Fort Worth Apartment Reviews Guide
Menu

Student Housing in Fort Worth, TX

Student Housing in Greater Fort Worth

Fort Worth's student housing market covers everything from purpose-built complexes marketed straight at TCU students to standard apartment communities that happen to sit close enough to campus for an easy commute. We track 114 of these properties across the city, from the blocks around University Drive and the TCU campus to complexes further out near TCC's satellite campuses and the medical district, where students in nursing and health programs often look for something quieter and cheaper than the properties packed with undergrads.

What this category actually covers

Student housing here ranges from individual-lease-by-the-bedroom apartments (common near TCU, where each roommate signs their own lease and is only responsible for their own rent) to traditional one-lease-per-unit apartments that just happen to attract a student crowd because of price or location. Some properties include furniture, a bus shuttle to campus, and utilities in the rent; others are bare-bones and priced accordingly. Knowing which model you're looking at before you tour matters, because the lease terms and what happens if a roommate skips out can differ a lot.

What to check before signing

Walk the unit at a time of day when neighbors are likely to be home, not just during a staged mid-morning tour. Ask about parking (permit systems can get tight near TCU during football season), noise policies, and how maintenance requests are handled during peak move-in weeks in August. Check whether the lease term lines up with the academic calendar or forces a summer sublet. Get the total monthly cost in writing, including any mandatory fees for trash, pest control, or amenity access, since the advertised base rent rarely tells the whole story.

How we score these properties

Our ranking weighs price against unit condition, proximity to campus and bus routes, maintenance responsiveness, and how honestly each property's marketing matches what renters actually report. See the full breakdown of factors on our methodology page, and check the ranked guide to Fort Worth apartment complexes for the properties that came out on top.

Find an apartment in student housing in Fort Worth, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info

All student housing in Fort Worth, TX, ranked by score and relevance

114 businesses, scored on recent reviews. The order weighs each business's overall score by how much of its reviewed work is student housing, so a lower-scored specialist can rank above a higher-scored generalist.

Casa Rana
#1
75

Casa Rana

4.5(77)✓ Google-verified

Most tenants praise Casa Rana's responsive leasing staff and fast maintenance, with named crew members like Seth and Daniel earning repeated recognition for going the extra mile. Laura and Lori handle complex situations with genuine care, and the company tracks down missing student packages with real urgency. However, some residents hit friction at move-in and move-out: flooring needing repair, promised yard work never materializing, and disputed paint charges for minor wear. Reaching the office can be slow during summer months, and one tenant felt the local team went silent after complaints reached corporate.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Loft Vue Living
#2
66

Loft Vue Living

3.9(208)✓ Google-verified

Loft Vue wins renter loyalty through two standouts: leasing staff (particularly Roderick and Alexa) who spend hours on first-time-renter questions and close deals same-day, and furnished units near TCU that undercut local student housing prices. The dark side is sporadic but serious: months-long Wi-Fi outages and ceiling damage without response, units entered without notice, belongings removed, cleaning fees charged on top. Two of 17 recent reviews report management that felt extractive rather than helpful. The business attracts strong initial sentiment from the leasing team and location, but a vocal minority report maintenance neglect and billing practices that undercut trust. For price-conscious TCU students with low maintenance expectations, the convenience and furnished options appeal. For anyone who might need quick repairs or careful lease-term billing, the gaps in follow-through management are a real risk.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The George
#3
87

The George

4.9(525)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents praise the maintenance team's quick response and the friendly leasing staff, with many highlighting Jason's exceptional service and the property's clean, safe feel. The location near Clearfork shops and diverse community appeal to multiple age groups, though some report sharp move-out fees, occasional noise from neighbors, and frustration with periodic amenity failures like elevators and pool upkeep. Repeat visitors note the leasing experience is personable and well-organized, and maintenance issues often resolve within hours. Pet owners appreciate the straightforward fee structure. However, pricing concerns and inconsistent staff attention during tenancy suggest the property's service depends heavily on which team members engage with you.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Olympus 7th Street Station
#4
84

Olympus 7th Street Station

4.7(183)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the maintenance team for same-day or next-day service, with Joe Brantley and Larry repeatedly named for their speed and professionalism. Staff like Vivian and Autumn earn high marks for making leasing and move-in smooth and personal. The location draws most renters: walkable to 7th Street, Montgomery Plaza, restaurants, and the Trinity Trail, yet surprisingly quiet for an urban core address. Two serious disputes stand out. One tenant was charged $6,000 for two months after moving out on a month-to-month lease, then an additional $1,500 when disputing the damages, and the account went to collections. Another reported two car break-ins with management refusing to cooperate with police or return calls. These conflicts suggest billing practices and security warrant close scrutiny.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Hunter Park Apartments
#5
84

Hunter Park Apartments

4.7(128)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents consistently praise Hunter Park for attentive maintenance that fixes problems within 24 hours, engaged staff by name, and a genuinely quiet atmosphere. Grounds stay clean, amenities work, and staff remember residents; one isolated complaint about a rude office interaction stands against overwhelming positive experience. The property draws multi-year tenants partly because on-site maintenance (Chuck and Moe) respond fast and think ahead. Management texts before entering apartments to avoid waking night-shift workers. Pool, dog park, good lighting, and proximity to shopping keep people rooted here; the fireplace and spacious layouts matter to those who stay.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing

Find an apartment in student housing in Fort Worth, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info
The Village on West Seminary
#6
82

The Village on West Seminary

5.0(42)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members like Claudia, Maria, and Taylor create a welcoming experience during tours and the application process, with residents and prospects consistently noting their attentiveness and warmth. The community appeals to families seeking safety and affordability, with new ownership backing recent improvements and a reputation for accessibility that extends from initial inquiry through move-in.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Marq on West 7th
#7
86

The Marq on West 7th

4.8(164)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents consistently praise The Marq for staff responsiveness and a tight-knit community feel. Maintenance requests close within 24 hours, with named staff like Kyle and Johnny earning frequent mention for quick, quality work. The Cultural District location near restaurants, museums, and shops appeals across age groups. One resident cited 13 years of loyalty. A security concern about bike theft and absent cameras surfaces in a small minority of reviews, though most residents report no issues.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Davis
#8
84

The Davis

4.5(452)✓ Google-verified

Living at The Davis feels like joining a community rather than renting an apartment. Staff members, particularly Marina, consistently make residents feel welcomed and cared for. Maintenance responds quickly to work orders and keeps the property clean. Amenities like the fitness center and pool are well-maintained. Long-term residents cite zero issues over years of tenancy. The quiet, relaxed vibe appeals across age groups and lifestyles. Parking can be tight in some buildings, which matters if you have multiple vehicles. Overall, the combination of responsive staff and genuine community connection sets this complex apart.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Silver Leaf Villas
#9
81

Silver Leaf Villas

4.5(331)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise Silver Leaf for spotless common areas, responsive staff, and a calm atmosphere that feels secure. Several named team members (Lizbeth, Sandy, Tania, Alma) earned specific recognition for guiding tours and moves. A small minority report premium pricing and occasional scheduling mishaps at leasing, though the balance of evidence strongly favors the property.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Marquis at Stonegate
#10
83

Marquis at Stonegate

4.6(197)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently report a safe, quiet community where maintenance responds within hours to overnight requests and staff build real relationships with tenants. The Trinity Trail access, proximity to shopping and dining, and well-kept pool and fitness center draw families and young professionals who renew leases; parking waitlists and lack of a playground are the main drawbacks. Dale, Kaylee, and Kate are named for their professionalism during move-ins and lease questions. Residents mention staying two years or longer, with multiple people upgrading to bigger units within the same complex rather than moving out.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Monarch Medical District Apartments
#11
83

The Monarch Medical District Apartments

4.6(320)✓ Google-verified

Sean and the leasing team-Jasmine, Sky, and Shawn-consistently earn praise for professionalism, quick turnarounds, and genuine care. Residents highlight Sean's diagnostic skill and willingness to explain repairs; leasing staff welcome new tenants warmly and handle move-ins smoothly. One long-term tenant noted a sharp decline: maintenance responsiveness dropped in the past year, with major issues ignored and communication breaking down. The first two years were strong, but recent deterioration has eroded confidence. This signals a potential shift worth monitoring.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Marquis at Bellaire Ranch
#12
82

Marquis at Bellaire Ranch

4.8(96)✓ Google-verified

Marquis at Bellaire Ranch wins consistent praise for its riverfront location, mature trees, and the warmth of its community. Residents highlight fast maintenance response, thoughtful management, proximity to Trinity Trails and Clearfork shops, and a rare blend of younger and older tenants creating a respectful, inclusive atmosphere. One resident reported repeated security failures and property damage disputes totaling $5,000 out of pocket, with minimal follow-up from management. Vehicle break-ins and an open security gate are documented concerns. Most other residents felt safe, though this account merits serious consideration before signing a lease.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Bexley Clearfork
#13
82

Bexley Clearfork

4.7(372)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Isaiah, Alton, Emily, and Salvador earn consistent praise for warmth and quick responses. Residents note clean grounds, modern apartments, and strong property upkeep. However, pet waste accumulation, overflowing trash bins, open gates allowing tailgating, and delayed maintenance undermine the experience. A major mold and humidity failure went unresolved for months. For the price, many feel the complex lacks basic security and enforcement. Location near shopping, dining, and highways appeals to residents. EV charging stations exist but often sit occupied by non-EV owners due to unenforced parking rules. The gap between staff quality and management systems remains stark.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Three77 Park
#14
80

Three77 Park

4.4(208)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents consistently praise the staff, maintenance responsiveness, and upkeep. Named team members like Alexa and Abbe are repeatedly cited for going beyond standard service, while maintenance typically responds within a day to repair requests. Move-in experiences are smooth and welcoming. Three exceptions stand out: two residents experienced quick evictions after late payments, and one visitor witnessed unprofessional conduct (staff filming TikToks during their phone meeting). The first complaint targets payment policy severity; the others reflect isolated incidents. Six-year and five-year residents speak warmly of community events, pest control follow-up, and consistent improvements under multiple management generations.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Crystal Springs
#15
81

Crystal Springs

4.8(115)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents praise the staff's warmth and professionalism, beautiful finishes, and lively community atmosphere. Many highlight quiet units and responsive maintenance. However, a meaningful minority report paper-thin soundproofing, inconsistent rules enforcement, and parking frustrations-complaints that stand in sharp tension with the majority's experience of peaceful, sound-resistant homes. Staff members including Stevie, Hannah, Kayci, Emily, and Jeff earn frequent mention for patient, attentive service during tours and move-ins. The property's resort-style amenities and River District location draw consistent praise. Negative reviews surface building-specific complaints: loose marijuana and noise enforcement in certain zones, trash room upkeep, and unpredictable move-out fee disputes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Montage Southside
#16
81

Montage Southside

4.6(93)✓ Google-verified

Tracy and Valerie in leasing earn repeated praise for patience, knowledge, and follow-through; residents consistently report clean, spacious homes and a well-kept community in a walkable downtown location. Maintenance responds quickly to requests, and the staff accommodates move-in timing flexibly. One sharp complaint marks the departure of a previous manager residents valued highly. The property appeals to people relocating, pet owners (nearby bars and restaurants, walkable area), and renters who toured multiple communities before choosing here. Competitive pricing relative to amenities is noted. Staff turnover has created a small sting in an otherwise stable experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Summers Landing Apartments
#17
82

Summers Landing Apartments

4.3(273)✓ Google-verified

Summers Landing's leasing process stands out for Ivette Fonseca's patience and genuine care, with reviewers repeatedly praising her guidance through tours and apartment selection. The community itself earns consistent marks for clean grounds, functional amenities like the pool and laundry, and staff who make settling in feel effortless and welcoming. Office Manager Veronica and the maintenance team round out a property where move-in goes smoothly and residents report feeling valued from day one. Reviewers moving from out of state or starting fresh highlight the personal attention that shaped their decision to choose this complex.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Parker House
#18
81

Parker House

4.6(262)✓ Google-verified

Most residents experience attentive staff, fast maintenance turnarounds (often same-day), and a community where management treats people by name. The downtown Sundance Square location with modern finishes keeps satisfaction high for many long-term tenants. Two recent departing residents report over $1,000 in contested move-out bills for wear-and-tear items and phantom charges, with difficulty reaching management to dispute. Noise complaints and recent communication gaps during a payment system change suggest infrastructure stress; these issues sit alongside otherwise strong day-to-day care.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Crescent Residences
#19
78

The Crescent Residences

4.5(102)✓ Google-verified

Residents and touring prospects consistently highlight the staff's responsiveness and professionalism across leasing, concierge, and maintenance roles, along with intentional community-building through regular events. Specific team members (Natasha, Vlad, Milton, Gary) earn repeated praise for going above their job descriptions to welcome and support residents. Construction noise remains a real drawback depending on unit location, and turnover among previous management teams had frustrated some residents, though new management (RPM) has stabilized operations and committed to addressing concerns. The property itself draws praise for being beautiful and well-maintained.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Broadway Chapter
#20
80

Broadway Chapter

4.7(89)✓ Google-verified

Residents and prospective tenants consistently praise the staff, especially managers Halie, Izabella, Katie, and Megan, for patience and going beyond their role to help with applications and move-in. Units are modern and well-maintained, and the Bricktown location near restaurants and bars appeals to those wanting walkability. Two one-star reviews flag rude leasing interactions and unclear self-tour instructions, though these are outliers in an 89-review sample skewed heavily toward five-star ratings.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Mercantile River District
#21
79

Mercantile River District

4.5(265)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff, especially Noelle and Melissa, earn consistent five-star praise for professionalism and above-and-beyond service during tours and move-ins. Residents highlight resort-style amenities (lazy river, state-of-the-art fitness center, game room) and speedy maintenance response times. The River District location appeals to young professionals and families seeking modern finishes. However, pest control failures, unpredictable fees, and management communication gaps undercut the luxury positioning. A two-month resident reported recurring roaches, unresolved roof noise, and non-responsive staff; a three-year resident cited neglected grounds and astronomical add-ons. Dog park sanitation and parking security are secondary concerns. The experience depends heavily on leasing staff and which building you occupy.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
35 West at Champions Circle Apartments
#22
79

35 West at Champions Circle Apartments

4.4(340)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the staff for genuine helpfulness and quick maintenance, with apartments described as clean and modern in a good location. Several reported excellent assistance during move-in from named staff like Sara. However, chronic phone accessibility problems, missed tour appointments, and post-move-in office communication breakdowns have frustrated applicants and new residents. One unverified but concerning report claimed theft involving a maintenance worker; the property notes no on-site cameras. Communication quality appears inconsistent, possibly tied to staffing changes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Hangar 19
#23
77

Hangar 19

4.5(279)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise Hangar 19's physical upkeep, modern finishes, and standout maintenance team, especially Robert and Kevin. However, two recent prospective tenants reported cold, dismissive experiences with front office staff who seemed reluctant to help and failed to acknowledge scheduled tours. The split highlights a disconnect: long-term residents describe a well-run, caring community where management goes above and beyond; tour-takers encountered what they perceived as indifference and neglect at the point of entry. Staff named positively include Robert (maintenance), Kevin, Marcus, and Monique (leasing).

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly Apartments
The Braden on Fifth
#24
77

The Braden on Fifth

4.4(179)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers consistently praise the leasing team for personal attention and the location near downtown Fort Worth. The building itself is clean, offers solid amenities like a gym and pool, and residents report friendly neighbors. However, a 2024 management change to Greystar has introduced real friction: visitor parking is severely limited, wifi drops frequently in common spaces, and office hours have become hard to reach during normal work days. Long-term residents appreciated consistency before the transition. The property draws young professionals and remote workers, who especially value the large communal office space with quiet pods. Maintenance tends to be responsive, though some issues (like broken TV screens and slow elevators) linger. Parking, however, remains the most repeated frustration-with only about 20 visitor spots for the entire complex.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Aviator West 7th
#25
78

Aviator West 7th

4.3(290)✓ Google-verified

Most visitors praise the clean, well-organized property and its proximity to Montgomery Plaza shops. Staff members Leslie, Santos, Christal, and Junior consistently make tours smooth and welcoming, answering questions thoroughly and helping applicants feel confident in their decision. However, some prospective tenants report days of missed calls and no follow-up from the leasing office, with the Molly chatbot creating frustration. One applicant raised serious concerns about application handling and alleged bias. These communication gaps stand out against the generally positive leasing team experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Rocklyn at Samuels
#26
78

Rocklyn at Samuels

4.4(225)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise a tight-knit staff and rapid maintenance response, with particular shout-outs to Richard (groundskeeping) and Nicole/Rose/Dominic (leasing). Management feels genuinely invested in resident comfort. Some frustration over pet deposit pricing, parking issues from adjacent winery patrons, and occasional cleanliness oversights, but these do not dampen the overall sense of a well-run property with strong morale. High staff turnover has occurred over the years, though core team members have remained. The property sits in a desirable downtown-adjacent location with appealing amenities. Most residents overlook isolated lapses in favor of the responsive, personable environment.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Reserve on Willow Lake
#27
78

The Reserve on Willow Lake

4.6(191)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents and well-established staff relationships form the core of positive experiences here; Mackenzie Tucker, Will, Abraham, and Vivem earn repeated praise for genuine care, responsiveness, and professionalism. The property itself excels: gated, quiet, spacious units, immaculate grounds, and quick maintenance response. However, recent ownership and management transitions have created serious friction. Multiple residents report move-out fees buried in fine print, payment plans that were ignored and sent to collections anyway, new staff unresponsiveness, and one leasing agent's dismissive, interrogating demeanor during tours. One-star reviews cluster after management change, suggesting systemic breakdown rather than isolated complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Hunter Plaza
#28
78

Hunter Plaza

4.3(188)✓ Google-verified

Staff excellence drives positive experiences here, especially leasing agent Nadia who handles applications with transparency and speed, and maintenance crew Erin and Francisco who respond quickly to requests. One resident reported serious safety, cleanliness, and harassment concerns that management appears not to have addressed; another flagged record-keeping issues and lease documentation problems. The building shows investment in updates-new washers, working elevators, clean hallways-though older infrastructure remains. Most tenants describe a warm welcome and smooth move-in, with staff treating them as individuals rather than numbers. Common praise focuses on Nadia's personal attention during the leasing process, maintenance responsiveness, and the property's central downtown location. The facility amenities (fitness center, theatre, library, business center, garage parking) are listed but not detailed in reviews.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Phoenix
#29
76

The Phoenix

4.5(71)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise the staff's genuine attentiveness and the property's clean, well-maintained condition. Maintenance requests resolve within 24 hours, and named team members like Trey, Erin, Allison, and Kimberly earn repeated recognition for going beyond standard service. Amenities and downtown location appeal to both remote workers and commuters, though guest parking policies and nearby homelessness deserve consideration.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
River Park Place
#30
76

River Park Place

4.4(90)✓ Google-verified

Residents and prospective tenants consistently praise River Park Place for its polished grounds, active maintenance team, and leasing staff who take time during tours and approvals. Autumn, Stacy, and Mindy earn repeated mentions for attentiveness and warmth. Facilities like the pool, gym, and washer units stay clean and well-equipped. Most residents feel at home and value the non-corporate ownership. A small number report uneven treatment from office staff, with some feeling deprioritized or misled during the application process. One long-term resident noted the community atmosphere has shifted over recent years. A security incident from a resident at the gatehouse raised questions about visitor experiences, though this was an outlier.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingSenior & 55+ Living
The Place At Westover Hills
#31
75

The Place At Westover Hills

3.9(165)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents and visitors consistently report feeling safe and supported here. Staff handle maintenance requests within 24 hours, organize monthly community gatherings, and take genuine interest in resident wellbeing. The complex maintains quiet grounds, secures packages, and provides in-unit washers and dryers across all floor plans.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Berkeley Apartments
#32
75

The Berkeley Apartments

4.2(481)✓ Google-verified

Strong staff and quick maintenance draw residents to renew leases, especially those drawn to community events. However, some face gaps in move-in guidance, pest delays, and surprise maintenance charges that undermine the otherwise positive experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Elm at River Park
#33
75

The Elm at River Park

4.3(123)✓ Google-verified

Most residents rave about The Elm's thoughtful staff, spotless grounds, and standout dog park, along with prompt maintenance and vibrant events. A few cite frustrations with management responsiveness, package handling, and ancillary services, though these appear occasional amid largely positive long-term stays.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Encore Panther Island
#34
76

Encore Panther Island

4.3(122)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Encore Panther Island earns strong loyalty from residents who credit the staff, especially Hailey, Pam, and Angela, with genuine attentiveness and rapid problem-solving. Maintenance typically responds within one to two days; residents consistently praise the clean grounds, working pool, dog park, and walking distance to downtown Fort Worth and Trinity Trails. The experience is tempered by occasional safety concerns in the surrounding area and street noise for ground-level units on the main road. One displaced domestic violence survivor reported a billing dispute after an ex-partner damaged her door during a break-in, alleging management failed to honor verbal commitments despite having been informed of her situation from the start.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Parkside So7 Urban Apartments
#35
74

Parkside So7 Urban Apartments

4.4(267)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the maintenance crew and location near Trinity Park, dining, and trails, with many calling it the best apartment experience they've had. Recent management changes have shaken confidence: some report grounds neglect, security lapses, false fire alarms multiple times weekly, and unresponsiveness to concerns, though others describe current staff as responsive and thoughtful. The core tension is between well-executed operations (when management is engaged) and periods where the property feels neglected despite premium pricing.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Willow & Wise
#36
72

Willow & Wise

4.5(99)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the sleek downtown location, modern amenities like the rooftop pool, and standout leasing staff members Tammerin and Alyssia who handle move-ins and tours with genuine care. However, persistent complaints undercut the positive experience: hidden fees totaling over $100 monthly, unresponsive management after lease-signing, paper-thin walls with constant neighbor noise, and widespread dog waste in hallways and parking areas. One resident broke their lease after a month due to staff retaliation and filthy move-in conditions. The property shines during the tour but struggles to maintain that standard post-occupancy.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Luxia River East Apartments
#37
74

Luxia River East Apartments

4.4(552)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the leasing team (Joshua, Reggie, Victor, Josh) for patient tours and detailed explanations, and the maintenance crew (Oscar, Edgar) for quick, thorough work. Cleanliness and location near downtown draw strong compliments. Yet repeat issues plague tenants: surprise charges for short notice violations, aggressive vehicle towing that catches registered cars, units swapped on move-in day, and staff who sometimes ignore calls or seem indifferent to problems. Management has improved recently under new team members, but systemic billing traps and parking enforcement remain serious pain points. The gap between exceptional individual staff and frustrating backend policies leaves residents conflicted. Those who stay for years feel genuinely cared for; those caught in overage fees or towing cycles feel exploited. The community itself feels safe and well-designed, but the fine print and operational inconsistencies erode trust.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Grandmarc at Westberry Place
#38
74 low data

Grandmarc at Westberry Place

4.5(175)✓ Google-verified

Most residents rate Grandmarc highly and highlight attentive leasing staff by name, a welcoming vibe, and quality common areas. Chronic fire alarm issues and occasional maintenance delays temper the experience.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Solay Fort Worth
#39
73

Solay Fort Worth

4.4(173)✓ Google-verified

Staff members Desteny, Nora, and Monica stand out for patient, helpful service during tours and transfers. Before May, residents report quiet surroundings and fast maintenance. A shift in management has triggered a stark reversal: trash accumulates indoors and outdoors, the gym and pool lack basic cleaning, the gate fails, and residents report car thefts and safety hazards. Complaints note office unavailability and unanswered emails. The 4.4-star rating masks a deep divide. Early reviews praise location, friendliness, and amenities at reasonable cost. Recent reviews describe a property that feels neglected despite luxury pricing, with garbage odors, overflowing chutes, broken systems, and an unsafe perimeter. Residents explicitly tie the decline to management change.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Presidium Revelstoke
#40
71

Presidium Revelstoke

4.3(313)✓ Google-verified

Presidium Revelstoke draws strong loyalty from long-term residents who praise Stephanie, Carlee, and the maintenance team for responsiveness and care. But a sharp divide emerged recently: a new property manager's combative style, unresolved security concerns (vehicle break-ins, broken gates, missing cameras), package theft, and noise complaints from poor building construction have left newer and frustrated residents questioning whether the premium price justifies the service. The complex excels at cosmetic upkeep and amenities (power washing, dog park, pet washing station) and staff like Stephanie earn genuine affection. However, systemic gaps remain: a faulty AI chatbot, difficulty reaching the office, gate remotes delayed weeks, pet owners ignoring community rules, and move-in units handed over uncleaned. Management changes appear ongoing; the shift in tone since a previous manager departed has triggered lease-renewal anxiety among residents who feel unheard.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Cityscape Apartment Fort Worth
#41
73

Cityscape Apartment Fort Worth

4.6(38)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents consistently praise the location, modern design, and staff warmth at this downtown Fort Worth complex. Named leasing and office staff handle move-ins smoothly and remain responsive. The core frustration centers on maintenance credibility: two separate reviewers report a dishwasher broken for 8-10+ months with no fix, a fired maintenance employee, and promises (patio gates, parking) not delivered.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Scenic at River East
#42
73

Scenic at River East

4.3(214)✓ Google-verified

Leasing tours and daily operations thrive when handled by staff like Madison, Paula, or Sam, who take time with questions and solve problems fast. Security, communication from back-office management, and move-out billing are serious friction points. Three residents reported multiple break-ins and a permanently open gate; two dispute unreasonable cleaning fees and debt collection threats over contested charges. Location and amenities (Trinity River access, dog parks, rooftop lounge) earn strong praise. Maintenance responds quickly, even on weekends. Pet policies are genuinely accommodating. But prospective residents should ask directly about security protocols, move-out billing policies, and get lease terms in writing. The complex works well for dog owners and downtown proximity seekers willing to verify safety measures upfront.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Jennings Place
#43
71

Jennings Place

4.4(105)✓ Google-verified

Jennings Place earns strong ratings from long-term residents and newcomers who praise the downtown location, dog park, and friendly staff members like Adrian, Perla, and Susan. Clean grounds and responsive maintenance earn mention, though recent complaints flag persistent problems: fallen branches, uncollected trash and furniture, mold in units, and delayed service work despite rising rent. Management quality varies noticeably across staff. While Adrian and Luis have won five-star praise for solving tenant issues promptly, one escalated complaint cited a manager's refusal to share corporate contact details and unwillingness to walk the grounds. Reviewers also note inconsistent maintenance staffing and that lawn care sometimes goes incomplete.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Broadstone on Trinity
#44
72

Broadstone on Trinity

4.0(315)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents report strong satisfaction with the location, staff professionalism, and a maintenance team that responds quickly and goes extra lengths during repairs. Leasing staff like Karli and management earn consistent praise for friendliness and problem-solving. Mold discoveries, questionable move-out carpet charges without documented proof, and recurring fee surprises trouble a vocal minority. Window leaks and elevator breakdowns have also been noted. Pet owners especially report alarm over undocumented damage claims on move-out.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Forena Revelstoke
#45
71

Forena Revelstoke

4.3(170)✓ Google-verified

Forena draws strong praise for its facilities, amenities, and original leasing experience: staff like Breonia and Breanna made tours and move-ins smooth, and some residents love the quiet community feel. But a significant cohort reports persistent car thefts, slow office response, recurring elevator failures, and frustration with new management. The shift from Olympus to AIR Communities brought charges residents dispute, poor communication, and enforcement gaps (smoking, pool hours). Many residents who initially loved it now doubt renewal under current management.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Longhorn Crossing Apartments
#46
70

Longhorn Crossing Apartments

4.1(250)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

New residents and visitors consistently praise Valeria Vazquez and the welcoming leasing team, along with the spacious, clean units and community events. Long-term residents report declining management responsiveness under current Property Manager Miranda, unresolved maintenance issues, safety concerns with loose dogs and inadequate courtesy officer response, and disputed move-out fees. The complex offers premium amenities and attracts tenants during the first few months, but sustained complaints center on maintenance neglect, poor property enforcement, and management's lack of presence on site. The gap between leasing-stage service and ongoing resident support appears significant.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Atlas Waterside
#47
70

Atlas Waterside

4.2(174)✓ Google-verified

Life at Atlas Waterside centers on a scenic riverfront location with walkable access to restaurants, shops, and the Trinity trail. Leasing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and grounds are well-kept with modern finishes, pool, and gym amenities. When problems arise, support falters. Multiple residents report unresolved security gaps (insufficient camera coverage, broken fobs, garage vulnerabilities), water damage from burst pipes, slow app-based gate systems, and management that becomes unresponsive after initial turnover. Staff commission disputes also appear unresolved over months, and pricing sits high relative to these service gaps.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Marine Creek Apartments
#48
71

Marine Creek Apartments

4.2(504)✓ Google-verified

The complex draws strong praise for front-line staff warmth and maintenance speed, with tenants citing prompt work orders and attentive management, especially managers Cecelia and Jacqueline. However, a persistent minority report serious problems: active pest infestations despite pest control calls, shoddy repairs (wood/paint patches over structural issues), mysterious fee charges that damaged credit when reported to collections, and unresolved safety concerns like broken door locks. The split between glowing long-term residents and deeply frustrated departing tenants suggests inconsistent service across departments and time. Positive experiences cluster around move-in speed, unit finishes (wood floors, granite, stainless steel), and grounds upkeep. Negative experiences concentrate on maintenance quality gaps, pest management failures, billing practices, and a sense that corporate ignores escalated complaints. Multiple reviews name responsive individuals (Cecelia, Alejandra, Ronaciel, Alexis) but also point to a lack of accountability higher up.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Mill Stone Apartments Homes
#49
71 low data

Mill Stone Apartments Homes

4.5(58)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents speak highly of their years at Mill Stone, citing affordable rates, a quiet atmosphere, and staff warmth as reasons for staying. Some report pest problems and intermittent pool closures, while parking and gate maintenance have drawn criticism.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
4000 Hulen
#50
71

4000 Hulen

4.2(242)✓ Google-verified

Staff, especially managers Robyn and Lily, earn consistent praise for going above and beyond, and maintenance typically responds within days. Spaces are move-in ready and well-maintained. However, location near train tracks brings constant squeaking and brake noise, walls let sound travel between units, and the guest parking policy (three free visits, then $4/day) frustrates residents planning gatherings. Added fees (trash valet, pest control, forced rental insurance at $16/month) compound affordability concerns despite initial pricing appeal.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Villas On the Hill
#51
68 low data

Villas On the Hill

4.2(98)✓ Google-verified

Early staff like Margarita and Vanessa earned strong praise for warmth and problem-solving. Recent reviews show sharp decline: new management accused of poor response times, evasiveness on pricing, and mishandling of residents with disabilities and military backgrounds. The property itself remains described as clean and well-located near transit and shopping, but service reliability appears to have deteriorated.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Ramble & Rose
#52
69

Ramble & Rose

4.2(181)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff like Brittney and Savanah are consistently praised for their knowledge and care during tours and applications. However, move-in delays, communication breakdowns during the leasing process, and a management shift in December have created serious frustration. Once residents move in, complaints center on slow maintenance responses (sometimes months), unannounced unit entries, and noisy neighbors that management dismisses rather than resolves. Security deposits have been illegally withheld for normal wear and tear. The units themselves remain attractive, but operational and administrative failures are driving long-term residents away. The property struggles with inconsistent execution beyond the leasing office. Hallways, elevators, and common areas report cleaning issues. Utility shutoffs happen with minimal notice. Construction on the south side creates ongoing access problems. Staff are often described as friendly in person but unable or unwilling to follow through on promises. Residents who have stayed longer (2-3 years) cite recent management changes as the source of decline.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Palladium Fort Worth
#53
60

Palladium Fort Worth

3.8(41)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Palladium Fort Worth shows a sharp divide tied to management changes. Under the current manager Toray, residents praise responsiveness, cleanliness, and genuine care for tenant concerns; multiple recent reviews highlight his problem-solving and welcoming approach. Significant complaints persist around marijuana odor seeping through walls, long waits for maintenance, unresolved security gate failures, and billing confusion under previous leadership. The complex offers spacious apartments with good balconies, a quiet setting, and advertised amenities like a fitness center and pool. However, water bills spike unexpectedly, and some residents report staff dismissal of lease violations. Recent leadership appears to have stabilized much of the experience, though enforcement of no-smoking policies remains inconsistent across units.

Student Housing
Monarch Pass Apartments
#54
70

Monarch Pass Apartments

4.1(1071)✓ Google-verified

Monarch Pass draws strong praise for staff warmth, particularly leasing agent Stephanie, and residents report feeling safe in a quiet setting. However, a significant minority struggle with delayed repairs, pest control failures, and laundry equipment that does not work reliably; some cite unresolved maintenance requests weeks after submission and disputes over promised rent relief.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Firestone at West 7th
#55
70

Firestone at West 7th

4.1(539)✓ Google-verified

The leasing team delivers standout service during move-in, and individual maintenance workers respond fast to requests. Downtown location and walkability draw praise, but the property shows its age: windows leak, AC fails repeatedly, and the emergency response disappoints in summer heat. Residents report inconsistent policy enforcement and a shift toward rowdier tenant mixes that management hasn't addressed. Genuine resident feedback diverges sharply from some clustered reviews mentioning specific staff; one tenant suspects fake positive posts from non-residents. The core trade-off is smooth leasing experience against ongoing building maintenance and neighbor quality struggles that seasoned residents find intolerable despite the location appeal.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Jameson at the Bluffs
#56
69

Jameson at the Bluffs

4.2(212)✓ Google-verified

Residents divide sharply on Jameson at the Bluffs. Supporters praise the resort-style pool, thoughtful staff (Emily, Joey, Josie, Tracy, Endy named specifically), and maintenance that typically responds within 48 hours. Detractors report persistent security gaps: broken gates, homeless encampments in the parking lot, tire theft, and property damage (black mold, flooding, collapsed ceilings) left unaddressed or charged back to tenants despite maintenance acknowledging systemic first-floor water issues. The leasing application process has frustrated returnees through third-party AI income verification (Snappt) that flags legitimate documents as fraudulent, denies employer contact, and keeps admin and application fees without refund. Renters also cite aggressive deposit withholding (charges approaching or meeting full deposit), recurring AC and pest problems, and train noise. The gap between five-star reviews from longer-term residents and one-star reviews from those departing suggests the community's appeal fades once security and maintenance shortcomings become apparent.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Rosedale
#57
59

The Rosedale

4.0(21)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing and maintenance staff build confidence during move-in, and most residents praise the quiet, clean community feel. But a significant minority report serious gaps between public promises and actual management-unresponsive after signing, disputed charges, and genuine safety fears tied to neighborhood crime that the business appears to sidestep rather than address.

Student Housing

Find an apartment in student housing in Fort Worth, TX

Tell us what you need and we'll connect you with the right leasing office or apartment community in your area. No obligation.

Request info
Westhouse Apartment Flats
#58
65

Westhouse Apartment Flats

3.8(293)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff earn consistent praise for warmth and quick repairs; community events like pool parties are well-organized. But security gaps are serious: multiple reviewers report car break-ins, tire theft, and visible drugs on grounds with delayed management response. Maintenance is the bright spot, though some issues linger unresolved.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent Housing
South 400 Apartments
#59
69

South 400 Apartments

3.9(145)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the maintenance team's speed and professionalism, particularly Joan, who has built a reputation for quick fixes and genuine care. Staff at all levels (leasing, front office, grounds) are consistently described as friendly and responsive, and common areas are well-maintained. The pool and gym are well-regarded. However, package theft is rampant due to an unguarded external mailroom, and some residents report security lapses (broken elevators, open garage gates). Move-in procedures lack coordination. Some describe the community as unsafe and dirty despite the strong staff presence. The contrast between excellent personal service and systemic security failures defines the mixed experience here.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Hub at Chisholm Trail
#60
69

The Hub at Chisholm Trail

3.5(345)✓ Google-verified

James Parker dominates recent five-star reviews, with renters consistently praising his attentiveness during tours, applications, and move-ins. His communication style puts nervous applicants at ease and speeds up paperwork. The community itself earns steady compliments for cleanliness, quiet grounds, and well-maintained units. Staff across the office appear accessible and patient, creating a leasing experience that feels personal rather than transactional.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Bowery at Southside
#61
69

The Bowery at Southside

4.2(142)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing staff earn consistent praise for personal attention and professionalism, particularly Marcella, Jackie, Raven, and Christina. Move-in transparency and online processes appeal to those with simple needs. However, management falls short once residents are in place: noise complaints go unresolved, maintenance staff misconduct was not addressed adequately, and unit cleanliness at move-in often fails to meet promises. Policy design leaves existing residents vulnerable to being passed over for unit transfers, and billing errors compound frustration. A handful report smooth year-long stays, but accountability gaps leave many feeling abandoned after signing the lease. The property markets itself across multiple categories but struggles with core tenant protection. Leasing works well; living here depends heavily on luck with neighbors, staff conduct, and how quickly management acts on complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Huntley
#62
69

The Huntley

4.1(163)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Shoni and Jai earn consistent praise for attentive, personable service. New tenants find the amenities and finishes impressive. But persistent complaints span thin walls, repeated theft despite cameras, dirty common spaces, and management's failure to address safety issues like trespassing and indecent exposure. Long-term residents report significant decline since a recent management changeover.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Mag & May
#63
69

Mag & May

4.1(158)✓ Google-verified

Mag & May has a stark split: maintenance staff are reliable and fast, leasing tours feel welcoming, and the Magnolia location scores high on walkability. But residents report chronic management failures: double charging for insurance despite proof, month-long unanswered voicemails, lost applications, and slow move-in readiness. The application process overwhelms the small office team, leaving applicants in limbo for weeks. Tenants also flag safety gaps-garage doors stay broken for months, packages vanish, and homeless activity around the property raises concerns. Some long-term residents praise earlier management, suggesting service quality dropped after recent staff changes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
University House TCU
#64
66

University House TCU

4.1(60)✓ Google-verified

Most current residents praise quick maintenance, friendly staff, and spotless apartments within walking distance of campus. Covered parking and study amenities draw repeat praise. Historical concerns about pest control and administrative practices surface in older reviews; current feedback suggests these may have improved, though move-in practices warrant clarification before signing.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District
#65
68

Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District

4.0(204)✓ Google-verified

Trinity Urban offers affordable apartments with genuine community spirit, though maintenance reliability and building systems are significant pain points. Staff like Juan and Kiana actively organize events that help residents connect, and pricing beats expectations for the location. Recurring complaints about non-working air conditioning, elevator outages, and delayed maintenance responses suggest operational gaps that undercut the otherwise welcoming atmosphere.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Taj Mahal Apartments
#66
66

Taj Mahal Apartments

3.6(101)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents have stayed for years because of genuine care from management, particularly Jackie Sevilla, and reliable maintenance crew David and Emad. The draw is bills-paid affordability near downtown, a quiet atmosphere, and staff that handle requests same-day without bureaucracy. Long-standing tenants prize the second-chance rental policy and resort pool. One resident flagged inconsistent neighbor behavior and wished for gated entry or garage parking, but these are exceptions in an overwhelmingly loyal base.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Club at Stonegate Apartments
#67
67

The Club at Stonegate Apartments

4.0(346)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Rod and a handful of staff members earn consistent praise for fast, attentive maintenance work. The location suits people near TCU, and many residents love the quiet neighborhood feel and pet amenities. However, prospective tenants repeatedly hit a wall: the complex uses AI chatbots that don't transfer calls to humans, making it nearly impossible to reach the leasing office before signing. Once inside, residents report serious structural issues (mold, water damage, broken windows), expensive move-out fees ($1,100+), undisclosed monthly charges, and a management team that dismisses health concerns. The divide is stark: families praising the safe community coexist with tenants fleeing due to hidden contracts and unresolved building defects. The complex's shift to AI support has created its biggest liability. Reviewers note that Preia (a leasing agent) is helpful when you reach her, but she is the exception. Maintenance quality depends heavily on who you get; Rod is exceptional, but others are slow or provide cosmetic fixes to serious problems. Move-in experience varies widely. Lease terms are strict, and the cumulative cost of undefined monthly fees plus break penalties catches many tenants off guard.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Cooper Apartments
#68
67

The Cooper Apartments

3.8(353)✓ Google-verified

Staff at The Cooper win strong praise for responsive, patient service during the leasing process, particularly Ana and Michelle. The complex attracts renters drawn to its city views, safe area, and proximity to TCU, and recovered well after a significant fire. However, a single low review cites maintenance failures, high post-fire pricing, and past management problems as reasons to avoid the property at current rates.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Bottle House on Main
#69
66

Bottle House on Main

3.8(248)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Gigi, Kaleigh, and Daje have earned strong loyalty from residents. Management responds quickly to maintenance issues and makes people feel valued during tours and stays. The complex sits close to downtown with a welcoming coffee area. However, cleanliness varies across common areas. Residents report filthy hallways, elevators, and gym equipment that does not work. Some tenants faced communication breakdowns and lease delays during move-in, leaving a frustrating first impression despite later improvements.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Highline on Magnolia
#70
65

Highline on Magnolia

4.3(44)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers praise the modern finishes, high ceilings, and proximity to downtown coffee shops and restaurants. Leasing staff Kevin and property manager Eveliz consistently earn individual praise for responsiveness and warmth. However, residents report escalating frustration with management response times, persistent delivery access problems on weekends, and security deposits taking months to process even after regional escalation. The building itself and maintenance work get quick attention, but broader property operations struggle. Residents note the dog park upgrade and new flooring, yet say management communication around these disruptions was minimal. Some newer residents feel the rent is steep relative to unit size and lack of resort amenities.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
District at LeftBank
#71
64

District at LeftBank

3.8(294)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The property shows a sharp divide between longtime dissatisfaction and hope under new ownership. Long-term residents report repeated water damage from faulty sprinkler lines, serious black mold left unaddressed, broken elevators, and broken security gates that made theft common. Pest control requests went unanswered for months despite infestations. Recent reviews praise the new management team (Adrienne, Britain, Sophia, Nicole, Lauryn) for quick responses and genuine care, though structural and systemic issues remain unresolved. The location near West 7th and downtown Fort Worth, spacious floor plans, and pet amenities attract residents, but safety concerns and maintenance neglect have driven many away. Staff responsiveness has improved noticeably, with new management resolving lease transfers and handling calls promptly. However, residents flag ongoing problems: dark hallways with burned-out lights, dog waste throughout common areas, and exterior doors still broken months into the transition. One resident reported being charged thousands in unexpected "reletting fees" after moving out with proper notice.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Southern Oaks Apartments
#72
65

Southern Oaks Apartments

3.9(128)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise Brenda, Norma, and Glenn Jones by name for personal attention and fast repairs, and many call the community quiet and welcoming. Management earns trust through responsiveness and genuine care. However, serious operational gaps undermine this goodwill: pest control failures were knowingly withheld, fees are disputed and sometimes unrefundable, senior tenants report repeated harassment, and one recent resident faced a pre-existing mice infestation management denied knowing about. The divide between individual staff kindness and institutional dysfunction creates polarized experiences.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Bexley at Left Bank
#73
65

Bexley at Left Bank

3.8(226)✓ Google-verified

Bexley at Left Bank draws sharp contrasts in resident experience. Maintenance staff, especially Erin, earn consistent praise for fast, responsive work and genuine care. Yet office communication falters: tenants report ignored calls, billing errors, and slow resolutions that require in-person visits. Sound insulation is a real problem, with neighbors' voices, music, and pets clearly audible. Rent jumps of $600-$800 after year one are steep when the same unit rents lower to new arrivals. The property offers genuinely nice amenities, a prime location, and staff who smile when they show up. But behind the attractive facade sit construction gaps, a broken garage gate in extended repair cycles, and an office that shifts into low gear once you renew. Strong maintenance and weak management make this a mixed bag: arrive with eyes open about noise, expect office friction, but know your unit repairs will get done right.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Lofts at West 7th
#74
64

The Lofts at West 7th

3.7(295)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the leasing team-Shelley, Allen, Jacob, and Nicholas stood out for patience and personal attention-and note clean units and a stellar West 7th location near bars, restaurants, and Trinity Park. However, recent construction disruptions sparked frustration: night-shift workers reported demolition-level noise in adjacent units with no advance notice or help from management, who dismissed concerns as normal apartment living. One reviewer also flagged forced WiFi charges and worries about the area's future.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Palladium East Berry Street
#75
54

Palladium East Berry Street

3.4(57)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff kindness and maintenance responsiveness draw strong praise from satisfied residents, but cleanliness lapses, pest complaints, and deposit disagreements undermine the experience. Leasing interactions vary sharply: some tenants encounter welcoming staff like Angie, while others report rude, dismissive treatment and communication failures. Affordability appeals, yet management inconsistency creates hesitation.

Student Housing
Carmel Creekside Apartments
#76
63

Carmel Creekside Apartments

3.7(347)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the location, cleanliness, and handful of exceptional staff members like Paige, who genuinely help tenants navigate issues. However, a persistent pattern emerges: AC units fail monthly and go weeks unrepaired, management ignores escalations, roof leaks are left unchecked, noise complaints bring no resolution, and residents report safety incidents including shootings. Multiple tenants cite hidden fees that push actual rent far above advertised rates. The leasing office makes strong first impressions with friendly application help, but maintenance responses become minimal once you move in. Repairs either drag on indefinitely or contractors do poor work. Several long-term residents who loved the community at first eventually left due to compounded maintenance failures and management's refusal to treat concerns seriously.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Kelley at Samuels Avenue
#77
62

The Kelley at Samuels Avenue

3.6(251)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents love the finishes, amenities, and staff like Omar, Vanessa, and Sheree who handle maintenance requests within hours and make move-in smooth. The location near Stockyards and Downtown works, and river views impress. However, recent applicants report a troubling pattern: leasing staff have sold them unavailable units, given false approval signals, held deposits for weeks, and responded to disputes with evasion or police calls instead of solutions. The gap between resident contentment and applicant chaos suggests operational breakdown in leasing and management accountability. Two separate families relocated 350+ miles after being assured approvals were final, given portal access to set up utilities, then faced sudden termination notices with no real explanation. Staff distraction during tours and open-door privacy breaches add to the sense of disorganization. For those already in, it's a solid home. For those trying to get in, the risk is substantial.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Bell Lancaster Apartments
#78
63

Bell Lancaster Apartments

3.7(259)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Karen and the maintenance team earn consistent praise for responsiveness and genuine care, making leasing and repairs straightforward. That goodwill runs into a wall of systemic problems: water damage left unrepaired for years, unsanitary common areas, frequent management changes that leave tenants without clear accountability, and billing errors around move-in promotions. One resident paid $800 extra after being rushed into a lease without receiving promised rent concessions. The property has real strengths in its units and staff presence, but struggles to translate day-to-day friendliness into reliable property management. Issues pile up (dumpster overflow, dog waste on grounds, pool maintenance failures) and linger. Lease disputes after move-out add friction. For those who find the right unit and avoid maintenance crises, Bell Lancaster works. For others, poor follow-through on repairs and management inconsistency creates years of frustration.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Union at River East
#79
63

The Union at River East

3.7(235)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise Orlando's warmth during leasing and the maintenance team's speed when engaged, plus the pool and outdoor amenities. However, persistent problems shadow the experience: a garage gate down for months, staff hostility when residents report issues, slow administrative solutions, and billing confusion that creates unexpected charges. Some see recent improvement; others view these as core management failures.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Borough Apartments
#80
63

The Borough Apartments

3.7(196)✓ Google-verified

Residents report a stark divide between hiring and leasing staff who are genuinely helpful, and an unstable management situation that has deteriorated significantly. Multiple property managers have cycled through, leaving communication broken and maintenance issues unaddressed. Water damage recurs in several units, mold problems go unremedied, and pest infestations (roaches and rats) persist without adequate treatment. The office is frequently unreachable. Tenants with housing vouchers and good staff interactions rate highly; those facing infrastructure failures and communication blackouts rate the complex critically.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Prescott Park Apartment Homes
#81
63

Prescott Park Apartment Homes

3.7(570)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Prescott Park divides sharply: leasing staff excel at tours and applications, and once moved in, maintenance responds quickly to repair requests. The apartments themselves offer good floor plans and affordability. But residents hit a wall after signing. Roach infestations are persistent despite regular spraying, office phones go unanswered for days, billing surprises arrive regularly (undisclosed fees, duplicate charges), and management becomes dismissive when residents ask questions or complain. The facility grounds are clean and the location near Randol Mill Park works well. Staff like Bianca, Maricela, and Alejandra earn consistent five-star praise for leasing. Yet for every welcoming tour experience, a tenant reports a rattlesnake in the living room, a week-long roof repair, uncommunicative billing, or a management team that feels "professional when they want you to sign but rude after."

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Taylor Commons
#82
62

Taylor Commons

3.6(133)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents and recent arrivals consistently praise the new management team (Cory and Kamitia) for transforming the community into a quieter, more responsive place. Maintenance staff, especially Tim, resolve issues quickly and professionally. However, a small but vocal group reports vehicle break-ins, personal item theft during moves, and inconsistent staff behavior. Security and trust remain unresolved friction points that overshadow the positive operational changes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Flats on Mill
#83
62

Flats on Mill

3.7(230)✓ Google-verified

Strong personalities on staff, especially Jenneth, earn repeated praise for attentive leasing and fast repairs. Yet the property wrestles with a deep split: long-term residents who found the community quiet and well-maintained under current ownership stand against those who left after pest infestations, management turnover, security problems, and constant fee surprises. One reviewer experienced cockroaches, shootings, 12 police cars, and a locked unit at move-out within 11 months; another praised silence and care from the same address. The pool has sat closed for two years, raising questions about promised amenities. Staff inconsistency mirrors these swings. Jenneth, Caesar (maintenance), and the current team earn genuine affection; an office worker named Michelle drew complaints about rudeness. Residents on quieter grounds report thriving; those in active zones report the opposite. New ownership appears to have stabilized things for some, but fee creep and pest control gaps persist even under the new regime.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Historic Electric Building Apartments
#84
62

Historic Electric Building Apartments

3.9(113)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Front-facing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and some residents describe year-long stays as positive. The building's location in historic Sundance Square remains an asset for those who value downtown living. Infrastructure problems dominate resident complaints: two of three elevators frequently offline for weeks, creating hazardous conditions for upper-floor tenants carrying belongings downstairs. Water outages, smoking despite no-smoking policies, thin sound insulation between units, trash overflow, and repeated utility billing errors point to systemic maintenance and management gaps that offset good staff interactions.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Hulen Park Place Townhomes
#85
62

Hulen Park Place Townhomes

3.8(101)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Hulen Park Place is deeply divided. Long-term residents praise its quiet layout and occasional responsive maintenance, but recent reviews describe chronic flooding, pest infestations, and a manager perceived as dismissive and difficult. The gap between five-star and one-star accounts suggests either significant recent deterioration or sharply different treatment by staff. Move-in conditions have disappointed renters, with dirty units and broken systems; one tenant reported an unusually fast resolution after initial complaint. Security deposit disputes and office inaccessibility frustrate tenants trying to resolve routine matters. The maintenance staff itself draws consistent praise, but management's willingness to prioritise repairs appears inconsistent.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
McCart Apartments
#86
61

McCart Apartments

3.9(71)✓ Google-verified

Audrey's attentiveness and quick lease processing earn consistent praise, but persistent water damage, plumbing issues, and slow maintenance repairs dominate complaints. Many residents report outdated fixtures, visible mold, and pest problems. The gap between website photos and actual unit condition frustrates long-term renters, and management allegedly charges move-out fees for pre-existing damage.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Burnett Lofts
#87
60

Burnett Lofts

3.6(115)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents credit Burnett Lofts for its walkable downtown position, well-appointed apartments, and a capable maintenance team led by Derrick. The leasing staff (particularly Kayla, Landon, and Sarah) receive consistent praise for professionalism and attentiveness. A management change in spring 2025 is noted as turning around prior service gaps. However, older reviews and recent comments reveal persistent friction: the parking garage gate has repeatedly failed, leaving cars vulnerable to break-ins; callers struggle to reach the leasing office; and move-out security deposit disputes have stretched months without resolution. Noise from neighbors and delayed HVAC fixes appear in multiple accounts. New management has improved maintenance responsiveness, but office accessibility and security remain contentious.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments
#88
59

Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments

4.2(17)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the modern apartments, location near downtown and Newby Park, and quick maintenance response from named staff like Camryn and Willie. Several tenants lived happily for years. However, move-out billing practices have triggered serious disputes, including allegations of unclear charges sent to collections without itemized explanations. The property has no gated parking or on-site amenities, and sits next to active train tracks.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Maxwell Apartments
#89
60

Maxwell Apartments

3.6(337)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff Alice and manager Veronica consistently earn praise for friendliness and thorough help during tours and move-in, making the application process smooth and welcoming for most applicants. However, residents report significant gaps once they move in: emergency maintenance responds slowly even in heat emergencies, repair requests languish unresolved (AC, dishwashers, rotting wood), and some face pest infestations and noise from other units. Disputes over deposit retention and application fee practices appear in multiple complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Mason Apartment Homes
#90
60

The Mason Apartment Homes

3.6(173)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Mason has a polarized track record. When staff like Cory, Ayla, and Marissa engage, residents report helpful service. But structural mold, roach infestations, slow repairs, management churn, and move-in chaos dominate the complaints. Rent starts affordably, yet surprise fees and costly towing practices offset the price advantage. Reviewers cite a property in decline over the past 18 months.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingSenior & 55+ Living
The Life at Westland Estates
#91
59

The Life at Westland Estates

3.4(190)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Positive experiences center on Natisha and Amanda, who earn consistent praise for patience, availability, and going beyond the lease process. Maintenance under Fabian responds quickly and handles repairs correctly. The apartments themselves are spacious and amenities work well when accessible. However, persistent complaints about roach infestations, non-functional gates, and limited gym access overshadow these strengths. Safety issues like package theft and unruly tenant behavior concern some residents. The gap between five-star and one-star reviews reflects a stark divide: those who encounter engaged management praise it highly, while others face pest problems and poor front-desk responsiveness.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Franklin at Samuels Avenue
#92
59

The Franklin at Samuels Avenue

3.3(245)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff receive consistent praise for friendliness and attentiveness during tours, and the downtown location near Sundance Square appeals to prospective residents. However, actual tenants report serious problems: AC failures lasting weeks even in extreme heat, maintenance delays, unreturned calls and emails, security breaches (unlocked building entrances, stolen packages and vehicle parts), filthy common areas, and management billing disputes. Staff inconsistency and documentation errors compound resident frustration; many long-term tenants report years of unresolved issues and repeated fee disputes. The disconnect between the leasing experience and tenant reality is stark. While some technicians (Bryce, Miguel, Tyler) receive individual praise, the broader operation struggles with accountability. Move-in units often lack basic readiness, emergency repairs take days despite heat exceeding 90 degrees, and management rarely responds to escalations. Residents note a pattern of management turnover that leaves lease discrepancies unresolved and documentation poorly handled.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Hayes Apartments
#93
56

The Hayes Apartments

3.2(119)✓ Google-verified

Timira and Bobbie draw consistent praise for patient, attentive service; some residents report maintenance arriving quickly. Many others describe a management crisis: AC units broken for weeks or months, ceilings and windows leaking through rainy seasons, roaches and rats documented across units. Residents report calling multiple times to no answer, work orders marked resolved without fixes, and staff behaviour ranging from dismissive to aggressive. A handful note positive recent changes, but the bulk of complaints span the past year and remain unresolved. The complex appears caught between pockets of good staff effort and systemic property failure. Move-in units often arrive dirty and broken. Elderly and families with children describe staying in cars or seeking legal counsel. One resident was charged $180 for belongings discarded by management without notice. The laundry costs $2 per load with frequent breakdowns. The core issue is maintenance volume: the office claims responsiveness on select tickets while residents document weeks-long waits for critical failures.

Student HousingFurnished & Corporate HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Slate at Fort Worth Apartments
#94
59

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(112)✓ Google-verified

New management since February 2026 has revitalized the property with rapid repairs, remodeling, and reopened amenities like the pool. Meshun Davis, the current manager, receives consistent praise for responsiveness and care. However, reviews from 2023 to 2024 reveal a troubled history of roach infestations, security deposit withholding, communication breakdowns, and unclean units under previous ownership.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Patriot Pointe Apartments
#95
57

Patriot Pointe Apartments

3.1(121)✓ Google-verified

The property draws strong praise for apartment size, layout, and amenities, with select staff members earning deep loyalty for professionalism and genuine care. Management responsiveness and maintenance speed fail repeatedly: mold sits untreated for weeks, pest control remains ineffective, and calls often go unanswered. High turnover in office staff mirrors tenant departure rates. While some residents thrive in the community, others face deteriorating grounds, noisy neighbors, and unresolved maintenance claims despite full rent charges. Standout employees like Daishuntane and Clemente drive positive experiences, but their impact cannot offset systemic gaps. The property's mixed-income model, proximity to Fort Worth Veterans Affairs and Tarrant County College, and amenities (pool, fitness center, game room) appeal on paper, yet execution wavers sharply between periods of good stewardship and visible decline.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Liberty Lofts
#96
56

Liberty Lofts

3.9(11)✓ Google-verified

Most recent reviews praise Liberty Lofts for approachable staff, responsive maintenance, and an active community vibe with regular resident events. Older severe complaints cite persistent heating and hot water problems, insufficient maintenance staff, and noise from nearby trains, though these specific issues have not resurfaced in recent feedback.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Ridglea Court Apartments
#97
56 low data

Ridglea Court Apartments

3.7(15)✓ Google-verified

Ridglea Court has lost ground since new ownership. Older reviews praised the sleek interiors, quiet gated setting, and downtown proximity, but recent tenants report a management office an hour away in Dallas that ignores requests, stripped amenities, and security breaches. Deposit disputes and maintenance delays are persistent frustrations.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Hulen Heights Apartments
#98
54 low data

Hulen Heights Apartments

3.7(30)

Strong long-term residents and manager Diane's attention earn consistent five-star praise, but office availability complaints and a serious discrimination allegation split opinion sharply. Older units with wear show; location near Central Market is a draw for most.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Mylo Apartment Homes
#99
57

Mylo Apartment Homes

3.6(439)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Nancy, Susan, Kyle, and Jason earn consistent praise for friendliness and quick service, especially during move-in and maintenance calls. However, residents report severe pest problems, unresolved AC and water damage, ignored maintenance requests, and poor trash pickup, with some families leaving after short stays due to heat and bug infestations. The welcome experience masks a pattern once you move in: work orders sit, pest control visits don't happen despite scheduled spraying, and management responses range from dismissive to accusatory. For families needing reliable upkeep and pest control, the gaps between promised service and delivery are significant.

Student HousingSenior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Foundry
#100
56

The Foundry

3.0(94)✓ Google-verified

Half of reviewers praise the office team-especially manager Mary and leasing consultant Kristi-for attentive service and quick maintenance response. They highlight a clean, quiet community with functional amenities. The other half report months-long maintenance backlogs, pervasive roach infestations despite pest control, non-functional laundry equipment, and failures to address water damage and mold. Pool hours consistently do not match posted times. Recent five-star reviews center on staff personality and responsiveness; one-star reviews span infrastructure failures, pest neglect, and inadequate emergency protocols. A three-year resident reports individual positive experiences with efficient management but acknowledges the pest and guest-parking issues others describe. The gap between best and worst experiences is stark.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Brittany Apartments
#101
54

The Brittany Apartments

3.4(298)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents report a sharp divide: staff like Nana, DeLa, and Asia earn genuine praise for warmth and professionalism in the office, but infrastructure problems dominate the experience. Water outages, heating failures, and plumbing issues recur monthly, with maintenance taking days or weeks to respond and often lacking parts. Residents face bills over $300 for utilities tied to building failures they do not control, unclear pest control service, and an AI phone system that frustrates callers trying to reach management. One long-term resident escaped after rates jumped from $1,200 to $1,600 monthly. The office team's attentiveness stands out starkly against neglected grounds (trash, unmaintained trees, acorns on walkways) and unresolved maintenance backlogs. Reviewers note a pattern of management turnover and promise a shift toward better conditions, but repeated failures across water systems, parking enforcement, and pest response persist. Walking in to speak face-to-face with staff appears more effective than calling or using the digital channels.

Student HousingSenior & 55+ LivingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Springs
#102
51

The Springs

2.8(122)✓ Google-verified

The complex suffers from pervasive mold, pest infestations, and maintenance failures that residents report after months of neglect. Staff responsiveness has varied sharply over time; a few recent employees (Eric, Ayanna) received praise, but the office frequently closes early, ignores work orders, and communication remains inconsistent or absent. Most residents do not recommend living here. Multiple reviews cite black mold in walls, water damage, roaches and rats, and the property is reportedly being demolished or shut down. Management struggles with turnover and compliance: office staff attitudes are described as rude or dismissive, and one former employee's key theft forced unit recopy efforts. Health risks and security concerns (homeless occupation of vacant units, drug paraphernalia found near playgrounds) are recurring themes that distinguish this from typical maintenance complaints.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Times Square On the Hill
#103
51

Times Square On the Hill

2.9(45)✓ Google-verified

Leasing staff-especially Jordan and Benitta-earn consistent praise for kindness and clear communication during move-in. Long-term residents report feeling safe and well-managed. However, newer complaints flag vehicle theft, parking headaches, and delayed fixes on water and maintenance issues, suggesting inconsistent upkeep.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
West 3855 - Camp Bowie Apartments
#104
49 low data

West 3855 - Camp Bowie Apartments

4.3(7)✓ Google-verified

Tenants praise updated interiors and solid upkeep despite the building's age. Limited recent feedback makes trends hard to assess.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent Housing
Village East Apartments
#105
48 low data

Village East Apartments

2.5(21)✓ Google-verified

Village East draws mixed reviews but skews sharply negative, primarily from students. Five-star reviewers praise furnished units near TCU and occasionally responsive staff; however, the bulk of reviews document repeated appliance breakdowns, understaffing that delayed repairs, package theft, vehicle break-ins, and management that declined to address complaints or offer compensation. Location advantage does not offset reliability and safety concerns that persisted across years.

Luxury ApartmentsStudent HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
West 7th Apartments
#106
49 low data

West 7th Apartments

3.6(30)

Staff like Zoraya, Chris, Latoya, and Astra Management earn praise for friendliness and effort, and the courtyard and gardens appeal to those seeking calm. Serious flaws undercut the setting: repeated AC breakdowns, weeks-long repair waits even in summer heat, mold in flooded units, and trash buildup from weekly cleaning cycles make this risky for anyone with low tolerance for maintenance gaps or heat sensitivity.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Spring Glen Apartments
#107
46 low data

Spring Glen Apartments

3.5(62)

Spring Glen draws long-term residents who value the peaceful setting and responsive management, though the pool's chronic closure frustrates prospects counting on that amenity. Evidence is limited to brief reviews spanning several years, with mixed satisfaction tilting toward stability for those already settled in.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments
#108
47 low data

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

4.4(16)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the quiet setting and past staff quality under managers Carmen and Marina, with maintenance technician Miller White specifically noted for professionalism. Recent reviews show sharp decline: new management rarely in the office, phones go unanswered, and one resident reported severe pest issues. Experience appears heavily dependent on current staff presence.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
TB
#109
42 low data

The Berkeley

3.4(5)

The Berkeley shows a stark divide in visitor experiences, with staff responsiveness praised in one account but a recent tour marred by cold reception, dirty common areas, and lack of effort. Cleaning happens only twice yearly, and recent management changes have tightened guest and pool access without resident input.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
University Villas Apartments
#110
37 low data

University Villas Apartments

2.8(10)✓ Google-verified

Most recent reviews describe widespread maintenance failures, pest infestations, and management issues over multiple years. A handful of older reviews praise affordability and community, but the preponderance of evidence paints a picture of a property where significant problems are not addressed quickly or properly.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Landing Furnished Apartments at The Henderson
#111
33 low data

Landing Furnished Apartments at The Henderson

No rating yet✓ Google-verified

Landing offers furnished apartments at The Henderson with a focus on flexibility for corporate and student stays. Their website lists gourmet kitchens, in-unit laundry, a resort-style pool, pet park, coworking space, and 24/7 guest support, though direct review evidence is limited.

Student HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Landing Furnished Apartments at Broadway Chapter
#112
31 low data

Landing Furnished Apartments at Broadway Chapter

No rating yet✓ Google-verified

Review evidence for this property is limited. Landing Furnished Apartments at Broadway Chapter in Bricktown serves students and corporate renters with furnished units, in-unit washer/dryer, fast Wi-Fi, and pet-friendly options. Their website lists 24/7 guest support, workspace amenities, and flexible short and long-term leases.

Student HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Landing Furnished Apartments at REVL Crockett Row
#113
31 low data

Landing Furnished Apartments at REVL Crockett Row

No rating yet✓ Google-verified

Review evidence is limited for this business. Their website lists furnished apartments, short-term stays, corporate housing, and monthly rentals in Fort Worth's Cultural District, with in-unit washer/dryer and fitness facilities available.

Student HousingFurnished & Corporate Housing
Campus apartments
#114
21 low data

Campus apartments

No rating yet

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Student Housing

Featured partners for apartment availability

How many apartments do you want to compare?

By sending this enquiry, you agree it will be shared with the leasing office, apartment community, or property manager contacts relevant to your request.

When you submit a quote or contact form, your inquiry may go to partner providers who can do the work. We may receive a referral fee for this, but our rankings and scores come from our published method alone and are never affected by fees.

Common questions about student housing

How much does student housing cost in Fort Worth?
Rates vary widely by proximity to TCU and unit type. Individual bedroom leases in purpose-built student complexes near campus tend to run higher per bed than a shared unit in a standard apartment community a few miles out. Always ask for the all-in monthly cost including fees, not just the advertised starting rate.
When should I start looking for student housing?
Popular complexes near TCU often fill up 6 to 9 months ahead of the fall semester, especially units with the best floor plans or closest walk to campus. Starting your search in the fall or winter before the following school year gives you the most options.
What should I expect during move-in?
Expect heavy competition for maintenance and leasing staff time in the first two weeks of August, when most leases turn over at once. Document the unit's condition with photos on move-in day and confirm any promised repairs are noted in writing before you sign.
How can I judge whether a property is actually good quality?
Look past the amenity photos and ask current residents about maintenance turnaround, noise levels, and how deposits are handled at move-out. A property that's responsive to repair requests during the school year usually matters more day to day than a resort-style pool that gets used a few weeks a year.

Last updated 2026-07-24