Greater Fort Worth Apartment Complex Guide
Menu

Pet-Friendly Apartments in Greater Fort Worth

Page 2 of 3: businesses ranked 101-200 of 245. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.

Standard River District
#101
65

Standard River District

4.0(147)✓ Google-verified

Standard River District's leasing team earns consistent praise for warmth and attention, and move-in experiences are often seamless when staff like Etta or Daniel handle tours. Once residents settle in, however, many report a sharp drop in responsiveness: maintenance requests go ignored or see no-shows, repairs stall for months, refunds take double the promised timeline, and management frequently goes unreachable by phone or text. The property itself is attractive and the units are spacious, but daily life deteriorates when problems emerge and the office stops answering.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
The Lofts at West 7th
#102
70

The Lofts at West 7th

3.8(303)✓ Google-verified

Staff at The Lofts, particularly Allen, Shelley Swafford, and Jacob, earn consistent praise for handling move-ins and questions without friction. Maintenance arrives quickly, and the West 7th location puts restaurants, bars, and Trinity Park within walking distance. One recent review flags that AC problems were dismissed rather than fixed, and the pet area is small despite the pet-friendly listing.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Lauren Apartments
#103
70

Lauren Apartments

3.9(145)✓ Google-verified

Most residents enjoy the property's upkeep and find the leasing team welcoming, though a vocal minority report slow maintenance response and poor enforcement of no-smoking rules. Staff member Mark earns specific praise for going above and beyond; management handles communications well and responds to problems quickly for most tenants. Parking on busy days and lingering smoke odor from non-compliant units present real friction for some.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments
The Club at Stonegate Apartments
#104
66

The Club at Stonegate Apartments

3.9(347)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong individual maintenance staff (Rod, Ron) earn five-star praise for speed and professionalism, and the location near TCU, Trader Joe's, and quiet streets appeals to residents. However, the business's shift to AI-only customer support creates a communication wall: prospective and current residents report weeks without callback, missed pest control requests, and contaminated common areas going uncleaned. Management dismisses serious issues like mold and vomit-stained stairs as routine, charges hit residents by surprise at move-out (one tenant paid $5,740 to exit early), and deposits rarely return intact. The core problem is not the units or their price, but the organization behind them. Reviews praise the complex's quiet feel and landscaping, yet simultaneously describe roaches, ceiling water damage, malfunctioning appliances, and stairwells left in biohazard condition for months. When residents tried to contact staff in person, they found the office empty despite posted hours. The contract itself locks people in with opacity: one longtime tenant learned of $100+ mystery fees only after moving in, and another discovered move-out penalties far steeper than anticipated.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
District at LeftBank
#105
66

District at LeftBank

3.9(291)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Six months of ownership transition split resident experience sharply. New management draws immediate praise for responsiveness, quick repairs, and staff warmth from leasing team members including Britain, Adrienne, Sophia, Nicole, and Lauryn. Long-term residents report the change as tangible improvement over prior neglect. However, underlying building infrastructure issues persist: repeated water damage from burst sprinkler pipes, black mold left unpainted over, non-functional elevators and security gates, and roach infestations unresolved despite eight pest control visits. Residents also report misleading verbal fee assurances followed by thousands in unexpected charges including reletting fees. Pet owners praise the dog park and washing station, but common areas remain littered with dog waste and hallways smell of smoke and urine. The property's core appeal remains location and layout for those drawn to West 7th proximity and spacious units. Staff turnover and management change inject hope, yet reviews suggest structural and institutional problems require more than friendly faces to fix.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Sierra Gardens
#106
60

Sierra Gardens

3.2(205)✓ Google-verified

Sierra Gardens draws strong praise for leasing staff like Sara and Maximiliano, who handle paperwork swiftly and solve move-in problems on the spot. Residents value the quiet grounds and responsive maintenance. However, repeated complaints about overnight noise, parking lot homeless encampments, stolen vehicles, and delayed infrastructure fixes (hot water, AC) paint a divided picture of life here.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Wallis and Baker Apartments and Brownstones
#107
70

Wallis and Baker Apartments and Brownstones

4.1(267)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents credit the maintenance crew and top leasing agents for creating a welcoming, well-maintained community with strong customer service. However, newer residents report persistent operational problems: packages and mail routinely sent to the wrong building due to duplicate unit numbers, trash areas that overwhelm hallways with smell, an office that closes weekends and Mondays making follow-up difficult, and maintenance tickets that sometimes take weeks to address. The complex offers premium amenities (pool, dog park, fitness center, wine room) and attracts loyalty from those with good staff experiences. The split between enthusiastic four-year residents and frustrated recent tenants suggests the community's quality depends heavily on which building you occupy and when you need help.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Villas at Cantamar Apartments
#108
69

Villas at Cantamar Apartments

3.7(205)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members, particularly Jessica Soto and Alexia Perez, consistently receive praise for attentiveness and bilingual support during the leasing process. The property itself draws repeated compliments for cleanliness, attractive balconies, and amenities like the pool, with several reviewers noting swift and flexible move-in assistance. One significant concern surfaces: a disabled resident reports electric scooter accessibility blocked by vehicles parked illegally (nose-in rather than backed-in), alongside friction with a resident who ignores the lease parking rule. This isolated but serious issue contradicts the otherwise positive tenant experience and raises questions about lease enforcement consistency.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Briella Fort Worth Apartments
#109
60

Briella Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(392)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Office staff shine with genuine warmth and efficiency, especially during leasing. Inside, many units are spotless and affordable. The break comes fast: roaches, gnats, and mice persist despite repeated requests for pest control. Maintenance responds slowly or not at all to serious issues like burst pipes, flooded dishwashers, and broken appliances; residents report needing the City of Fort Worth to force repairs. Towing fees ($333 minimum) and overflowing dumpsters add to the frustration.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Cottages at Bedford
#110
64

Cottages at Bedford

3.8(193)✓ Google-verified

Cottages at Bedford divides sharply along a management timeline. Since new management took over roughly five months ago, residents consistently report a transformed experience: Traci Jean and her team conduct thorough lease reviews, answer maintenance requests promptly, and maintain a welcoming atmosphere. Before that transition, the property struggled with serious structural and pest issues, staff unprofessionalism, and confusing exit charges that left tenants feeling exploited. Current residents praise the cleanliness and responsive support they receive today. The property offers in-unit washer-dryer, a fitness center, swimming pool, and dog park amenities. However, past residents documented persistent mold from roof leaks, roach and bed bug infestations despite paid pest control, and broken door locks that violated city code. Some maintenance staff credibility suffered when their accounts of incidents contradicted tenants. The sharp divide in recent reviews suggests the business is working to rebuild trust after a rough period, though longer-term proof of sustained improvement and mold remediation is still pending.

Pet-Friendly Apartments
Bottle House on Main
#111
65

Bottle House on Main

3.8(256)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews hinge on specific staff: Edgar handles maintenance repairs quickly, Tristun and Gigi excel at tours, and Kaleigh runs operations smoothly. One-star reviews expose the flip side: front desk communication fails, hallways and elevators look neglected, pool and gym upkeep slip, and residents report vehicle vandalism and disputes over towing. Staff inconsistency appears to be the fault line. Where a skilled leasing agent or maintenance member steps in, people feel heard and cared for. Without that personal touch, the same complex feels unresponsive and dirty. Location near downtown and amenities impress; follow-through on cleanliness and security does not.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Southern Oaks Apartments
#112
65

Southern Oaks Apartments

3.9(130)✓ Google-verified

Brenda and Norma in the office set Southern Oaks apart with genuine care and patience through the leasing process. Glenn Jones and the maintenance team handle repairs quickly and professionally. But the complex struggles with serious gaps: recent residents report mice in walls, mold odor, pest control marked complete when untreated, and frustration over pet policy disclosure and post-move billing disputes. Location near shopping is a draw, and many find it quiet for a city complex. Long-term residents praise the family feel and how staff know tenants by name. New arrivals, though, sometimes encounter uninhabitable conditions on move-in and hit walls when asking for lease releases. The split between five-star praise for staff and one-star warnings about hidden problems suggests experience varies sharply by unit and timing.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Silver Leaf Villas
#113
75

Silver Leaf Villas

4.5(332)✓ Google-verified

Many residents praise the peaceful atmosphere, cleanliness, and welcoming staff, especially during tours and move-in. However, recent reviews flag serious maintenance problems: dishwashers, AC units, hot water, and plumbing have required multiple visits for the same issues, with temporary fixes instead of real solutions. Pest complaints and mildew damage add to the frustration.

Student HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments
Ironwood Crossing Apartments & Townhomes
#114
59

Ironwood Crossing Apartments & Townhomes

3.4(277)✓ Google-verified

New management has turned operations around with visible property improvements, responsive maintenance, and staff like Elena, Dana, and Charles earning repeated praise for going above and beyond. However, some residents report ongoing construction delays, garbage overflow, and uneven service quality; affordability keeps residents anchored despite these gaps.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Willow Glen
#115
74

Willow Glen

4.1(199)✓ Google-verified

Willow Glen draws consistent praise for its quiet setting, clean grounds, and attentive staff who resolve issues quickly. Residents of multiple years highlight pool gatherings and friendly community events as major draws. Serious concerns emerge around pest control, deposit practices, and transparency. One resident reported a roach-infested unit from move-in day, while another documented their refundable deposit being converted to inflated utility charges and unsubstantiated damage claims.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Grapevine Station Apartments
#116
68

Grapevine Station Apartments

4.1(150)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents consistently praise the tight-knit staff and location walking distance to downtown Grapevine, and many have renewed multiple times. However, recent reports expose gaps: maintenance backlogs leave tenants without AC in summer heat for weeks, pest control appointments take months to confirm, and leasing staff inconsistently handle tours and questions. Staff like Elijah, Madison, and Brody earn genuine loyalty, and the complex itself stays clean and quiet. But service failures in repair prioritization and vendor coordination directly harm livability during emergencies, and the gap between five-star and one-star reviews suggests experience varies sharply depending on when problems occur and who handles them.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Firestone at West 7th
#117
75

Firestone at West 7th

4.1(548)✓ Google-verified

Staff at Firestone turn apartment hunting into a smooth, welcoming process. Lilly, Fi, Fiorella, and other team members spend time understanding what each prospective resident needs, respond quickly to work orders, and follow through after move-in. The location near West 7th's shops and restaurants matters to residents who value walkability. One reviewer flagged clustered five-star posts and fake accounts, noting that maintenance delivers but the front office sometimes drops the ball on issue resolution. Landscaping upkeep got mixed marks. Overall, this is a genuinely strong complex held up by attentive staff and a desirable neighborhood, though the recent review surge warrants a grain of salt.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Mariposa Park Apartments
#118
59

Mariposa Park Apartments

3.5(103)✓ Google-verified

Mariposa Park has made a dramatic turnaround under new management. Melina, Edith, Rafael, and other staff are consistently praised for fast problem-solving, hands-on presence, and genuine care for residents. However, security remains a concern: the back parking lot lacks lighting, creating a serious safety risk for residents leaving early or late. Maintenance quality varies, and earlier management was poor enough to drive complaints. The complex attracts residents seeking affordability and stability. Staff turnover has been visible, but current team members are winning trust through daily availability and follow-through on repairs. For those prioritizing staff responsiveness and community feel over amenities, this is a solid pick. Those needing guaranteed security should look elsewhere or ask specifically about lighting plans.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
The Savoy
#119
64

The Savoy

4.0(89)✓ Google-verified

Residents split sharply on The Savoy. Those staying long-term praise staff like Kyndra and maintenance team (Dee, Jay, Lester) for genuine care and quick repairs. Others faced months of unresolved Wi-Fi failures, pest issues after move-in, maintenance entering without notice, and management that felt argumentative rather than helpful when problems escalated. The complex offers affordable living and a quiet setting, but recurring infrastructure and accountability gaps push some renters to break leases early.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments
The Palmer
#120
64

The Palmer

4.0(61)✓ Google-verified

The Palmer earns strong praise for friendly, responsive leasing staff and a quiet, pet-welcoming boutique community near trails and shopping. One former resident documented months of unresolved billing errors, wrongful debt collection charges, and repeated management claims to fix the issue without taking action, ultimately harming their credit and business.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Dove Creek Villas
#121
59

Dove Creek Villas

3.6(78)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the staff, cleanliness, and value. Jessica, Stacy, Veronica, and maintenance staff Rudy earn consistent recognition for responsiveness and professionalism. However, serious complaints surface about pest control failures, rotting cabinets left unrepaired, overgrown landscaping, and management discouraging resident improvements like patio grills. The property is gated and safe, but experience varies sharply between those who move in smoothly and those who encounter unresolved damage.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
The Arbors on Oakmont
#122
73

The Arbors on Oakmont

4.3(301)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Arbors delivers standout hospitality from named staff like Genesis, McKenzi, and Sonia, who consistently earn praise for warmth, attentiveness, and making the lease process smooth. Residents and prospects report beautiful, quiet apartments with thorough cleaning by Ashley and strong maintenance support. However, a significant recent infestation complaint reveals critical gaps: one resident encountered persistent cockroaches from move-in, saw maintenance requests closed without action, and waited 48 hours for management response during a genuine crisis. Earlier reviews also flag occasional rudeness from front office staff and a mismatch between photos and reality. The 79% five-star rate masks sharp polarization.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
The Trail Lakes Apartments
#123
71

The Trail Lakes Apartments

4.9(13)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the complex for its clean, quiet grounds and responsive management. The property manager Amanda stands out across reviews for her professionalism, availability, and genuine care for tenants; maintenance staff are described as friendly and helpful.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Aero Apartments
#124
59

Aero Apartments

3.0(217)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise recent management changes and the maintenance app when it works, but recurring complaints about roaches, delayed repairs, and broken utilities like AC during summer heat contradict service promises. The divide is sharp: satisfied tenants credit cleanliness and responsibility, while frustrated ones report management ignores maintenance tickets, changes staff constantly, and prioritizes rent collection over habitability.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
SageWater Village
#125
74

SageWater Village

4.0(211)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise SageWater Village for attentive maintenance, welcoming staff like Jenna, Darah, and Omar, and a clean, walkable property with a pond and pool. One long-term resident flagged persistent smoking violations despite repeated complaints, though even that reviewer credited maintenance with being excellent.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments
Ramble & Rose
#126
68

Ramble & Rose

4.1(183)✓ Google-verified

Tour staff, especially Brittany and Savannah, consistently impress prospective residents with product knowledge and care. Units offer modern finishes, good layouts, and appealing common spaces. Yet residents who stay past the leasing stage encounter a sharp divide: the front office remains helpful, but maintenance backlogs stretch to months, upkeep has visibly declined under new management, and communication gaps leave tenants frustrated. Noise complaints languish unresolved, utilities are cut with minimal notice, and move-out disputes over deposit deductions claim normal wear-and-tear charges are illegal. Those with ongoing issues cite the contrast between the sales experience and the living experience as the core problem. A resident of over three years notes the property offers fair value for space and location compared to peers nearby. However, reviews from the past six months paint an increasingly negative picture tied to ResProp's takeover in December: elevators out for weeks, thin sound barriers, hallway odors that vary by floor, and staff citing apartment-living realities rather than solving them. Some tenants credit named staff members (Marie, Karen, Savannah, Brittany) with patience and fairness, yet cannot overcome the structural issues.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Hub at Chisholm Trail
#127
59

The Hub at Chisholm Trail

3.5(359)✓ Google-verified

James Parker's attentive leasing support and a refreshed management team have earned strong recent praise, though the property faces serious operational gaps. Residents report maintenance requests vanishing, phones that ring unanswered, pest infestations, and safety concerns like unlit walkways that persist despite repeated requests. The affordability appeals, but move-in chaos and neglected repairs frustrate long-term residents. New management is actively working to improve the grounds, and maintenance crews are visible, but residents need faster follow-through to close the gap between good intentions and lived experience.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Luxia River East Apartments
#128
74

Luxia River East Apartments

4.4(557)✓ Google-verified

Most residents encounter engaged staff and enjoy the riverside location and resort-style amenities, with maintenance and leasing teams named repeatedly for going the extra mile. However, a notable segment reports serious problems: multiple vehicle thefts despite advertised gated parking, unexpected move-in unit switches without timely notice, surprise billings for late notice violations, and vehicles towed due to portal changes. Security and transparent communication remain inconsistent across tenancies.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Haven at Mansfield
#129
62

Haven at Mansfield

3.9(102)✓ Google-verified

Haven at Mansfield draws strong praise for maintenance speed and leasing support, but recent reviews highlight sustained problems with elevator failures, weak policy enforcement, and declining common-area cleanliness. Long-term residents report management instability, pest issues, noise complaints, and billing disputes that management has not resolved despite repeated requests.

Pet-Friendly Apartments
Flats on Mill
#130
63

Flats on Mill

3.7(229)✓ Google-verified

Flats on Mill splits sharply between residents who praise responsive staff (especially leasing agent Janneth) and fast maintenance, and those who report cockroaches, safety issues, and surprise fees that spike after ownership changes. Repairs arrive within hours or a day when things work, but communication breakdowns and unexplained lock-outs mar the experience for frustrated tenants. The bark park stays stocked, and some residents enjoy quiet sections with good neighbors. Yet pest control monthly charges do not guarantee service visits, and amenities like the pool have sat unused for years. New management appears to be turning the ship, but older complaints about fees and bugs linger.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Wildwood Creek
#131
64

Wildwood Creek

3.9(163)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star reviews consistently praise three leasing agents-Adam Branscum, Jordyn Lindquist, and Jennifer-for patient, responsive service that makes move-ins smooth even for out-of-state relocations. Maintenance staff (Carlos and Felipe) receive specific mentions for prompt seasonal work and responsiveness to repair requests. However, a stark gap exists between the renovated model units and actual resident conditions. One-star reviewers report poorly maintained hallways, parking areas, landscaping, and a pool that sits idle; management allegedly charged them for damages they didn't cause and pressures tenants to sign leases before seeing their units. A recurring frustration: valet trash fees are mandatory with no opt-out option. Most damaging is a report involving a medically fragile elderly tenant whose broken AC went unrepaired for nearly a year despite his heart and lung conditions, after which management charged a $3,000 lease-break fee. The location's appeal and staff caliber keep ratings buoyant, but maintenance responsiveness and financial fairness appear inconsistent. Wait times for appointments and difficulty reaching management plague some tenants. Those scoring five stars tend to arrive as fresh leases; those scoring one star report discovering misalignment only after move-in or encountering obstacles during renewal.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Vine South
#132
64

Vine South

4.1(72)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Vine South draws strong praise for its quiet, tree-lined setting near good schools and for maintenance staff who respond quickly to work orders. But recent reviews expose a split experience: some residents praise affordable rent and friendly office staff by name, while others report cockroaches at move-in, unresponsive management, high fees for lease breaks or packages, and a front office perceived as dismissive. The property appears well-kept, yet operational fairness and pest prevention remain pain points.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Aden Crest Apartments
#133
58

Aden Crest Apartments

3.4(145)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents experience a quiet community but struggle with inconsistent enforcement of policies and maintenance gaps. Staff friendliness varies widely-some praise specific managers and maintenance workers, while others report unresolved issues like ceiling leaks, water outages, and mold that persisted for months or years despite work orders.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Dove Park Apartments
#134
58

Dove Park Apartments

3.1(98)✓ Google-verified

Strong resident satisfaction drives many 5-star reviews, with families and couples praising Veronica and the leasing team, quick maintenance turnarounds, and the park-like setting near Highway 114. However, a recent tour revealed significant facility concerns: foul smells and a roach sighting cast doubt on cleanliness standards that would alarm prospective renters or long-term residents. Community events like the Back-to-School bash build loyalty, and the proximity to Grapevine parks and Southlake appeals to those seeking value. Yet unresolved pest and odor complaints suggest maintenance gaps despite the pace of repair responses. Current residents often overlook age because space and affordability outweigh newer finishes.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
The Dylan
#135
61

The Dylan

3.6(107)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Dylan delivers a modern, well-maintained community with responsive staff and a convenient location near shops and restaurants. Hidden costs pile up quickly: residents report base rents of $1,200-$1,600 plus $25-$125 monthly add-ons for parking, trash, and pets, and towing fees exceed $300 if you park without a reserved spot after 9 pm.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
29 Fifty Apartments
#136
67

29 Fifty Apartments

4.0(313)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff like Allison, Paige Jinks, Victor, and Donisha earn consistent praise for attentiveness and transparent communication; first impressions lean positive. Recent management turnover has soured the picture: residents report bait-and-switch move-in deals, amenities closing without notice, mounting hidden fees creeping past $400/month above advertised rent, water leaks left unfixed, and a failing gate plus poor security allowing trespassing and vandalism.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Bell Lancaster Apartments
#137
63

Bell Lancaster Apartments

3.7(259)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Karen and the maintenance team earn consistent praise for responsiveness and genuine care, making leasing and repairs straightforward. That goodwill runs into a wall of systemic problems: water damage left unrepaired for years, unsanitary common areas, frequent management changes that leave tenants without clear accountability, and billing errors around move-in promotions. One resident paid $800 extra after being rushed into a lease without receiving promised rent concessions. The property has real strengths in its units and staff presence, but struggles to translate day-to-day friendliness into reliable property management. Issues pile up (dumpster overflow, dog waste on grounds, pool maintenance failures) and linger. Lease disputes after move-out add friction. For those who find the right unit and avoid maintenance crises, Bell Lancaster works. For others, poor follow-through on repairs and management inconsistency creates years of frustration.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Henderson
#138
61

The Henderson

3.6(268)✓ Google-verified

Strong personal connections with staff drive some residents to move in and stay, while infrastructure neglect, unprofessional management, and billing disputes push others out swiftly. Praise centers on individual staff members (Linda, Jonetta Brooks, maintenance crew), but complaint reviews detail years of deferred upkeep, water damage, mold, pest issues, and frustrating charge disputes that dwarf the friendly service experience.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Trinity Highline
#139
71

Trinity Highline

4.3(70)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the leasing and maintenance teams by name, especially Nina and Demarcus, who respond within hours to requests and handle move-ins smoothly. However, parking is a persistent and serious problem, with many residents unable to find spots after 7 pm and forced to pay extra for reserved spots or park near the cemetery. The advertised smoke-free environment is not enforced, leaving persistent cigarette and marijuana smells throughout units and hallways. Additional complaints include car towing without adequate reimbursement and delayed refunds after lease termination. The community feels friendly and well-maintained on the surface, but structural issues like parking capacity and smoke control undermine the experience for residents staying longer than a few months. Management is responsive to individual requests but appears unable to enforce complex issues like smoking violations or resolve the underlying parking shortage that the building's design created once occupancy filled.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Griffin Apartments
#140
66

The Griffin Apartments

3.9(213)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance staff, notably Angel, earn consistent praise for patience and problem-solving, and front-desk workers like Christina and Shayla receive recognition for professionalism. However, move-in experience is marred by dirty units, broken appliances, and pests; repairs drag on for months despite multiple work orders, and office communication fails repeatedly-closed during stated hours, voicemail loops, unanswered emails. Several residents report deposit disputes and aggressive billing after move-out, with management unresponsive to itemized charge requests. The complex occupies a lower-income Fort Worth neighborhood and attracts tenants seeking affordability, yet the gap between staff goodwill and systemic dysfunction is stark. Residents describe noisy neighbors, neglected grounds, and mold issues alongside climate control failures. Those with positive experiences often credit individual staff members rather than property-wide standards, suggesting service depends heavily on who handles your case.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Silversage Point at Western Center
#141
57

Silversage Point at Western Center

3.3(108)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Recent tenants and prospective renters praise staff warmth and quick repairs under strong management, but many long-term residents report chronic failures: leaks go unfixed for months, roaches persist despite complaints, and management changes so often that follow-up work stops. The property appears livable under stable leadership but unstable when the office turnover returns.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
The Cooper Apartments
#142
66

The Cooper Apartments

3.8(356)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the leasing team's efficiency and personal attention, with staff like Ana and Michelle earning specific credit for making move-in straightforward and stress-free. The grounds feel clean and welcoming, the location suits students near TCU and professionals, and pet owners appreciate the safety for walks. However, one reviewer cited steep pricing ($1.3k for basic units) alongside concerns about past management failures and a significant fire, raising questions about whether recent improvements have fully addressed earlier operational problems.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Marina Del Rey Apartments
#143
57

Marina Del Rey Apartments

3.4(97)✓ Google-verified

Tenants praise the management team, particularly Diana Munoz and Daphne, for professionalism and responsiveness; many residents stay multiple years and highlight recent upgrades like new washers and dryers. However, some report pest issues at move-in, delayed maintenance, and tight parking. Rent charges ($2000 for three-bedroom) draw mixed reactions; one reviewer noted the complex works with people rebuilding credit.

Luxury ApartmentsPet-Friendly ApartmentsStudent Housing
Forena Revelstoke
#144
71

Forena Revelstoke

4.3(173)✓ Google-verified

Leasing agent Breonia and the team earned consistent praise for attentive, personalized service; apartments and amenities impressed visitors. However, persistent car theft, break-ins, and a recent management transition to AIR Communities have left residents frustrated with unresponsive office staff, falling maintenance standards, and billing disputes. Security concerns dominate recent complaints, though some residents report smooth initial experiences.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Montelena Apartments Grapevine
#145
71

Montelena Apartments Grapevine

4.3(130)✓ Google-verified

Montelena draws consistent praise for its leasing team (Latoya, Connie, Angie) and maintenance staff who resolve most requests same-day, plus a quiet, safe atmosphere that appeals to young families. However, repeated complaints about structural problems (vinyl flooring glue, AC units failing to cool adequately in summer) and management's delayed or dismissive responses reveal cracks in problem-solving. Internal communication gaps have left tenants frustrated when notices weren't honored and promises contradicted. The property itself is well-maintained cosmetically and sits near lakes and cultural amenities, but families with children or those in hot months should ask specifics about flooring materials and HVAC capacity before signing. Staff turnover and inconsistent service quality suggest operational growing pains.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
The Berkeley Apartments
#146
71

The Berkeley Apartments

4.2(507)✓ Google-verified

Kenza Berthal has single-handedly salvaged move-in experiences for multiple residents through her attentiveness and problem-solving; others credit her patience and friendliness with making the application process smooth. That said, once you live here, maintenance becomes a struggle: residents report waiting months for repairs, mysterious missing packages, unaddressed mold and water damage, and a property manager who does not return calls until move-out day. The 700+ unit community appears stretched thin on staffing. Baron, a leasing agent, has frustrated residents with rushed tours, dismissive attitudes, and incorrect lease information. More broadly, the gap between a strong first impression (thanks to select staff and nice grounds) and post-move-in reality (slow maintenance, communication breakdowns) is the core tension in these reviews.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Magnolia Lofts On Vickery
#147
56

Magnolia Lofts On Vickery

4.0(23)✓ Google-verified

Staff professionalism and location shine, but serious construction and maintenance problems plague the complex. Multiple tenants report severe water damage, poor move-in conditions, weak security, and noise issues that management either delayed fixing or refused to address, citing cost. Leasing team earns consistent five-star praise, yet long-term residents face costly repairs, high utilities, and deposit disputes that undermine the luxury positioning.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments
The Preserve
#148
62

The Preserve

3.6(278)✓ Google-verified

The Preserve divides sharply along leasing and residency lines. Renters working with Ashley, Val, or a responsive Rachel report excellent service and love the trails, dog park, and floor plans. Long-term residents, however, cite mounting frustration: rising rents, deteriorating unit maintenance, management rudeness (especially one staff member), and the company's pattern of withholding deposits or charging post-move fees without notice. Dog waste accumulation is a persistent complaint. Recent management outreach after a negative review earned back one month's rent and fee waivers, suggesting some willingness to remedy.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Atlas Waterside
#149
70

Atlas Waterside

4.2(174)✓ Google-verified

Life at Atlas Waterside centers on a scenic riverfront location with walkable access to restaurants, shops, and the Trinity trail. Leasing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and grounds are well-kept with modern finishes, pool, and gym amenities. When problems arise, support falters. Multiple residents report unresolved security gaps (insufficient camera coverage, broken fobs, garage vulnerabilities), water damage from burst pipes, slow app-based gate systems, and management that becomes unresponsive after initial turnover. Staff commission disputes also appear unresolved over months, and pricing sits high relative to these service gaps.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
StoneLedge Apartments Grapevine
#150
65

StoneLedge Apartments Grapevine

3.9(133)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise the pool, fitness amenities, and maintenance responsiveness, but move-out becomes the breaking point for many. Office staff frequently unavailable; when management gives verbal instructions, they later deny conversations happened. Move-out bills often spike hundreds of dollars for carpet, walls, or "cleaning," despite tenants saying they left units clean. One tenant documented damage to credit score after disputing charges years later. A few leasing consultants (Danielle, Koree) get consistent five-star mention for warmth and efficiency, yet management reputations fracture fast. The property appeals to those staying years; new residents report tour mix-ups and expectations misalignment. Noise near the fire station and highway mars some units. The tension: beautiful grounds and good maintenance work undercut by what reviewers call predatory billing practices at checkout.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Station 121 at Town Center Apartments
#151
59

Station 121 at Town Center Apartments

3.4(442)✓ Google-verified

Station 121 offers spacious units and attracts residents who praise quick maintenance response and individual staff members like Steven, Alexandria, Amity, and Savannah for their genuine care. A two-year resident calls it the best value in the area, though notes the team is overworked. However, move-in condition problems (roaches, musty odors), failing AC units that don't reach comfortable temperatures, and inconsistent management communication frustrate others. Understaffing appears to undermine consistency across the massive property. Pet owners should note the $25 monthly fee plus a $75 cleaning charge at lease end. Some report that calling management is difficult; visiting in person works better. Despite uneven execution, reviewers consistently mention staff members by name and recall amenity events, suggesting personal touches matter here when they land.

Pet-Friendly Apartments
Royal St. Moritz
#152
61

Royal St. Moritz

3.7(183)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Loyal residents praise responsive maintenance and a good Grapevine location, but a sharp divide emerges. Many multi-year tenants report no pest issues and say staff cares; newer arrivals encounter filthy units, roach infestations across hallways and apartments, uncleaned carpets, damaged fixtures, and management dismissal of complaints. AC repairs require escalation, common areas stay littered with trash and weed smoke, and move-out fees shock departing tenants.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Vine + Vail Townhomes and Apartments
#153
70

Vine + Vail Townhomes and Apartments

4.2(215)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Vine + Vail wins consistent praise for maintenance responsiveness and staff friendliness, with tenants naming Spencer, Kevin, Pilar, and Courtney as standouts who resolve issues quickly. The property sits in a quiet area near walking trails and ranks above average for the townhome category. However, residents report a sharp divide between touring promises and move-in reality: parking spaces are heavily reserved and visitor spots absent, airport and mall noise contradicts "quiet" claims, and plumbing or appliance failures at move-in are common. A few tenants faced delayed security deposit returns and confusion over lease concessions. The maintenance team's strength masks deeper management communication problems.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Bexley Arcadia
#154
64

Bexley Arcadia

3.9(135)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance staff earn consistent praise for speed and friendliness, and three leasing agents (Zyra, Angel, Breann) stand out for patience and problem-solving. The units themselves are clean and well-equipped. However, senior management is the persistent weak point: unresponsive calls, ignoring residents in office, slow resolution on long-term problems like mold and broken appliances. Common areas have deteriorated since Weinstein Properties took over. Those living here succeed by building relationships with specific staff members rather than relying on formal processes. Quality swings sharply between individuals. Maintenance technician Lallish, for example, has fixed complex issues same-visit; others initially misdiagnosed mold as dust. Residents report waiting months for appliance replacement while managers deflect. Pet owners note friendly dogs around the complex. Parking and security complaints suggest inconsistent enforcement.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments
The Skylark on Harwood
#155
58

The Skylark on Harwood

3.2(330)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Leasing staff earn consistent praise for professionalism and patience, with Diamond and Carissa named repeatedly as standouts. Tenants also appreciate pet amenities and unit upgrades. However, long-term residents report persistent ground decay, roaches, delayed pool access, and mounting hidden fees that leave many frustrated. Management changes have driven sharp swings in property upkeep, and website photos do not match current conditions. A seven-year tenant describes a dramatic shift under recent management: broken gates, graffiti, non-functional pool despite city approval, phantom fees, and a once-welcoming community becoming transactional. Staff care appears spotty; maintenance responsiveness has declined. The property offers appeal to new movers but struggles with retention and transparency, particularly around true total costs.

Pet-Friendly Apartments
The Drake on Summit Apartments
#156
64

The Drake on Summit Apartments

3.8(210)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Drake on Summit attracts renters with its modern amenities and walkable location near downtown Fort Worth, but the experience deteriorates significantly after move-in. Residents report cleanliness that went from acceptable to deplorable within months, broken security doors that anyone can bypass, rampant car break-ins in an unpatrolled garage, and an overwhelmed or indifferent maintenance team that responds quickly to some requests but then goes silent for weeks on critical issues like mold and AC failures. The sky deck and gym are real draws; the frustration is real too. Fire alarms blast at odd hours for years until a vendor switch helps. Management uses AI phone trees that trap callers, then charges residents for security deposit deductions without documentation. Early residents loved it here; recent ones feel unsafe and neglected. Some staff shine (Chris, Kelly, Natalie handling positive interactions), but the system behind them has fractured.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments
Sansom Bluff Apartments
#157
60

Sansom Bluff Apartments

3.5(198)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sansom Bluff offers spacious apartments with good amenities and standout maintenance and activities staff. However, the leasing office consistently fails to answer phones or provide welcoming service, and management shows dismissive attitudes once residents move in. The property itself appeals to pet owners and families, but office staff turnover has left frustrated residents who feel unwelcome when they need help.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments
Magnolia Park Apartments
#158
60

Magnolia Park Apartments

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Magnolia Park divides sharply: 72% of reviewers praise responsive staff, swift maintenance, and the West 7th location; leasing associates Camryn, Brooke, and Rikki are named repeatedly for going beyond move-in basics. However, 22% report persistent soundproofing failures in upper floors (units 302, 304 especially), and one recent guest with a service animal was fined $500, indicating management shifts that contradict earlier pet-friendly reputation. The complex handles maintenance within 24 hours and accommodates tenants thoughtfully, yet noise complaints span years unresolved and rent is cited as high relative to downtown options.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Park 7
#159
69

Park 7

4.1(61)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Park 7 residents consistently praise the responsiveness and warmth of staff, particularly recent management changes. Brooke, Camryn, and maintenance staff (Heath, Juan) earned repeated praise for solving problems quickly and communicating clearly. The location near downtown and West 7th, clean grounds, and upgraded units draw multiple mentions. One resident reported months-long delays on a broken key and a missing key for a new household member, plus confusion about advertised 24/7 package management. Most five-star reviewers note improvement under the new management team.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Mesa Vista Apartments
#160
69

Mesa Vista Apartments

4.1(52)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently report a quiet, well-maintained complex with responsive maintenance staff. Manager Hugo receives repeated praise for his attentiveness, kindness, and hands-on management. One older complaint cited rude management and slow repairs, but more recent reviews contradict this pattern, with residents reporting same-day maintenance fixes and Hugo's dedicated tenant support.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Mercantile Square
#161
55

Mercantile Square

2.9(227)✓ Google-verified

Mercantile Square delivers affordable apartments with occasional moments of exceptional maintenance work, but systemic problems undermine the value. Accounting errors, falsified move-in incentives, amenities that stay closed for months, and slow repairs leave residents frustrated despite recent management changes.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Westcliff Park Apartments
#162
55 low data

Westcliff Park Apartments

3.6(60)✓ Google-verified

Westcliff Park draws strong loyalty from long-term residents who praise staff warmth and affordability, yet serious complaints about delayed repairs, unresponsive management, and vehicle theft persist. Evidence is mixed: high-satisfaction residents highlight Emily, Thalia, and Jeanie's attentiveness, while others report months-long maintenance delays and security lapses the office failed to address or communicate.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
The Haven at Chisholm Trail
#163
59

The Haven at Chisholm Trail

3.4(461)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Haven offers helpful staff and amenities near shopping and medical services, but residents consistently report frustration with office communication: calls go unanswered, promises repeat without follow-through, and work orders languish. Maintenance teams deliver when reached, yet safety concerns and neighbor complaints have required management escalation and, in at least one case, tenant departure.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Monticello Crossroads
#164
59

Monticello Crossroads

3.6(146)✓ Google-verified

New management has won over some residents with responsive service and visible improvements, but chronic maintenance failures and poor communication undermine trust. Air conditioning repairs drag for months while residents pay full rent for amenities that sit unused; office hours go unstaffed and emails go unanswered. Recent leasing managers Johan and Roger earn consistent praise, yet the gap between their helpfulness and the maintenance team's slowness has left multiple residents filing complaints with Texas authorities.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments
Bexley at Left Bank
#165
64

Bexley at Left Bank

3.8(228)✓ Google-verified

The complex divides sharply: residents praise maintenance team members like Erin and Josh for fast, professional repairs, and appreciate community events. However, leasing office communication is inconsistent, with many reporting ignored calls and slow issue resolution. Serious concerns include lingering pet odors in hallways, thin walls that carry neighbor noise and cooking smells, pest infestations left unaddressed for months, and instances of billing disputes that damaged credit without signed leases. Building systems (gates, windows) also show wear and slow repair timelines. Layout and construction issues persist throughout: gaps in windows and doors, poor soundproofing, and insufficient weekend cleaning of common areas. The complex shines when upper management visits but struggles with daily operations. Staff quality varies widely by department, with some residents crediting recent hires Daniel and Erica for improving communication, while others cite years of being ignored by the office.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Ryan Apartments
#166
59

The Ryan Apartments

3.4(247)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong staff like Cory and Chasity deliver seamless leasing and quick maintenance for many residents, earning consistent praise for professionalism and responsiveness. Yet the complex struggles with systemic issues: pest infestations ignored by management, safety problems (gunshots, break-ins), and surprise fees that surface after move-in. Some long-term residents have watched conditions decline sharply over the past year. The dog park and fitness center appeal to those who prioritize amenities, but the management overhaul has not yet won back tenants facing AC failures and unresolved building maintenance.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Monterrey Apartments
#167
58

Monterrey Apartments

3.6(99)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Pet owners value the quiet grounds and affordable pricing, and individual maintenance staff earn consistent praise for quick responses. However, serious problems undercut this: reviewers report roaches and rodents in units, pool closed for years, ceiling damage with water leaks, and utility bills that jump 60-263% after move-in with no clear explanation. Leasing office staff are frequently unavailable; one resident waited 7 days without hot water while reporting an ongoing outage.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Flats at Brentwood
#168
68

Flats at Brentwood

4.0(321)✓ Google-verified

Isai Camacho and the leasing team excel during the application and move-in phase, earning consistent praise for speed and personality. After move-in, residents hit a wall: maintenance requests languish for months, staff dodge phone calls, and management communication drops sharply once tenants are signed. The grounds look sharp, and repair crews pitch in when they show up. But a resident waiting six months to have a dishwasher installed, combined with reports of homeless activity and understaffing, paint a picture of a complex that front-loads charm and then underdelivers on day-to-day service.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Bristol Grapevine
#169
68

Bristol Grapevine

4.1(435)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Leasing staff earn consistent praise for attentiveness and patience, particularly Hailey, and residents appreciate the property's setting and pool amenities. However, management communication falters sharply once you move in: complaints about pest invasions, marijuana odors, and maintenance delays go unaddressed, and some describe an offsite management company that dismisses concerns rather than solve them. The leasing experience and first-time renter support stand out as strengths, but long-term residents report escalating frustration with the management company's negligence on urgent issues like water damage and health hazards. Timing varies from quick resolutions on minor repairs to weeks-long delays on serious problems.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments
#170
59

Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments

4.1(20)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the prime downtown location near parks and restaurants, clean units, and responsive named staff like Camryn and maintenance crew Willie and Ramon. The biggest tensions emerge around the no-elevator design (blocking accessibility for mobility-limited renters), inadequate parking, train noise, and serious billing disputes at move-out. The property works best for young professionals and dog owners who prioritize walkability over amenities and frills.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Resort at 925
#171
62

Resort at 925

4.1(45)✓ Google-verified

Staff and location draw consistent five-star praise, with management named by name for going above and beyond. However, the elevator system has become a persistent liability: reviewers report multiple outages over years, entrapment during summer heat, and management refusal to replace 18-year-old equipment despite repeated failures. At nearly $3,000 a month, residents feel this cost is unjustified given the deteriorating infrastructure and lack of compensation for disruption. Recent arrivals remain optimistic about onboarding and the property's upscale feel, but long-term residents express frustration with rent increases and unresolved maintenance that management calls "out of control."

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesPet-Friendly Apartments
The Life at Westland Estates
#172
59

The Life at Westland Estates

3.4(191)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members Natisha and Amanda earn consistent praise for going beyond typical leasing help, moving tenants in smoothly, and arranging fast maintenance. The maintenance team responds quickly to reported issues. However, a smaller group of residents report roach infestations in units, unleashed dogs creating safety problems, and grounds left unclean. Pest entry through drains and chimneys went unresolved in some cases. Gym access limited to office hours leaves working residents unable to use the advertised on-site facility. Parking lot speeding and package theft were also mentioned. The complex appears split: those with responsive staff have stayed happy; those facing pest and safety issues found management unresponsive to complaints.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District
#173
68

Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District

4.0(206)✓ Google-verified

Most residents enjoy the downtown location, amenities, and staff friendliness, with many praising same-day or next-day maintenance response. However, persistent mechanical issues-faulty AC, broken elevators, and frequent false fire alarms-undercut the experience for others, and some report incomplete repairs or delayed follow-up on service tickets.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ Living
Mag & May
#174
68

Mag & May

4.1(159)✓ Google-verified

The maintenance team earns consistent praise for speed and professionalism, and the property itself draws compliments for design and location. However, residents report a sharp divide: leasing and management communicate poorly, ignore follow-ups, and seem unable to resolve billing errors or facility repairs beyond immediate apartment work. Staff turnover appears to have worsened this gap, especially after management changes. Multiple residents mention Cameron as unresponsive and dismissive; Anne White (regional manager) is credited with helping resolve escalated issues. The complex promises luxury apartments and excellent service but delivery is uneven. Long-term residents describe frustration with undisclosed charges (especially renter's insurance duplication), broken amenities (garage locks, elevator downtime lasting weeks, Dwello smart home features that fail), and an application process that is slow and poorly organized. Several moved out or abandoned applications citing management dysfunction. Security issues, including package theft and homeless presence outside, are raised but described as partly outside management's control.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Hulen Heights Apartments
#175
53 low data

Hulen Heights Apartments

3.7(30)

Strong long-term residents and manager Diane's attention earn consistent five-star praise, but office availability complaints and a serious discrimination allegation split opinion sharply. Older units with wear show; location near Central Market is a draw for most.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Decker Apartment Homes
#176
58

Decker Apartment Homes

3.7(274)✓ Google-verified

Eight years in and fresh arrivals alike report the same core failures: calls and emails go unanswered, water shuts down without notice, and pest control stalls while damage spreads. The move-in team impresses, and maintenance responds quickly when they can, but systemic issues around communication, infrastructure (flooded parking lot, broken gates), and neighborhood safety consistently override that initial goodwill. Residents describe being nickeled and dimed for utilities they cannot reliably access, then abandoned by management once the lease term winds down.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments
The Huntley
#177
67

The Huntley

4.0(173)✓ Google-verified

The Huntley delivers strong first impressions: leasing staff like Shoni and Shawnie Davis earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and new units are clean and well-presented. However, long-term residents report serious frustration with thin walls, chronic parking garage theft, and a management that does not respond meaningfully to safety or noise complaints. The disconnect between the tour experience and life after move-in is stark.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
The Residences of Diamond Hill
#178
53

The Residences of Diamond Hill

2.5(145)✓ Google-verified

Severe maintenance and pest issues dominate resident feedback, with tenants reporting cockroaches, ants, and spiders in newly-painted units alongside unprompted move-in claims. Staff responsiveness is a consistent friction point: applications get lost, maintenance tickets close without work completed, AC failures go unresolved, and communication from the office is sparse or nonexistent. A handful of five-star reviews praise the community's safety for families and mention helpful staff members, but these stand against a sea of complaints spanning years.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Linwood Square
#179
60

Linwood Square

3.8(66)✓ Google-verified

Linwood Square draws mixed experiences tied to affordability and social community, though upkeep and management responsiveness remain ongoing friction points. Staff like Myra, Angelica, and Chonda earn praise for genuine care, and residents value granite counters, included utilities, and pet policies. However, complaints span dirty common areas, maintenance delays, staff professionalism issues, and record-keeping lapses that have left applicants restarts from zero.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments
Valley View
#180
56

Valley View

3.3(96)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the staff's responsiveness and the value for square footage, with managers like Yadira, Milan, and maintenance worker Luis earning repeated recognition. However, cockroach and bedbug infestations plague multiple units, parking limitations require fees for visitors, and several tenants report management prioritizes fees over resolving their own errors.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
South 400
#181
65

South 400

3.9(146)✓ Google-verified

South 400 residents consistently praise the maintenance team and office staff for going above and beyond, with Joan specifically noted for solving problems quickly and respectfully. However, serious security failures undermine the "luxury" positioning: packages vanish from an unsecured mail room, elevator and garage failures persist, and one resident reported being entered on without notice during a vulnerable moment. The property splits sharply between those who value personal service and those frustrated by infrastructure gaps and theft. The leasing office staff (Anna Lainez, Ashley, Katie) earn high marks for responsiveness and kindness during the application and move-in phases. A three-year resident calls it the best place they have lived. Maintenance requests are often handled within 30 minutes. Yet multiple one-star reviews and a vocal complaint about "careless management" over a year-long pattern of unresolved issues suggest management has struggled to act on resident feedback or prevent systemic problems.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Maxwell Apartments
#182
60

Maxwell Apartments

3.6(342)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing and management staff, especially Alice and Veronica, earn consistent praise for patience and professionalism. However, maintenance response times have declined significantly under new leadership. Residents report week-long waits for repairs, repeated AC failures, and unresolved issues like malfunctioning gates and pest problems. Move-in experience is typically smooth, but post-move conflicts over deposits and fees (especially involving the AI chatbot) have escalated disputes. The complex's physical appearance draws approval when maintained, yet critical systems like cooling and emergency contact lines frequently fail. Those relocating for work value the location near Stockyards and Sundance Square; families should weigh maintenance reliability against the competitive leasing team.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Spring Valley Apartments
#183
55

Spring Valley Apartments

3.2(80)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star reviews praise Amanda, Stacy, and other staff for genuine care, while a significant minority find the complex deteriorating and expensive for its condition. Long-standing tenants report severe AC failures in summer, roaches, water damage left unrepaired, and management that resists fixing issues while aggressively collecting rent. Billing errors, deposit non-return, and an unresponsive maintenance contractor (Massey) dominate negative accounts. The property appears split between those who value the staff's hospitality and newer residents discovering the aging infrastructure, cost, and service gaps.

Pet-Friendly Apartments
Laurel Heights at Cityview
#184
65

Laurel Heights at Cityview

3.8(363)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing team and maintenance response draw praise, but recurring appliance failures and parking issues frustrate long-term residents. Recent improvements to gates and water service suggest management is addressing past problems, though enforcement gaps remain.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Mason Apartment Homes
#185
60

The Mason Apartment Homes

3.6(173)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Mason has a polarized track record. When staff like Cory, Ayla, and Marissa engage, residents report helpful service. But structural mold, roach infestations, slow repairs, management churn, and move-in chaos dominate the complaints. Rent starts affordably, yet surprise fees and costly towing practices offset the price advantage. Reviewers cite a property in decline over the past 18 months.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ Living
Bella Via Apartments
#186
56

Bella Via Apartments

3.4(76)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise Diana and Johana's personal attention and responsiveness, alongside affordable rents and move-in condition. Others report months of ignored noise complaints, slow maintenance, safety worries (vehicle theft, nearby gunshots), and leasing office delays that cost applicants time before rejection or approval notification errors.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Axis Waterfront
#187
59

Axis Waterfront

3.0(306)✓ Google-verified

The leasing office staff, especially Henry and Trenna, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and fast approvals, making the rental process smooth for relocating families. Behind that friendly front sits a complex with persistent maintenance failures: roaches and gnats in units, weekly water outages, aging electrical systems, and management that ignores concerns or resists early lease termination despite serious safety issues. Maintenance problems appear intermittent rather than universal, but when they occur, complaints about unresponsive management and billing disputes dominate. Residents report staying years when satisfied, and pet owners appreciate the dog amenities. Long-term renewals suggest the community works for some, while others describe their experience as unsafe and unmanageable.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
CoHo Apartments
#188
65 low data

CoHo Apartments

4.4(23)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents love the walkable South Main location, quick maintenance response, and the high-tech Ori furniture that appeals to minimalists. Recent concerns center on management transitions: security deposits held beyond Texas law timelines, AC failures not properly repaired, and broken gate access. Strongest reviews praise named staff like Kim, Tony, and Camryn. Weakest highlight legal and safety oversights under newer management.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing
Cobble Hill
#189
59

Cobble Hill

3.5(126)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the reviews are enthusiastic; the other half report serious problems. Recent arrivals and visitors praise the new manager Devin and staff member Kellie, clean spaces, and fair pricing around $875 monthly. But long-term residents describe years of roach infestations, slow pest control responses, and office staff (particularly Lori) who ignore maintenance requests and don't answer calls. A few moved to different buildings and still faced infestations. Communication breakdowns extend to canceling tours without notice and denying refundable application fees. For affordability and pets, this complex works. The grounds have improved under new management. But verify pest control thoroughly before signing a lease, especially for units toward the back of the property. Ask for a pre-move inspection and get promises about pest treatment in writing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Taylor Commons
#190
59

Taylor Commons

3.6(140)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Cory's recent management and maintenance staff (Tim) have earned strong praise for responsiveness and professionalism, especially among new residents and those who have seen recent improvement. Serious infrastructure issues-summer heat failures, unresolved pest problems, closed amenities (pool, social area) despite repeated promises-frustrate established tenants and suggest maintenance backlog over quick fixes. Long-term residents report feeling deprioritized as the community prioritizes new move-ins. Hidden fees, sporadic security, and amenity hours that don't match resident schedules add to wear and discontent despite the friendliness of some staff.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ Living
Palm Tree Apartment Homes
#191
59 low data

Palm Tree Apartment Homes

3.8(44)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise Palm Tree for its quiet atmosphere and cleanliness. Staff are consistently described as friendly, and management keeps up maintenance despite the property's age. Monthly pest control and modern amenities round out the experience, though some have noted the buildings are older.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
Buttercup Place Apartments
#192
50 low data

Buttercup Place Apartments

3.4(20)✓ Google-verified

Buttercup Place draws deeply committed residents, including those rebuilding from homelessness, who praise the community and staff support. Recent reviews flag ongoing pest issues, unresponsive phone lines, and safety concerns in shared spaces that undercut the positive foundation.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Villas at 1404 Apartments
#193
63

Villas at 1404 Apartments

3.8(163)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Tenants report starkly different experiences. Half praise the leasing staff, especially Jewel and Nana, for making the sign-up smooth and responsive maintenance requests. The other half describe a gap between advertised amenities (in-unit washer/dryer, central AC, private patios) and what arrives, along with mounting hidden charges for internet, pest control, and parking. Most damaging are recurring complaints about overgrown grounds, rat and snake sightings, and untreated roach problems that persist despite pest control visits. The 3.8-star rating masks this split: 65% five-star reviews celebrate staff warmth, while 28% one-star reviews cite habitability failures. Recent reviews show ongoing AC breakdowns and grounds issues. One positive: when maintenance staff like Anthony engage fully, repairs happen quickly, but lack of support suggests staffing gaps. Affordability draws renters, but many report the advertised price masks extra charges accumulating monthly.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Sorrento
#194
54

Sorrento

3.4(421)✓ Google-verified

Sorrento divides sharply between residents who connect with front-office staff and those battling months-long maintenance failures. Since BH Living took over management, most reviewers report AC breakdowns lasting weeks in Texas summer heat, gates that stay broken, and maintenance requests answered only after tenants visit the office in person or contact the city. Staff turnover means floaters handle problems rather than permanent workers. One bright spot: individual leasing agents like Giia, Kaitlyn, Lily, and Lindsey earned praise for warmth and professionalism. But the complex as a whole fails tenants on its core responsibility-keeping the property safe and livable. Specific failures recur across reviews: a flooded kitchen sink that drains on its own, portable AC units that break immediately, gates non-functional for months, wheel theft with no usable security footage, and electric bills topping $600 monthly due to running backup cooling. Residents also report being charged for trash collection and threatened with $400 towing fees for unregistered guest vehicles. The shift from previous management (Knightvest and Greystar) triggered the decline. Multiple residents have contacted lawyers or the city. Those who have stayed praise the townhomes and amenities, but the cost is paid in stress and out-of-pocket fixes.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities
The Stella
#195
63

The Stella

3.7(211)✓ Google-verified

Staff turnover in recent months improved the experience, with newer management (Ashley, Brenda, Tresh) earning consistent praise for responsiveness and care. However, long-standing operational problems persist: multiple residents report systematic billing errors, overcharges they had to catch themselves, and move-out fees charged despite miscommunication from the office. Safety is a critical concern repeated across recent reviews, with residents documenting frequent police activity for overdoses, open drug use on common grounds, and homeless people at night. Move-in conditions were poor enough several residents photographed damage and filth; pest problems and cigarette odor have made units uncomfortable for families. Maintenance crew responds quickly and professionally. The office staff under new management are friendly and helpful with lease questions. Yet billing remains chaotic, move-out procedures unclear, and the neighborhood environment at portions of the complex is unsafe enough that residents felt they could not walk alone or recommend the property despite appreciating the staff. The gap between what residents were charged and what they received is the core frustration.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments
Carmel Creekside Apartments
#196
63

Carmel Creekside Apartments

3.7(347)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the location, cleanliness, and handful of exceptional staff members like Paige, who genuinely help tenants navigate issues. However, a persistent pattern emerges: AC units fail monthly and go weeks unrepaired, management ignores escalations, roof leaks are left unchecked, noise complaints bring no resolution, and residents report safety incidents including shootings. Multiple tenants cite hidden fees that push actual rent far above advertised rates. The leasing office makes strong first impressions with friendly application help, but maintenance responses become minimal once you move in. Repairs either drag on indefinitely or contractors do poor work. Several long-term residents who loved the community at first eventually left due to compounded maintenance failures and management's refusal to treat concerns seriously.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
The Borough Apartments
#197
63

The Borough Apartments

3.7(201)✓ Google-verified

When staff like Charlene, Jada, and Gila Payton are on duty, residents experience responsive help and smooth leasing. The area itself is quiet and manageable. However, repeated management changes have created chaos: phone numbers disconnect, offices go unstaffed, pest control fails, and water damage leaves mold unchecked. Some units appear structurally compromised, with residents reporting weeks without fixes or follow-up. The core tension is consistent. Current management gets specific praise for availability and problem-solving. But institutional failures (no emergency contact info after ownership changes, flooded bedrooms ignored, roaches untreated for months) suggest systemic breakdown when turnover happens. Residents stay because the community has potential; they leave because promises go unfulfilled.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments
Caden Apartments
#198
62

Caden Apartments

3.7(273)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Leasing staff, especially Melanie and Tony, earn consistent praise for professionalism and going beyond expectations. The complex struggles with maintenance: pest infestations persist despite paid pest control, repairs take months, and only two maintenance workers handle a large property, leaving residents frustrated and doing fixes themselves.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Sunset Heights Apartments
#199
57

Sunset Heights Apartments

3.5(51)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Bree and Tiarra earn genuine praise for attentiveness and problem-solving, and the location draws people who value proximity to downtown and quiet surroundings. However, persistent pest issues (roaches, fleas), sluggish maintenance response, frequent management changes, and complaints about noise and poorly maintained grounds undercut the experience for many long-term residents. Expect inconsistency.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments
Hulen Park Place Townhomes
#200
63

Hulen Park Place Townhomes

3.8(103)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the residents report exceptional care from management (especially Nicole) and quick maintenance, citing clean spaces and a welcoming vibe. The other half describe chronic leaks, locked office doors during business hours, slow or ignored repair requests, and interactions with the same manager that feel dismissive or hostile, ranging from hang-ups during emergencies to perceived unfair treatment. Management credibility splits sharply on this point: several five-star reviews credit Nicole with professionalism and hard work; multiple one-star reviews call her unorganized, unwelcoming, and unavailable. Flooding recurs as a maintenance failure. Parking policy changes (free to reserved) drew frustration. Review recency and edit history suggest ongoing tension rather than resolution.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Last updated 2026-08-23