Pet-Friendly Apartments in Fort Worth, TX

Page 2 of 3: businesses ranked 101-200 of 209. Start from the top.

Firestone at West 7th

#101

75

Firestone at West 7th

4.1(548)✓ Google-verified

Staff at Firestone turn apartment hunting into a smooth, welcoming process. Lilly, Fi, Fiorella, and other team members spend time understanding what each prospective resident needs, respond quickly to work orders, and follow through after move-in. The location near West 7th's shops and restaurants matters to residents who value walkability. One reviewer flagged clustered five-star posts and fake accounts, noting that maintenance delivers but the front office sometimes drops the ball on issue resolution. Landscaping upkeep got mixed marks. Overall, this is a genuinely strong complex held up by attentive staff and a desirable neighborhood, though the recent review surge warrants a grain of salt.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Mariposa Park Apartments

#102

59

Mariposa Park Apartments

3.5(103)✓ Google-verified

Mariposa Park has made a dramatic turnaround under new management. Melina, Edith, Rafael, and other staff are consistently praised for fast problem-solving, hands-on presence, and genuine care for residents. However, security remains a concern: the back parking lot lacks lighting, creating a serious safety risk for residents leaving early or late. Maintenance quality varies, and earlier management was poor enough to drive complaints. The complex attracts residents seeking affordability and stability. Staff turnover has been visible, but current team members are winning trust through daily availability and follow-through on repairs. For those prioritizing staff responsiveness and community feel over amenities, this is a solid pick. Those needing guaranteed security should look elsewhere or ask specifically about lighting plans.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Savoy

#103

64

The Savoy

4.0(89)✓ Google-verified

Residents split sharply on The Savoy. Those staying long-term praise staff like Kyndra and maintenance team (Dee, Jay, Lester) for genuine care and quick repairs. Others faced months of unresolved Wi-Fi failures, pest issues after move-in, maintenance entering without notice, and management that felt argumentative rather than helpful when problems escalated. The complex offers affordable living and a quiet setting, but recurring infrastructure and accountability gaps push some renters to break leases early.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

The Palmer

#104

64

The Palmer

4.0(61)✓ Google-verified

The Palmer earns strong praise for friendly, responsive leasing staff and a quiet, pet-welcoming boutique community near trails and shopping. One former resident documented months of unresolved billing errors, wrongful debt collection charges, and repeated management claims to fix the issue without taking action, ultimately harming their credit and business.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Arbors on Oakmont

#105

73

The Arbors on Oakmont

4.3(301)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Arbors delivers standout hospitality from named staff like Genesis, McKenzi, and Sonia, who consistently earn praise for warmth, attentiveness, and making the lease process smooth. Residents and prospects report beautiful, quiet apartments with thorough cleaning by Ashley and strong maintenance support. However, a significant recent infestation complaint reveals critical gaps: one resident encountered persistent cockroaches from move-in, saw maintenance requests closed without action, and waited 48 hours for management response during a genuine crisis. Earlier reviews also flag occasional rudeness from front office staff and a mismatch between photos and reality. The 79% five-star rate masks sharp polarization.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Trail Lakes Apartments

#106

71

The Trail Lakes Apartments

4.9(13)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the complex for its clean, quiet grounds and responsive management. The property manager Amanda stands out across reviews for her professionalism, availability, and genuine care for tenants; maintenance staff are described as friendly and helpful.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Aero Apartments

#107

59

Aero Apartments

3.0(217)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise recent management changes and the maintenance app when it works, but recurring complaints about roaches, delayed repairs, and broken utilities like AC during summer heat contradict service promises. The divide is sharp: satisfied tenants credit cleanliness and responsibility, while frustrated ones report management ignores maintenance tickets, changes staff constantly, and prioritizes rent collection over habitability.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

SageWater Village

#108

74

SageWater Village

4.0(211)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise SageWater Village for attentive maintenance, welcoming staff like Jenna, Darah, and Omar, and a clean, walkable property with a pond and pool. One long-term resident flagged persistent smoking violations despite repeated complaints, though even that reviewer credited maintenance with being excellent.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Ramble & Rose

#109

68

Ramble & Rose

4.1(183)✓ Google-verified

Tour staff, especially Brittany and Savannah, consistently impress prospective residents with product knowledge and care. Units offer modern finishes, good layouts, and appealing common spaces. Yet residents who stay past the leasing stage encounter a sharp divide: the front office remains helpful, but maintenance backlogs stretch to months, upkeep has visibly declined under new management, and communication gaps leave tenants frustrated. Noise complaints languish unresolved, utilities are cut with minimal notice, and move-out disputes over deposit deductions claim normal wear-and-tear charges are illegal. Those with ongoing issues cite the contrast between the sales experience and the living experience as the core problem. A resident of over three years notes the property offers fair value for space and location compared to peers nearby. However, reviews from the past six months paint an increasingly negative picture tied to ResProp's takeover in December: elevators out for weeks, thin sound barriers, hallway odors that vary by floor, and staff citing apartment-living realities rather than solving them. Some tenants credit named staff members (Marie, Karen, Savannah, Brittany) with patience and fairness, yet cannot overcome the structural issues.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Hub at Chisholm Trail

#110

59

The Hub at Chisholm Trail

3.5(359)✓ Google-verified

James Parker's attentive leasing support and a refreshed management team have earned strong recent praise, though the property faces serious operational gaps. Residents report maintenance requests vanishing, phones that ring unanswered, pest infestations, and safety concerns like unlit walkways that persist despite repeated requests. The affordability appeals, but move-in chaos and neglected repairs frustrate long-term residents. New management is actively working to improve the grounds, and maintenance crews are visible, but residents need faster follow-through to close the gap between good intentions and lived experience.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Luxia River East Apartments

#111

74

Luxia River East Apartments

4.4(557)✓ Google-verified

Most residents encounter engaged staff and enjoy the riverside location and resort-style amenities, with maintenance and leasing teams named repeatedly for going the extra mile. However, a notable segment reports serious problems: multiple vehicle thefts despite advertised gated parking, unexpected move-in unit switches without timely notice, surprise billings for late notice violations, and vehicles towed due to portal changes. Security and transparent communication remain inconsistent across tenancies.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Flats on Mill

#112

63

Flats on Mill

3.7(229)✓ Google-verified

Flats on Mill splits sharply between residents who praise responsive staff (especially leasing agent Janneth) and fast maintenance, and those who report cockroaches, safety issues, and surprise fees that spike after ownership changes. Repairs arrive within hours or a day when things work, but communication breakdowns and unexplained lock-outs mar the experience for frustrated tenants. The bark park stays stocked, and some residents enjoy quiet sections with good neighbors. Yet pest control monthly charges do not guarantee service visits, and amenities like the pool have sat unused for years. New management appears to be turning the ship, but older complaints about fees and bugs linger.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Aden Crest Apartments

#113

58

Aden Crest Apartments

3.4(145)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Residents experience a quiet community but struggle with inconsistent enforcement of policies and maintenance gaps. Staff friendliness varies widely-some praise specific managers and maintenance workers, while others report unresolved issues like ceiling leaks, water outages, and mold that persisted for months or years despite work orders.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Dylan

#114

61

The Dylan

3.6(107)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Dylan delivers a modern, well-maintained community with responsive staff and a convenient location near shops and restaurants. Hidden costs pile up quickly: residents report base rents of $1,200-$1,600 plus $25-$125 monthly add-ons for parking, trash, and pets, and towing fees exceed $300 if you park without a reserved spot after 9 pm.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Bell Lancaster Apartments

#115

63

Bell Lancaster Apartments

3.7(259)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Karen and the maintenance team earn consistent praise for responsiveness and genuine care, making leasing and repairs straightforward. That goodwill runs into a wall of systemic problems: water damage left unrepaired for years, unsanitary common areas, frequent management changes that leave tenants without clear accountability, and billing errors around move-in promotions. One resident paid $800 extra after being rushed into a lease without receiving promised rent concessions. The property has real strengths in its units and staff presence, but struggles to translate day-to-day friendliness into reliable property management. Issues pile up (dumpster overflow, dog waste on grounds, pool maintenance failures) and linger. Lease disputes after move-out add friction. For those who find the right unit and avoid maintenance crises, Bell Lancaster works. For others, poor follow-through on repairs and management inconsistency creates years of frustration.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Henderson

#116

61

The Henderson

3.6(268)✓ Google-verified

Strong personal connections with staff drive some residents to move in and stay, while infrastructure neglect, unprofessional management, and billing disputes push others out swiftly. Praise centers on individual staff members (Linda, Jonetta Brooks, maintenance crew), but complaint reviews detail years of deferred upkeep, water damage, mold, pest issues, and frustrating charge disputes that dwarf the friendly service experience.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Trinity Highline

#117

71

Trinity Highline

4.3(70)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the leasing and maintenance teams by name, especially Nina and Demarcus, who respond within hours to requests and handle move-ins smoothly. However, parking is a persistent and serious problem, with many residents unable to find spots after 7 pm and forced to pay extra for reserved spots or park near the cemetery. The advertised smoke-free environment is not enforced, leaving persistent cigarette and marijuana smells throughout units and hallways. Additional complaints include car towing without adequate reimbursement and delayed refunds after lease termination. The community feels friendly and well-maintained on the surface, but structural issues like parking capacity and smoke control undermine the experience for residents staying longer than a few months. Management is responsive to individual requests but appears unable to enforce complex issues like smoking violations or resolve the underlying parking shortage that the building's design created once occupancy filled.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Griffin Apartments

#118

66

The Griffin Apartments

3.9(213)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance staff, notably Angel, earn consistent praise for patience and problem-solving, and front-desk workers like Christina and Shayla receive recognition for professionalism. However, move-in experience is marred by dirty units, broken appliances, and pests; repairs drag on for months despite multiple work orders, and office communication fails repeatedly-closed during stated hours, voicemail loops, unanswered emails. Several residents report deposit disputes and aggressive billing after move-out, with management unresponsive to itemized charge requests. The complex occupies a lower-income Fort Worth neighborhood and attracts tenants seeking affordability, yet the gap between staff goodwill and systemic dysfunction is stark. Residents describe noisy neighbors, neglected grounds, and mold issues alongside climate control failures. Those with positive experiences often credit individual staff members rather than property-wide standards, suggesting service depends heavily on who handles your case.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Silversage Point at Western Center

#119

57

Silversage Point at Western Center

3.3(108)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Recent tenants and prospective renters praise staff warmth and quick repairs under strong management, but many long-term residents report chronic failures: leaks go unfixed for months, roaches persist despite complaints, and management changes so often that follow-up work stops. The property appears livable under stable leadership but unstable when the office turnover returns.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Cooper Apartments

#120

66

The Cooper Apartments

3.8(356)✓ Google-verified

Residents praise the leasing team's efficiency and personal attention, with staff like Ana and Michelle earning specific credit for making move-in straightforward and stress-free. The grounds feel clean and welcoming, the location suits students near TCU and professionals, and pet owners appreciate the safety for walks. However, one reviewer cited steep pricing ($1.3k for basic units) alongside concerns about past management failures and a significant fire, raising questions about whether recent improvements have fully addressed earlier operational problems.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Forena Revelstoke

#121

71

Forena Revelstoke

4.3(173)✓ Google-verified

Leasing agent Breonia and the team earned consistent praise for attentive, personalized service; apartments and amenities impressed visitors. However, persistent car theft, break-ins, and a recent management transition to AIR Communities have left residents frustrated with unresponsive office staff, falling maintenance standards, and billing disputes. Security concerns dominate recent complaints, though some residents report smooth initial experiences.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Berkeley Apartments

#122

71

The Berkeley Apartments

4.2(507)✓ Google-verified

Kenza Berthal has single-handedly salvaged move-in experiences for multiple residents through her attentiveness and problem-solving; others credit her patience and friendliness with making the application process smooth. That said, once you live here, maintenance becomes a struggle: residents report waiting months for repairs, mysterious missing packages, unaddressed mold and water damage, and a property manager who does not return calls until move-out day. The 700+ unit community appears stretched thin on staffing. Baron, a leasing agent, has frustrated residents with rushed tours, dismissive attitudes, and incorrect lease information. More broadly, the gap between a strong first impression (thanks to select staff and nice grounds) and post-move-in reality (slow maintenance, communication breakdowns) is the core tension in these reviews.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Magnolia Lofts On Vickery

#123

56

Magnolia Lofts On Vickery

4.0(23)✓ Google-verified

Staff professionalism and location shine, but serious construction and maintenance problems plague the complex. Multiple tenants report severe water damage, poor move-in conditions, weak security, and noise issues that management either delayed fixing or refused to address, citing cost. Leasing team earns consistent five-star praise, yet long-term residents face costly repairs, high utilities, and deposit disputes that undermine the luxury positioning.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Atlas Waterside

#124

70

Atlas Waterside

4.2(174)✓ Google-verified

Life at Atlas Waterside centers on a scenic riverfront location with walkable access to restaurants, shops, and the Trinity trail. Leasing staff earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and grounds are well-kept with modern finishes, pool, and gym amenities. When problems arise, support falters. Multiple residents report unresolved security gaps (insufficient camera coverage, broken fobs, garage vulnerabilities), water damage from burst pipes, slow app-based gate systems, and management that becomes unresponsive after initial turnover. Staff commission disputes also appear unresolved over months, and pricing sits high relative to these service gaps.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Bexley Arcadia

#125

64

Bexley Arcadia

3.9(135)✓ Google-verified

Maintenance staff earn consistent praise for speed and friendliness, and three leasing agents (Zyra, Angel, Breann) stand out for patience and problem-solving. The units themselves are clean and well-equipped. However, senior management is the persistent weak point: unresponsive calls, ignoring residents in office, slow resolution on long-term problems like mold and broken appliances. Common areas have deteriorated since Weinstein Properties took over. Those living here succeed by building relationships with specific staff members rather than relying on formal processes. Quality swings sharply between individuals. Maintenance technician Lallish, for example, has fixed complex issues same-visit; others initially misdiagnosed mold as dust. Residents report waiting months for appliance replacement while managers deflect. Pet owners note friendly dogs around the complex. Parking and security complaints suggest inconsistent enforcement.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

The Drake on Summit Apartments

#126

64

The Drake on Summit Apartments

3.8(210)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Drake on Summit attracts renters with its modern amenities and walkable location near downtown Fort Worth, but the experience deteriorates significantly after move-in. Residents report cleanliness that went from acceptable to deplorable within months, broken security doors that anyone can bypass, rampant car break-ins in an unpatrolled garage, and an overwhelmed or indifferent maintenance team that responds quickly to some requests but then goes silent for weeks on critical issues like mold and AC failures. The sky deck and gym are real draws; the frustration is real too. Fire alarms blast at odd hours for years until a vendor switch helps. Management uses AI phone trees that trap callers, then charges residents for security deposit deductions without documentation. Early residents loved it here; recent ones feel unsafe and neglected. Some staff shine (Chris, Kelly, Natalie handling positive interactions), but the system behind them has fractured.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Sansom Bluff Apartments

#127

60

Sansom Bluff Apartments

3.5(198)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sansom Bluff offers spacious apartments with good amenities and standout maintenance and activities staff. However, the leasing office consistently fails to answer phones or provide welcoming service, and management shows dismissive attitudes once residents move in. The property itself appeals to pet owners and families, but office staff turnover has left frustrated residents who feel unwelcome when they need help.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Magnolia Park Apartments

#128

60

Magnolia Park Apartments

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Magnolia Park divides sharply: 72% of reviewers praise responsive staff, swift maintenance, and the West 7th location; leasing associates Camryn, Brooke, and Rikki are named repeatedly for going beyond move-in basics. However, 22% report persistent soundproofing failures in upper floors (units 302, 304 especially), and one recent guest with a service animal was fined $500, indicating management shifts that contradict earlier pet-friendly reputation. The complex handles maintenance within 24 hours and accommodates tenants thoughtfully, yet noise complaints span years unresolved and rent is cited as high relative to downtown options.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Park 7

#129

69

Park 7

4.1(61)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Park 7 residents consistently praise the responsiveness and warmth of staff, particularly recent management changes. Brooke, Camryn, and maintenance staff (Heath, Juan) earned repeated praise for solving problems quickly and communicating clearly. The location near downtown and West 7th, clean grounds, and upgraded units draw multiple mentions. One resident reported months-long delays on a broken key and a missing key for a new household member, plus confusion about advertised 24/7 package management. Most five-star reviewers note improvement under the new management team.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Mesa Vista Apartments

#130

69

Mesa Vista Apartments

4.1(52)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently report a quiet, well-maintained complex with responsive maintenance staff. Manager Hugo receives repeated praise for his attentiveness, kindness, and hands-on management. One older complaint cited rude management and slow repairs, but more recent reviews contradict this pattern, with residents reporting same-day maintenance fixes and Hugo's dedicated tenant support.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Mercantile Square

#131

55

Mercantile Square

2.9(227)✓ Google-verified

Mercantile Square delivers affordable apartments with occasional moments of exceptional maintenance work, but systemic problems undermine the value. Accounting errors, falsified move-in incentives, amenities that stay closed for months, and slow repairs leave residents frustrated despite recent management changes.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Westcliff Park Apartments

#132

55 low data

Westcliff Park Apartments

3.6(60)✓ Google-verified

Westcliff Park draws strong loyalty from long-term residents who praise staff warmth and affordability, yet serious complaints about delayed repairs, unresponsive management, and vehicle theft persist. Evidence is mixed: high-satisfaction residents highlight Emily, Thalia, and Jeanie's attentiveness, while others report months-long maintenance delays and security lapses the office failed to address or communicate.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Haven at Chisholm Trail

#133

59

The Haven at Chisholm Trail

3.4(461)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Haven offers helpful staff and amenities near shopping and medical services, but residents consistently report frustration with office communication: calls go unanswered, promises repeat without follow-through, and work orders languish. Maintenance teams deliver when reached, yet safety concerns and neighbor complaints have required management escalation and, in at least one case, tenant departure.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Monticello Crossroads

#134

59

Monticello Crossroads

3.6(146)✓ Google-verified

New management has won over some residents with responsive service and visible improvements, but chronic maintenance failures and poor communication undermine trust. Air conditioning repairs drag for months while residents pay full rent for amenities that sit unused; office hours go unstaffed and emails go unanswered. Recent leasing managers Johan and Roger earn consistent praise, yet the gap between their helpfulness and the maintenance team's slowness has left multiple residents filing complaints with Texas authorities.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

Bexley at Left Bank

#135

64

Bexley at Left Bank

3.8(228)✓ Google-verified

The complex divides sharply: residents praise maintenance team members like Erin and Josh for fast, professional repairs, and appreciate community events. However, leasing office communication is inconsistent, with many reporting ignored calls and slow issue resolution. Serious concerns include lingering pet odors in hallways, thin walls that carry neighbor noise and cooking smells, pest infestations left unaddressed for months, and instances of billing disputes that damaged credit without signed leases. Building systems (gates, windows) also show wear and slow repair timelines. Layout and construction issues persist throughout: gaps in windows and doors, poor soundproofing, and insufficient weekend cleaning of common areas. The complex shines when upper management visits but struggles with daily operations. Staff quality varies widely by department, with some residents crediting recent hires Daniel and Erica for improving communication, while others cite years of being ignored by the office.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Ryan Apartments

#136

59

The Ryan Apartments

3.4(247)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Strong staff like Cory and Chasity deliver seamless leasing and quick maintenance for many residents, earning consistent praise for professionalism and responsiveness. Yet the complex struggles with systemic issues: pest infestations ignored by management, safety problems (gunshots, break-ins), and surprise fees that surface after move-in. Some long-term residents have watched conditions decline sharply over the past year. The dog park and fitness center appeal to those who prioritize amenities, but the management overhaul has not yet won back tenants facing AC failures and unresolved building maintenance.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Monterrey Apartments

#137

58

Monterrey Apartments

3.6(99)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Pet owners value the quiet grounds and affordable pricing, and individual maintenance staff earn consistent praise for quick responses. However, serious problems undercut this: reviewers report roaches and rodents in units, pool closed for years, ceiling damage with water leaks, and utility bills that jump 60-263% after move-in with no clear explanation. Leasing office staff are frequently unavailable; one resident waited 7 days without hot water while reporting an ongoing outage.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Flats at Brentwood

#138

68

Flats at Brentwood

4.0(321)✓ Google-verified

Isai Camacho and the leasing team excel during the application and move-in phase, earning consistent praise for speed and personality. After move-in, residents hit a wall: maintenance requests languish for months, staff dodge phone calls, and management communication drops sharply once tenants are signed. The grounds look sharp, and repair crews pitch in when they show up. But a resident waiting six months to have a dishwasher installed, combined with reports of homeless activity and understaffing, paint a picture of a complex that front-loads charm and then underdelivers on day-to-day service.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments

#139

59

Magnolia at Mistletoe Heights Apartments

4.1(20)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the prime downtown location near parks and restaurants, clean units, and responsive named staff like Camryn and maintenance crew Willie and Ramon. The biggest tensions emerge around the no-elevator design (blocking accessibility for mobility-limited renters), inadequate parking, train noise, and serious billing disputes at move-out. The property works best for young professionals and dog owners who prioritize walkability over amenities and frills.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Life at Westland Estates

#140

59

The Life at Westland Estates

3.4(191)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Staff members Natisha and Amanda earn consistent praise for going beyond typical leasing help, moving tenants in smoothly, and arranging fast maintenance. The maintenance team responds quickly to reported issues. However, a smaller group of residents report roach infestations in units, unleashed dogs creating safety problems, and grounds left unclean. Pest entry through drains and chimneys went unresolved in some cases. Gym access limited to office hours leaves working residents unable to use the advertised on-site facility. Parking lot speeding and package theft were also mentioned. The complex appears split: those with responsive staff have stayed happy; those facing pest and safety issues found management unresponsive to complaints.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District

#141

68

Trinity Urban Apartments - Bluff & District

4.0(206)✓ Google-verified

Most residents enjoy the downtown location, amenities, and staff friendliness, with many praising same-day or next-day maintenance response. However, persistent mechanical issues-faulty AC, broken elevators, and frequent false fire alarms-undercut the experience for others, and some report incomplete repairs or delayed follow-up on service tickets.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ Living

Mag & May

#142

68

Mag & May

4.1(159)✓ Google-verified

The maintenance team earns consistent praise for speed and professionalism, and the property itself draws compliments for design and location. However, residents report a sharp divide: leasing and management communicate poorly, ignore follow-ups, and seem unable to resolve billing errors or facility repairs beyond immediate apartment work. Staff turnover appears to have worsened this gap, especially after management changes. Multiple residents mention Cameron as unresponsive and dismissive; Anne White (regional manager) is credited with helping resolve escalated issues. The complex promises luxury apartments and excellent service but delivery is uneven. Long-term residents describe frustration with undisclosed charges (especially renter's insurance duplication), broken amenities (garage locks, elevator downtime lasting weeks, Dwello smart home features that fail), and an application process that is slow and poorly organized. Several moved out or abandoned applications citing management dysfunction. Security issues, including package theft and homeless presence outside, are raised but described as partly outside management's control.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Hulen Heights Apartments

#143

53 low data

Hulen Heights Apartments

3.7(30)

Strong long-term residents and manager Diane's attention earn consistent five-star praise, but office availability complaints and a serious discrimination allegation split opinion sharply. Older units with wear show; location near Central Market is a draw for most.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Decker Apartment Homes

#144

58

Decker Apartment Homes

3.7(274)✓ Google-verified

Eight years in and fresh arrivals alike report the same core failures: calls and emails go unanswered, water shuts down without notice, and pest control stalls while damage spreads. The move-in team impresses, and maintenance responds quickly when they can, but systemic issues around communication, infrastructure (flooded parking lot, broken gates), and neighborhood safety consistently override that initial goodwill. Residents describe being nickeled and dimed for utilities they cannot reliably access, then abandoned by management once the lease term winds down.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment CommunitiesLuxury Apartments

The Huntley

#145

67

The Huntley

4.0(173)✓ Google-verified

The Huntley delivers strong first impressions: leasing staff like Shoni and Shawnie Davis earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism, and new units are clean and well-presented. However, long-term residents report serious frustration with thin walls, chronic parking garage theft, and a management that does not respond meaningfully to safety or noise complaints. The disconnect between the tour experience and life after move-in is stark.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

The Residences of Diamond Hill

#146

53

The Residences of Diamond Hill

2.5(145)✓ Google-verified

Severe maintenance and pest issues dominate resident feedback, with tenants reporting cockroaches, ants, and spiders in newly-painted units alongside unprompted move-in claims. Staff responsiveness is a consistent friction point: applications get lost, maintenance tickets close without work completed, AC failures go unresolved, and communication from the office is sparse or nonexistent. A handful of five-star reviews praise the community's safety for families and mention helpful staff members, but these stand against a sea of complaints spanning years.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Linwood Square

#147

60

Linwood Square

3.8(66)✓ Google-verified

Linwood Square draws mixed experiences tied to affordability and social community, though upkeep and management responsiveness remain ongoing friction points. Staff like Myra, Angelica, and Chonda earn praise for genuine care, and residents value granite counters, included utilities, and pet policies. However, complaints span dirty common areas, maintenance delays, staff professionalism issues, and record-keeping lapses that have left applicants restarts from zero.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Valley View

#148

56

Valley View

3.3(96)✓ Google-verified

Residents consistently praise the staff's responsiveness and the value for square footage, with managers like Yadira, Milan, and maintenance worker Luis earning repeated recognition. However, cockroach and bedbug infestations plague multiple units, parking limitations require fees for visitors, and several tenants report management prioritizes fees over resolving their own errors.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

South 400

#149

65

South 400

3.9(146)✓ Google-verified

South 400 residents consistently praise the maintenance team and office staff for going above and beyond, with Joan specifically noted for solving problems quickly and respectfully. However, serious security failures undermine the "luxury" positioning: packages vanish from an unsecured mail room, elevator and garage failures persist, and one resident reported being entered on without notice during a vulnerable moment. The property splits sharply between those who value personal service and those frustrated by infrastructure gaps and theft. The leasing office staff (Anna Lainez, Ashley, Katie) earn high marks for responsiveness and kindness during the application and move-in phases. A three-year resident calls it the best place they have lived. Maintenance requests are often handled within 30 minutes. Yet multiple one-star reviews and a vocal complaint about "careless management" over a year-long pattern of unresolved issues suggest management has struggled to act on resident feedback or prevent systemic problems.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Maxwell Apartments

#150

60

Maxwell Apartments

3.6(342)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing and management staff, especially Alice and Veronica, earn consistent praise for patience and professionalism. However, maintenance response times have declined significantly under new leadership. Residents report week-long waits for repairs, repeated AC failures, and unresolved issues like malfunctioning gates and pest problems. Move-in experience is typically smooth, but post-move conflicts over deposits and fees (especially involving the AI chatbot) have escalated disputes. The complex's physical appearance draws approval when maintained, yet critical systems like cooling and emergency contact lines frequently fail. Those relocating for work value the location near Stockyards and Sundance Square; families should weigh maintenance reliability against the competitive leasing team.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Laurel Heights at Cityview

#151

65

Laurel Heights at Cityview

3.8(363)✓ Google-verified

Strong leasing team and maintenance response draw praise, but recurring appliance failures and parking issues frustrate long-term residents. Recent improvements to gates and water service suggest management is addressing past problems, though enforcement gaps remain.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Mason Apartment Homes

#152

60

The Mason Apartment Homes

3.6(173)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The Mason has a polarized track record. When staff like Cory, Ayla, and Marissa engage, residents report helpful service. But structural mold, roach infestations, slow repairs, management churn, and move-in chaos dominate the complaints. Rent starts affordably, yet surprise fees and costly towing practices offset the price advantage. Reviewers cite a property in decline over the past 18 months.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ Living

Bella Via Apartments

#153

56

Bella Via Apartments

3.4(76)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise Diana and Johana's personal attention and responsiveness, alongside affordable rents and move-in condition. Others report months of ignored noise complaints, slow maintenance, safety worries (vehicle theft, nearby gunshots), and leasing office delays that cost applicants time before rejection or approval notification errors.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Axis Waterfront

#154

59

Axis Waterfront

3.0(306)✓ Google-verified

The leasing office staff, especially Henry and Trenna, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and fast approvals, making the rental process smooth for relocating families. Behind that friendly front sits a complex with persistent maintenance failures: roaches and gnats in units, weekly water outages, aging electrical systems, and management that ignores concerns or resists early lease termination despite serious safety issues. Maintenance problems appear intermittent rather than universal, but when they occur, complaints about unresponsive management and billing disputes dominate. Residents report staying years when satisfied, and pet owners appreciate the dog amenities. Long-term renewals suggest the community works for some, while others describe their experience as unsafe and unmanageable.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

CoHo Apartments

#155

65 low data

CoHo Apartments

4.4(23)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Most residents love the walkable South Main location, quick maintenance response, and the high-tech Ori furniture that appeals to minimalists. Recent concerns center on management transitions: security deposits held beyond Texas law timelines, AC failures not properly repaired, and broken gate access. Strongest reviews praise named staff like Kim, Tony, and Camryn. Weakest highlight legal and safety oversights under newer management.

Furnished & Corporate HousingStudent HousingAffordable & Low-Income Housing

Cobble Hill

#156

59

Cobble Hill

3.5(126)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the reviews are enthusiastic; the other half report serious problems. Recent arrivals and visitors praise the new manager Devin and staff member Kellie, clean spaces, and fair pricing around $875 monthly. But long-term residents describe years of roach infestations, slow pest control responses, and office staff (particularly Lori) who ignore maintenance requests and don't answer calls. A few moved to different buildings and still faced infestations. Communication breakdowns extend to canceling tours without notice and denying refundable application fees. For affordability and pets, this complex works. The grounds have improved under new management. But verify pest control thoroughly before signing a lease, especially for units toward the back of the property. Ask for a pre-move inspection and get promises about pest treatment in writing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Taylor Commons

#157

59

Taylor Commons

3.6(140)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Cory's recent management and maintenance staff (Tim) have earned strong praise for responsiveness and professionalism, especially among new residents and those who have seen recent improvement. Serious infrastructure issues-summer heat failures, unresolved pest problems, closed amenities (pool, social area) despite repeated promises-frustrate established tenants and suggest maintenance backlog over quick fixes. Long-term residents report feeling deprioritized as the community prioritizes new move-ins. Hidden fees, sporadic security, and amenity hours that don't match resident schedules add to wear and discontent despite the friendliness of some staff.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ Living

Palm Tree Apartment Homes

#158

59 low data

Palm Tree Apartment Homes

3.8(44)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise Palm Tree for its quiet atmosphere and cleanliness. Staff are consistently described as friendly, and management keeps up maintenance despite the property's age. Monthly pest control and modern amenities round out the experience, though some have noted the buildings are older.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Buttercup Place Apartments

#159

50 low data

Buttercup Place Apartments

3.4(20)✓ Google-verified

Buttercup Place draws deeply committed residents, including those rebuilding from homelessness, who praise the community and staff support. Recent reviews flag ongoing pest issues, unresponsive phone lines, and safety concerns in shared spaces that undercut the positive foundation.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Villas at 1404 Apartments

#160

63

Villas at 1404 Apartments

3.8(163)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Tenants report starkly different experiences. Half praise the leasing staff, especially Jewel and Nana, for making the sign-up smooth and responsive maintenance requests. The other half describe a gap between advertised amenities (in-unit washer/dryer, central AC, private patios) and what arrives, along with mounting hidden charges for internet, pest control, and parking. Most damaging are recurring complaints about overgrown grounds, rat and snake sightings, and untreated roach problems that persist despite pest control visits. The 3.8-star rating masks this split: 65% five-star reviews celebrate staff warmth, while 28% one-star reviews cite habitability failures. Recent reviews show ongoing AC breakdowns and grounds issues. One positive: when maintenance staff like Anthony engage fully, repairs happen quickly, but lack of support suggests staffing gaps. Affordability draws renters, but many report the advertised price masks extra charges accumulating monthly.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Sorrento

#161

54

Sorrento

3.4(421)✓ Google-verified

Sorrento divides sharply between residents who connect with front-office staff and those battling months-long maintenance failures. Since BH Living took over management, most reviewers report AC breakdowns lasting weeks in Texas summer heat, gates that stay broken, and maintenance requests answered only after tenants visit the office in person or contact the city. Staff turnover means floaters handle problems rather than permanent workers. One bright spot: individual leasing agents like Giia, Kaitlyn, Lily, and Lindsey earned praise for warmth and professionalism. But the complex as a whole fails tenants on its core responsibility-keeping the property safe and livable. Specific failures recur across reviews: a flooded kitchen sink that drains on its own, portable AC units that break immediately, gates non-functional for months, wheel theft with no usable security footage, and electric bills topping $600 monthly due to running backup cooling. Residents also report being charged for trash collection and threatened with $400 towing fees for unregistered guest vehicles. The shift from previous management (Knightvest and Greystar) triggered the decline. Multiple residents have contacted lawyers or the city. Those who have stayed praise the townhomes and amenities, but the cost is paid in stress and out-of-pocket fixes.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

The Stella

#162

63

The Stella

3.7(211)✓ Google-verified

Staff turnover in recent months improved the experience, with newer management (Ashley, Brenda, Tresh) earning consistent praise for responsiveness and care. However, long-standing operational problems persist: multiple residents report systematic billing errors, overcharges they had to catch themselves, and move-out fees charged despite miscommunication from the office. Safety is a critical concern repeated across recent reviews, with residents documenting frequent police activity for overdoses, open drug use on common grounds, and homeless people at night. Move-in conditions were poor enough several residents photographed damage and filth; pest problems and cigarette odor have made units uncomfortable for families. Maintenance crew responds quickly and professionally. The office staff under new management are friendly and helpful with lease questions. Yet billing remains chaotic, move-out procedures unclear, and the neighborhood environment at portions of the complex is unsafe enough that residents felt they could not walk alone or recommend the property despite appreciating the staff. The gap between what residents were charged and what they received is the core frustration.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

Carmel Creekside Apartments

#163

63

Carmel Creekside Apartments

3.7(347)✓ Google-verified

Long-term residents praise the location, cleanliness, and handful of exceptional staff members like Paige, who genuinely help tenants navigate issues. However, a persistent pattern emerges: AC units fail monthly and go weeks unrepaired, management ignores escalations, roof leaks are left unchecked, noise complaints bring no resolution, and residents report safety incidents including shootings. Multiple tenants cite hidden fees that push actual rent far above advertised rates. The leasing office makes strong first impressions with friendly application help, but maintenance responses become minimal once you move in. Repairs either drag on indefinitely or contractors do poor work. Several long-term residents who loved the community at first eventually left due to compounded maintenance failures and management's refusal to treat concerns seriously.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Borough Apartments

#164

63

The Borough Apartments

3.7(201)✓ Google-verified

When staff like Charlene, Jada, and Gila Payton are on duty, residents experience responsive help and smooth leasing. The area itself is quiet and manageable. However, repeated management changes have created chaos: phone numbers disconnect, offices go unstaffed, pest control fails, and water damage leaves mold unchecked. Some units appear structurally compromised, with residents reporting weeks without fixes or follow-up. The core tension is consistent. Current management gets specific praise for availability and problem-solving. But institutional failures (no emergency contact info after ownership changes, flooded bedrooms ignored, roaches untreated for months) suggest systemic breakdown when turnover happens. Residents stay because the community has potential; they leave because promises go unfulfilled.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Caden Apartments

#165

62

Caden Apartments

3.7(273)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Leasing staff, especially Melanie and Tony, earn consistent praise for professionalism and going beyond expectations. The complex struggles with maintenance: pest infestations persist despite paid pest control, repairs take months, and only two maintenance workers handle a large property, leaving residents frustrated and doing fixes themselves.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Sunset Heights Apartments

#166

57

Sunset Heights Apartments

3.5(51)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Bree and Tiarra earn genuine praise for attentiveness and problem-solving, and the location draws people who value proximity to downtown and quiet surroundings. However, persistent pest issues (roaches, fleas), sluggish maintenance response, frequent management changes, and complaints about noise and poorly maintained grounds undercut the experience for many long-term residents. Expect inconsistency.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Hulen Park Place Townhomes

#167

63

Hulen Park Place Townhomes

3.8(103)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Half the residents report exceptional care from management (especially Nicole) and quick maintenance, citing clean spaces and a welcoming vibe. The other half describe chronic leaks, locked office doors during business hours, slow or ignored repair requests, and interactions with the same manager that feel dismissive or hostile, ranging from hang-ups during emergencies to perceived unfair treatment. Management credibility splits sharply on this point: several five-star reviews credit Nicole with professionalism and hard work; multiple one-star reviews call her unorganized, unwelcoming, and unavailable. Flooding recurs as a maintenance failure. Parking policy changes (free to reserved) drew frustration. Review recency and edit history suggest ongoing tension rather than resolution.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Sansom Ridge Apartments

#168

62

Sansom Ridge Apartments

4.1(47)✓ Google-verified

Staff members like Rosetta, Bren'Sha, Sabrina, and Lisa earn consistent praise for friendliness and genuine helpfulness. The property offers spacious units, a food pantry, community events, and quiet grounds at an affordable price. However, residents report serious maintenance gaps: roach infestations staff cannot control, trash accumulation, package theft from unlocked office storage, and parking lot safety concerns (unsupervised children, car break-ins, towing company damage). Office management has been unresponsive to payment questions and resident concerns.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Union at River East

#169

62

The Union at River East

3.7(234)✓ Google-verified

Staff members Orlando and Ryan earn consistent five-star praise for attentiveness and problem-solving, while the maintenance team responds quickly when called. The complex offers appealing amenities: infinity-edge pool, co-working space, outdoor seating, and flexible floor plans on a prime Race Street location. Yet rent at $1,800+ monthly brings high expectations the property has struggled to meet. Residents report a broken garage gate left unfixed for months, creating security gaps and theft. Management has been slow or dismissive on disability accommodations, key fob access failures, and billing errors. Move-in readiness and building access control remain friction points despite recent signs of operational improvement.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Westmount at River Park Apartments

#170

53

Westmount at River Park Apartments

3.4(218)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Westmount at River Park is split sharply between strong praise for leasing staff and deep frustration with management, maintenance, and condition. Long-term residents cite repeated turnover in management, inconsistent policies, unresponsive offices, hidden fees that weren't refunded, and deteriorating units. The pool has stayed closed for months despite being a resident priority, the workout room smells bad, and in-unit amenities like washers and hot water fail or were never installed as promised. Staff at the leasing desk earn consistent five-star reviews for helpfulness. Those staying report feeling safe but exhausted by the complex's rigid policies and slow repairs. The business advertises one- and two-bedroom options with pet services, a fitness center, and coffee bar. Their website lists special move-in offers. In practice, reviewers say move-in deals go unpaid, parking is heavily restricted, and maintenance requests languish. One tenant with strong payment history faced eviction proceedings after requesting a single payment delay. Newer residents sometimes report good initial experiences; longer-term occupants describe escalating frustration with unresponsive management and inability to reach named staff like Brittany.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

#171

57

Sandshell at Fossil Creek Apartments

3.4(149)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Sandshell divides sharply. Those staying long-term praise the quiet grounds, pool events, and genuinely helpful staff members like Hailey and Garrett. But newer residents hit a wall fast: cockroaches carpet the laundromat, mice run across floors, ants infest bathrooms, and mold hangs in the air. Water cuts off for hours without warning, parking enforcement tows cars at 1 a.m. with no advance notice, and move-out inspections generate five-figure damage charges that reviewers say don't match photos they took. The complex bills itself as luxury on its website, but reviews describe it as poorly maintained, aging apartments sold at premium prices. One long-term resident's later review warns that management uses move-out inspections to retain deposits aggressively. Multiple reviewers mention switching to nearby alternatives like The Hadley because pest and infrastructure problems go unresolved for weeks or months.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Crest at River District Apartments

#172

57 low data

Crest at River District Apartments

3.6(31)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Crest at River District draws praise for modern units, helpful staff like Carlos and Johnny, and a quiet location near restaurants and trails. However, some tenants report slow repairs on serious damage, poor management responsiveness, noise complaints from neighboring residents, pest problems, and frustration over ESA breed restrictions that may conflict with Fair Housing protections. Experiences vary considerably depending on when you move in and which staff members you work with.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

West 3855 - Camp Bowie Apartments

#173

49 low data

West 3855 - Camp Bowie Apartments

4.3(7)✓ Google-verified

Tenants praise updated interiors and solid upkeep despite the building's age. Limited recent feedback makes trends hard to assess.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Prescott Park Apartment Homes

#174

61

Prescott Park Apartment Homes

3.7(572)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

The leasing team, especially Bianca, earns consistent praise for friendliness and ease of signing up. Once moved in, residents discover a sharp divide: responsive maintenance staff and pleasant floor plans offset ongoing pest problems, water issues, and an office that becomes hard to reach after the lease is signed. Billing surprises and hidden fees (Lease Lock, deposits, move-out charges) catch residents off guard. Roach infestations appear recurrent across units, along with foundation problems and wildlife. Parking fills quickly after 8 PM, and management prioritizes enforcement over transparent communication with tenants.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

McCart Apartments

#175

61

McCart Apartments

3.9(71)✓ Google-verified

Audrey's attentiveness and quick lease processing earn consistent praise, but persistent water damage, plumbing issues, and slow maintenance repairs dominate complaints. Many residents report outdated fixtures, visible mold, and pest problems. The gap between website photos and actual unit condition frustrates long-term renters, and management allegedly charges move-out fees for pre-existing damage.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

West 7th Apartments

#176

48 low data

West 7th Apartments

3.6(30)

Staff like Zoraya, Chris, Latoya, and Astra Management earn praise for friendliness and effort, and the courtyard and gardens appeal to those seeking calm. Serious flaws undercut the setting: repeated AC breakdowns, weeks-long repair waits even in summer heat, mold in flooded units, and trash buildup from weekly cleaning cycles make this risky for anyone with low tolerance for maintenance gaps or heat sensitivity.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Reserve at Quebec

#177

59

Reserve at Quebec

3.0(209)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Five-star reviews highlight a maintenance team that shows up fast and treats residents well, especially Tony and Luis who earn repeated praise. Residents who stay long-term describe a quiet, family-friendly place with attentive staff. However, a parallel stream of one-star complaints focuses on months-long repair delays, failed emergency calls (sewage backups left unresolved), unresponsive management after promises are made, and a recent billing scare where a resident faced collection action after her lease ended. The split is stark: those praising the community and maintenance crew versus those trapped in repair limbo with indifferent office staff. Property remains affordable and pet-friendly, but the gap between maintenance responsiveness and office follow-through creates a lottery feel. Families and seniors considering this location should ask specifically about AC and emergency repair timelines before signing.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingSenior & 55+ LivingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

#178

54

The Holt on Chisholm Trail

3.1(423)✓ Google-verified

Staff like Amanda and Arthur shine during leasing, but the property itself struggles badly. Reviewers report months-long AC outages, non-functioning laundry, roach infestations, water damage, broken amenities, and pavement with large holes. Management does not respond to complaints or code violations, and tenants describe unit conditions so poor they postponed move-ins. One five-star reviewer praised Eric in maintenance for fixing multiple issues in a single visit, yet others say maintenance walks around smoking instead of addressing requests. The gap between leasing experience and living experience is stark. Tenants across multiple reviews mention feeling trapped: unprepared units, delayed move-ins, eviction notices despite rent credits for unlivable conditions, and corporate silence. This complex carries serious red flags for anyone without a strong alternative.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Marine Park Apartments

#179

59 low data

Marine Park Apartments

3.7(77)✓ Google-verified

Staff earns consistent praise for helpfulness and professionalism, with several tenants naming specific team members who eased their move-in. Serious soundproofing issues and aggressive upfront screening frustrate some prospective and current renters.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Spur Canyon Apartments

#180

54

Spur Canyon Apartments

3.3(324)✓ Google-verified

Spur Canyon's 3.3 rating reflects a property in crisis. While leasing agent Jermaine earns consistent praise for tour friendliness and technician Brandon received credit for swift AC repair, nearly 40 percent of reviews are one or two stars. Residents report months-long waits for AC fixes in summer heat, repeated flooding, rotten wood falling outside, raccoons in walls, and roaches inside. Fees surprise tenants, management avoids accountability, and the emergency maintenance line does not answer. Multiple reviewers say the property is unsafe and regret signing leases. The complex is 50 years old and shows it. Exterior damage, water ingress, pest infestation, and lack of emergency response form the core complaint. One resident reported waiting four months for repairs after flooding on November 4, 2024, with no resolution as of June 2026. Another pregnant tenant terminated her lease after a two-week wait for AC in 93-degree heat. Residents say the advertising misrepresents the unit and location condition. Staff turnover has made management worse since a new manager arrived.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

#181

47 low data

Santa Barbara Gardens Apartments

4.4(16)✓ Google-verified

Most residents praise the quiet setting and past staff quality under managers Carmen and Marina, with maintenance technician Miller White specifically noted for professionalism. Recent reviews show sharp decline: new management rarely in the office, phones go unanswered, and one resident reported severe pest issues. Experience appears heavily dependent on current staff presence.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

#182

59

Slate at Fort Worth Apartments

3.5(114)✓ Google-verified

Slate has split sharply along a management change: since March 2026, tenants praise responsive staff (especially Meshun Davis), active renovations, and the reopened pool. Before that shift, residents faced pest problems, mold, poor communication, and unresolved maintenance issues. The location near Fort Worth groceries and highways and cleaning standards are strengths when managed well. New tenants report smooth leasing tours; long-term residents from the pre-2026 era warn against the property entirely.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Sunset Pointe Apartments

#183

58

Sunset Pointe Apartments

3.3(208)✓ Google-verified

Five-star reviews praise staff by name (Becky, Beverly) and report pleasant stays; longer residents recall good years before 2023. One-star reviews detail years of ignored maintenance requests, unresolved plumbing failures, pest infestations they were charged to treat, mystery cable billing, and management that avoids accountability. Some five-star reviewers acknowledge the mixed picture but credit staff effort for improvements. The gap mirrors the rating spread itself: enthusiastic five-stars versus deeply frustrated long-term tenants who report management declining since late 2023, inconsistent maintenance response, and charges for repairs typically the landlord's duty. Responsiveness varies dramatically by staff member.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Morningside Apartments

#184

58

Morningside Apartments

3.6(65)✓ Google-verified

Management and leasing staff, especially Maria and Juan, earn consistent praise for attentiveness and problem-solving. Recent administrative changes have notably improved resident satisfaction and maintenance responsiveness. However, recurring complaints center on aging infrastructure: pest problems, mold, leaks, and slow fixes on critical systems like heating. Some residents report year-long repair waits. The gap between enthusiastic recent reviews and older complaints suggests either real improvements underway or inconsistent execution across different maintenance issues and timeframes.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Siddons Place Apartments

#185

58

Siddons Place Apartments

3.8(26)✓ Google-verified

Residents who stayed long-term often felt at home here, appreciating staff who care and enough space for families. Persistent issues with pool closures and roaches, plus a reported deposit retention problem, tempered satisfaction for some.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

The Franklin at Samuels Avenue

#186

58

The Franklin at Samuels Avenue

3.4(246)✓ Google-verified

Staff treat tour-goers with genuine warmth and stay engaged during leasing, earning consistent praise for their time and professionalism. After move-in, the experience fractures: tenants report months of broken AC during 90-degree heat, non-functional security gates and locks that anyone can bypass, trash piling on floors with roaches present, and management that becomes unreachable by phone or email. Billing disputes linger unresolved, with some tenants sent to collections over contested charges; record-keeping errors persist across management transitions.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

The Celine

#187

58

The Celine

2.7(224)✓ Google-verified

Staff warmth and apartment size draw people in; five-star reviewers praise named team members like Selena, Crystal, and Lauren for attentiveness and quick responses. The darker side emerges quickly: residents report unbearable summer heat with blocked AC requests, move-in units crawling with roaches and stripped of water, maintenance tickets logged but never completed, and a pattern of hidden fees stacking advertised rent to nearly 20% higher. Security failures (car break-ins, improper towing) and withheld deposits pile onto the frustration. Recent management changes hint at systemic turnover. Some residents who stick it out a year report positive experiences; others flee before their lease ends or pursue legal action. The split between five-star and one/two-star reviews (40% vs 55%) reflects this divide: you either hit responsive management and avoid major repairs, or you land in a unit needing work that never materializes and a lease office that ghosts you.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Spring Glen Apartments

#188

46 low data

Spring Glen Apartments

3.5(62)

Spring Glen draws long-term residents who value the peaceful setting and responsive management, though the pool's chronic closure frustrates prospects counting on that amenity. Evidence is limited to brief reviews spanning several years, with mixed satisfaction tilting toward stability for those already settled in.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Park West Apartments

#189

57

Park West Apartments

3.8(20)✓ Google-verified

Park West's reputation has split sharply along timeline lines. Residents who arrived or renewed within the last few months praise a new management team (Anthony, Tammy, Christina, Elena, Calvin, Jesse) as warm and responsive, noting the grounds are cleaner, gates now work, and amenities like a theater room and smart home tech feel genuinely valuable. Older complaints paint a darker picture: roaches, broken pool and gym equipment, work orders ignored for years, rude staff, and security issues including theft and break-ins. The shift feels real, but lingering maintenance backlogs and a history of neglect mean tenants considering a move here should verify conditions in person and clarify response times in writing. The pet-friendly side (bark park on site) draws positive mention, though no detailed pet policy review text appears. Prices are described as "incredible" by one recent renter, but the 20-review spread is steep-65 percent five-star against 30 percent one/two-star-suggesting either genuine recent improvement or the reality that affordability masks unresolved problems for those not yet affected.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Burnett Lofts

#190

60

Burnett Lofts

3.6(117)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Burnett Lofts holds a 3.6 rating across 117 Google reviews. A detailed sentiment read was not produced on this pass, so the placement rests on rating consistency and volume.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Patriot Pointe Apartments

#191

57

Patriot Pointe Apartments

3.1(121)✓ Google-verified

The property draws strong praise for apartment size, layout, and amenities, with select staff members earning deep loyalty for professionalism and genuine care. Management responsiveness and maintenance speed fail repeatedly: mold sits untreated for weeks, pest control remains ineffective, and calls often go unanswered. High turnover in office staff mirrors tenant departure rates. While some residents thrive in the community, others face deteriorating grounds, noisy neighbors, and unresolved maintenance claims despite full rent charges. Standout employees like Daishuntane and Clemente drive positive experiences, but their impact cannot offset systemic gaps. The property's mixed-income model, proximity to Fort Worth Veterans Affairs and Tarrant County College, and amenities (pool, fitness center, game room) appeal on paper, yet execution wavers sharply between periods of good stewardship and visible decline.

Student HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Western Hills Apartments

#192

56 low data

Western Hills Apartments

4.1(56)✓ Google-verified

Many residents find this complex peaceful with well-kept grounds and responsive maintenance. Recent concerns include rude phone interactions, lease paperwork mix-ups, and one tenant's allegation of discriminatory treatment.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Gardens At Cobb Park

#193

55 low data

Gardens At Cobb Park

4.1(18)✓ Google-verified

Gardens at Cobb Park draws praise from residents who value its peaceful setting and friendly staff, particularly assistant manager Huseni. However, significant complaints span unresponsive office communication, serious security issues, and documented pest infestations that management has not resolved. Limited recent activity makes current conditions unclear.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Fort West Apartments

#194

46

Fort West Apartments

2.7(21)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Fort West Apartments struggles with fundamental maintenance and management failures that create unsafe living conditions. Tenants report raw sewage backups lasting months, unchecked roach infestations, mold, and flooded units with no follow-up. The property management is consistently unreachable; complaints go unanswered and maintenance requests stall indefinitely. A controversial towing policy charges $350 per vehicle despite unclear registration procedures, and the office is often vacant. A handful of long-term residents praise quiet periods and responsive staff, but they appear to be exceptions in a complex marked by code violations, inadequate staffing, and systemic neglect.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Leuda May Apartments

#195

54

Leuda May Apartments

3.9(20)✓ Google-verified

Recent management changes have improved day-to-day responsiveness, with tenants praising staff like Donya and Holly for quick action on repairs and accessible communication. However, billing disputes persist, roach infestations in some units went unaddressed for months, and the property's history of frequent management turnover has left some residents uncertain about long-term reliability.

Furnished & Corporate HousingAffordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Premier Gardens Apartments

#196

53 low data

Premier Gardens Apartments

3.8(6)✓ Google-verifiedPublishes prices

Long-term residents praise affordable rents for the Cultural District location and recent maintenance improvements, but communication remains a sore spot and some units suffer from heat inefficiency and water infiltration during heavy rain. The property offers spacious townhome-style flats with patios, though older finishes and infrastructure limits appeal.

Pet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

#197

49

Highland Vista (fka Tides at Meadowbrook)

2.6(72)✓ Google-verified

Most tenants describe a complex in serious disrepair where basic requests go unaddressed for months, management ignores legal notices, and residents resort to court action to force compliance. Staff turnover is constant, billing is unreliable, and pests (roaches, beetles) persist despite cleaned units. A handful reported helpful staff, but systemic issues dominate the experience.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsTownhome-Style Apartment Communities

Birchman Commons Apartments

#198

50 low data

Birchman Commons Apartments

3.4(45)✓ Google-verified

Birchman Commons shows sharp division: older residents praise quiet surroundings and cleanliness, but recent reviews (past 2 years) reveal management collapse, with no leasing office, unresponsive phones, broken laundry for months, and no maintenance response system. The complex appears understaffed and declining.

Pet-Friendly Apartments

Alton Park Apartments

#199

50

Alton Park Apartments

3.4(76)✓ Google-verified

Alton Park has a stark divide: some residents praise office staff and the grounds, but the majority report a frustrating move-in process with shifting timelines, staff rudeness, and maintenance failures. Amenities like the pool and gym operate office hours only, leaving working families unable to use them. Unresolved maintenance issues (AC, electrical hazards, faulty gate) and poor communication compound the problems.

Affordable & Low-Income HousingPet-Friendly Apartments

Fort 1901 Lofts & Apartments

#200

40 low data

Fort 1901 Lofts & Apartments

3.7(3)

Limited review data shows sharp contrast: one renter praised the peaceful, modern feel and value, but another reported months-long mold issues, roof leaks, and slow repairs despite management change. Health impact noted.

Student HousingPet-Friendly ApartmentsLuxury Apartments

Last updated 2026-08-23