff like Donya and Holly for quick action on repairs and accessible communication. However, billing disputes persist, roach infestations in some units went unaddressed for months, and the property's history of frequent management turnover has left some residents uncertain about long-term reliability.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate Housing
The Moderne
#162
53

The Moderne

3.3(25)✓ Google-verified

The Moderne splits sharply between recent positive reviews citing responsive staff and a well-managed turnaround, and older negative accounts of filthy move-ins, ignored maintenance requests, and Airbnb chaos. New management appears to have improved responsiveness, but cleanliness and security issues persist in some reports. Location near West 7th and Montgomery Plaza appeals, though pricing and policy transparency draw criticism.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Crestwood Place Apartments
#163
53

Crestwood Place Apartments

3.5(83)✓ Google-verified

Crestwood Place draws praise for rare staff members like Michele and Joannah who deliver genuine care, and its low rents appeal to budget-conscious tenants. Yet the overwhelming experience is neglect: roaches, leaking fixtures, sewage odors, and units painted over decades go unaddressed for months. Management has cycled through multiple companies; office hours shrink while fees grow. Long-time residents report a sharp decline since 2023, with the property rumored for redevelopment as 55+ senior housing.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsSenior & 55+ Living
The Residences of Diamond Hill
#164
52

The Residences of Diamond Hill

2.5(144)✓ Google-verified

The complex is beset by slow maintenance response and tenant behavior problems. Work orders sit open for months, AC systems fail in heat, and water damage causing mold remains unfixed even when officially marked "resolved". Noise from children and poor neighbor management drive many to leave. A few staff members like Christy Mullins and Jackie/Scarlett stand out, but overall communication from the office is poor, calls go unreturned, and residents feel the property prioritizes rent over their wellbeing.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments
#165
52

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

3.4(148)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half of residents report extremely poor conditions including widespread pests, water issues, and damaged units, while others praise the quiet setting and leasing staff. The complex charges steep move-out fees without proof of damage, tows visitor cars without warning, and offers no resolution for major maintenance problems like broken locks, rusty appliances, and ongoing infestations that contradict its luxury branding.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Madeleine
#166
51

The Madeleine

3.0(99)✓ Google-verified

The Madeleine's low average rating masks a sharp divide: a minority report genuine satisfaction with staff helpfulness, while most residents cite persistent pest issues, delayed repairs, water failures, and management unresponsiveness. Maintenance technicians Dwayne and James earned praise for follow-through, yet others wait weeks for basic service requests to start. Residents report roach infestations, ants, water shutdowns blamed on the city (contradicted by neighbors' working service), and mounting unexplained fees. Trash accumulation, dog waste in common areas, and unchecked neighbor complaints add to the decline reviewers describe. The leasing office, when staffed, includes standouts like Cynthia and Tashyra, but office manager Crystal is frequently absent and staff are accused of dismissive attitudes. Conditions appear uneven across the property, with some residents experiencing minor issues while others report health hazards including possible mold in HVAC systems and respiratory problems in young children. One tenant filed a maintenance photo log spanning months with no resolution. Parking is severely limited, enforced neighbor conduct is minimal, and gate security is non-functional. The core tension: reviewers cannot determine whether poor maintenance is widespread neglect or whether discrimination shapes service quality by section or resident type.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
The Springs
#167
51

The Springs

2.8(122)✓ Google-verified

The complex suffers from pervasive mold, pest infestations, and maintenance failures that residents report after months of neglect. Staff responsiveness has varied sharply over time; a few recent employees (Eric, Ayanna) received praise, but the office frequently closes early, ignores work orders, and communication remains inconsistent or absent. Most residents do not recommend living here. Multiple reviews cite black mold in walls, water damage, roaches and rats, and the property is reportedly being demolished or shut down. Management struggles with turnover and compliance: office staff attitudes are described as rude or dismissive, and one former employee's key theft forced unit recopy efforts. Health risks and security concerns (homeless occupation of vacant units, drug paraphernalia found near playgrounds) are recurring themes that distinguish this from typical maintenance complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Times Square On the Hill
#168
51

Times Square On the Hill

2.9(45)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff-especially Jordan and Benitta-earn consistent praise for kindness and clear communication during move-in. Long-term residents report feeling safe and well-managed. However, newer complaints flag vehicle theft, parking headaches, and delayed fixes on water and maintenance issues, suggesting inconsistent upkeep.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)
#169
48

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

2.6(73)✓ Google-verified

Highland Vista residents report a pattern of critical unresolved maintenance failures, persistent pest infestations, and indifferent management that has driven multiple tenants to pursue legal action. Sewage backups, water damage, non-functional heating and cooling, and roach problems persist for weeks or months despite repeated requests. Staff turnover, billing errors, emergency response delays, and hostile interactions with management create an environment where tenants say basic habitability standards go unmet, and disputes often require court intervention to resolve.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingFurnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Buttercup Place Apartments
#170
48 low data

Buttercup Place Apartments

3.3(19)✓ Google-verified

Buttercup Place offers an affordable place to live near highway and retail access, and reviewers in stable housing report satisfaction with their units. However, recent complaints point to unresponsive management, pest problems, and safety concerns in common areas that raise doubt about maintenance and oversight.

Luxury ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Travis Gardens Apartments
#171
48 low data

Travis Gardens Apartments

3.1(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Travis Gardens divides sharply: recent five-star reviews credit strong management (Ms. Shonda, Christy), safety, and community feel. Older one-star reviews cite hostile management, pest problems, slow maintenance, parking chaos, and severe failures during family hardship and winter emergencies. Current state unclear; property appears to have cycled through different management eras with mixed results.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Fort 1901 Lofts & Apartments
#172
40 low data

Fort 1901 Lofts & Apartments

3.7(3)

Limited review data shows sharp contrast: one renter praised the peaceful, modern feel and value, but another reported months-long mold issues, roof leaks, and slow repairs despite management change. Health impact noted.

Luxury ApartmentsFurnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Aspen Apartments
#173
39 low data

The Aspen Apartments

2.7(74)✓ Google-verified

Aspen sits well below the townhome-style average (2.7 vs. 3.93 stars). Maintenance response splits sharply: some praise quick action, but others report two-day delays on water floods and ignored roach infestations. Management turnover leaves residents divided. Office staff earn consistent praise from some tenants and complaints of rudeness and billing disputes from others. Safety issues (gunfire, physical threats, resident shooting) and unexplained utility charges dominate negative reviews. Most flagrant complaints cite pet control failures despite payment, unpredictable fee stacking, and refund delays up to four months.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Autumn Chase Apartments
#174
35 low data

Autumn Chase Apartments

3.1(57)

Autumn Chase splits sharply between five-star praise for office staff kindness and swift repairs, and one/two-star complaints about persistent sewage leaks, roaches, slow maintenance despite promises, visitor parking fees, and a high-crime neighborhood with constant police calls. The property has cycled through multiple management teams in short periods, leaving tenants uncertain which experience they will get.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Park Terrace Apartment
#175
32 low data

Park Terrace Apartment

2.7(13)

Park Terrace shows significant dissatisfaction: 54% of reviews are one or two stars, with tenants citing poor communication, outdated apartments, and trash on grounds. Maintenance staff Steve is praised for responsiveness, but management and front-desk interactions are frequently described as disrespectful or dismissive.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Featured partners for apartment availability

How many apartments do you want to compare?

By sending this enquiry, you agree it will be shared with the leasing office, apartment community, or property manager contacts relevant to your request.

When you submit a quote or contact form, your inquiry may go to partner providers who can do the work. We may receive a referral fee for this, but our rankings and scores come from our published method alone and are never affected by fees.

Common questions about townhome-style apartment communities

How much do townhome-style apartments cost in Fort Worth?
Rents generally run higher than a standard one-bedroom apartment because you're getting more square footage, a garage, and less shared wall space. Expect a premium of roughly 10-25% over a comparable flat-style unit in the same part of town, though older or smaller communities in outer suburbs can price closer to standard apartments.
What's the difference between a townhome-style apartment and renting an actual townhouse?
A townhome-style apartment is owned and managed by one company as part of a larger rental community, so you sign a standard apartment lease and the property handles maintenance, landscaping, and amenities. A rented townhouse is usually owned by an individual landlord, which can mean more negotiating room but less consistency in upkeep and amenities.
What should I check before signing a lease at one of these communities?
Confirm whether the garage or parking spot is included in the quoted rent or billed as an add-on, ask how utilities and trash are split if the unit has multiple levels, and get maintenance response times in writing. Also check the unit's exact floor plan since square footage and layout can vary a lot even within the same community.
How do I judge the quality of a townhome-style community beyond the tour?
Look at how the exterior and common areas are maintained outside of move-in season, ask current residents (or read recent reviews) about noise and maintenance turnaround, and check whether the community has had recent renovations to roofs, siding, or parking areas, since deferred exterior maintenance is a common issue in older townhome-style properties.

Last updated 2026-07-24