Luxury Apartments in Fort Worth, TX

Page 3 of 4: businesses ranked 201-300 of 337. Start from the top.

Villas by the Park Apartments

#201

67

Villas by the Park Apartments

4.0(201)✓ Google-verified

Staff earn consistent praise for responsiveness and warmth, and tenants who have stayed report good value and quick maintenance. However, move-in experiences vary sharply: some arrive to non-working AC, dust, ceiling stains, and missing fixtures, and chronic issues like roof leaks take months to resolve. Security gaps (broken gate, no gate access controls) and upkeep problems (dirty walkways, roaches, amenities that do not work) are recurring pain points for longer-term residents.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Woodhill Apartments

#202

60

Woodhill Apartments

4.0(85)✓ Google-verified

Woodhill Apartments draws strong loyalty from long-term residents who praise the office team, cleanliness, and calm atmosphere, but recent reviews flag serious maintenance gaps and a pest control crisis. Payment methods are outdated, parking irregular, and management appears inconsistent in addressing noise complaints and tenant rights issues. The complex welcomes cats and offers townhomes alongside standard units. Move-in cleaning is spotty; utilities and shared equipment (washers, air filters) are costly add-ons. The pool and quiet grounds appeal to those seeking peace, though the property's age shows.

Luxury Apartments

Leuda May Apartments

#203

54

Leuda May Apartments

3.9(20)✓ Google-verified

Recent management changes have improved day-to-day responsiveness, with tenants praising staff like Donya and Holly for quick action on repairs and accessible communication. However, billing disputes persist, roach infestations in some units went unaddressed for months, and the property's history of frequent management turnover has left some residents uncertain about long-term reliability.

Furnished & Corporate HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Venue at 8651 Apartments

#204

65

Venue at 8651 Apartments

3.8(524)✓ Google-verified

Venue at 8651 earns strong marks for maintenance staff who fix issues quickly and explain problems clearly, plus clean grounds and package lockers that reviewers value. However, serious concerns emerge around unresponsive management, delays in processing transfers and refunds, pest-infested move-in units, and surprise visitor parking charges and towing policies that left tenants frustrated.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Union at River East

#205

62

The Union at River East

3.7(234)✓ Google-verified

Staff members Orlando and Ryan earn consistent five-star praise for attentiveness and problem-solving, while the maintenance team responds quickly when called. The complex offers appealing amenities: infinity-edge pool, co-working space, outdoor seating, and flexible floor plans on a prime Race Street location. Yet rent at $1,800+ monthly brings high expectations the property has struggled to meet. Residents report a broken garage gate left unfixed for months, creating security gaps and theft. Management has been slow or dismissive on disability accommodations, key fob access failures, and billing errors. Move-in readiness and building access control remain friction points despite recent signs of operational improvement.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

West Wind Apartments

#206

57

West Wind Apartments

3.0(129)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

West Wind draws strong praise from some residents for maintenance responsiveness and community friendliness, but a larger group reports persistent roach problems, inconsistent management, and harsh move-out billing practices. Several reviewers describe misleading leasing interactions and poor follow-through on promises, alongside complaints of aggressive parking enforcement and limited flexibility on payment methods and lease terms.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

The Residences of Diamond Hill

#207

53

The Residences of Diamond Hill

2.5(145)✓ Google-verified

Severe maintenance and pest issues dominate resident feedback, with tenants reporting cockroaches, ants, and spiders in newly-painted units alongside unprompted move-in claims. Staff responsiveness is a consistent friction point: applications get lost, maintenance tickets close without work completed, AC failures go unresolved, and communication from the office is sparse or nonexistent. A handful of five-star reviews praise the community's safety for families and mention helpful staff members, but these stand against a sea of complaints spanning years.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Historic Electric Building Apartments

#208

62

Historic Electric Building Apartments

3.9(113)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Front-facing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and some residents describe year-long stays as positive. The building's location in historic Sundance Square remains an asset for those who value downtown living. Infrastructure problems dominate resident complaints: two of three elevators frequently offline for weeks, creating hazardous conditions for upper-floor tenants carrying belongings downstairs. Water outages, smoking despite no-smoking policies, thin sound insulation between units, trash overflow, and repeated utility billing errors point to systemic maintenance and management gaps that offset good staff interactions.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Ridgmar Oaks

#209

60

Ridgmar Oaks

3.9(38)✓ Google-verified

Ridgmar Oaks draws strong praise for spacious layouts and responsive leasing staff like Lisa and Viviana, yet reviews highlight a troubling gap between front-office service and property maintenance. Multiple residents report months-long AC outages, roach problems, rodent issues, and deteriorating conditions that management addresses slowly or patches rather than fixes. Tenant experiences improve markedly when dedicated staff handle cases, but the underlying maintenance shortfalls remain a significant concern for long-term residents.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Dylan Apartments

#210

59

Dylan Apartments

3.3(215)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong five-star reviews praise responsive maintenance (Andres, staff noticed dishwasher leak), welcoming leasing agents (Celia, Maria, Claudia), and a calm, quiet setting. However, repeated one-star complaints document widespread roach problems in units, spoiled food, and wires damaged by pests. Management reportedly becomes hostile when questioned; promised amenities like the pool stay closed. The rating split (52% five-star, 39% one/two-star) reflects two very different tenant experiences.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Horizons at Sunridge

#211

59

Horizons at Sunridge

3.0(203)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the reviews are five-star, often highlighting maintenance staff like Juan Hernandez and office team members who handle requests quickly. The other half describe delayed repairs (10 days for door fixes), constant roach infestations despite weekly spraying, thin doors that don't close, mold on window sealant, and management resistance to resident complaints or unit transfers. Long-time residents report paying multiple rent increases before finally getting breaks. The office and management seem disconnected from property upkeep complaints. Amenities like the pool, dog park, screened patios, and fitness center draw praise when accessible. Several residents note the community feels quiet and family-friendly when maintenance keeps pace. But the stark divide suggests experience depends heavily on how quickly the maintenance team responds and whether management follows through on building repairs versus cosmetic fixes.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Griffin Apartments

#212

66

The Griffin Apartments

3.9(213)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance staff, notably Angel, earn consistent praise for patience and problem-solving, and front-desk workers like Christina and Shayla receive recognition for professionalism. However, move-in experience is marred by dirty units, broken appliances, and pests; repairs drag on for months despite multiple work orders, and office communication fails repeatedly-closed during stated hours, voicemail loops, unanswered emails. Several residents report deposit disputes and aggressive billing after move-out, with management unresponsive to itemized charge requests. The complex occupies a lower-income Fort Worth neighborhood and attracts tenants seeking affordability, yet the gap between staff goodwill and systemic dysfunction is stark. Residents describe noisy neighbors, neglected grounds, and mold issues alongside climate control failures. Those with positive experiences often credit individual staff members rather than property-wide standards, suggesting service depends heavily on who handles your case.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Prescott Park Apartment Homes

#213

61

Prescott Park Apartment Homes

3.7(572)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The leasing team, especially Bianca, earns consistent praise for friendliness and ease of signing up. Once moved in, residents discover a sharp divide: responsive maintenance staff and pleasant floor plans offset ongoing pest problems, water issues, and an office that becomes hard to reach after the lease is signed. Billing surprises and hidden fees (Lease Lock, deposits, move-out charges) catch residents off guard. Roach infestations appear recurrent across units, along with foundation problems and wildlife. Parking fills quickly after 8 PM, and management prioritizes enforcement over transparent communication with tenants.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Crestwood Place Apartments

#214

53

Crestwood Place Apartments

3.5(84)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents describe steady decline under current management, with broken amenities (laundry, gym access), delayed repairs (AC took a month; washers out for months), and inconsistent enforcement. While some staff members earn praise for kindness, the complex feels neglected overall, with office hours severely limited and tenant complaints routinely ignored. Management changes frequently, and residents report paying for amenities they cannot access.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Ridglea Court Apartments

#215

56 low data

Ridglea Court Apartments

3.7(15)✓ Google-verified

Ridglea Court has lost ground since new ownership. Older reviews praised the sleek interiors, quiet gated setting, and downtown proximity, but recent tenants report a management office an hour away in Dallas that ignores requests, stripped amenities, and security breaches. Deposit disputes and maintenance delays are persistent frustrations.

Student HousingLuxury Apartments

The Cooper Apartments

#216

66

The Cooper Apartments

3.8(356)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the leasing team's efficiency and personal attention, with staff like Ana and Michelle earning specific credit for making move-in straightforward and stress-free. The grounds feel clean and welcoming, the location suits students near TCU and professionals, and pet owners appreciate the safety for walks. However, one reviewer cited steep pricing ($1.3k for basic units) alongside concerns about past management failures and a significant fire, raising questions about whether recent improvements have fully addressed earlier operational problems.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

The Club at Stonegate Apartments

#217

66

The Club at Stonegate Apartments

3.9(347)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong individual maintenance staff (Rod, Ron) earn five-star praise for speed and professionalism, and the location near TCU, Trader Joe's, and quiet streets appeals to residents. However, the business's shift to AI-only customer support creates a communication wall: prospective and current residents report weeks without callback, missed pest control requests, and contaminated common areas going uncleaned. Management dismisses serious issues like mold and vomit-stained stairs as routine, charges hit residents by surprise at move-out (one tenant paid $5,740 to exit early), and deposits rarely return intact. The core problem is not the units or their price, but the organization behind them. Reviews praise the complex's quiet feel and landscaping, yet simultaneously describe roaches, ceiling water damage, malfunctioning appliances, and stairwells left in biohazard condition for months. When residents tried to contact staff in person, they found the office empty despite posted hours. The contract itself locks people in with opacity: one longtime tenant learned of $100+ mystery fees only after moving in, and another discovered move-out penalties far steeper than anticipated.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Western Hills Apartments

#218

56 low data

Western Hills Apartments

4.1(56)✓ Google-verified

Many residents find this complex peaceful with well-kept grounds and responsive maintenance. Recent concerns include rude phone interactions, lease paperwork mix-ups, and one tenant's allegation of discriminatory treatment.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Patriot Pointe Apartments

#219

57

Patriot Pointe Apartments

3.1(121)✓ Google-verified

The property draws strong praise for apartment size, layout, and amenities, with select staff members earning deep loyalty for professionalism and genuine care. Management responsiveness and maintenance speed fail repeatedly: mold sits untreated for weeks, pest control remains ineffective, and calls often go unanswered. High turnover in office staff mirrors tenant departure rates. While some residents thrive in the community, others face deteriorating grounds, noisy neighbors, and unresolved maintenance claims despite full rent charges. Standout employees like Daishuntane and Clemente drive positive experiences, but their impact cannot offset systemic gaps. The property's mixed-income model, proximity to Fort Worth Veterans Affairs and Tarrant County College, and amenities (pool, fitness center, game room) appeal on paper, yet execution wavers sharply between periods of good stewardship and visible decline.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Maxwell Apartments

#220

60

Maxwell Apartments

3.6(342)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing and management staff, especially Alice and Veronica, earn consistent praise for patience and professionalism. However, maintenance response times have declined significantly under new leadership. Residents report week-long waits for repairs, repeated AC failures, and unresolved issues like malfunctioning gates and pest problems. Move-in experience is typically smooth, but post-move conflicts over deposits and fees (especially involving the AI chatbot) have escalated disputes. The complex's physical appearance draws approval when maintained, yet critical systems like cooling and emergency contact lines frequently fail. Those relocating for work value the location near Stockyards and Sundance Square; families should weigh maintenance reliability against the competitive leasing team.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Highland Park Apartments

#221

59

Highland Park Apartments

3.6(91)✓ Google-verified

Highland Park's leasing team, especially Daisy and Kenda, earns consistent praise for patience and knowledge. Maintenance and property management divide opinion sharply: some residents report timely fixes and friendly responses; others faced months of ignored requests, pest problems, and water damage. The quiet location near Clearfork appeals to renters, but the aging buildings and wear require realistic expectations.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Tides on Westcreek Apartments

#222

55

Tides on Westcreek Apartments

3.5(311)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Tides on Westcreek delivers inconsistent experiences. Residents consistently report severe pest problems (cockroaches, rodents, spiders), mold, water damage, and slow maintenance responses. Staff member Jocelyn receives genuine praise for helpfulness, but management fails to resolve core habitability issues or communicate transparently about fees, parking policies, and lease terms. The complex charges aggressively for amenities (gym, valet trash, parking) that often malfunction or aren't delivered. Tenants report surprise billing, wrongful debt collection, vehicle towing at odd hours, and lease renewals with sudden $250/month increases. Application processes are opaque and slow, with some denied for non-traditional income documentation despite strong credit profiles.

Luxury Apartments

La Jolla Apartments

#223

58 low data

La Jolla Apartments

4.1(71)✓ Google-verified

La Jolla offers a safe, family-oriented location near schools with grounds amenities, but maintenance quality has declined. Recent complaints center on slow AC repairs, deteriorating grounds, pest issues, and unclear site navigation, though past tenants praised the manager and reliability.

Luxury Apartments

Chalk Gardens

#224

58 low data

Chalk Gardens

4.8(6)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents praise the leasing and maintenance teams by name, noting smooth application processes and quick repairs. Suilma and Lili earn specific credit for accessibility and problem-solving; the AC technician impressed with speed and efficiency.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Columbia Renaissance Square

#225

56 low data

Columbia Renaissance Square

3.4(45)✓ Google-verified

Residents report standout staff members who respond quickly and organize weekly events, but persistent pest problems, thin walls that carry neighbor noise, and inconsistent maintenance undercut the experience. Some praise the move-in condition and fitness amenities; others cite unprepared temp workers and a six-year decline in upkeep.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

Eastbank at Waterside

#226

59

Eastbank at Waterside

3.5(195)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff in the leasing office, especially Daisy, Samantha, and Martin, earn consistent praise for patience and helpfulness during the apartment search. The location near Trinity Trails, shopping, and highways appeals to residents, and many who have stayed long-term report clean grounds and timely maintenance work overall. However, management (identified as Catherine and Samantha in supervisory roles) faces repeated complaints about poor communication, inconsistency, and lack of follow-through. Residents report unresolved issues like flooding, mold, excessive pet waste in hallways, and questionable move-out charges that required disputes to overturn. The gap between the leasing team's professionalism and management's handling has driven departures.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Southern Oaks Apartments

#227

65

Southern Oaks Apartments

3.9(130)✓ Google-verified

Brenda and Norma in the office set Southern Oaks apart with genuine care and patience through the leasing process. Glenn Jones and the maintenance team handle repairs quickly and professionally. But the complex struggles with serious gaps: recent residents report mice in walls, mold odor, pest control marked complete when untreated, and frustration over pet policy disclosure and post-move billing disputes. Location near shopping is a draw, and many find it quiet for a city complex. Long-term residents praise the family feel and how staff know tenants by name. New arrivals, though, sometimes encounter uninhabitable conditions on move-in and hit walls when asking for lease releases. The split between five-star praise for staff and one-star warnings about hidden problems suggests experience varies sharply by unit and timing.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Springs

#228

51

The Springs

2.8(121)✓ Google-verified

The Springs has deteriorated significantly. Residents report mold in walls and vents, roaches, rats, and possums throughout units. Maintenance is slow or nonexistent; water damage goes unfixed for months. Office staff are described as rude and unresponsive. A few past staff members earned praise, but recent management changes have worsened communication and responsiveness. The complex faces structural failures, squatters in vacant units, and potential closure.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

The Savoy

#229

64

The Savoy

4.0(89)✓ Google-verified

Residents split sharply on The Savoy. Those staying long-term praise staff like Kyndra and maintenance team (Dee, Jay, Lester) for genuine care and quick repairs. Others faced months of unresolved Wi-Fi failures, pest issues after move-in, maintenance entering without notice, and management that felt argumentative rather than helpful when problems escalated. The complex offers affordable living and a quiet setting, but recurring infrastructure and accountability gaps push some renters to break leases early.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

The Kimberly Apartments

#230

64

The Kimberly Apartments

3.8(238)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Several staff members earn consistent praise for friendliness and problem-solving, particularly leasing agent Karina and office coordinator Stephanie. However, the experience diverges sharply after move-in. Reviewers report recurring pest problems, outdated units that don't match online photos, and maintenance requests that stall for weeks. Valet trash costs $25 monthly but doesn't materialize. The complex attracts budget-conscious renters, but quality control and follow-through lag behind the advertised amenities. Security interactions have soured some, and move-in delays frustrated new residents. Maintenance team members like Noe, Adan, and Undrea do follow through when assigned, yet the system itself appears inconsistent. Long-term residents report satisfaction, but newer tenants face a steeper adjustment. The disparity between pre-lease pitch and post-move reality drives much of the negative feedback.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Bexley at Left Bank

#231

64

Bexley at Left Bank

3.8(228)✓ Google-verified

The complex divides sharply: residents praise maintenance team members like Erin and Josh for fast, professional repairs, and appreciate community events. However, leasing office communication is inconsistent, with many reporting ignored calls and slow issue resolution. Serious concerns include lingering pet odors in hallways, thin walls that carry neighbor noise and cooking smells, pest infestations left unaddressed for months, and instances of billing disputes that damaged credit without signed leases. Building systems (gates, windows) also show wear and slow repair timelines. Layout and construction issues persist throughout: gaps in windows and doors, poor soundproofing, and insufficient weekend cleaning of common areas. The complex shines when upper management visits but struggles with daily operations. Staff quality varies widely by department, with some residents crediting recent hires Daniel and Erica for improving communication, while others cite years of being ignored by the office.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Villa Capri Apartments

#232

54 low data

Villa Capri Apartments

4.0(27)✓ Google-verified

Villa Capri was highly regarded for years under stable management, with residents praising a tight-knit community, caring staff, and reasonable rents. Recent upheaval has clouded that reputation: new management raised rents over 40% while maintenance lapsed and pest issues emerged, though some older reviews still highlight friendly staff and security features.

Luxury Apartments

Aden Crest Apartments

#233

58

Aden Crest Apartments

3.4(145)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents experience a quiet community but struggle with inconsistent enforcement of policies and maintenance gaps. Staff friendliness varies widely-some praise specific managers and maintenance workers, while others report unresolved issues like ceiling leaks, water outages, and mold that persisted for months or years despite work orders.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments

#234

59

Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments

4.1(20)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the prime downtown location near parks and restaurants, clean units, and responsive named staff like Camryn and maintenance crew Willie and Ramon. The biggest tensions emerge around the no-elevator design (blocking accessibility for mobility-limited renters), inadequate parking, train noise, and serious billing disputes at move-out. The property works best for young professionals and dog owners who prioritize walkability over amenities and frills.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Harmon Villas

#235

53

Harmon Villas

2.7(176)✓ Google-verified

Harmon Villas presents a stark divide. A small group of reviewers praise welcoming staff and an attractive layout, but the overwhelming majority report a complex in decline. Long-term residents describe chronic maintenance backlogs (some waiting six months or more), frequent vehicle break-ins despite management awareness, and an office that rarely picks up the phone. Physical conditions deteriorate steadily: thin walls mean constant noise from neighbors and their pets, trash and pests accumulate, and building security fails (broken gates, dark lighting, pool shut down following a drowning incident). Management churn compounds frustration, and rent has risen significantly with no upgrades to justify the increases. The application process itself discourages prospects. Staff demand conflicting documents, close the office without notice, reject legitimate file formats, and fail to track their own unit assignments. One applicant drove multiple times, paid a $400 deposit, only to be told no unit ever existed. Dozens cite phone calls going unanswered for weeks. Those who do land an apartment report years of unresolved maintenance requests, safety hazards (broken playground equipment, faulty lighting), and a general sense of institutional neglect.

Luxury Apartments

The Foundry

#236

50

The Foundry

2.9(95)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents report serious habitability problems: roaches and mice are persistent, maintenance fixes are temporary, and laundry equipment stays broken for months. The office staff (Mary and Kristi notably) are consistently praised for friendliness and responsiveness, but they cannot overcome systemic property neglect. New visitors on tours see a clean presentation, yet actual residents struggle with pest control that barely functions, poor grounds maintenance, and emergency services gaps that have caused property damage and health concerns. Reviewers also note the surrounding neighborhood feels unsafe with frequent police activity and car break-ins. The pool opens and closes off-schedule despite posted times. One two-year resident called it a poor value for the rent; another long-term tenant said conditions worsen yearly despite slow rent increases.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Decker Apartment Homes

#237

58

Decker Apartment Homes

3.7(274)✓ Google-verified

Eight years in and fresh arrivals alike report the same core failures: calls and emails go unanswered, water shuts down without notice, and pest control stalls while damage spreads. The move-in team impresses, and maintenance responds quickly when they can, but systemic issues around communication, infrastructure (flooded parking lot, broken gates), and neighborhood safety consistently override that initial goodwill. Residents describe being nickeled and dimed for utilities they cannot reliably access, then abandoned by management once the lease term winds down.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

The Franklin at Samuels Avenue

#238

58

The Franklin at Samuels Avenue

3.4(246)✓ Google-verified

Staff treat tour-goers with genuine warmth and stay engaged during leasing, earning consistent praise for their time and professionalism. After move-in, the experience fractures: tenants report months of broken AC during 90-degree heat, non-functional security gates and locks that anyone can bypass, trash piling on floors with roaches present, and management that becomes unreachable by phone or email. Billing disputes linger unresolved, with some tenants sent to collections over contested charges; record-keeping errors persist across management transitions.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Buttercup Place Apartments

#239

50 low data

Buttercup Place Apartments

3.4(20)✓ Google-verified

Buttercup Place draws deeply committed residents, including those rebuilding from homelessness, who praise the community and staff support. Recent reviews flag ongoing pest issues, unresponsive phone lines, and safety concerns in shared spaces that undercut the positive foundation.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Valencia Plaza Apartments

#240

63

Valencia Plaza Apartments

4.3(29)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Valencia Plaza offers affordable two-bedroom apartments in a quiet Harmony Hills setting, with recent management changes winning praise for responsiveness. However, long-term residents report chronic AC failures and poor maintenance follow-up, with some forced to hire private contractors after months without resolution.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Flats on Mill

#241

63

Flats on Mill

3.7(229)✓ Google-verified

Flats on Mill splits sharply between residents who praise responsive staff (especially leasing agent Janneth) and fast maintenance, and those who report cockroaches, safety issues, and surprise fees that spike after ownership changes. Repairs arrive within hours or a day when things work, but communication breakdowns and unexplained lock-outs mar the experience for frustrated tenants. The bark park stays stocked, and some residents enjoy quiet sections with good neighbors. Yet pest control monthly charges do not guarantee service visits, and amenities like the pool have sat unused for years. New management appears to be turning the ship, but older complaints about fees and bugs linger.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Spur Canyon Apartments

#242

54

Spur Canyon Apartments

3.3(324)✓ Google-verified

Spur Canyon's 3.3 rating reflects a property in crisis. While leasing agent Jermaine earns consistent praise for tour friendliness and technician Brandon received credit for swift AC repair, nearly 40 percent of reviews are one or two stars. Residents report months-long waits for AC fixes in summer heat, repeated flooding, rotten wood falling outside, raccoons in walls, and roaches inside. Fees surprise tenants, management avoids accountability, and the emergency maintenance line does not answer. Multiple reviewers say the property is unsafe and regret signing leases. The complex is 50 years old and shows it. Exterior damage, water ingress, pest infestation, and lack of emergency response form the core complaint. One resident reported waiting four months for repairs after flooding on November 4, 2024, with no resolution as of June 2026. Another pregnant tenant terminated her lease after a two-week wait for AC in 93-degree heat. Residents say the advertising misrepresents the unit and location condition. Staff turnover has made management worse since a new manager arrived.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Stella

#243

63

The Stella

3.7(211)✓ Google-verified

Staff turnover in recent months improved the experience, with newer management (Ashley, Brenda, Tresh) earning consistent praise for responsiveness and care. However, long-standing operational problems persist: multiple residents report systematic billing errors, overcharges they had to catch themselves, and move-out fees charged despite miscommunication from the office. Safety is a critical concern repeated across recent reviews, with residents documenting frequent police activity for overdoses, open drug use on common grounds, and homeless people at night. Move-in conditions were poor enough several residents photographed damage and filth; pest problems and cigarette odor have made units uncomfortable for families. Maintenance crew responds quickly and professionally. The office staff under new management are friendly and helpful with lease questions. Yet billing remains chaotic, move-out procedures unclear, and the neighborhood environment at portions of the complex is unsafe enough that residents felt they could not walk alone or recommend the property despite appreciating the staff. The gap between what residents were charged and what they received is the core frustration.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Victoria Place Apartments

#244

50 low data

Victoria Place Apartments

3.0(38)✓ Google-verified

Victoria Place has recovered noticeably since new ownership took over several years ago. Residents praise the cleanliness, responsive management, and improved grounds. However, AC outages during hot months and lingering security concerns dampen satisfaction, and some find pricing steep.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Borough Apartments

#245

63

The Borough Apartments

3.7(201)✓ Google-verified

When staff like Charlene, Jada, and Gila Payton are on duty, residents experience responsive help and smooth leasing. The area itself is quiet and manageable. However, repeated management changes have created chaos: phone numbers disconnect, offices go unstaffed, pest control fails, and water damage leaves mold unchecked. Some units appear structurally compromised, with residents reporting weeks without fixes or follow-up. The core tension is consistent. Current management gets specific praise for availability and problem-solving. But institutional failures (no emergency contact info after ownership changes, flooded bedrooms ignored, roaches untreated for months) suggest systemic breakdown when turnover happens. Residents stay because the community has potential; they leave because promises go unfulfilled.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Jefferson Ederville

#246

57

Jefferson Ederville

3.8(18)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Faith, Darius, Valerie, and Carlos earn consistent praise for going above and beyond during tours and maintenance. The newer construction, fitness center, pool, game rooms, and pricing draw residents in. However, a sharp divide emerges: those approved report satisfaction, while applicants face weeks of silence, repeated document requests, and denials only days before move-in, with property manager Brittany cited repeatedly for disorganization and poor follow-up. The leasing process remains the core complaint. Staff appear to ignore or silence phones while applicants attempt contact thirty times with no response. Multiple reviewers say they followed instructions months in advance, only to be told at the last moment they did not qualify, despite providing all requested paperwork. Location near Six Flags, AT&T Stadium, and Globe Life Field appeals to some, but the attainable housing program requires clear communication it currently lacks.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Western Station apartments

#247

62

Western Station apartments

3.6(285)✓ Google-verified

Staff member Maria Briseño earns consistent praise for professionalism during tours and move-in. Grounds are safe and quiet with modern finishes. However, repeated residents report months-long waits for AC fixes, water leaks, pest infestations, and mold. The emergency maintenance line often fails to connect. Management lies about unit availability and lease terms, then avoids callbacks. Once locked in, residents struggle to reach anyone to enforce promised repairs or lease credits. One resident's update suggests recent managerial changes and pool reopenings are underway. A long-term resident notes LiveNJoy management (the operator) is short-staffed, difficult to escalate with, and overcharges residents. Corporate offices ignored complaints until a resident found their direct email.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Crest at River District Apartments

#248

57 low data

Crest at River District Apartments

3.6(31)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Crest at River District draws praise for modern units, helpful staff like Carlos and Johnny, and a quiet location near restaurants and trails. However, some tenants report slow repairs on serious damage, poor management responsiveness, noise complaints from neighboring residents, pest problems, and frustration over ESA breed restrictions that may conflict with Fair Housing protections. Experiences vary considerably depending on when you move in and which staff members you work with.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Park West Apartments

#249

57

Park West Apartments

3.8(20)✓ Google-verified

Park West's reputation has split sharply along timeline lines. Residents who arrived or renewed within the last few months praise a new management team (Anthony, Tammy, Christina, Elena, Calvin, Jesse) as warm and responsive, noting the grounds are cleaner, gates now work, and amenities like a theater room and smart home tech feel genuinely valuable. Older complaints paint a darker picture: roaches, broken pool and gym equipment, work orders ignored for years, rude staff, and security issues including theft and break-ins. The shift feels real, but lingering maintenance backlogs and a history of neglect mean tenants considering a move here should verify conditions in person and clarify response times in writing. The pet-friendly side (bark park on site) draws positive mention, though no detailed pet policy review text appears. Prices are described as "incredible" by one recent renter, but the 20-review spread is steep-65 percent five-star against 30 percent one/two-star-suggesting either genuine recent improvement or the reality that affordability masks unresolved problems for those not yet affected.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Normandale Place Apartments

#250

49 low data

Normandale Place Apartments

3.8(14)✓ Google-verified

Normandale Place draws strong praise for safety and staff warmth, but recent reviews flag serious concerns: renters report being shown clean sample units then moved to deteriorated ones at higher rent once leases are signed. The property's grey cinderblock design leaves some residents feeling the space does not match its marketing promise of dignity.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingLuxury Apartments

The Hayes Apartments

#251

53

The Hayes Apartments

3.1(117)✓ Google-verified

Most residents report chronic maintenance failures that persist for months without resolution: air conditioning that doesn't cool, ceilings that leak when it rains, dishwashers that break repeatedly, and pest infestations including roaches and rats. Leasing staff like Timira Jackson receive praise for patience and helpfulness during sign-up, but once tenants move in, repeated maintenance requests go unfilled, calls go unanswered, and management responds defensively when problems are raised. Multiple residents describe being told repair timeframes are uncertain, having completed requests marked as resolved without actual fixes, and facing threats of eviction rather than assistance. A few positive reviews note recent staff improvements, but the overwhelming pattern is that The Hayes does not address serious habitability issues. The gap between the leasing experience and the reality after move-in appears stark. Reviewers cite pest problems worsening, water damage going untreated, and utilities being overcharged, yet report that management either deflects blame or avoids contact. One resident documented an eight-month sequence of repeated AC failures, flooding from HVAC units, laundry machines breaking at each use, and repeated service calls that failed to fix the issue. Staff conduct is also cited as unprofessional: aggressive door knocking, throwing away residents' belongings without notice, reckless driving through the complex, and one report of a maintenance worker cussing at a guest.

Student HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Westmount at River Park Apartments

#252

53

Westmount at River Park Apartments

3.4(218)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Westmount at River Park is split sharply between strong praise for leasing staff and deep frustration with management, maintenance, and condition. Long-term residents cite repeated turnover in management, inconsistent policies, unresponsive offices, hidden fees that weren't refunded, and deteriorating units. The pool has stayed closed for months despite being a resident priority, the workout room smells bad, and in-unit amenities like washers and hot water fail or were never installed as promised. Staff at the leasing desk earn consistent five-star reviews for helpfulness. Those staying report feeling safe but exhausted by the complex's rigid policies and slow repairs. The business advertises one- and two-bedroom options with pet services, a fitness center, and coffee bar. Their website lists special move-in offers. In practice, reviewers say move-in deals go unpaid, parking is heavily restricted, and maintenance requests languish. One tenant with strong payment history faced eviction proceedings after requesting a single payment delay. Newer residents sometimes report good initial experiences; longer-term occupants describe escalating frustration with unresponsive management and inability to reach named staff like Brittany.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Henderson

#253

61

The Henderson

3.6(268)✓ Google-verified

Strong personal connections with staff drive some residents to move in and stay, while infrastructure neglect, unprofessional management, and billing disputes push others out swiftly. Praise centers on individual staff members (Linda, Jonetta Brooks, maintenance crew), but complaint reviews detail years of deferred upkeep, water damage, mold, pest issues, and frustrating charge disputes that dwarf the friendly service experience.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Carmen Apartments

#254

59

The Carmen Apartments

2.7(190)✓ Google-verified

Tenants split sharply on The Carmen. Loyal residents praise named staff like Menshayla and maintenance crews who respond quickly and treat people well; some have lived here over a decade. But newer or shorter-stay residents report months-long waits on critical repairs, unresolved pest and mold issues despite paying for services, and a front office that often doesn't answer. One tenant left while pregnant due to unaddressed apartment problems; another notes water shut-offs without refunds and accessibility barriers for wheelchairs.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Jefferson Elara

#255

56

Jefferson Elara

3.7(15)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

A newly built complex with genuinely attentive leasing staff on good days (Xavier and Kyla draw repeated praise), but applicants report weeks of silence, conflicting information, and unclear policies on income restrictions. Residents praise the apartments themselves and gated community feel, yet complain of surveillance-style inspections and restrictive rules on minor things like trash timing. The experience pivots sharply on which staff member you reach-and whether you reach anyone at all.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Sierra Hermosa Apartments

#256

54

Sierra Hermosa Apartments

2.7(130)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews highlight leasing staff like Brenda, Crystal Herrera, Kelly, and Katia as patient and professional, with clean grounds and convenient access to shops and transit. Newer tenants report smooth approvals and welcoming atmospheres. However, a wave of one-star reviews from recent months documents recurring infrastructure failures: water shuts off weekly for leak checks with hot water problems afterward, maintenance requests go unanswered for weeks, ceiling damage from snow remains unfixed, and one tenant reported roach infestations. Multiple reviewers describe management as unresponsive despite repeated work orders, though one maintenance worker was praised for his help. The gap between polished leasing and poor property upkeep suggests the building itself may be struggling. Recent management changes appear to have introduced new operational problems, including unannounced parking lot construction, vehicle towing without notice, and gate malfunctions creating safety hazards. A former five-star tenant who re-reviewed after new management took over downgraded to one star.

Luxury Apartments

Sierra Gardens

#257

60

Sierra Gardens

3.2(205)✓ Google-verified

Sierra Gardens draws strong praise for leasing staff like Sara and Maximiliano, who handle paperwork swiftly and solve move-in problems on the spot. Residents value the quiet grounds and responsive maintenance. However, repeated complaints about overnight noise, parking lot homeless encampments, stolen vehicles, and delayed infrastructure fixes (hot water, AC) paint a divided picture of life here.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Sansom Bluff Apartments

#258

60

Sansom Bluff Apartments

3.5(198)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sansom Bluff offers spacious apartments with good amenities and standout maintenance and activities staff. However, the leasing office consistently fails to answer phones or provide welcoming service, and management shows dismissive attitudes once residents move in. The property itself appeals to pet owners and families, but office staff turnover has left frustrated residents who feel unwelcome when they need help.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Briella Fort Worth Apartments

#259

60

Briella Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(392)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Office staff shine with genuine warmth and efficiency, especially during leasing. Inside, many units are spotless and affordable. The break comes fast: roaches, gnats, and mice persist despite repeated requests for pest control. Maintenance responds slowly or not at all to serious issues like burst pipes, flooded dishwashers, and broken appliances; residents report needing the City of Fort Worth to force repairs. Towing fees ($333 minimum) and overflowing dumpsters add to the frustration.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Westcliff Park Apartments

#260

55 low data

Westcliff Park Apartments

3.6(60)✓ Google-verified

Westcliff Park draws strong loyalty from long-term residents who praise staff warmth and affordability, yet serious complaints about delayed repairs, unresponsive management, and vehicle theft persist. Evidence is mixed: high-satisfaction residents highlight Emily, Thalia, and Jeanie's attentiveness, while others report months-long maintenance delays and security lapses the office failed to address or communicate.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Handley Oaks Apartments

#261

59

Handley Oaks Apartments

4.0(59)✓ Google-verified

Reviewers split sharply on Handley Oaks. Many praise the office staff (particularly Norma and Lupita) for helpfulness, the quiet grounds, and the clean remodeled units on move-in. However, a persistent minority report serious roach infestations that management fails to remedy, alongside complaints of rent overcharging, inadequate pest control, and staff becoming unresponsive once leases are signed. The property appears well-maintained when working, but pest issues are a deal-breaker for some.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Mira Monte Apartments

#262

50 low data

Mira Monte Apartments

2.8(85)

Mira Monte draws sharp criticism for structural problems that go unrepaired: flooding, broken pipes, overflowing tubs, and cockroaches. Tenants report management avoids liability and staff lack professionalism. One older review notes recent ownership and improvements, but recent posts suggest those gains have not held.

Luxury Apartments

Axis Waterfront

#263

59

Axis Waterfront

3.0(306)✓ Google-verified

The leasing office staff, especially Henry and Trenna, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and fast approvals, making the rental process smooth for relocating families. Behind that friendly front sits a complex with persistent maintenance failures: roaches and gnats in units, weekly water outages, aging electrical systems, and management that ignores concerns or resists early lease termination despite serious safety issues. Maintenance problems appear intermittent rather than universal, but when they occur, complaints about unresponsive management and billing disputes dominate. Residents report staying years when satisfied, and pet owners appreciate the dog amenities. Long-term renewals suggest the community works for some, while others describe their experience as unsafe and unmanageable.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Ironwood Crossing Apartments & Townhomes

#264

59

Ironwood Crossing Apartments & Townhomes

3.4(277)✓ Google-verified

New management has turned operations around with visible property improvements, responsive maintenance, and staff like Elena, Dana, and Charles earning repeated praise for going above and beyond. However, some residents report ongoing construction delays, garbage overflow, and uneven service quality; affordability keeps residents anchored despite these gaps.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Crosby Apartments

#265

59

The Crosby Apartments

3.3(201)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Crosby divides sharply. Five-star reviews praise Tyler's attentiveness and affordable rents that stay low on renewal, with some tenants noting manageable utility bills and occasional quick maintenance. One-star tenants report the opposite experience: ignored requests after signing, window leaks unfixed for months, roaches invading from vacated units, water bills spiking unpredictably, and management blamed for miscommunication on move-in. Crime and towing threats loom large in negative accounts. The gap between positive and negative stories suggests either vastly different treatment across tenants or rapid swings in management responsiveness.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Monticello Crossroads

#266

59

Monticello Crossroads

3.6(146)✓ Google-verified

New management has won over some residents with responsive service and visible improvements, but chronic maintenance failures and poor communication undermine trust. Air conditioning repairs drag for months while residents pay full rent for amenities that sit unused; office hours go unstaffed and emails go unanswered. Recent leasing managers Johan and Roger earn consistent praise, yet the gap between their helpfulness and the maintenance team's slowness has left multiple residents filing complaints with Texas authorities.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Travis Gardens Apartments

#267

47 low data

Travis Gardens Apartments

3.1(30)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Travis Gardens divides sharply: recent five-star reviews credit strong management (Ms. Shonda, Christy), safety, and community feel. Older one-star reviews cite hostile management, pest problems, slow maintenance, parking chaos, and severe failures during family hardship and winter emergencies. Current state unclear; property appears to have cycled through different management eras with mixed results.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Tides on Avril

#268

57

Tides on Avril

3.5(247)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the reviews are five-star praise for office staff like Taliza, Bibiana, and Felicia, and fast maintenance responses. The other half report serious problems: cockroach infestations across units despite multiple fumigations, black mold in bathrooms and vents, clogged sewage lines, holes in the dog park fence, a non-functional pool, and a laundry room too expensive to use. Management ignores repair requests and disputed charges. Move-in is especially problematic. Residents are not allowed to inspect units beforehand, then arrive to find conditions far worse than advertised models. Deposits take months to return after repeated calls to multiple staff members. Charges rise without clear explanation. One reviewer paid $789 for a one-bedroom and saw it climb to $1,200, while another's bill jumped from $1,276 to $1,475.50. Staff deny residents pay for amenities even as rent statements show "service and facilities charges."

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Tides at Eastchase

#269

59

Tides at Eastchase

3.0(292)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise staff warmth and the property's spacious layouts, but recent reviews reveal a breakdown in essential services. AC failures have left dozens without cooling for weeks, repair requests go unanswered, the maintenance team is drastically understaffed, and management responses range from unavailable to evasive. Common area cleanliness is noted, yet pet waste management and pest control remain persistent frustrations despite repeated complaints. The complex has cycled through multiple management companies and staffing changes. When dedicated property managers like Aide Aguilar, Andrea Smith, or Diamond Torres are present, residents report genuine responsiveness and quick email replies. However, these bright spots sit against a pattern of deferred maintenance, broken communication, and a gap between what management claims it can do (like providing portable AC) and what it actually delivers.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Calloway Place Apartments

#270

54

Calloway Place Apartments

3.6(28)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Calloway Place draws strong loyalty from residents who praise quick maintenance response and staff like Penny and Amanda. However, a significant minority report unresolved structural issues (cracked roofs left with temporary fixes, faulty AC units), hidden billing charges, and harsh towing enforcement that catches residents off guard.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Sorrento

#271

54

Sorrento

3.4(421)✓ Google-verified

Sorrento divides sharply between residents who connect with front-office staff and those battling months-long maintenance failures. Since BH Living took over management, most reviewers report AC breakdowns lasting weeks in Texas summer heat, gates that stay broken, and maintenance requests answered only after tenants visit the office in person or contact the city. Staff turnover means floaters handle problems rather than permanent workers. One bright spot: individual leasing agents like Giia, Kaitlyn, Lily, and Lindsey earned praise for warmth and professionalism. But the complex as a whole fails tenants on its core responsibility-keeping the property safe and livable. Specific failures recur across reviews: a flooded kitchen sink that drains on its own, portable AC units that break immediately, gates non-functional for months, wheel theft with no usable security footage, and electric bills topping $600 monthly due to running backup cooling. Residents also report being charged for trash collection and threatened with $400 towing fees for unregistered guest vehicles. The shift from previous management (Knightvest and Greystar) triggered the decline. Multiple residents have contacted lawyers or the city. Those who have stayed praise the townhomes and amenities, but the cost is paid in stress and out-of-pocket fixes.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Villa Del Sol Apartments

#272

57

Villa Del Sol Apartments

3.4(100)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff like Edith Gonzalez earn consistent praise for patience and helpfulness, and maintenance responds quickly when contacted early. Yet the complex is plagued by roach infestations, billing confusion, and serious unresolved maintenance problems including water damage and sewage leaks that inspectors have flagged. Safety concerns and management responsiveness vary widely depending on staff and lease tenure. Long-term residents report shifting experiences tied to ownership changes and management turnover. The pool operates intermittently. Prices advertised on their website range $949–$1,129 monthly, though residents dispute added fees and charges that sometimes exceed quoted rent. New occupants occasionally encounter courteous service; established tenants describe years of neglect and friction over documentation.

Luxury Apartments

Summit at Unique Garden Apartments

#273

58 low data

Summit at Unique Garden Apartments

3.8(29)✓ Google-verified

Recent reviews highlight staff responsiveness and property cleanliness, with past residents praising the leasing process and management support. Current complaints center on heating failures going unaddressed for months, unresponsive office staff during business hours, and a nonfunctional emergency maintenance line.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

The Ryan Apartments

#274

59

The Ryan Apartments

3.4(247)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong staff like Cory and Chasity deliver seamless leasing and quick maintenance for many residents, earning consistent praise for professionalism and responsiveness. Yet the complex struggles with systemic issues: pest infestations ignored by management, safety problems (gunshots, break-ins), and surprise fees that surface after move-in. Some long-term residents have watched conditions decline sharply over the past year. The dog park and fitness center appeal to those who prioritize amenities, but the management overhaul has not yet won back tenants facing AC failures and unresolved building maintenance.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Life at Westland Estates

#275

59

The Life at Westland Estates

3.4(191)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members Natisha and Amanda earn consistent praise for going beyond typical leasing help, moving tenants in smoothly, and arranging fast maintenance. The maintenance team responds quickly to reported issues. However, a smaller group of residents report roach infestations in units, unleashed dogs creating safety problems, and grounds left unclean. Pest entry through drains and chimneys went unresolved in some cases. Gym access limited to office hours leaves working residents unable to use the advertised on-site facility. Parking lot speeding and package theft were also mentioned. The complex appears split: those with responsive staff have stayed happy; those facing pest and safety issues found management unresponsive to complaints.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Cambridge Court

#276

59

Cambridge Court

3.6(144)✓ Google-verified

Tenants who worked with Monique Sanchez report warm, professional leasing interactions and rate the experience highly. However, longer-term residents describe mismanaged amenities that remain permanently closed, slow maintenance, pest problems, and a newer management team perceived as unresponsive and indifferent to tenant concerns. The gap between new-tenant satisfaction and resident complaints suggests first impressions hide operational challenges. Amenities advertised on the website (pool, fitness center) are described by year-long residents as never operational. Office phone calls go unanswered, vehicle towing is strictly enforced, and turnover in the maintenance and office staff is frequent.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Palm Tree Apartment Homes

#277

59 low data

Palm Tree Apartment Homes

3.8(44)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise Palm Tree for its quiet atmosphere and cleanliness. Staff are consistently described as friendly, and management keeps up maintenance despite the property's age. Monthly pest control and modern amenities round out the experience, though some have noted the buildings are older.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

#278

47 low data

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

4.4(16)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the quiet setting and past staff quality under managers Carmen and Marina, with maintenance technician Miller White specifically noted for professionalism. Recent reviews show sharp decline: new management rarely in the office, phones go unanswered, and one resident reported severe pest issues. Experience appears heavily dependent on current staff presence.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Tides on Hulen

#279

53

Tides on Hulen

3.0(195)✓ Google-verified

The leasing team at Tides on Hulen draws genuine praise for accessibility and helpfulness, but the property itself is plagued by unresolved maintenance failures that persist for months. Residents report no hot water for extended periods, broken toilets and doors, and management that either avoids the phone or becomes dismissive when contacted. Security deposits vanish after move-out, and the gap between what the marketing promises (furnished, well-maintained) and what residents live through is stark enough that even loyal long-term tenants leave frustrated and uncompensated.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Sycamore Creek

#280

46 low data

Sycamore Creek

5.0(5)

Sycamore Creek drew consistent five-star praise for recently renovated units and attentive management in Meadowbrook. Reviewers highlighted the property's fresh updates and quick response times, though the sample is small.

Luxury Apartments

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

#281

59

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(114)✓ Google-verified

Slate has split sharply along a management change: since March 2026, tenants praise responsive staff (especially Meshun Davis), active renovations, and the reopened pool. Before that shift, residents faced pest problems, mold, poor communication, and unresolved maintenance issues. The location near Fort Worth groceries and highways and cleaning standards are strengths when managed well. New tenants report smooth leasing tours; long-term residents from the pre-2026 era warn against the property entirely.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Dunmore Apartments

#282

58

Dunmore Apartments

3.2(156)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Some tenants praise the staff's warmth and the affordable pricing, but persistent maintenance delays and application communication breakdowns frustrate others. Long-term residents report rising costs, infrastructure problems, and neighborhood safety concerns that offset the clean grounds and friendly office team.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury Apartments

Sunset Pointe Apartments

#283

58

Sunset Pointe Apartments

3.3(208)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews praise staff by name (Becky, Beverly) and report pleasant stays; longer residents recall good years before 2023. One-star reviews detail years of ignored maintenance requests, unresolved plumbing failures, pest infestations they were charged to treat, mystery cable billing, and management that avoids accountability. Some five-star reviewers acknowledge the mixed picture but credit staff effort for improvements. The gap mirrors the rating spread itself: enthusiastic five-stars versus deeply frustrated long-term tenants who report management declining since late 2023, inconsistent maintenance response, and charges for repairs typically the landlord's duty. Responsiveness varies dramatically by staff member.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Fort West Apartments

#284

46

Fort West Apartments

2.7(21)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Fort West Apartments struggles with fundamental maintenance and management failures that create unsafe living conditions. Tenants report raw sewage backups lasting months, unchecked roach infestations, mold, and flooded units with no follow-up. The property management is consistently unreachable; complaints go unanswered and maintenance requests stall indefinitely. A controversial towing policy charges $350 per vehicle despite unclear registration procedures, and the office is often vacant. A handful of long-term residents praise quiet periods and responsive staff, but they appear to be exceptions in a complex marked by code violations, inadequate staffing, and systemic neglect.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Spring Glen Apartments

#285

46 low data

Spring Glen Apartments

3.5(62)

Spring Glen draws long-term residents who value the peaceful setting and responsive management, though the pool's chronic closure frustrates prospects counting on that amenity. Evidence is limited to brief reviews spanning several years, with mixed satisfaction tilting toward stability for those already settled in.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Villlas at Edgewood

#286

48 low data

Villlas at Edgewood

3.4(31)

Most recent reviews describe serious problems: cockroach infestations, slow repairs, break-ins, and theft. Earlier reviews praised individual staff members and quiet periods, but overwhelming recent feedback flags security concerns, unresponsive management, and maintenance delays that lasted days. Evidence is limited by review age spread and thin detail in some complaints.

Luxury Apartments

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

#287

57

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

3.4(149)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sandshell divides sharply. Those staying long-term praise the quiet grounds, pool events, and genuinely helpful staff members like Hailey and Garrett. But newer residents hit a wall fast: cockroaches carpet the laundromat, mice run across floors, ants infest bathrooms, and mold hangs in the air. Water cuts off for hours without warning, parking enforcement tows cars at 1 a.m. with no advance notice, and move-out inspections generate five-figure damage charges that reviewers say don't match photos they took. The complex bills itself as luxury on its website, but reviews describe it as poorly maintained, aging apartments sold at premium prices. One long-term resident's later review warns that management uses move-out inspections to retain deposits aggressively. Multiple reviewers mention switching to nearby alternatives like The Hadley because pest and infrastructure problems go unresolved for weeks or months.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Moderne

#288

51

The Moderne

3.2(24)✓ Google-verified

The Moderne shows a sharp divide between newer and older tenant experiences. Recent five-star reviews praise the updated management team (especially Sydnee), responsive service requests, and the West 7th location near dining and shops. However, older reviews paint a troubling picture of move-in disasters (mold, filthy units), neglected grounds, security breaches, and management indifference. The property allegedly operates Airbnbs alongside permanent housing, creating noise and property damage. Tenants report illegal insurance charges and unfair lease-blocking after maintenance issues.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Madeleine

#289

50

The Madeleine

2.9(99)✓ Google-verified

The Madeleine shows a sharp divide: residents praise individual staff members like maintenance workers Dwayne and James for their attentiveness, yet describe the property overall as declining rapidly with trash, parking chaos, and water cuts. Management ignores neighbor complaints and allows conditions to deteriorate, leaving long-term residents frustrated. Several residents report untreated pest problems, broken AC systems, and unfinished repairs stretching months. A parent documents moisture and likely mold in HVAC vents affecting a baby's health. Hidden fees appear regularly on bills. Leasing office staff can be dismissive when responding to serious issues, though early-leasing staff like Tashyra and Cynthia earned praise for patience.

Luxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Westcreek Townhomes

#290

44 low data

Westcreek Townhomes

3.3(56)

Westcreek Townhomes is extremely difficult to contact. Phone numbers do not work, voicemails go unreturned for weeks, and emails receive no response. The few who managed appointments or tours report billing disputes and units that look different in person than advertised. Review evidence is limited but consistent across years.

Townhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Bella Via Apartments

#291

56

Bella Via Apartments

3.4(76)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise Diana and Johana's personal attention and responsiveness, alongside affordable rents and move-in condition. Others report months of ignored noise complaints, slow maintenance, safety worries (vehicle theft, nearby gunshots), and leasing office delays that cost applicants time before rejection or approval notification errors.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Gardens At Cobb Park

#292

55 low data

Gardens At Cobb Park

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Gardens at Cobb Park draws praise from residents who value its peaceful setting and friendly staff, particularly assistant manager Huseni. However, significant complaints span unresponsive office communication, serious security issues, and documented pest infestations that management has not resolved. Limited recent activity makes current conditions unclear.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

#293

54

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

3.1(423)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Amanda and Arthur shine during leasing, but the property itself struggles badly. Reviewers report months-long AC outages, non-functioning laundry, roach infestations, water damage, broken amenities, and pavement with large holes. Management does not respond to complaints or code violations, and tenants describe unit conditions so poor they postponed move-ins. One five-star reviewer praised Eric in maintenance for fixing multiple issues in a single visit, yet others say maintenance walks around smoking instead of addressing requests. The gap between leasing experience and living experience is stark. Tenants across multiple reviews mention feeling trapped: unprepared units, delayed move-ins, eviction notices despite rent credits for unlivable conditions, and corporate silence. This complex carries serious red flags for anyone without a strong alternative.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Lancaster Apartments

#294

54

Lancaster Apartments

2.9(70)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise maintenance technician Jaime for swift, thorough repairs and the office staff (including Abril) for friendliness. One complaint alleges discriminatory treatment in payment processing and language barriers. The wide rating split (40% five-star, 50% one/two-star) reflects a sharp divide: recent visitors describe efficient maintenance and a calm environment, while at least one reviewer felt excluded.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Ridglea Oaks Apartments

#295

43 low data

Ridglea Oaks Apartments

5.0(1)✓ Google-verified

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Luxury Apartments

Hulen Heights Apartments

#296

53 low data

Hulen Heights Apartments

3.7(30)

Strong long-term residents and manager Diane's attention earn consistent five-star praise, but office availability complaints and a serious discrimination allegation split opinion sharply. Older units with wear show; location near Central Market is a draw for most.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Premier Gardens Apartments

#297

53 low data

Premier Gardens Apartments

3.8(6)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise affordable rents for the Cultural District location and recent maintenance improvements, but communication remains a sore spot and some units suffer from heat inefficiency and water infiltration during heavy rain. The property offers spacious townhome-style flats with patios, though older finishes and infrastructure limits appeal.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Whisperwind Apartments

#298

42 low data

Whisperwind Apartments

3.5(17)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Past tenants praised affordability and the neighborhood's quiet setting, but maintenance failures, pest issues, and unresponsive landlord staff dominate recent feedback. Rents have climbed without corresponding unit upgrades, and on-site management struggles under divided duties across multiple properties.

Luxury Apartments

PS1200

#299

50 low data

PS1200

5.0(1)✓ Google-verified

One reviewer urges others to visit and experience the property firsthand. Limited review evidence prevents deeper insight into specific services or resident experience.

Luxury Apartments

West 1901

#300

48 low data

West 1901

4.8(4)✓ Google-verified

Four reviews average 4.8 stars with no one or two-star ratings. Detail is limited as review text is not available, but the consistent five-star and four-star ratings suggest strong satisfaction among those who have left feedback.

Luxury Apartments

Last updated 2026-08-23